Re: Chicken on Debian
On Sun, 10 Jan 2021 14:15:14 -0700 Duke Normandin wrote: > On Sun, 10 Jan 2021 22:05:21 +0100 > Mario Domenech Goulart wrote: > > Hey Mario ... > > Thanks for all the help!! You're welcome! > [snip] > >> If you want to compile CHICKEN from sources, it's a piece of cake >> on Linux, and doesn't depend on much more than what you'd need to >> install eggs. You'll need a C toolchain and GNU make. >> >> In case that's a viable alternative for you, below is a simple >> recipe that will install CHICKEN in $HOME/local/chicken-5.2.0 >> (you can change that, of course). >> >> $ wget >> http://code.call-cc.org/releases/5.2.0/chicken-5.2.0.tar.gz $ tar >> xzvf chicken-5.2.0.tar.gz $ cd chicken-5.2.0 >> $ make PLATFORM=linux PREFIX=$HOME/local/chicken-5.2.0 install > > Is 5.2.0 "Bleeding Edge" where I'll be in trouble all the time? :) 5.2.0 is the most stable release so far. It's the best CHICKEN can offer at the moment. :-) > And making a bunch of noise on this list? No problem. > I'll see what I do have for a toolchain and go from there. Much > obliged! You're welcome. Good luck! All the best. Mario -- http://parenteses.org/mario
Re: Chicken on Debian
On Sun, 10 Jan 2021 22:05:21 +0100 Mario Domenech Goulart wrote: > $ wget > http://code.call-cc.org/releases/5.2.0/chicken-5.2.0.tar.gz $ tar > xzvf chicken-5.2.0.tar.gz $ cd chicken-5.2.0 > $ make PLATFORM=linux PREFIX=$HOME/local/chicken-5.2.0 install dnormandin@ASUSLAP:~$ ls local/chicken-5.2.0/bin/ chicken chicken-do chicken-install chicken-profile chicken-status chicken-uninstall csc csi feathers :-D
Re: Chicken on Debian
On Sun, 10 Jan 2021 22:05:21 +0100 Mario Domenech Goulart wrote: Hey Mario ... Thanks for all the help!! [snip] > If you want to compile CHICKEN from sources, it's a piece of cake > on Linux, and doesn't depend on much more than what you'd need to > install eggs. You'll need a C toolchain and GNU make. > > In case that's a viable alternative for you, below is a simple > recipe that will install CHICKEN in $HOME/local/chicken-5.2.0 > (you can change that, of course). > > $ wget > http://code.call-cc.org/releases/5.2.0/chicken-5.2.0.tar.gz $ tar > xzvf chicken-5.2.0.tar.gz $ cd chicken-5.2.0 > $ make PLATFORM=linux PREFIX=$HOME/local/chicken-5.2.0 install Is 5.2.0 "Bleeding Edge" where I'll be in trouble all the time? :) And making a bunch of noise on this list? I'll see what I do have for a toolchain and go from there. Much obliged! -- Duke
Re: Chicken on Debian
On Sun, 10 Jan 2021 22:12:50 +0200 Lassi Kortela wrote: > > dnormandin@ASUSLAP:~$ sudo apt install chicken-bin=5.2.0 > > E: Version '5.2.0' for 'chicken-bin' was not found > > 5.2.0 is in Debian Testing and Unstable. > https://repology.org/project/chicken/versions Thanks! I'm rusty with 'apt' utility. I want to update my /etc/apt/sources.list I'm NOT winning because I'm not using the correct URL. Would you please give me a clue. My last entry was: deb http://deb.debian.org/debian buster/lisp main but that doesn't seem to pick up the 4.13.0-1 version. Only an older version: dnormandin@ASUSLAP:~$ apt search chicken-bin Sorting... Done Full Text Search... Done chicken-bin/oldstable 4.11.0-1 amd64 Practical and portable Scheme system - compiler -- Duke
Re: Chicken on Debian
Hi Duke, On Sun, 10 Jan 2021 13:09:37 -0700 Duke Normandin wrote: > Debian shows only: > > dnormandin@ASUSLAP:~$ apt search chicken > Sorting... Done > Full Text Search... Done > chicken-bin/oldstable 4.11.0-1 amd64 > Practical and portable Scheme system - compiler > > dnormandin@ASUSLAP:~$ sudo apt install chicken-bin=5.2.0 > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree > Reading state information... Done > E: Version '5.2.0' for 'chicken-bin' was not found If you want to compile CHICKEN from sources, it's a piece of cake on Linux, and doesn't depend on much more than what you'd need to install eggs. You'll need a C toolchain and GNU make. In case that's a viable alternative for you, below is a simple recipe that will install CHICKEN in $HOME/local/chicken-5.2.0 (you can change that, of course). $ wget http://code.call-cc.org/releases/5.2.0/chicken-5.2.0.tar.gz $ tar xzvf chicken-5.2.0.tar.gz $ cd chicken-5.2.0 $ make PLATFORM=linux PREFIX=$HOME/local/chicken-5.2.0 install You can add $HOME/local/chicken-5.2.0/bin to $PATH to execute the CHICKEN tools without providing the path to them. All the best. Mario -- http://parenteses.org/mario
Re: Chicken on Debian
dnormandin@ASUSLAP:~$ sudo apt install chicken-bin=5.2.0 E: Version '5.2.0' for 'chicken-bin' was not found 5.2.0 is in Debian Testing and Unstable. https://repology.org/project/chicken/versions
Chicken on Debian
