Re: [Chevelle-list] Back in the Day / Float the Valves?

2005-10-14 Thread plgchevelle65

Well said. And if you get the looks of admiration  thumbs up that I get on the road,being a Chevelle Snob is not a bad thing. I'd like my engine to stay together for a while. Gone are the days when we were hot rod/shade tree kidsand we could blow it and rebuild it by the followingweekend!  

Phil G. 65 SS
-Original Message-From: Craig Ellis [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: The Chevelle Mailing List Chevelle-list@chevelles.netSent: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 15:09:00 -0400Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Back in the Day / Float the Valves?





I decided years ago when I put a 6500 RPM cam in my BB motor that I'd eyeball limit to 6000. I'm not draggin' for money and I'd just as soon not grenade my 1970 vintage block just to spank some yahoo with three earings and a '98 Mustang. If I can't git 'r donewith 6k, well, I'll have to accept it.

Besides, it doesn't matter how fast some lesser car goes - mine is a Chevelle with fatblockand a Muncie - that makes it more better by definition.
Chevelle Snob

- Original Message - 
From: Matthew Post 
To: The Chevelle Mailing List 
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 2:59 PM
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Back in the Day / Float the Valves?
Yeah, me too. I've also always been careful of hitting rev limiters on other cars I've owned. I am considering a rev limiter for the Chevelle, but have always wonder if a rev limiter can cause harm to an engine as well? Or is it just fouled plugs at worst? Does anyone have an opinion on that?Of course, even if the rev limiter caused some damage, it's probably not as serious as over revving an engine I'm sure. There's no KABOOM! when you hit a rev limiter. Just wondering if there might be long term harm.Thanks,MattAt 11:29 AM 10/13/2005, you wrote:
Thank you for the insight, it seems like harm can only come from this and no advantage gained.I have always been won to respect the redline in cars, motorcycles, etc. and the few times over was a "whew it stayed together"Thanks again,Krister-Original Message-From: Craig Ellis [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: The Chevelle Mailing List Chevelle-list@chevelles.netSent: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:01:27 -0400Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Back in the Day / Float the Valves?Nope...it's basically reving the motor past the point where the valve springs can close the valve in time for the next compression or exhaust stroke. It's a "bad thing"...especially if the piston slaps a valve. That's one of the reasons valve seat spring load is important and why you match springs to cam, etc.Craig E.

- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
To: Chevelle-list@chevelles.net 
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 1:55 PM
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Back in the Day / Float the Valves?
Well I am 41, been around cars my whole life and have not heard the term "float the valves" doesn't sound like a good thing to do, but what is it? My guess - depressing clutch to shift, but intenially not taking your foot off the gas? 
 
Thank you,
 
Krister Meister
Bloomingdale, IL
'66 SS #'s 
 
-Original Message-
From: Bob Haggard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: The Chevelle Mailing List Chevelle-list@chevelles.net
Sent: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 21:48:21 -0400
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Back in the Day
When I was in the Air Force (66-70) a friend had a red Chevelle SS with 
396/350hp. It was a beautiful car and what I always remember was he liked to 
shift when the valves would float. I was amazed that it stayed together since a 
high school friend had a 63 Impalla (1963) with 409/425hp that would float the 
valves when he missed a shift and it would usually end up back at the Chevy 
dealer to replace bent pushrods and other assorted parts.
Bob Haggard - old fart
 
 From: Bob Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: 2005/10/12 Wed PM 04:25:42 EDT
 To: Chevelle-list@chevelles.net
 Subject: [Chevelle-list] Back in the Day
 
 Reminisicing at the tender age of 17 working in the local burger joint and 
working the night shift when the night porter Pee Wee drove up with his new 
1969 Chevelle SS , Black with Red interior and red stripes, with 396-375 and 
four on the floor with eyebrows on the headlights??
 
 
 -
 Yahoo! Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try it free.
 


Re: [Chevelle-list] Back in the Day / Float the Valves?

2005-10-13 Thread meisterkcel

Well I am 41, been around cars my whole life and have not heard the term "float the valves" doesn't sound like a good thing to do, but what is it? My guess - depressing clutch to shift, but intenially not taking your foot off the gas? 

