Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Add proper list checks to assq/assv/assoc and memq/memv/member

2014-01-27 Thread Peter Bex
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 01:06:48PM +0100, Moritz Heidkamp wrote:
> > You somehow missed C_i_memv, though, which resulted in library-tests
> > to fail.  So at least the tests are complete :)
> 
> Hm, that's weird, I was sure I had given it a final run. Anyway, I might
> be missing something but my patch actually does cover C_i_memv (lines
> 73-82), doesn't it? AFAICT you added another check to C_u_i_memq,
> referring to memv in the error message. But isn't the point of C_u_*
> variants to be unchecked?

I don't know, I seem to be losing my mind or something :)

> Note that I made a bootstrap build before running the tests. Maybe
> that's why the tests didn't fail for me?

I did a full rebuild using the new CHICKEN.  The test failed because
it did not receive an error so that's unlikely to be due to old code.

Cheers,
Peter
-- 
http://www.more-magic.net

___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers


Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Add proper list checks to assq/assv/assoc and memq/memv/member

2014-01-27 Thread Moritz Heidkamp
Hey Peter,

Peter Bex  writes:

> Thanks for this one.

thanks for reviewing!


> You somehow missed C_i_memv, though, which resulted in library-tests
> to fail.  So at least the tests are complete :)

Hm, that's weird, I was sure I had given it a final run. Anyway, I might
be missing something but my patch actually does cover C_i_memv (lines
73-82), doesn't it? AFAICT you added another check to C_u_i_memq,
referring to memv in the error message. But isn't the point of C_u_*
variants to be unchecked?

Note that I made a bootstrap build before running the tests. Maybe
that's why the tests didn't fail for me?
 
Thanks again and cheers!
Moritz

___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers


Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Add proper list checks to assq/assv/assoc and memq/memv/member

2014-01-26 Thread Peter Bex
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 02:56:45PM +0100, Moritz Heidkamp wrote:
> Fellow Chickeneers,
> 
> please see the commit message of the attached patch for details!

Thanks for this one.  You somehow missed C_i_memv, though, which
resulted in library-tests to fail.  So at least the tests are
complete :)

I've fixed that small bug and pushed the change.

Cheers,
Peter
-- 
http://www.more-magic.net

___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers


[Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Add proper list checks to assq/assv/assoc and memq/memv/member

2014-01-24 Thread Moritz Heidkamp
Fellow Chickeneers,

please see the commit message of the attached patch for details!

Cheers
Moritz

>From 16396c41c63699e261f108af4cf48e15eb54bdde Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Moritz Heidkamp 
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 12:20:11 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Add proper list checks to assq/assv/assoc and
 memq/memv/member

Previously it was possible to pass any kind of value to these procedures
as their list argument and they would just return #f in that case. This
patch adds checks to the checked variants at the end of the loop so it
will only incur additional runtime cost if either a non-list is passed
as the list argument or if the sought element is not found.

Note that this patch has the side-effect of also erroring out on
improper lists in the not-found case. This lead to an error getting
raised in the scrutinizer which is taken care of in this patch, too.

Furthermore, the test cases added for all procedures affected by this
patch uncovered a bug in the specializations defined for assq, assv, and
assoc in types.db which would specialize to the unsafe inlined variant
of assq for any kind of list rather than lists of pairs. This is also
fixed.
---
 runtime.c   | 18 ++
 scrutinizer.scm |  2 +-
 tests/library-tests.scm | 35 +++
 types.db|  6 +++---
 4 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/runtime.c b/runtime.c
index c90b9dd..58dde49 100644
--- a/runtime.c
+++ b/runtime.c
@@ -5518,6 +5518,9 @@ C_regparm C_word C_fcall C_i_assq(C_word x, C_word lst)
 lst = C_u_i_cdr(lst);
   }
 
+  if(lst!=C_SCHEME_END_OF_LIST)
+barf(C_BAD_ARGUMENT_TYPE_ERROR, "assq", lst);
+
   return C_SCHEME_FALSE;
 }
 
@@ -5537,6 +5540,9 @@ C_regparm C_word C_fcall C_i_assv(C_word x, C_word lst)
 lst = C_u_i_cdr(lst);
   }
 
+  if(lst!=C_SCHEME_END_OF_LIST)
+barf(C_BAD_ARGUMENT_TYPE_ERROR, "assv", lst);
+
   return C_SCHEME_FALSE;
 }
 