Debian shows only: dnormandin@ASUSLAP:~$ apt search chicken Sorting... Done Full Text Search... Done chicken-bin/oldstable 4.11.0-1 amd64 Practical and portable Scheme system - compiler dnormandin@ASUSLAP:~$ sudo apt install chicken-bin=5.2.0 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done E: Version '5.2.0' for 'chicken-bin' was not found Is there a Debian maintainer in the crowd? Anybody got Mr Putin's mobile # so that I can report this serious matter? ROTFL -- Duke
Re: [Chicken-users] Debian 9 amd64 chicken-bin 4.11.0-1 cannot import from undefined module process-context
On 9/17/19 10:46 PM, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote: $ wgethttp://code.call-cc.org/releases/5.1.0/chicken-5.1.0.tar.gz $ tar xzvf chicken-5.1.0.tar.gz $ cd chicken-5.1.0 $ make PLATFORM=linux PREFIX=$HOME/local/chicken-5.1.0 install $ export PATH=$PATH:$HOME/local/chicken-5.1.0/bin On 9/17/19 11:09 PM, Peter Bex wrote: You don't need to be root if you set PREFIX to a user-writable directory. Remove Debian chicken-bin: 2019-09-17 23:16:26 root@tinkywinky ~ # apt-get remove chicken-bin Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required: libchicken-dev libchicken8 libpcre3-dev libpcre32-3 libpcrecpp0v5 Use 'apt autoremove' to remove them. The following packages will be REMOVED: chicken-bin 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 to remove and 0 not upgraded. After this operation, 5903 kB disk space will be freed. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y (Reading database ... 115436 files and directories currently installed.) Removing chicken-bin (4.11.0-1) ... Processing triggers for man-db (2.7.6.1-2) ... 2019-09-17 23:17:15 root@tinkywinky ~ # apt autoremove Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages will be REMOVED: libchicken-dev libchicken8 libpcre3-dev libpcre32-3 libpcrecpp0v5 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 5 to remove and 0 not upgraded. After this operation, 14.9 MB disk space will be freed. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y (Reading database ... 115333 files and directories currently installed.) Removing libchicken-dev (4.11.0-1) ... Removing libchicken8 (4.11.0-1) ... Removing libpcre3-dev:amd64 (2:8.39-3) ... Removing libpcre32-3:amd64 (2:8.39-3) ... Removing libpcrecpp0v5:amd64 (2:8.39-3) ... Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.24-11+deb9u4) ... Processing triggers for man-db (2.7.6.1-2) ... Download Chicken tarball with Firefox. Checksum: 2019-09-17 23:23:58 dpchrist@tinkywinky ~/samba/dpchrist/Downloads/c/chicken-scheme $ ll total 4109 drwxr-xr-x+ 2 dpchrist dpchrist 0 2019-09-17 23:23:17 ./ drwxr-xr-x+ 38 dpchrist dpchrist 0 2019-09-17 23:21:59 ../ -rw-r--r--+ 1 dpchrist dpchrist 86 2019-09-17 23:23:04 SHA256SUM -rw-r--r--+ 1 dpchrist dpchrist 4071169 2019-09-17 23:22:04 chicken-5.1.0.tar.gz 2019-09-17 23:23:42 dpchrist@tinkywinky ~/samba/dpchrist/Downloads/c/chicken-scheme $ cat SHA256SUM 5c1101a8d8faabfd500ad69101e0c7c8bd826c68970f89c270640470e7b84b4b *chicken-5.1.0.tar.gz 2019-09-17 23:24:05 dpchrist@tinkywinky ~/samba/dpchrist/Downloads/c/chicken-scheme $ sha256sum -c SHA256SUM chicken-5.1.0.tar.gz: OK Build: 2019-09-17 23:26:31 dpchrist@tinkywinky ~/build $ tar -xzf ~/samba/dpchrist/Downloads/c/chicken-scheme/chicken-5.1.0.tar.gz 2019-09-17 23:27:17 dpchrist@tinkywinky ~/build $ cd chicken-5.1.0/ 2019-09-17 23:28:23 dpchrist@tinkywinky ~/build/chicken-5.1.0 $ make PLATFORM=linux PREFIX=$HOME/local/chicken-5.1.0 install echo '#define C_CHICKEN_PROGRAM "chicken"' >> chicken-defaults.h echo '#ifndef C_INSTALL_CC' >> chicken-defaults.h echo '# define C_INSTALL_CC "gcc"' >> chicken-defaults.h install -m 644 ./LICENSE "/home/dpchrist/local/chicken-5.1.0/share/chicken/doc" install -m 644 ./setup.defaults "/home/dpchrist/local/chicken-5.1.0/share/chicken" install -m 644 ./feathers.tcl "/home/dpchrist/local/chicken-5.1.0/share/chicken" Adjust PATH: 2019-09-17 23:47:49 dpchrist@tinkywinky ~ $ export PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/games:/usr/games:/home/dpchrist/local/chicken-5.1.0/bin Test: 2019-09-17 23:49:00 dpchrist@tinkywinky ~ $ cd sandbox/chicken-scheme 2019-09-17 23:49:43 dpchrist@tinkywinky ~/sandbox/chicken-scheme $ csc -o palindrome palindrome.scm 2019-09-17 23:50:26 dpchrist@tinkywinky ~/sandbox/chicken-scheme $ ./palindrome level level is a palindrome 2019-09-17 23:50:33 dpchrist@tinkywinky ~/sandbox/chicken-scheme $ ./palindrome label label isn't a palindrome Thank you, everyone. :-) David ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Re: [Chicken-users] Debian 9 amd64 chicken-bin 4.11.0-1 cannot import from undefined module process-context