Thank you,

Krister Meister
Bloomingdale, IL
'66 SS #'s-Original Message-From: Bob Haggard [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: The Chevelle Mailing List Chevelle-list@chevelles.netSent: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 21:48:21 -0400Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Back in the Day


When I was in the Air Force (66-70) a friend had a red Chevelle SS with 
396/350hp.  It was a beautiful car and what I always remember was he liked to 
shift when the valves would float.  I was amazed that it stayed together since a 
high school friend had a 63 Impalla (1963) with 409/425hp that would float the 
valves when he missed a shift and it would usually end up back at the Chevy 
dealer to replace bent pushrods and other assorted parts.
Bob Haggard - old fart
 
 From: Bob Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED]com
 Date: 2005/10/12 Wed PM 04:25:42 EDT
 To: Chevelle-list@chevelles.net
 Subject: [Chevelle-list] Back in  the Day
 
 Reminisicing at the tender age of 17 working in the local burger joint and 
working the night shift when the night porter  Pee Wee drove up with his new 
1969 Chevelle SS , Black with Red interior and red stripes, with 396-375 and 
four on the floor with eyebrows on the headlights??
 
   
 -
  Yahoo! Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try it free.
 





Re: [Chevelle-list] Back in the Day / Float the Valves?

2005-10-13 Thread Craig Ellis



Nope...it's basically reving the motor past the point 
where the valve springs can close the valve in time for the next compression or 
exhauststroke. It's a "bad thing"...especially if the piston slaps a 
valve. That's one of the reasons valve seat spring load is important and why you 
match springs to cam, etc.

Craig E.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  To: Chevelle-list@chevelles.net 
  
  Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 1:55 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Back in the 
  Day / Float the Valves?
  
  
  
  Well I am 41, been around cars my whole life and have not heard the term 
  "float the valves" doesn't sound like a good thing to do, but what is 
  it? My guess - depressing clutch to shift, but intenially not taking 
  your foot off the gas? 
  
  Thank you,
  
  Krister Meister
  Bloomingdale, IL
  '66 SS #'s-Original Message-From: Bob 
  Haggard [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: The Chevelle Mailing List 
  Chevelle-list@chevelles.netSent: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 21:48:21 
  -0400Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Back in the Day
  

  When I was in the Air Force (66-70) a friend had a red Chevelle SS with 
396/350hp.  It was a beautiful car and what I always remember was he liked to 
shift when the valves would float.  I was amazed that it stayed together since a 
high school friend had a 63 Impalla (1963) with 409/425hp that would float the 
valves when he missed a shift and it would usually end up back at the Chevy 
dealer to replace bent pushrods and other assorted parts.
Bob Haggard - old fart
 
 From: Bob Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED]com
 Date: 2005/10/12 Wed PM 04:25:42 EDT
 To: Chevelle-list@chevelles.net
 Subject: [Chevelle-list] Back in  the Day
 
 Reminisicing at the tender age of 17 working in the local burger joint and 
working the night shift when the night porter  Pee Wee drove up with his new 
1969 Chevelle SS , Black with Red interior and red stripes, with 396-375 and 
four on the floor with eyebrows on the headlights??
 
   
 -
  Yahoo! Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try it free.
 





Re: [Chevelle-list] Back in the Day / Float the Valves?

2005-10-13 Thread Larry Shouse



When your RPM is so high your valve springs can't 
keep up with the cam/lifters. The valves won't close fast enough, causing the 
tops of the pistons to hit the valves.

Larry

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  To: Chevelle-list@chevelles.net 
  
  Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 1:55 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Back in the 
  Day / Float the Valves?
  
  
  
  Well I am 41, been around cars my whole life and have not heard the term 
  "float the valves" doesn't sound like a good thing to do, but what is 
  it? My guess - depressing clutch to shift, but intenially not taking 
  your foot off the gas? 
  