@@ -5556,6 +5562,9 @@ C_regparm C_word C_fcall C_i_assoc(C_word x, C_word lst)
 lst = C_u_i_cdr(lst);
   }
 
+  if(lst!=C_SCHEME_END_OF_LIST)
+barf(C_BAD_ARGUMENT_TYPE_ERROR, "assoc", lst);
+
   return C_SCHEME_FALSE;
 }
 
@@ -5567,6 +5576,9 @@ C_regparm C_word C_fcall C_i_memq(C_word x, C_word lst)
 else lst = C_u_i_cdr(lst);
   }
 
+  if(lst!=C_SCHEME_END_OF_LIST)
+barf(C_BAD_ARGUMENT_TYPE_ERROR, "memq", lst);
+
   return C_SCHEME_FALSE;
 }
 
@@ -5589,6 +5601,9 @@ C_regparm C_word C_fcall C_i_memv(C_word x, C_word lst)
 else lst = C_u_i_cdr(lst);
   }
 
+  if(lst!=C_SCHEME_END_OF_LIST)
+barf(C_BAD_ARGUMENT_TYPE_ERROR, "memv", lst);
+
   return C_SCHEME_FALSE;
 }
 
@@ -5599,6 +5614,9 @@ C_regparm C_word C_fcall C_i_member(C_word x, C_word lst)
 if(C_equalp(C_u_i_car(lst), x)) return lst;
 else lst = C_u_i_cdr(lst);
   }
+
+  if(lst!=C_SCHEME_END_OF_LIST)
+barf(C_BAD_ARGUMENT_TYPE_ERROR, "member", lst);
   
   return C_SCHEME_FALSE;
 }
diff --git a/scrutinizer.scm b/scrutinizer.scm
index 020949d..e29e847 100644
--- a/scrutinizer.scm
+++ b/scrutinizer.scm
@@ -2029,7 +2029,7 @@
 		  t))
 	((eq? 'deprecated (car t))
 	 (and (= 2 (length t)) (symbol? (second t)) t))
-	((or (memq '--> t) (memq '-> t)) =>
+	((and (list? t) (or (memq '--> t) (memq '-> t))) =>
 	 (lambda (p)
 	   (let* ((cleanf (eq? '--> (car p)))
 		  (ok (or (not rec) (not cleanf
diff --git a/tests/library-tests.scm b/tests/library-tests.scm
index 5418fbb..df0639f 100644
--- a/tests/library-tests.scm
+++ b/tests/library-tests.scm
@@ -541,3 +541,38 @@ A
 (assert (equal? '#(2 3) (subvector '#(1 2 3) 1)))
 (assert (equal? '#(2)   (subvector '#(1 2 3) 1 2)))
 (assert (equal? '#()(subvector '#(1 2 3) 1 1)))
+
+;;; alist accessors
+
+(assert (equal? '(foo) (assq 'foo '((foo)
+(assert (not (assq 'foo '(
+(assert-fail (assq 'foo '(bar)))
+(assert-fail (assq 'foo 'bar))
+
+
+(assert (equal? '(foo) (assv 'foo '((foo)
+(assert (not (assv 'foo '(
+(assert-fail (assv 'foo '(bar)))
+(assert-fail (assv 'foo 'bar))
+
+(assert (equal? '("foo") (assoc "foo" '(("foo")
+(assert (not (assoc "foo" '(
+(assert-fail (assoc "foo" '("bar")))
+(assert-fail (assoc "foo" "bar"))
+
+;;; list membership
+
+(assert (equal? '(foo) (memq 'foo '(bar foo
+(assert (not (memq 'foo '(bar
+(assert (not (memq 'foo '(
+(assert-fail (memq 'foo 'foo))
+
+(assert (equal? '(foo) (memv 'foo '(bar foo
+(assert (not (memv 'foo '(bar
+(assert (not (memv 'foo '(
+(assert-fail (memv 'foo 'foo))
+
+(assert (equal? '("foo") (member "foo" '("bar" "foo"
+(assert (not (member "foo" '("bar"
+(assert (not (member "foo" '(
+(assert-fail (member "foo" "foo"))
diff --git a/types.db b/types.db
index f1d87a3..7156c9b 100644
--- a/types.db
+++ b/types.db
@@ -189,11 +189,11 @@
 
 (assq (forall (a b) (#(procedure #:clean) assq (* (list-of (pair a b)))
 		 (or boolean (pair a b
-  ((* list) (##core#inline "C_u_i_assq" #(1) #(2
+  ((* (list-of pai