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 11:00:17PM -0700, David Christensen wrote: > The current release of Chicken appears to be 5.1.0: > > https://code.call-cc.org/ Correct. > I do not see a Debian backport: > > https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=chicken=names=all=stretch-backports Yeah, Debian... I think I asked for a CHICKEN 5.0.0 port when it came out but nobody was interested in packaging it. > Does anyone have any experiencing compiling, installing, and running Chicken > 5.1.0 from a source tarball on Debian 9? Can I do this with a normal user > account? I used to do it all the time. I still do, but now I run Debian 10. You don't need to be root if you set PREFIX to a user-writable directory. Cheers, Peter signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Re: [Chicken-users] Debian 9 amd64 chicken-bin 4.11.0-1 cannot import from undefined module process-context
On 9/17/19 10:36 PM, Vasilij Schneidermann wrote: Hey David, You're using version 4 of the compiler, but version 5 of the documentation. You can tell the latter by looking for the number in the URL. Thanks for the tip. Taking a stab in the dark: http://wiki.call-cc.org/man/4/The%20User's%20Manual http://wiki.call-cc.org/man/4/Getting%20started 2019-09-17 22:49:46 dpchrist@tinkywinky ~/sandbox/chicken-scheme-4 $ cat palindrome.scm ;;; http://wiki.call-cc.org/man/4/Getting%20started ;;; downloaded 2019-09-17 (define (palindrome? x) (define (check left right) (if (>= left right) #t (and (char=? (string-ref x left) (string-ref x right)) (check (add1 left) (sub1 right) (check 0 (sub1 (string-length x (let ((arg (car (command-line-arguments (display (string-append arg (if (palindrome? arg) " is a palindrome\n" " isn't a palindrome\n" 2019-09-17 22:50:17 dpchrist@tinkywinky ~/sandbox/chicken-scheme-4 $ csc -o palindrome palindrome.scm 2019-09-17 22:50:24 dpchrist@tinkywinky ~/sandbox/chicken-scheme-4 $ ./palindrome level level is a palindrome 2019-09-17 22:50:29 dpchrist@tinkywinky ~/sandbox/chicken-scheme-4 $ ./palindrome liver liver isn't a palindrome The current release of Chicken appears to be 5.1.0: https://code.call-cc.org/ I do not see a Debian backport: https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=chicken=names=all=stretch-backports Only a Sid package (no thanks; I prefer stability): https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=chicken=names=all=all Does anyone have any experiencing compiling, installing, and running Chicken 5.1.0 from a source tarball on Debian 9? Can I do this with a normal user account? David ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Re: [Chicken-users] Debian 9 amd64 chicken-bin 4.11.0-1 cannot import from undefined module process-context
On Wed, 18 Sep 2019 07:46:01 +0200 Mario Domenech Goulart wrote: >> 2019-09-17 22:06:21 root@tinkywinky ~ >> # cat /etc/debian_version >> 9.11 >> >> 2019-09-17 22:10:03 root@tinkywinky ~ >> # uname -a >> Linux tinkywinky 4.9.0-11-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.9.189-3 (2019-09-02) >> x86_64 GNU/Linux >> >> 2019-09-17 22:15:35 root@tinkywinky ~ >> # dpkg-query -s chicken-bin >> Package: chicken-bin >> Status: install ok installed >> Priority: optional >> Section: lisp >> Installed-Size: 5765 >> Maintainer: Davide Puricelli (evo) >> Architecture: amd64 >> Source: chicken >> Version: 4.11.0-1 >> Replaces: chicken, chicken-dev >> Depends: libc6 (>= 2.4), libchicken8 (>= 4.11.0), libchicken-dev (= >> 4.11.0-1) >> Conflicts: chicken, chicken-dev >> Description: Practical and portable Scheme system - compiler >> CHICKEN is a Scheme compiler which compiles a subset of R5RS into C. >> It uses the ideas presented in Baker's paper "Cheney on the MTA", and >> has a small core and is easily extendable. >> . >> This package contains the compiler. >> Homepage: http://www.call-cc.org >> >> >> I am attempting to follow: >> >> http://wiki.call-cc.org/man/5/Getting%20started >> >> >> I have created a Scheme program source file: >> >> 2019-09-17 22:07:12 dpchrist@tinkywinky ~/sandbox/chicken-scheme >> $ cat palindrome.scm >> ;;; http://wiki.call-cc.org/man/5/Getting%20started >> ;;; downloaded 2019-09-17 >> >> (import (chicken process-context)) ; for "command-line-arguments" >> >> (define (palindrome? x) >> (define (check left right) >> (if (>= left right) >> #t >> (and (char=? (string-ref x left) (string-ref x right)) >> (check (add1 left) (sub1 right) >> (check 0 (sub1 (string-length x >> >> (let ((arg (car (command-line-arguments >> (display >>(string-append arg >> (if (palindrome? arg) >> " is a palindrome\n" >> " isn't a palindrome\n" >> >> >> When I try to compile: >> >> 2019-09-17 22:07:15 dpchrist@tinkywinky ~/sandbox/chicken-scheme >> $ csc -o palindrome palindrome.scm >> >> Syntax error (import): cannot import from undefined module >> >> process-context >> >> Expansion history: >> >>(##core#begin (import (chicken process-context))) >>(import (chicken process-context))<-- >> >> Error: shell command terminated with non-zero exit status 17920: >> '/usr/bin/chicken' 'palindrome.scm' -output-file 