  Thank you,
  
  Krister Meister
  Bloomingdale, IL
  '66 SS #'s-Original Message-From: Bob 
  Haggard [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: The Chevelle Mailing List 
  Chevelle-list@chevelles.netSent: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 21:48:21 
  -0400Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Back in the Day
  

  When I was in the Air Force (66-70) a friend had a red Chevelle SS with 
396/350hp.  It was a beautiful car and what I always remember was he liked to 
shift when the valves would float.  I was amazed that it stayed together since a 
high school friend had a 63 Impalla (1963) with 409/425hp that would float the 
valves when he missed a shift and it would usually end up back at the Chevy 
dealer to replace bent pushrods and other assorted parts.
Bob Haggard - old fart
 
 From: Bob Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED]com
 Date: 2005/10/12 Wed PM 04:25:42 EDT
 To: Chevelle-list@chevelles.net
 Subject: [Chevelle-list] Back in  the Day
 
 Reminisicing at the tender age of 17 working in the local burger joint and 
working the night shift when the night porter  Pee Wee drove up with his new 
1969 Chevelle SS , Black with Red interior and red stripes, with 396-375 and 
four on the floor with eyebrows on the headlights??
 
   
 -
  Yahoo! Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try it free.
 





Re: [Chevelle-list] Back in the Day / Float the Valves?

2005-10-13 Thread meisterkcel

Thank you for the insight, it seems like harm can only come from this and no advantage gained.

I have always been won to respect the redline in cars, motorcycles, etc. and the few times over was a "whew it stayed together"

Thanks again,

Krister-Original Message-From: Craig Ellis craig@neagroup.comTo: The Chevelle Mailing List Chevelle[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:01:27 -0400Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Back in the Day / Float the Valves?



Nope...it's basically reving the motor past the point where the valve springs can close the valve in time for the next compression or exhauststroke. It's a "bad thing"...especially if the piston slaps a valve. That's one of the reasons valve seat spring load is important and why you match springs to cam, etc.

Craig E.

- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
To: Chevelle-list@chevelles.net 
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 1:55 PM
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Back in the Day / Float the Valves?



Well I am 41, been around cars my whole life and have not heard the term "float the valves" doesn't sound like a good thing to do, but what is it? My guess - depressing clutch to shift, but intenially not taking your foot off the gas? 

Thank you,

Krister Meister
Bloomingdale, IL
'66 SS #'s-Original Message-From: Bob Haggard skylark1970@alltel.netTo: The Chevelle Mailing List Chevelle-list@chevelles.netSent: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 21:48:21 -0400Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Back in the Day


When I was in the Air Force (66-70) a friend had a red Chevelle SS with 
396/350hp.  It was a beautiful car and what I always remember was he liked to 
shift when the valves would float.  I was amazed that it stayed together since a 
high school friend had a 63 Impalla (1963) with 409/425hp that would float the 
valves when he missed a shift and it would usually end up back at the Chevy 
dealer to replace bent pushrods and other assorted parts.
Bob Haggard - old fart
 
 From: Bob Fisher twins3950@yahoo.com
 Date: 2005/10/12 Wed PM 04:25:42 EDT
 To: Chevelle-list@chevelles.net
 Subject: [Chevelle-list] Back in  the Day
 
 Reminisicing at the tender age of 17 working in the local burger joint and 
working the night shift when the night porter  Pee Wee drove up with his new 
1969 Chevelle SS , Black with Red interior and red stripes, with 396-375 and 
four on the floor with eyebrows on the headlights??
 
   
 -
  Yahoo! Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try it free.
 





Re: [Chevelle-list] Back in the Day / Float the Valves?

2005-10-13 Thread jim



I use to road race motorcycles and floating the 
valves wasnt a good thing. it meant your valves springs were no longer doing 
there job and the valves werent seated when they should have been and 
compression and horsepower were going out the exhaust.I always thought 
when looking at dyno run charts in magazinesthat the horse power 
dropped at or just before"Red Line" because the valves were starting to 
float?. It would be niceto hear more about it from 
all you knowledgable guys on the list.Jimmy.C

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  To: Chevelle-list@chevelles.net 
  
  Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 12:55 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Back in the 
  Day / Float the Valves?
  
  
  
  Well I am 41, been around cars my whole life and have not heard the term 
  "float the valves" doesn't sound like a good thing to do, but what is 
  it? My guess - depressing clutch to shift, but intenially not taking 
  your foot off the gas? 
  
