RE: [Chevelle-list] thermostat question

2004-04-02 Thread Cutter
Well Jeg's shipping is actually free, they just nab you a flat rate for
"handling"...Big orders are the way to go with them..

Ron
http://home.comcast.net/~cutter169/index.htm



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Nasta
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 12:24 PM
To: The Chevelle Mailing List
Subject: RE: [Chevelle-list] thermostat question

One good thing about ordering via the web is that you get to see the
shipping cost before concluding the ordering process.

However, there are some things you should never order through the mail,
mainly because your local auto parts store has them and it is much faster
and cheaper to buy them locally.







RE: [Chevelle-list] thermostat question

2004-04-02 Thread John Nasta
One good thing about ordering via the web is that you get to see the
shipping cost before concluding the ordering process.

However, there are some things you should never order through the mail,
mainly because your local auto parts store has them and it is much faster
and cheaper to buy them locally.







Re: [Chevelle-list] thermostat question

2004-04-02 Thread TC
Gotta ask that dreaded shipping price first!!Especially on e-bay if not
stated!!
I fell into that paid more for shipping than item cost  once>>>>>
- Original Message - 
From: "Dave Studly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "The Chevelle Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 11:05 AM
Subject: RE: [Chevelle-list] thermostat question


> > I ordered the 180 degree thermostat from Jegs, and
> > will keep you all posted on whether or not it helps-
> > They banged me over the head with a $10 shipping
> > charge though, so it must be made out of solid gold
> > 8^]
>
> Ouch, you did get banged on that.  Your local Autozone should have one of
> those in stock for less than $5.  Certainly less than $10.
>
> -Dave
>
>
>





RE: [Chevelle-list] thermostat question

2004-04-02 Thread Dave Studly
> I ordered the 180 degree thermostat from Jegs, and
> will keep you all posted on whether or not it helps-
> They banged me over the head with a $10 shipping
> charge though, so it must be made out of solid gold
> 8^]

Ouch, you did get banged on that.  Your local Autozone should have one of
those in stock for less than $5.  Certainly less than $10.

-Dave




Re: [Chevelle-list] thermostat question

2004-04-02 Thread J. Brady
WOW- Never expected to get such a wide response rate
with my dinky little thermostat question!  Anyhow,
here's the details on my '66:

1. shroud installed (don't know if there was one there
when it came from the factory or not)

2. stock 4-blade fan

3. stock water pump pulley (the pump is from Auto
Zone, but it's for a stock 327)

4. thermostat came from Auto Zone too (at that point I
didn't know there were so many choices for
thermostats)

5. radiator is a new replacement radiator that is for
a '66 Chevelle with a 327 (don't remember how many
rows, but I can check when I get home tonite)

I ordered the 180 degree thermostat from Jegs, and
will keep you all posted on whether or not it helps-
They banged me over the head with a $10 shipping
charge though, so it must be made out of solid gold 
8^]

Thanks for all the input!

Jim
'66 Malibu
'59 Corvette
1959 Corvette Registry, Webmaster
http://59vette.cjb.net



--- Dave Benjamin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When doing a show car and wanting to keep the
> original look etc. You don't
> add a 7 blade fan, you don't butcher a fan shroud
> into THE CAR EITHER. I
> changed the thermostat to keep it running COOL.
> 
> YES THAT IS MY POINT AND I HOPE IT HELPS YOUR
> DISCUSSION
> JOHN
> 
> 
> Dave
> Ingersoll,Ontario
> My web site:   http://members.tripod.com/benj30/
> 
> 
> - Original Message - 
> From: "John Nasta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "The Chevelle Mailing List"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 1:51 PM
> Subject: RE: [Chevelle-list] thermostat question
> 
> 
> > I believe you. Is that connected in any way to
> this discussion of how to
> > achieve better cooling in a car that runs hot?
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Behalf Of Dave Benjamin
> > Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 1:05 PM
> > To: The Chevelle Mailing List
> > Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] thermostat question
> >
> > My 66 was factory 4 blade fan, rad size  with 2
> spd and no shroud.
> >
> > Dave
> > Ingersoll,Ontario
> > My web site:   http://members.tripod.com/benj30/
> >
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "John Nasta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "The Chevelle Mailing List"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 12:53 PM
> > Subject: RE: [Chevelle-list] thermostat question
> >
> >
> > > As Brad pointed out, the thermostat has more to
> do with engine warming
> > than
> > > cooling. A fan shroud, a higher volume fan, a
> smaller WP pulley, or a
> > bigger
> > > (or less restricted) radiator would help.
> > >
> > > John Nasta
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Behalf Of Dave Benjamin
> > > Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 12:29 PM
> > > To: The Chevelle Mailing List
> > > Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] thermostat question
> > >
> > > I tried a 160 in my 1966 chevelle and it didn't
> work very well. There
> was
> > no
> > > fan shroud factory and ounce the motor got up to
> 160 it wouldn't (open/
> > > close) cycle. It would stay open therefore not
> very good cooling. The
> 180
> > > worked fine it it.
> > >
> > > Dave
> > > Ingersoll,Ontario
> > > My web site:   http://members.tripod.com/benj30/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 