'palindrome.c' >> >> >> I appear to be missing the module "chicken process-context", which is >> supposed to be included (?): >> >> http://wiki.call-cc.org/man/5/Included%20modules >> >> >> Suggestions? > > The problem is that you are using CHICKEN 4 to compile code for CHICKEN > 5. There are some incompatibilities. One of the is the import > declarations for modules. > > Installing CHICKEN 5 from sources on Linux is not difficult and doesn't > require much besied what is required to install eggs (the only extra > requirement is GNU make). In case you wnat to do that, here are the > steps that should work on Debian: > > $ wget http://code.call-cc.org/releases/5.1.0/chicken-5.1.0.tar.gz > $ tar xzvf chicken-5.1.0.tar.gz > $ cd chicken-5.1.0 > $ make PLATFORM=linux PREFIX=$HOME/local/chicken-5.1.0 install > > That will install CHICKEN 5.1.0 under $HOME/local/chicken-5.1.0. > > To have the CHICKEN 5 tools in your environment's PATH, you can do > something like > > $ export PATH=$PATH:$HOME/local/chicken-5.1.0/bin > > assuming you are using Bash. Actually, $ export PATH=$HOME/local/chicken-5.1.0/bin:$PATH if you want the CHICKEN 5 tools to take precedence over the CHICKEN 4 tools from the Debian package. Or you can simply remove the Debian package. > On the CHICKEN 4 -> CHICKEN 5 migration, you might find > http://wiki.call-cc.org/porting-c4-to-c5 helpful. > > If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask them here or in the IRC > channel (Freenode, #chicken). All the best. Mario -- http://parenteses.org/mario ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Re: [Chicken-users] Debian 9 amd64 chicken-bin 4.11.0-1 cannot import from undefined module process-context
Hi David, On Tue, 17 Sep 2019 22:22:26 -0700 David Christensen wrote: > chicken-users: > > I am Chicken noob with (e-mail addresses redacted): Welcome! > 2019-09-17 22:06:21 root@tinkywinky ~ > # cat /etc/debian_version > 9.11 > > 2019-09-17 22:10:03 root@tinkywinky ~ > # uname -a > Linux tinkywinky 4.9.0-11-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.9.189-3 (2019-09-02) > x86_64 GNU/Linux > > 2019-09-17 22:15:35 root@tinkywinky ~ > # dpkg-query -s chicken-bin > Package: chicken-bin > Status: install ok installed > Priority: optional > Section: lisp > Installed-Size: 5765 > Maintainer: Davide Puricelli (evo) > Architecture: amd64 > Source: chicken > Version: 4.11.0-1 > Replaces: chicken, chicken-dev > Depends: libc6 (>= 2.4), libchicken8 (>= 4.11.0), libchicken-dev (= > 4.11.0-1) > Conflicts: chicken, chicken-dev > Description: Practical and portable Scheme system - compiler > CHICKEN is a Scheme compiler which compiles a subset of R5RS into C. > It uses the ideas presented in Baker's paper "Cheney on the MTA", and > has a small core and is easily extendable. > . > This package contains the compiler. > Homepage: http://www.call-cc.org > > > I am attempting to follow: > > http://wiki.call-cc.org/man/5/Getting%20started > > > I have created a Scheme program source file: > > 2019-09-17 22:07:12 dpchrist@tinkywinky ~/sandbox/chicken-scheme > $ cat palindrome.scm > ;;; http://wiki.call-cc.org/man/5/Getting%20started > ;;; downloaded 2019-09-17 > > (import (chicken process-context)) ; for "command-line-arguments" > > (define (palindrome? x) > (define (check left right) > (if (>= left right) > #t > (and (char=? (string-ref x left) (string-ref x right)) > (check (add1 left) (sub1 right) > (check 0 (sub1 (string-length x > > (let ((arg (car (command-line-arguments > (display >(string-append arg > (if (palindrome? arg) > " is a palindrome\n" > " isn't a palindrome\n" > > > When I try to compile: > > 2019-09-17 22:07:15 dpchrist@tinkywinky ~/sandbox/chicken-scheme > $ csc -o palindrome palindrome.scm > > Syntax error (import): cannot import from undefined module > > process-context > > Expansion history: > > (##core#begin (import (chicken process-context))) > (import (chicken process-context))<-- > > Error: shell command terminated with non-zero exit status 17920: > '/usr/bin/chicken' 'palindrome.scm' -output-file 'palindrome.c' > > > I appear to be missing the module "chicken process-context", which is > supposed to be included (?): > > http://wiki.call-cc.org/man/5/Included%20modules > > > Suggestions? The problem is that you are using CHICKEN 4 to compile code for CHICKEN 5. There are some incompatibilities. One of the is the import declarations for modules. Installing CHICKEN 5 from sources on Linux is not difficult and doesn't require much besied what is required to install eggs (the only extra requirement is GNU make). In case you wnat to do that, here are the steps that should work on Debian: $ wget http://code.call-cc.org/releases/5.1.0/chicken-5.1.0.tar.gz $ tar xzvf chicken-5.1.0.tar.gz $ cd chicken-5.1.0 $ make PLATFORM=linux PREFIX=$HOME/local/chicken-5.1.0 install That will install CHICKEN 5.1.0 under $HOME/local/chicken-5.1.0. To have the CHICKEN 5 tools in your environment's PATH, you can do something like $ export PATH=$PATH:$HOME/local/chicken-5.1.0/bin assuming you are using Bash. On the CHICKEN 4 -> CHICKEN 5 migration, you might find http://wiki.call-cc.org/porting-c4-to-c5 helpful. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask them here or in the IRC channel (Freenode, #chicken). All the best. Mario -- http://parenteses.org/mario ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Re: [Chicken-users] Debian 9 amd64 chicken-bin 4.11.0-1 cannot import from undefined module process-context