  Thank you,
  
  Krister Meister
  Bloomingdale, IL
  '66 SS #'s-Original Message-From: Bob 
  Haggard [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: The Chevelle Mailing List 
  Chevelle-list@chevelles.netSent: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 21:48:21 
  -0400Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Back in the Day
  

  When I was in the Air Force (66-70) a friend had a red Chevelle SS with 
396/350hp.  It was a beautiful car and what I always remember was he liked to 
shift when the valves would float.  I was amazed that it stayed together since a 
high school friend had a 63 Impalla (1963) with 409/425hp that would float the 
valves when he missed a shift and it would usually end up back at the Chevy 
dealer to replace bent pushrods and other assorted parts.
Bob Haggard - old fart
 
 From: Bob Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED]com
 Date: 2005/10/12 Wed PM 04:25:42 EDT
 To: Chevelle-list@chevelles.net
 Subject: [Chevelle-list] Back in  the Day
 
 Reminisicing at the tender age of 17 working in the local burger joint and 
working the night shift when the night porter  Pee Wee drove up with his new 
1969 Chevelle SS , Black with Red interior and red stripes, with 396-375 and 
four on the floor with eyebrows on the headlights??
 
   
 -
  Yahoo! Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try it free.
 





Re: [Chevelle-list] Back in the Day / Float the Valves?

2005-10-13 Thread Matthew Post


Yeah, me too. I've also always been careful of hitting rev limiters
on other cars I've owned. I am considering a rev limiter for the
Chevelle, but have always wonder if a rev limiter can cause harm to an
engine as well? Or is it just fouled plugs at worst? Does
anyone have an opinion on that?
Of course, even if the rev limiter caused some damage, it's probably not
as serious as over revving an engine I'm sure. There's no KABOOM!
when you hit a rev limiter. Just wondering if there might be long
term harm.
Thanks,
Matt
At 11:29 AM 10/13/2005, you wrote:
Thank you for the insight,
it seems like harm can only come from this and no advantage gained.

I have always been won to respect the redline in cars, motorcycles, etc.
and the few times over was a whew it stayed together

Thanks again,

Krister

-Original Message-
From: Craig Ellis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: The Chevelle Mailing List Chevelle-list@chevelles.net
Sent: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:01:27 -0400
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Back in the Day / Float the Valves?
Nope...it's basically reving the motor past the
point where the valve springs can close the valve in time for the next
compression or exhaust stroke. It's a bad thing...especially
if the piston slaps a valve. That's one of the reasons valve seat spring
load is important and why you match springs to cam, etc.

Craig E.


- Original Message - 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

To: Chevelle-list@chevelles.net 

Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 1:55 PM

Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Back in the Day / Float the
Valves?

Well I am 41, been around cars my whole life and have not heard the
term float the valves doesn't sound like a good thing
to do, but what is it? My guess - depressing clutch to shift, but
intenially not taking your foot off the gas? 



Thank you,



Krister Meister

Bloomingdale, IL

'66 SS #'s 



-Original Message-

From: Bob Haggard [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: The Chevelle Mailing List
Chevelle-list@chevelles.net

Sent: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 21:48:21 -0400

Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Back in the Day


When I was in the Air Force (66-70) a friend had a red Chevelle
SS with 

396/350hp. It was a beautiful car and what I always remember
was he liked to 

shift when the valves would float. I was amazed that it stayed
together since a 

high school friend had a 63 Impalla (1963) with 409/425hp that would
float the 

valves when he missed a shift and it would usually end up back at the
Chevy 

dealer to replace bent pushrods and other assorted parts.

Bob Haggard - old fart

 

 From: Bob Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Date: 2005/10/12 Wed PM 04:25:42 EDT

 To: Chevelle-list@chevelles.net

 Subject: [Chevelle-list] Back in the Day

 

 Reminisicing at the tender age of 17 working in the local burger
joint and 

working the night shift when the night porter Pee Wee drove up
with his new 

1969 Chevelle SS , Black with Red interior and red stripes, with
396-375 and 

four on the floor with eyebrows on the headlights??

 

 

 -

 Yahoo! Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try
it free.

 






Re: [Chevelle-list] Back in the Day / Float the Valves?