__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway 
http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/



RE: [Chevelle-list] thermostat question

2004-04-01 Thread John Nasta









Well, good
for you. Hopefully I will be able to answer a question for you some day, and
hopefully Jim got some considerable advice about HIS car.

 

Thank you,

John Nasta

 

 

 

-Original
Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On
Behalf Of Dave Benjamin
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 12:07
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list]
thermostat question

 

When I built
the 1966 chevelle I built it to be fun and drivable.( because it is not a
driver) why build the car. I went to car shows, did poker runs with 30 other
hot rods etc. Now that is the reason to drive them. I am not going to be
someone who loads there car up on a trailer to go to a show. I DRIVE
IT. That is why I had to figure out my cooling problem.

 

SORRY
Done now.

 

Dave
Ingersoll,Ontario
My web site:   http://members.tripod.com/benj30/

 

 

 

 

 

-
Original Message - 
From: "John Nasta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "The Chevelle Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 11:57 PM
Subject: RE: [Chevelle-list] thermostat question


> When doing a show car and wanting to keep the original look etc. You don't
> worry about it overheating in traffic, because it is not a driver.
>
> As pointed out all too many times already, changing to s higher degree
> thermostat will not prevent the car from running hot.
>
> Calm down, honcho.
>
> Thank you,
> John Nasta
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dave Benjamin
> Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 11:22 PM
> To: The Chevelle Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] thermostat question
>
> When doing a show car and wanting to keep the original look etc. You don't
> add a 7 blade fan, you don't butcher a fan shroud into THE CAR EITHER. I
> changed the thermostat to keep it running COOL.
>
> YES THAT IS MY POINT AND I HOPE IT HELPS YOUR DISCUSSION
> JOHN
>
>
> Dave
> Ingersoll,Ontario
> My web site:   http://members.tripod.com/benj30/
>
>
>
>
>








Re: [Chevelle-list] thermostat question

2004-04-01 Thread Dave Benjamin




When I built the 1966 chevelle I built it to be fun and drivable.( because 
it is not a driver) why build the car. I went to car shows, did poker runs with 
30 other hot rods etc. Now that is the reason to drive them. I am not going to 
be someone who loads there car up on a trailer to go to a show. I DRIVE 
IT. That is why I had to figure out my cooling problem.
 
SORRY Done now.
 
DaveIngersoll,OntarioMy web 
site:   http://members.tripod.com/benj30/
 
 
 
 
 
- Original 
Message - From: "John Nasta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: "The Chevelle Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 11:57 PMSubject: RE: 
[Chevelle-list] thermostat question> When doing a show car and 
wanting to keep the original look etc. You don't> worry about it 
overheating in traffic, because it is not a driver.>> As pointed 
out all too many times already, changing to s higher degree> thermostat 
will not prevent the car from running hot.>> Calm down, 
honcho.>> Thank you,> John 
Nasta>>>> -Original Message-> From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dave Benjamin> 
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 11:22 PM> To: The Chevelle Mailing 
List> Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] thermostat question>> 
When doing a show car and wanting to keep the original look etc. You 
don't> add a 7 blade fan, you don't butcher a fan shroud into THE CAR 
EITHER. I> changed the thermostat to keep it running 
COOL.>> YES THAT IS MY POINT AND I HOPE IT HELPS YOUR 
DISCUSSION> JOHN>>> Dave> 
Ingersoll,Ontario> My web site:   http://members.tripod.com/benj30/>>>>>