Hey David, You're using version 4 of the compiler, but version 5 of the documentation. You can tell the latter by looking for the number in the URL. Vasilij___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
[Chicken-users] Debian 9 amd64 chicken-bin 4.11.0-1 cannot import from undefined module process-context
chicken-users: I am Chicken noob with (e-mail addresses redacted): 2019-09-17 22:06:21 root@tinkywinky ~ # cat /etc/debian_version 9.11 2019-09-17 22:10:03 root@tinkywinky ~ # uname -a Linux tinkywinky 4.9.0-11-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.9.189-3 (2019-09-02) x86_64 GNU/Linux 2019-09-17 22:15:35 root@tinkywinky ~ # dpkg-query -s chicken-bin Package: chicken-bin Status: install ok installed Priority: optional Section: lisp Installed-Size: 5765 Maintainer: Davide Puricelli (evo) Architecture: amd64 Source: chicken Version: 4.11.0-1 Replaces: chicken, chicken-dev Depends: libc6 (>= 2.4), libchicken8 (>= 4.11.0), libchicken-dev (= 4.11.0-1) Conflicts: chicken, chicken-dev Description: Practical and portable Scheme system - compiler CHICKEN is a Scheme compiler which compiles a subset of R5RS into C. It uses the ideas presented in Baker's paper "Cheney on the MTA", and has a small core and is easily extendable. . This package contains the compiler. Homepage: http://www.call-cc.org I am attempting to follow: http://wiki.call-cc.org/man/5/Getting%20started I have created a Scheme program source file: 2019-09-17 22:07:12 dpchrist@tinkywinky ~/sandbox/chicken-scheme $ cat palindrome.scm ;;; http://wiki.call-cc.org/man/5/Getting%20started ;;; downloaded 2019-09-17 (import (chicken process-context)) ; for "command-line-arguments" (define (palindrome? x) (define (check left right) (if (>= left right) #t (and (char=? (string-ref x left) (string-ref x right)) (check (add1 left) (sub1 right) (check 0 (sub1 (string-length x (let ((arg (car (command-line-arguments (display (string-append arg (if (palindrome? arg) " is a palindrome\n" " isn't a palindrome\n" When I try to compile: 2019-09-17 22:07:15 dpchrist@tinkywinky ~/sandbox/chicken-scheme $ csc -o palindrome palindrome.scm Syntax error (import): cannot import from undefined module process-context Expansion history: (##core#begin (import (chicken process-context))) (import (chicken process-context))<-- Error: shell command terminated with non-zero exit status 17920: '/usr/bin/chicken' 'palindrome.scm' -output-file 'palindrome.c' I appear to be missing the module "chicken process-context", which is supposed to be included (?): http://wiki.call-cc.org/man/5/Included%20modules Suggestions? David ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Re: [Chicken-users] Debian chicken 4.7.0.6 : tests/finalizer-error-test.scm fails
Claude, I'm guessing you didn't install chicken first prior to running the tests. The finalizer error only occurs with older chickens. I can't reproduce the problem with make PLATFORM=blah PREFIX=$PWD/tmp all install check On Sep 13, 2012, at 8:40 AM, Claude Marinier wrote: IBM ThinkCenter, Debian Squeeze (updated regularly) gcc (Debian 4.4.5-8) 4.4.5 chicken 4.7.0.6 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Error: unbound variable: i Call history: finalizer-error-test.scm:9: print* finalizer-error-test.scm:9: print* finalizer-error-test.scm:9: print* finalizer-error-test.scm:9: print* finalizer-error-test.scm:9: print* finalizer-error-test.scm:9: print* finalizer-error-test.scm:9: print* finalizer-error-test.scm:9: print* finalizer-error-test.scm:9: print* finalizer-error-test.scm:9: print* finalizer-error-test.scm:9: print* finalizer-error-test.scm:9: print* finalizer-error-test.scm:9: print* finalizer-error-test.scm:9: print* finalizer-error-test.scm:9: print* finalizer-error-test.scm:9: print* -- make[1]: *** [check] Error 70 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/chicken-4.7.0.6' make: *** [check] Error 2 -- Claude ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
[Chicken-users] debian package