2005-10-13 Thread Craig Ellis



I decided years ago when I put a 6500 RPM cam in my BB 
motor that I'd eyeball limit to 6000. I'm not draggin' for money and I'd just as 
soon not grenade my 1970 vintage block just to spank some yahoo with three 
earings and a '98 Mustang. If I can't git 'r 
donewith 6k, well, I'll have to accept it.

Besides, it doesn't matter how fast some lesser car goes 
- mine is a Chevelle with fatblockand a Muncie - that makes it more better 
by definition.
Chevelle Snob

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Matthew Post 
  
  To: The Chevelle Mailing List 
  Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 2:59 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Back in the 
  Day / Float the Valves?
  Yeah, me too. I've also always been careful of hitting 
  rev limiters on other cars I've owned. I am considering a rev limiter 
  for the Chevelle, but have always wonder if a rev limiter can cause harm to an 
  engine as well? Or is it just fouled plugs at worst? Does anyone 
  have an opinion on that?Of course, even if the rev limiter caused some 
  damage, it's probably not as serious as over revving an engine I'm sure. 
  There's no KABOOM! when you hit a rev limiter. Just wondering if there 
  might be long term harm.Thanks,MattAt 11:29 AM 10/13/2005, 
  you wrote:
  Thank you for the insight, 
it seems like harm can only come from this and no advantage 
gained.I have always been won to respect the redline in cars, 
motorcycles, etc. and the few times over was a "whew it stayed 
together"Thanks 
again,Krister-Original Message-From: 
Craig Ellis [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: The Chevelle Mailing List 
Chevelle-list@chevelles.netSent: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:01:27 
-0400Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Back in the Day / Float the 
Valves?Nope...it's basically reving the motor 
past the point where the valve springs can close the valve in time for the 
next compression or exhaust stroke. It's a "bad thing"...especially if the 
piston slaps a valve. That's one of the reasons valve seat spring load is 
important and why you match springs to cam, etc.Craig E.

  - Original Message - 
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  To: Chevelle-list@chevelles.net 
  Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 1:55 PM
  Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Back in the Day / Float the 
  Valves?
  Well I am 41, been around cars my whole life and have not heard the 
  term "float the valves" doesn't sound like a good thing to do, but 
  what is it? My guess - depressing clutch to shift, but intenially 
  not taking your foot off the gas? 
  
  Thank you,
  
  Krister Meister
  Bloomingdale, IL
  '66 SS #'s 
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Bob Haggard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: The Chevelle Mailing List Chevelle-list@chevelles.net
  Sent: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 21:48:21 -0400
  Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Back in the Day
  When I was in the Air Force (66-70) a friend had a red Chevelle SS 
  with 
  396/350hp. It was a beautiful car and what I always remember was 
  he liked to 
  shift when the valves would float. I was amazed that it stayed 
  together since a 
  high school friend had a 63 Impalla (1963) with 409/425hp that would 
  float the 
  valves when he missed a shift and it would usually end up back at the 
  Chevy 
  dealer to replace bent pushrods and other assorted parts.
  Bob Haggard - old fart
   
   From: Bob Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Date: 2005/10/12 Wed PM 04:25:42 EDT
   To: Chevelle-list@chevelles.net
   Subject: [Chevelle-list] Back in the Day
   
   Reminisicing at the tender age of 17 working in the local burger 
  joint and 
  working the night shift when the night porter Pee Wee drove up 
  with his new 
  1969 Chevelle SS , Black with Red interior and red stripes, with 
  396-375 and 
  four on the floor with eyebrows on the headlights??
   
   
   -
   Yahoo! Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try 
  it free.
   


Re: [Chevelle-list] Back in the Day / Float the Valves?

2005-10-13 Thread John



Any Chevelle is just naturally better!

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Craig Ellis 
  
  To: The Chevelle Mailing List 
  Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 2:09 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Back in the 
  Day / Float the Valves?
  
  I decided years ago when I put a 6500 RPM cam in my BB 
  motor that I'd eyeball limit to 6000. I'm not draggin' for money and I'd just 
  as soon not grenade my 1970 vintage block just to spank some yahoo with three 
  earings and a '98 Mustang. If I can't git 'r 
  donewith 6k, well, I'll have to accept it.
  
