Re: [Chevelle-list] crossmember for 70 ss auto.

2008-08-13 Thread dansolomon
You must have the wrong crossmember. They should line up metal to metal.

--Original Message--
From: Amber Andre
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Chevelle List
ReplyTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReplyTo: Chevelle List
Sent: Aug 13, 2008 8:56 PM
Subject: [Chevelle-list] crossmember for 70 ss auto.

the cross member that I have isn't long enough to go from the bolt holes on the 
right to bolt holes on the left.Is this correct?Or do the ends fit into a 
rubber pocket with a metal bracket on top?


  



Godspeed,
Dan Solomon
It is a mistake to allow any mechanical object to realize you are in a hurry.
http://www.freewebs.com/chevelles1970/




[Chevelle-list] crossmember for 70 ss auto.

2008-08-13 Thread Amber Andre
the cross member that I have isn't long enough to go from the bolt holes on the 
right to bolt holes on the left.Is this correct?Or do the ends fit into a 
rubber pocket with a metal bracket on top?


  



Re: [Chevelle-list] Crossmember

2006-01-26 Thread MICRLASER



The location of the crossmember depends on what transmission you 
have.  TH400's are longer, therefore the crossmember has to be further 
back.  Also bear in mind that EC frames are different than 2 door 
coupes.  The EC frame is boxed and is 4 inches longer in the middle than a 
2 door.  The bolts to go in, what you call upside down.
 
Tom


[Chevelle-list] Crossmember

2006-01-26 Thread Ryan Langstraat



I was reading through my restoration book tonight 
in the process of reinstalling my crossmember.  The diagram in my book 
shows that for the two door coupe, the crossmember bolts to the front two holes 
in the frame not the back two that are used for elkys.  It also looks like 
you install the bolts in "upside down" with lock washer, regular washer and then 
nut.  I am just wanting to make sure that I am looking at the pics 
right.  If someone can either confirm or correct me on this that would be 
great!
 
Thanks
Ryan
A.C.E.S.  #07184


Re: [Chevelle-List] crossmember woes

2001-08-30 Thread Dave Corgill


Replies to this message are sent to The Chevelle Mailing List


At 02:20 PM 08/30/2001 -0400, you wrote:
>When I converted my 65 from a 4 speed to a th 400 I just had to move the
>crossmember back a couple inches. Its been a long time but I do remember
>having to drill at least two of the four holes.
>   Larry

Same here on a 700R4 install in a 66, didn't have to drill the two of four
holes, but they didn't line up correct, so I did run a drill thru the last
holes.



[EMAIL PROTECTED] & The Doberman gang in Dallas (Taxes)
Dave's Doberman page http://www.geocities.com/Athens/1877/
Doberworld home page http://www.geocities.com/Athens/1878/
El-Camino/Chevelle page http://www.geocities.com/Athens/1876/
My Machine Shop http://cncshop.8m.com


-
To Unsubscribe please visit www.chevelles.net/list.html
To start a new topic, send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [Chevelle-List] crossmember woes

2001-08-30 Thread Z16CHEVELLEGUY
When I converted my 65 from a 4 speed to a th 400 I just had to move the 
crossmember back a couple inches. Its been a long time but I do remember 
having to drill at least two of the four holes.
   Larry


Re: [Chevelle-List] crossmember woes

2001-08-30 Thread Kent Lewis


Replies to this message are sent to The Chevelle Mailing List


Tom,

  I believe you are correct about the crossmembers being interchangeable
between the different transmissions for the '68 thru '72 Chevelles.   But,
he was referring to a '66 or '67.  They are a "slightly different breed"
when it comes to interchangeability of parts.  This from a guy (ME !) that
has never owned any other year than a 1968.  Come to think of it, this is
the only Chevelle I have ever owned.  Proud owner since 1983.

Kent
'68 Malibu ZZ502/502 :)


-
To Unsubscribe please visit www.chevelles.net/list.html
To start a new topic, send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [Chevelle-List] crossmember woes

2001-08-30 Thread MICRLASER


Replies to this message are sent to The Chevelle Mailing List


When I installed the TH400 in my 70, all I had to do is move the crossmember 
back to the next set of holes.  They were predrilled in the frame from the 
factory.  By the way it was an original TH350 car, but the guy I got it from 
had a 4 speed in it.  All the crossmembers are the same Powerglide, TH350, 
TH400, and 4 speed.  

Tom

-
To Unsubscribe please visit www.chevelles.net/list.html
To start a new topic, send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [Chevelle-List] crossmember woes

2001-08-30 Thread Clifford E Klimas


Replies to this message are sent to The Chevelle Mailing List


I thought the crossmember for the TH350 and TH400 were the same(?)  So said
the trans guy who replaced my old TH350 with a TH400.  All he did was turn
the crossmember around, and I think he even used the same mounting holes on
the frame.  I'm using a polyurethane safety-interlock trans mount, and it
fits in there fine.


>
> If chevelles follow camaros, and I bet that they do  , the x-members
> are different.  I  have a 400 specific x-member on order for my 68
> camaro.  It is different than the original.
> rick
>
> >When I bought my 67, the guy had replaced the PG with a TH 350. I went
> >to
> >put my new TH 400 in  today, and I have run into a problem I need some
> >help
> >on. There isn't enough room between the crossmember mounting surface
> >and the
> >mounting surface on the trans. to fit the trans. mount. I need about
> >another
> >3/4 inch.


-
To Unsubscribe please visit www.chevelles.net/list.html
To start a new topic, send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [Chevelle-List] crossmember woes

2001-08-29 Thread rick schaefer


Replies to this message are sent to The Chevelle Mailing List


fred
If chevelles follow camaros, and I bet that they do  , the x-members
are different.  I  have a 400 specific x-member on order for my 68
camaro.  It is different than the original.
rick
On Wed, 29 Aug 2001 19:04:44 -0400 "Fred Knoche" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>
>Replies to this message are sent to The Chevelle Mailing List
>
>
>When I bought my 67, the guy had replaced the PG with a TH 350. I went 
>to
>put my new TH 400 in  today, and I have run into a problem I need some 
>help
>on. There isn't enough room between the crossmember mounting surface 
>and the
>mounting surface on the trans. to fit the trans. mount. I need about 
>another
>3/4 inch. The mount is a duplicate of the old one from a local trans 
>supply
>house. If I jack the engine/trans higher it hits the shifter linkage 
>where
>it comes out the floor. Are 350 crossmembers different than 400's? My 
>only
>solution is to remove and  reweld the crossmember mounting surface 
>lower on
>the crossmember. Any ideas, suggestions would help.
>Thanks
>Fred
>
>
>-
>To Unsubscribe please visit www.chevelles.net/list.html
>To start a new topic, send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
To Unsubscribe please visit www.chevelles.net/list.html
To start a new topic, send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[Chevelle-List] crossmember woes

2001-08-29 Thread Fred Knoche


Replies to this message are sent to The Chevelle Mailing List


When I bought my 67, the guy had replaced the PG with a TH 350. I went to
put my new TH 400 in  today, and I have run into a problem I need some help
on. There isn't enough room between the crossmember mounting surface and the
mounting surface on the trans. to fit the trans. mount. I need about another
3/4 inch. The mount is a duplicate of the old one from a local trans supply
house. If I jack the engine/trans higher it hits the shifter linkage where
it comes out the floor. Are 350 crossmembers different than 400's? My only
solution is to remove and  reweld the crossmember mounting surface lower on
the crossmember. Any ideas, suggestions would help.
Thanks
Fred


-
To Unsubscribe please visit www.chevelles.net/list.html
To start a new topic, send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]