Hi, find attached a diff against git, which successfully builds .debs for ubuntu (chicken version 4.3.5). /Jörg diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 28b97b5..da00ad4 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +chicken (4.3.5-0.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * New version + + -- Joerg F. Wittenberger joerg.wittenber...@softeyes.net Thu, 13 Feb 2009 14:08:00 +0200 + chicken (3.2.0-0.2) unstable; urgency=low * Added directory information to texi documentation file. diff --git a/debian/chicken-bin.install b/debian/chicken-bin.install index 06828da..a2845c2 100644 --- a/debian/chicken-bin.install +++ b/debian/chicken-bin.install @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ usr/bin usr/share/chicken/*.scm usr/share/chicken/*.exports +var/lib/chicken/3/*.so diff --git a/debian/chicken-bin.manpages b/debian/chicken-bin.manpages index 157bea0..82996d9 100644 --- a/debian/chicken-bin.manpages +++ b/debian/chicken-bin.manpages @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@ csc.1 csi.1 chicken.1 -chicken-setup.1 chicken-profile.1 chicken-bug.1 diff --git a/debian/libchicken3.install b/debian/libchicken3.install index 8f3aac4..5bdd0c5 100644 --- a/debian/libchicken3.install +++ b/debian/libchicken3.install @@ -1 +1 @@ -usr/lib/lib*.so.3 +usr/lib/lib*.so.5 diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules old mode 100644 new mode 100755 index ca04c72..07e6a58 --- a/debian/rules +++ b/debian/rules @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ binary-common: # The asterisk in chicken.info* is necessary, because Debian makeinfo # is very different from the standard makeinfo, and it is incredibly # difficult to convince it to produce standalone Texinfo files. - dh_installinfo chicken.info* +# dh_installinfo chicken.info* dh_installchangelogs ChangeLog.* dh_install --sourcedir=debian/tmp dh_link ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Re: [Chicken-users] Debian packages for some eggs now available
On 13/02/2008, Ivan Raikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, the Debian egg packages can be easily converted to RPM by the alien program, but there might be slight differences in how each RPM distribution does its library version numbering. E.g. the estraier egg depends on libestraier8 package in Debian, but that could be named something completely different in RedHat, Suse and so on. The main Chicken packages and the eggs that do not have dependencies external to Chicken can be easily converted to and installed as RPMs, though. It's been a while since I was last involved with rpm, but even then it was certainly worth it making different spec files (and/or taking care you don't use the wrong ones). It's not just the dependencies and paths (which obviously matter) but there's also different sets of spec macros and other things. They aren't really hard to write, though. -- I appear to be temporarily using gmail's horrible interface. I apologise for any failure in my part in trying to make it do the right thing with post formatting. ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Re: [Chicken-users] Debian packages for some eggs now available
Well, my experience with RPM is also a bit dated, and it was limited to translating custom Debian kernel packages to RedHat and Mandrake RPMs. In my case, it worked well because all three distributions used the same script to update the kernel image installation, and of course the kernel has no library dependencies, other than modutils, so the generated RPMs seemed to install and work fine. I did this also in part because the RPM distros did not have an equivalent of Debian kernel-package scripts, which allow you to add your own patches to the Debian kernel and create kernel packages out of that. Chicken also has no dependencies other than libc, so I am guessing such a conversion would be relatively uncomplicated. I agree that the proper way to do this would be to write an RPM .spec file, but I don't use RPM distros, so I have little motivation. If somebody writes the .spec file, I will be happy to install RedHat in a virtual image and test the RPMs, though. -Ivan Harri Haataja [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It's been a while since I was last involved with rpm, but even then it was certainly worth it making different spec files (and/or taking care you don't use the wrong ones). It's not just the dependencies and paths (which obviously matter) but there's also different sets of spec macros and other things. They aren't really hard to write, though. ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Re: [Chicken-users] Debian packages for some eggs now available