  Besides, it doesn't matter how fast some lesser car 
  goes - mine is a Chevelle with fatblockand a Muncie - that makes it more 
  better by definition.
  Chevelle Snob
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Matthew 
Post 
To: The Chevelle Mailing List 

Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 2:59 
PM
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Back in 
the Day / Float the Valves?
Yeah, me too. I've also always been careful of hitting 
rev limiters on other cars I've owned. I am considering a rev limiter 
for the Chevelle, but have always wonder if a rev limiter can cause harm to 
an engine as well? Or is it just fouled plugs at worst? Does 
anyone have an opinion on that?Of course, even if the rev limiter 
caused some damage, it's probably not as serious as over revving an engine 
I'm sure. There's no KABOOM! when you hit a rev limiter. Just 
wondering if there might be long term harm.Thanks,MattAt 
11:29 AM 10/13/2005, you wrote:
Thank you for the 
  insight, it seems like harm can only come from this and no advantage 
  gained.I have always been won to respect the redline in 
  cars, motorcycles, etc. and the few times over was a "whew it stayed 
  together"Thanks 
  again,Krister-Original 
  Message-From: Craig Ellis [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: The 
  Chevelle Mailing List Chevelle-list@chevelles.netSent: Thu, 13 
  Oct 2005 14:01:27 -0400Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Back in the Day / 
  Float the Valves?Nope...it's basically reving 
  the motor past the point where the valve springs can close the valve in 
  time for the next compression or exhaust stroke. It's a "bad 
  thing"...especially if the piston slaps a valve. That's one of the reasons 
  valve seat spring load is important and why you match springs to cam, 
  etc.Craig E.
  
- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
To: Chevelle-list@chevelles.net 
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 1:55 PM
    Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Back in the Day / Float the 
Valves?
Well I am 41, been around cars my whole life and have not heard the 
term "float the valves" doesn't sound like a good thing to do, but 
what is it? My guess - depressing clutch to shift, but intenially 
not taking your foot off the gas? 
 
Thank you,
 
Krister Meister
Bloomingdale, IL
'66 SS #'s 
 
-Original Message-
From: Bob Haggard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: The Chevelle Mailing List 
Chevelle-list@chevelles.net
Sent: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 21:48:21 -0400
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Back in the Day
When I was in the Air Force (66-70) a friend had a red Chevelle 
SS with 
396/350hp. It was a beautiful car and what I always remember 
was he liked to 
shift when the valves would float. I was amazed that it stayed 
together since a 
high school friend had a 63 Impalla (1963) with 409/425hp that would 
float the 
valves when he missed a shift and it would usually end up back at 
the Chevy 
dealer to replace bent pushrods and other assorted parts.
Bob Haggard - old fart
 
 From: Bob Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: 2005/10/12 Wed PM 04:25:42 EDT
 To: Chevelle-list@chevelles.net
 Subject: [Chevelle-list] Back in the Day
 
 Reminisicing at the tender age of 17 working in the local 
burger joint and 
working the night shift when the night porter Pee Wee drove up 
with his new 
1969 Chevelle SS , Black with Red interior and red stripes, with 
396-375 and 
four on the floor with eyebrows on the headlights??
 
 
 -
 Yahoo! Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try 
it free.
 


RE: [Chevelle-list] Back in the Day / Float the Valves?

2005-10-13 Thread Dale








A good rev limiter shouldnt do
any harm unless you continually run it against the limit which, I suppose,
could foul plugs in time. The idea is to cut spark to cylinders so the
engine wont rev any higher I dont think professional class drag
race cars use em, maybe Pro Stock  not sure, but NASCAR sure uses
em.





Dale McIntosh

67 El Camino

1967
ChevelleReference CDnow available!

ACES #1709/TC
Gold #92











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matthew Post
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005
2:00 PM
To: The
 Chevelle Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Back
in the Day / Float the Valves?





Yeah, me too. I've also always been careful of hitting rev
limiters on other cars I've owned. I am considering a rev limiter for the
Chevelle, but have always wonder if a rev limiter can cause harm to an engine
as well? Or is it just fouled plugs at worst? Does anyone have an
opinion on that?

Of course, even if the rev limiter caused some damage, it's probably not as
serious as over revving an engine I'm sure. There's no KABOOM! when you
hit a rev limiter. Just wondering if there might be long term harm.