RE: [Chevelle-list] thermostat question

2004-04-01 Thread John Nasta
No, but it is connected to YOUR discussion of YOUR car and YOUR beliefs
about it. If somebody asks how to keep their car from running hot and I
offer free advice to help that person reach his goal, I would hope that the
discussion would not be limited to YOUR beliefs about YOUR car.

Thank you,
John Nasta



-Original Message-


I believe you. Is that connected in any way to this discussion of how to
achieve better cooling in a car that runs hot?


Dave
Ingersoll,Ontario
My web site:   http://members.tripod.com/benj30/


- Original Message -
From: "John Nasta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "The Chevelle Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 11:57 PM
Subject: RE: [Chevelle-list] thermostat question


> When doing a show car and wanting to keep the original look etc. You don't
> worry about it overheating in traffic, because it is not a driver.
>
> As pointed out all too many times already, changing to s higher degree
> thermostat will not prevent the car from running hot.
>
> Calm down, honcho.
>
> Thank you,
> John Nasta
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dave Benjamin
> Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 11:22 PM
> To: The Chevelle Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] thermostat question
>
> When doing a show car and wanting to keep the original look etc. You don't
> add a 7 blade fan, you don't butcher a fan shroud into THE CAR EITHER. I
> changed the thermostat to keep it running COOL.
>
> YES THAT IS MY POINT AND I HOPE IT HELPS YOUR DISCUSSION
> JOHN
>
>
> Dave
> Ingersoll,Ontario
> My web site:   http://members.tripod.com/benj30/
>
>
>
>
>





Re: [Chevelle-list] thermostat question

2004-04-01 Thread Dave Benjamin
I believe you. Is that connected in any way to this discussion of how to
achieve better cooling in a car that runs hot?


Dave
Ingersoll,Ontario
My web site:   http://members.tripod.com/benj30/


- Original Message - 
From: "John Nasta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "The Chevelle Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 11:57 PM
Subject: RE: [Chevelle-list] thermostat question


> When doing a show car and wanting to keep the original look etc. You don't
> worry about it overheating in traffic, because it is not a driver.
>
> As pointed out all too many times already, changing to s higher degree
> thermostat will not prevent the car from running hot.
>
> Calm down, honcho.
>
> Thank you,
> John Nasta
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dave Benjamin
> Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 11:22 PM
> To: The Chevelle Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] thermostat question
>
> When doing a show car and wanting to keep the original look etc. You don't
> add a 7 blade fan, you don't butcher a fan shroud into THE CAR EITHER. I
> changed the thermostat to keep it running COOL.
>
> YES THAT IS MY POINT AND I HOPE IT HELPS YOUR DISCUSSION
> JOHN
>
>
> Dave
> Ingersoll,Ontario
> My web site:   http://members.tripod.com/benj30/
>
>
>
>
>




RE: [Chevelle-list] thermostat question

2004-04-01 Thread John Nasta
When doing a show car and wanting to keep the original look etc. You don't
worry about it overheating in traffic, because it is not a driver.

As pointed out all too many times already, changing to s higher degree
thermostat will not prevent the car from running hot.

Calm down, honcho.

Thank you,
John Nasta



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dave Benjamin
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 11:22 PM
To: The Chevelle Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] thermostat question

When doing a show car and wanting to keep the original look etc. You don't
add a 7 blade fan, you don't butcher a fan shroud into THE CAR EITHER. I
changed the thermostat to keep it running COOL.

YES THAT IS MY POINT AND I HOPE IT HELPS YOUR DISCUSSION
JOHN


Dave
Ingersoll,Ontario
My web site:   http://members.tripod.com/benj30/







Re: [Chevelle-list] thermostat question

2004-04-01 Thread Dave Benjamin
When doing a show car and wanting to keep the original look etc. You don't
add a 7 blade fan, you don't butcher a fan shroud into THE CAR EITHER. I
changed the thermostat to keep it running COOL.