Well, the Debian egg packages can be easily converted to RPM by the alien program, but there might be slight differences in how each RPM distribution does its library version numbering. E.g. the estraier egg depends on libestraier8 package in Debian, but that could be named something completely different in RedHat, Suse and so on. The main Chicken packages and the eggs that do not have dependencies external to Chicken can be easily converted to and installed as RPMs, though. -Ivan Leonardo Valeri Manera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Nice work. I'm nearly ready to start throwing egg gentoo ebuilds at people, waiting on the final word on the install location that we're gonna use... If someone does something like your script for rpms, we'll have all most main package types covered. Bow to the chicken! \o/ Leo ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Re: [Chicken-users] Debian packages for some eggs now available
On 13/02/2008, Ivan Raikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I have debianized a number of eggs and have uploaded the resulting i386 binary packages to the Debian repository on chicken.wiki.br. Information on how to access that repository is here: http://chicken.wiki.br/Debian packages The debianized eggs are mostly the prerequisites to svnwiki, plus a few others that I use regularly. (The full list is at http://chicken.wiki.br/debian-eggs) If you need Debian packages for any egg, just let me know. Next, I will be working on packaging ezxdisp and svnwiki itself. I have also written a script that will almost automatically build Debian packages for all eggs that have a debian subdirectory in the SVN repository. I say almost automatically, because not all eggs have their documentation in the repository, so you will have to manually copy some HTML documentation from the Chicken website to the directory tree from which you are building. The script is called dpkg-eggs.scm and is located in the scripts subdirectory of the main Chicken SVN tree. -Ivan Nice work. I'm nearly ready to start throwing egg gentoo ebuilds at people, waiting on the final word on the install location that we're gonna use... If someone does something like your script for rpms, we'll have all most main package types covered. Bow to the chicken! \o/ Leo ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
[Chicken-users] Debian packages for some eggs now available
Hi all, I have debianized a number of eggs and have uploaded the resulting i386 binary packages to the Debian repository on chicken.wiki.br. Information on how to access that repository is here: http://chicken.wiki.br/Debian packages The debianized eggs are mostly the prerequisites to svnwiki, plus a few others that I use regularly. (The full list is at http://chicken.wiki.br/debian-eggs) If you need Debian packages for any egg, just let me know. Next, I will be working on packaging ezxdisp and svnwiki itself. I have also written a script that will almost automatically build Debian packages for all eggs that have a debian subdirectory in the SVN repository. I say almost automatically, because not all eggs have their documentation in the repository, so you will have to manually copy some HTML documentation from the Chicken website to the directory tree from which you are building. The script is called dpkg-eggs.scm and is located in the scripts subdirectory of the main Chicken SVN tree. -Ivan ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Re: [Chicken-users] Debian packages for Chicken 3.0.0 available now
The Debian repository on chicken.wiki.br now includes Chicken packages for the Debian armel architecture (ARM EABI v4). Thanks to Matthew Welland, who built and tested those packages. -Ivan Ivan Raikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi all, I have compiled Debian packages for Chicken 3.0.0 on Intel architectures. Instructions on how to install them are here: http://chicken.wiki.br/Debian%20packages Let me know if you have any problems or suggestions. ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
[Chicken-users] Debian packages for Chicken 3.0.0 available now
Hi all, I have compiled Debian packages for Chicken 3.0.0 on Intel architectures. Instructions on how to install them are here: http://chicken.wiki.br/Debian%20packages Let me know if you have any problems or suggestions. -Ivan ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Re: [Chicken-users] Debian packages for Chicken 3.0.0 available now
Thanks for doing this! BTW, if you publish directions on how to make the .deb's I'll make attempt to make them for ARM (targeting OS2008). If anyone else is doing this let me know. Matt -- On Wednesday 06 February 2008 07:42:58 am Ivan Raikov wrote: Hi all, I have compiled Debian packages for Chicken 3.0.0 on Intel architectures. Instructions on how to install them are here: http://chicken.wiki.br/Debian%20packages Let me know if you have any problems or suggestions. -Ivan ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
[Chicken-users] Debian slander?