Thanks,
Matt

At 11:29 AM 10/13/2005, you wrote:



Thank you for the insight, it seems like harm can only come from
this and no advantage gained.

I have always been won to respect the redline in cars, motorcycles, etc. and
the few times over was a whew it stayed together

Thanks again,

Krister

-Original Message-
From: Craig Ellis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: The Chevelle Mailing List
Chevelle-list@chevelles.net
Sent: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:01:27 -0400
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Back in the Day / Float the Valves?

Nope...it's
basically reving the motor past the point where the valve springs can close the
valve in time for the next compression or exhaust stroke. It's a bad
thing...especially if the piston slaps a valve. That's one of the reasons
valve seat spring load is important and why you match springs to cam, etc.

Craig E.

- Original Message - 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

To: Chevelle-list@chevelles.net 

Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 1:55 PM

Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Back in the Day / Float
the Valves?

Well I am 41, been around cars my whole life and have
not heard the term float the valves doesn't sound like a good
thing to do, but what is it? My guess - depressing clutch to shift, but
intenially not taking your foot off the gas? 



Thank you,



Krister Meister

Bloomingdale,
 IL

'66 SS #'s 



-Original Message-

From: Bob Haggard [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: The Chevelle Mailing
 List Chevelle-list@chevelles.net

Sent: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 21:48:21 -0400

Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Back in the Day



When I was in the Air Force (66-70) a friend had a red
Chevelle SS with 

396/350hp. It was a
beautiful car and what I always remember was he liked to 

shift when the valves would
float. I was amazed that it stayed together since a 

high school friend had a 63
Impalla (1963) with 409/425hp that would float the 

valves when he missed a
shift and it would usually end up back at the Chevy 

dealer to replace bent
pushrods and other assorted parts.

Bob Haggard - old fart

 

 From: Bob Fisher
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Date: 2005/10/12 Wed PM
04:25:42 EDT

 To:
Chevelle-list@chevelles.net

 Subject:
[Chevelle-list] Back in the Day

 

 Reminisicing at the
tender age of 17 working in the local burger joint and 

working the night shift when
the night porter Pee Wee drove up with his new 

1969 Chevelle SS , Black
with Red interior and red stripes, with 396-375 and 

four on the floor with
eyebrows on the headlights??

 





-

 Yahoo! Music
Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try it free.

 










RE: [Chevelle-list] Back in the Day / Float the Valves?

2005-10-13 Thread Brad Waller




As others 
have already said, floating them is not good in most cases. If you have 
lots of valve clearance, this can self limit the revolutions so that you don't 
break something really bad, like a rod or crank! Since the valves don't 
seal the cylinder, you will lose power and should not over-rev the engine. 
Of course, most high performance engines only have a tiny bit of clearance, so 
this is usually a bad thing. Also, floating the valves stresses the valve 
springs big time and can lead to failure. This could be breakage or 
weakening - which will mean they will float even earlier if you keep doing 
it.
The power 
drop is just from the system design. Valve timing, air flow, and other 
factors determine the torque at each RPM, and the torque starts to drop at some 
point and it continues to drop as RPM increases from then on because that is how 
the dynamics work. Because the formula for horsepower is based on torque 
and RPM (HP=TQ*RPM/5252), horsepower peaks later, but also eventually drops 
off. Valve float would kill power, but generally would happen after 
red line, and long after all peak power numbers - unless the springs are bad or 
incorrect.
Brad Waller ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
'66 Corvette | 327/dead | 4-speed | Wilwood Brakes | 
245/45/16 BFG R1'67 Chevelle | ex-SS396 | 355/700R4 | F-Body 
Brakes| 275/40/17 Kumho MX

  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
  jimSent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 1:00 PMTo: The 
  Chevelle Mailing ListSubject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Back in the Day / 
  Float the Valves?
  
  I use to road race motorcycles and floating 
  the valves wasnt a good thing. it meant your valves springs were no longer 
  doing there job and the valves werent seated when they should have been and 
  compression and horsepower were going out the exhaust.I always thought 
  when looking at dyno run charts in magazinesthat the horse power 
  dropped at or just before"Red Line" because the valves were starting to 
  float?. It would be niceto hear more about it 
  from all you knowledgable guys on the list.Jimmy.C


RE: [Chevelle-list] Back in the Day / Float the Valves?