YES THAT IS MY POINT AND I HOPE IT HELPS YOUR DISCUSSION
JOHN


Dave
Ingersoll,Ontario
My web site:   http://members.tripod.com/benj30/


- Original Message - 
From: "John Nasta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "The Chevelle Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 1:51 PM
Subject: RE: [Chevelle-list] thermostat question


> I believe you. Is that connected in any way to this discussion of how to
> achieve better cooling in a car that runs hot?
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dave Benjamin
> Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 1:05 PM
> To: The Chevelle Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] thermostat question
>
> My 66 was factory 4 blade fan, rad size  with 2 spd and no shroud.
>
> Dave
> Ingersoll,Ontario
> My web site:   http://members.tripod.com/benj30/
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "John Nasta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "The Chevelle Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 12:53 PM
> Subject: RE: [Chevelle-list] thermostat question
>
>
> > As Brad pointed out, the thermostat has more to do with engine warming
> than
> > cooling. A fan shroud, a higher volume fan, a smaller WP pulley, or a
> bigger
> > (or less restricted) radiator would help.
> >
> > John Nasta
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dave Benjamin
> > Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 12:29 PM
> > To: The Chevelle Mailing List
> > Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] thermostat question
> >
> > I tried a 160 in my 1966 chevelle and it didn't work very well. There
was
> no
> > fan shroud factory and ounce the motor got up to 160 it wouldn't (open/
> > close) cycle. It would stay open therefore not very good cooling. The
180
> > worked fine it it.
> >
> > Dave
> > Ingersoll,Ontario
> > My web site:   http://members.tripod.com/benj30/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>




RE: [Chevelle-list] thermostat question

2004-04-01 Thread Dale McIntosh
Reading what Stewart (a popular name in aftermarket water pumps) says about
thermostats:

A common misconception is that if coolant flows too quickly through the
system, that it will not have time to cool properly. However the cooling
system is a closed loop, so if you are keeping the coolant in the radiator
longer to allow it to cool, you are also allowing it to stay in the engine
longer, which increases coolant temperatures. Coolant in the engine will
actually boil away from critical heat areas within the cooling system if not
forced through the cooling system at a sufficiently high velocity. This
situation is a common cause of so-called "hot spots", which can lead to
failures.

Years ago, cars used low pressure radiator caps with upright-style
radiators. At high RPM, the water pump pressure would overcome the radiator
cap's rating and force coolant out, resulting in an overheated engine. Many
enthusiasts mistakenly believed that these situations were caused because
the coolant was flowing through the radiator so quickly, that it did not
have time to cool. Using restrictors or slowing water pump speed prevented
the coolant from being forced out, and allowed the engine to run cooler.
However, cars built in the past thirty years have used cross flow radiators
that position the radiator cap on the low pressure (suction) side of the
system. This type of system does not subject the radiator cap to pressure
from the water pump, so it benefits from maximizing coolant flow, not
restricting it.

Dale McIntosh




Re: [Chevelle-list] thermostat question

2004-04-01 Thread Wayne
I  read a bunch of he replies,,  some vary good points. Still not sure if
your 210 Deg  is with a thermostat installed ?
A 195 deg will keep the coolant in the radiator the longest = the lowest
possible coolant temp re entering the block... If you  Rad at present dose
not have the ability to dissipate the heat.. a number of the options  can
help..
!. fan shroud
2. larger air flow fan
3. HI flow water pump ( higher exchange rate = more time for coolant in the
rad )
4. smaller dia pulley see above,plus higher fan speed at low RPM's

Wayne
ACES # 1556
TC # 186

From: "J. Brady" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 11:23 AM
Subject: [Chevelle-list] thermostat question


> Hi Gang,
>
> I just ordered a Be Cool 180 degree thermostat for my
> '66 327 from Jeg's, and had a question about it-  They
> also offered a 160 degree model.  I spoke w/another
> car enthusiast, and they advised to stick with the 180
> thermostat, as the 160 might impact how well the
> heater performs in the Winter.  Can anyone provide any
> feedback on the 2 options, and will this definitely
> help my motor run cooler?  She currently runs a
> constant 210.  I wanted to see what options I had
> without having to install an electric fan just yet..
>
> Thanks!
>
> Jim
>
> '66 Malibu
> '59 Corvette
> 1959 Corvette Registry, Webmaster
> http://59vette.cjb.net
>
> __
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway
> http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/
>
>
>