http://packages.debian.org/sid/chicken-bin It certainly seems production quality and decently performant to me; does the Chicken community still agree with the statements there? If not, I'll endeavour to get it changed. -Robin -- Lojban Reason #17: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffalo_buffalo Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/ http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Re: [Chicken-users] Debian slander?
Hi Robin, On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 11:24:10 -0800 Robin Lee Powell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://packages.debian.org/sid/chicken-bin It certainly seems production quality and decently performant to me; does the Chicken community still agree with the statements there? If not, I'll endeavour to get it changed. I don't agree and would like to see it changed. Best wishes, Mario ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Re: [Chicken-users] Debian slander?
Hi! It certainly seems production quality and decently performant to me; does the Chicken community still agree with the statements there? If not, I'll endeavour to get it changed. BTW, don't forget that Debian is ported to 11 architectures. It may run fine on i386. But does Chicken run fine on all those architectures? It's too bad though that the Chicken version in Sid is still 2.5. Groetjes, Peter. ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Re: [Chicken-users] Debian slander?
Hi Peter, On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 20:49:26 +0100 Peter Busser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It certainly seems production quality and decently performant to me; does the Chicken community still agree with the statements there? If not, I'll endeavour to get it changed. BTW, don't forget that Debian is ported to 11 architectures. It may run fine on i386. But does Chicken run fine on all those architectures? We'd be ver happy to hear feedback from people testing Chicken on 11 architectures. Currently what we know for 2.7xx is documented at http://chicken.wiki.br/portability It's too bad though that the Chicken version in Sid is still 2.5. Agreed. Best wishes, Mario ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Re: [Chicken-users] Debian slander?
Hallo, Mario Domenech Goulart escreveu: Hi Peter, On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 20:49:26 +0100 Peter Busser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's too bad though that the Chicken version in Sid is still 2.5. Agreed. I emailed the maintainer once offering help for packaging newer Chickens, but got no answer whatsoever. Cheers, -alex ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Re: [Chicken-users] Debian Package
Hallo, On 4/22/07, Alex Queiroz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Debian packages for the AMD64 architecture, version 2.6, are in: http://www.ventonegro.org/chicken/ Their version is 0.1 to allow a smooth upgrade when the official ones hit sid. Now with i386 packages, too. -- -alex http://www.ventonegro.org/ ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Re: [Chicken-users] Debian Package
Thanks, Alex and Michael! I have added links to the packages at http://chicken.wiki.br/debian packages cheers, felix ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Re: [Chicken-users] Debian Package
Hallo, On 4/22/07, Michael McDermott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here is the release 2.6 package I created for my own system. Debian packages for the AMD64 architecture, version 2.6, are in: http://www.ventonegro.org/chicken/ Their version is 0.1 to allow a smooth upgrade when the official ones hit sid. Cheers, -- -alex http://www.ventonegro.org/ ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
[Chicken-users] Debian package
Hallo, Does anybody know if 2.6 is close to hitting Debian unstable? Cheers, -- -alex http://www.ventonegro.org/ ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Re: [Chicken-users] Debian package
This is probably a question for Davide Puricelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] who is the Debian maintainer of the Chicken package. There is apparently a wishlist item filed for an update to 2.6: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=418747 Alex Queiroz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hallo, Does anybody know if 2.6 is close to hitting Debian unstable? Cheers, ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Re: [Chicken-users] Debian package
Hallo, On 4/22/07, Ivan Raikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is probably a question for Davide Puricelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] who is the Debian maintainer of the Chicken package. There is apparently a wishlist item filed for an update to 2.6: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=418747 Hmm... I could build a package myself with the attached diff. Thanks! Cheers, -- -alex http://www.ventonegro.org/ ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