2005-10-13 Thread Matthew Post


Thanks Dale. That's what I figured.
At 03:06 PM 10/13/2005, Dale wrote:

A good rev limiter shouldn’t
do any harm unless you continually run it against the limit which, I
suppose, could foul plugs in time. The idea is to cut spark to
cylinders so the engine won’t rev any higher I don’t think
professional class drag race cars use ‘em, maybe Pro Stock – not sure,
but NASCAR sure uses ‘em.

Dale
McIntosh
67 El Camino

1967 Chevelle Reference CD now
available!
ACES #1709/TC
Gold #92


From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Matthew Post
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 2:00 PM
To: The Chevelle Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Back in the Day / Float the
Valves?

Yeah, me too. I've also always been careful of hitting rev limiters
on other cars I've owned. I am considering a rev limiter for the
Chevelle, but have always wonder if a rev limiter can cause harm to an
engine as well? Or is it just fouled plugs at worst? Does
anyone have an opinion on that?
Of course, even if the rev limiter caused some damage, it's probably not
as serious as over revving an engine I'm sure. There's no KABOOM!
when you hit a rev limiter. Just wondering if there might be long
term harm.
Thanks,
Matt
At 11:29 AM 10/13/2005, you wrote:
Thank you for the insight, it seems like harm can only come from
this and no advantage gained.

I have always been won to respect the redline in cars, motorcycles, etc.
and the few times over was a whew it stayed together

Thanks again,

Krister

-Original Message-
From: Craig Ellis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: The Chevelle Mailing List Chevelle-list@chevelles.net
Sent: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:01:27 -0400
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Back in the Day / Float the Valves?
Nope...it's basically reving the motor past
the point where the valve springs can close the valve in time for the
next compression or exhaust stroke. It's a bad
thing...especially if the piston slaps a valve. That's one of the
reasons valve seat spring load is important and why you match springs to
cam, etc.

Craig E.
- Original Message -

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
To: Chevelle-list@chevelles.net 
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 1:55 PM
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Back in the Day / Float the Valves?
Well I am 41, been around cars my whole life and have not heard the term
float the valves doesn't sound like a good thing to do,
but what is it? My guess - depressing clutch to shift, but
intenially not taking your foot off the gas? 

Thank you,

Krister Meister
Bloomingdale, IL
'66 SS #'s 

-Original Message-
From: Bob Haggard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: The Chevelle Mailing List Chevelle-list@chevelles.net
Sent: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 21:48:21 -0400
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Back in the Day
When I was in the Air
Force (66-70) a friend had a red Chevelle SS with 
396/350hp. It
was a beautiful car and what I always remember was he liked to 
shift when the valves would float. I was amazed that it stayed
together since a 
high school friend had a 63 Impalla (1963) with 409/425hp that would
float the 
valves when he missed a shift and it would usually end up back at the
Chevy 
dealer to replace bent pushrods and other assorted parts.
Bob Haggard - old fart
 
 From: Bob Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: 2005/10/12 Wed PM 04:25:42 EDT
 To: Chevelle-list@chevelles.net
 Subject: [Chevelle-list] Back in the Day
 
 Reminisicing at the tender age of 17 working in the local burger
joint and 
working the night shift when the night porter Pee Wee drove up with
his new 
1969 Chevelle SS , Black with Red interior and red stripes, with 396-375
and 
four on the floor with eyebrows on the headlights??
 
 
 -
 Yahoo! Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try it
free.
 




RE: [Chevelle-list] Back in the Day / Float the Valves?

2005-10-13 Thread Bill Lessenberry


Pro stock cars  bikes definitely use them.

At 05:06 PM 10/13/2005, you wrote:
A
good rev limiter shouldn’t do any harm unless you continually run it
against the limit which, I suppose, could foul plugs in time. The
idea is to cut spark to cylinders so the engine won’t rev any
higher I don’t think professional class drag race cars use ‘em,
maybe Pro Stock – not sure, but NASCAR sure uses
‘em.