RE: [Chevelle-list] thermostat question

2004-04-01 Thread John Nasta
That's a good point. Assuming the radiator is good, I would try a 7-blade
fan. A restrictor also means that the coolant is staying in the block
longer. It may be self-defeating. Doesn't sound like a good idea to me. As
Brad said, a shroud also helps quite a bit. You can also have an air dam
down below to help force the fan to pull air through the radiator rather
than from under the bumper.

John Nasta



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ed Riggins
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 1:29 PM
To: The Chevelle Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] thermostat question

Which also runs the pump faster and may not allow the water to go through
the
radiator slow
enough for thermal efficiency.  Have you heard of people putting restrictors
on
the return
side of the radiator to do just that?  But unless the radiator is new or
obviously in perfect
condition, I've always found that the best place to start with a heating
problem.  My .02. ER

John Nasta wrote:

> Try a smaller WP pulley. Just think of a 10-speed bike. It will make your
> fan turn at a higher RPM.
>
> John Nasta
> Old Car Network
> http://oldcarnetwork.com
>





Re: [Chevelle-list] thermostat question

2004-04-01 Thread Capt Crunch
If it runs at a constant 210 a thermostat will do nothing for you if your 
current one is operation correctlly. Radiator and water pump(pulley) would 
be where to look for cooler constant temp. I agree that most times the 
radiator is at fault... whether is is too small, old, partially blocked... 
etc.

Mikey

_
Find a broadband plan that fits. Great local deals on high-speed Internet 
access. 
https://broadband.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-us/go/onm00200360ave/direct/01/




RE: [Chevelle-list] thermostat question

2004-04-01 Thread John Nasta
I believe you. Is that connected in any way to this discussion of how to
achieve better cooling in a car that runs hot?


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dave Benjamin
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 1:05 PM
To: The Chevelle Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] thermostat question

My 66 was factory 4 blade fan, rad size  with 2 spd and no shroud.

Dave
Ingersoll,Ontario
My web site:   http://members.tripod.com/benj30/



- Original Message -
From: "John Nasta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "The Chevelle Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 12:53 PM
Subject: RE: [Chevelle-list] thermostat question


> As Brad pointed out, the thermostat has more to do with engine warming
than
> cooling. A fan shroud, a higher volume fan, a smaller WP pulley, or a
bigger
> (or less restricted) radiator would help.
>
> John Nasta
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dave Benjamin
> Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 12:29 PM
> To: The Chevelle Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] thermostat question
>
> I tried a 160 in my 1966 chevelle and it didn't work very well. There was
no
> fan shroud factory and ounce the motor got up to 160 it wouldn't (open/
> close) cycle. It would stay open therefore not very good cooling. The 180
> worked fine it it.
>
> Dave
> Ingersoll,Ontario
> My web site:   http://members.tripod.com/benj30/
>
>
>
>
>





Re: [Chevelle-list] thermostat question

2004-04-01 Thread Ed Riggins
Which also runs the pump faster and may not allow the water to go through the
radiator slow
enough for thermal efficiency.  Have you heard of people putting restrictors on
the return
side of the radiator to do just that?  But unless the radiator is new or
obviously in perfect
condition, I've always found that the best place to start with a heating
problem.  My .02. ER

John Nasta wrote:

> Try a smaller WP pulley. Just think of a 10-speed bike. It will make your
> fan turn at a higher RPM.
>
> John Nasta
> Old Car Network
> http://oldcarnetwork.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 11:48 AM
> To: The Chevelle Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] thermostat question
>
> Unless you live in a hot climate (which you don't) a 180 thermostat is fine
> for the street.  However, if your cooling system currently is at 210 the
> thermostat alone won't fix it; it'll open earlier (do you have a 195 in
> there now?) and slow the temperature ascent but eventually it'll still reach
> 210.  Have you verified that this 210 reading is accurate?  Factory gauge or
> aftermarket?  How old is the sending unit?  GM gauges work based on
> resistance and if you can locate the resistance scale for your car (a
> factory service manual might contain it) you can use a combination of
> resistors to check the accuracy of the gauge.
>
> A fan shroud always helps with a mechanical fan but I don't know if '66s
> came with one from the factory or what your feeling is regarding the
> addition of one.  I personally like fixed-blade fans used in conjuction with
> thermal clutches.
>
> The radiator isn't very old, is it?  How long has it been since the system's
> been flushed?
>
> Brad O.
>
> > I just ordered a Be Cool 180 degree thermostat for my '66 327 from Jeg's,
> and had a
> > question about it-  They also offered a 160 degree model.  I spoke
> w/another car
> > enthusiast, and they advised to stick with the 180 thermostat, as the 160
> might impact
> > how well the heater performs in the Winter.  Can anyone provide any
> feedback on the 2
> > options, and will this definitely help my motor run cooler?  She currently
> runs a
> > constant 210.  I wanted to see what options I had without having to
> install an electric
> > fan just yet..
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Jim




Re: [Chevelle-list] thermostat question

2004-04-01 Thread Dave Benjamin
My 66 was factory 4 blade fan, rad size  with 2 spd and no shroud.

Dave
Ingersoll,Ontario
My web site:   http://members.tripod.com/benj30/



- Original Message - 
From: "John Nasta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "The Chevelle Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 12:53 PM
Subject: RE: [Chevelle-list] thermostat question


> As Brad pointed out, the thermostat has more to do with engine warming
than
> cooling. A fan shroud, a higher volume fan, a smaller WP pulley, or a
bigger
> (or less restricted) radiator would help.
>
> John Nasta
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dave Benjamin
> Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 12:29 PM
> To: The Chevelle Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] thermostat question
>
> I tried a 160 in my 1966 chevelle and it didn't work very well. There was
no
> fan shroud factory and ounce the motor got up to 160 it wouldn't (open/
> close) cycle. It would stay open therefore not very good cooling. The 180
> worked fine it it.
>
> Dave
> Ingersoll,Ontario
> My web site:   http://members.tripod.com/benj30/
>
>
>
>
>




RE: [Chevelle-list] thermostat question

2004-04-01 Thread John Nasta
As Brad pointed out, the thermostat has more to do with engine warming than
cooling. A fan shroud, a higher volume fan, a smaller WP pulley, or a bigger
(or less restricted) radiator would help.

John Nasta



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dave Benjamin
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 12:29 PM
To: The Chevelle Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] thermostat question

I tried a 160 in my 1966 chevelle and it didn't work very well. There was no
fan shroud factory and ounce the motor got up to 160 it wouldn't (open/
close) cycle. It would stay open therefore not very good cooling. The 180
worked fine it it.

Dave
Ingersoll,Ontario
My web site:   http://members.tripod.com/benj30/







Re: [Chevelle-list] thermostat question

2004-04-01 Thread Dave Benjamin
I tried a 160 in my 1966 chevelle and it didn't work very well. There was no
fan shroud factory and ounce the motor got up to 160 it wouldn't (open/
close) cycle. It would stay open therefore not very good cooling. The 180
worked fine it it.

Dave
Ingersoll,Ontario
My web site:   http://members.tripod.com/benj30/


- Original Message - 
From: "John Nasta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "The Chevelle Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 12:19 PM
Subject: RE: [Chevelle-list] thermostat question


> Try a smaller WP pulley. Just think of a 10-speed bike. It will make your
> fan turn at a higher RPM.
>
> John Nasta
> Old Car Network
> http://oldcarnetwork.com
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 11:48 AM
> To: The Chevelle Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] thermostat question
>
> Unless you live in a hot climate (which you don't) a 180 thermostat is
fine
> for the street.  However, if your cooling system currently is at 210 the
> thermostat alone won't fix it; it'll open earlier (do you have a 195 in
> there now?) and slow the temperature ascent but eventually it'll still
reach
> 210.  Have you verified that this 210 reading is accurate?  Factory gauge
or
> aftermarket?  How old is the sending unit?  GM gauges work based on
> resistance and if you can locate the resistance scale for your car (a
> factory service manual might contain it) you can use a combination of
> resistors to check the accuracy of the gauge.
>
> A fan shroud always helps with a mechanical fan but I don't know if '66s
> came with one from the factory or what your feeling is regarding the
> addition of one.  I personally like fixed-blade fans used in conjuction
with
> thermal clutches.
>
> The radiator isn't very old, is it?  How long has it been since the
system's
> been flushed?
>
> Brad O.
>
>
>
> > I just ordered a Be Cool 180 degree thermostat for my '66 327 from
Jeg's,
> and had a
> > question about it-  They also offered a 160 degree model.  I spoke
> w/another car
> > enthusiast, and they advised to stick with the 180 thermostat, as the
160
> might impact
> > how well the heater performs in the Winter.  Can anyone provide any
> feedback on the 2
> > options, and will this definitely help my motor run cooler?  She
currently
> runs a
> > constant 210.  I wanted to see what options I had without having to
> install an electric
> > fan just yet..
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Jim
>
>




RE: [Chevelle-list] thermostat question

2004-04-01 Thread John Nasta
Try a smaller WP pulley. Just think of a 10-speed bike. It will make your
fan turn at a higher RPM.

John Nasta
Old Car Network
http://oldcarnetwork.com


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 11:48 AM
To: The Chevelle Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] thermostat question

Unless you live in a hot climate (which you don't) a 180 thermostat is fine
for the street.  However, if your cooling system currently is at 210 the
thermostat alone won't fix it; it'll open earlier (do you have a 195 in
there now?) and slow the temperature ascent but eventually it'll still reach
210.  Have you verified that this 210 reading is accurate?  Factory gauge or
aftermarket?  How old is the sending unit?  GM gauges work based on
resistance and if you can locate the resistance scale for your car (a
factory service manual might contain it) you can use a combination of
resistors to check the accuracy of the gauge.

A fan shroud always helps with a mechanical fan but I don't know if '66s
came with one from the factory or what your feeling is regarding the
addition of one.  I personally like fixed-blade fans used in conjuction with
thermal clutches.

The radiator isn't very old, is it?  How long has it been since the system's
been flushed?

Brad O.



> I just ordered a Be Cool 180 degree thermostat for my '66 327 from Jeg's,
and had a
> question about it-  They also offered a 160 degree model.  I spoke
w/another car
> enthusiast, and they advised to stick with the 180 thermostat, as the 160
might impact
> how well the heater performs in the Winter.  Can anyone provide any
feedback on the 2
> options, and will this definitely help my motor run cooler?  She currently
runs a
> constant 210.  I wanted to see what options I had without having to
install an electric
> fan just yet..
>
> Thanks!
>
> Jim




Re: [Chevelle-list] thermostat question

2004-04-01 Thread bdo_chevelle
Unless you live in a hot climate (which you don't) a 180 thermostat is fine for the 
street.  However, if your cooling system currently is at 210 the thermostat alone 
won't fix it; it'll open earlier (do you have a 195 in there now?) and slow the 
temperature ascent but eventually it'll still reach 210.  Have you verified that this 
210 reading is accurate?  Factory gauge or aftermarket?  How old is the sending unit?  
GM gauges work based on resistance and if you can locate the resistance scale for your 
car (a factory service manual might contain it) you can use a combination of resistors 
to check the accuracy of the gauge.

A fan shroud always helps with a mechanical fan but I don't know if '66s came with one 
from the factory or what your feeling is regarding the addition of one.  I personally 
like fixed-blade fans used in conjuction with thermal clutches.

The radiator isn't very old, is it?  How long has it been since the system's been 
flushed?

Brad O.



> I just ordered a Be Cool 180 degree thermostat for my '66 327 from Jeg's, and had a
> question about it-  They also offered a 160 degree model.  I spoke w/another car
> enthusiast, and they advised to stick with the 180 thermostat, as the 160 might 
> impact
> how well the heater performs in the Winter.  Can anyone provide any feedback on the 2
> options, and will this definitely help my motor run cooler?  She currently runs a
> constant 210.  I wanted to see what options I had without having to install an 
> electric
> fan just yet..
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Jim