Re: [chromium-dev] Re: Building chromium for arm--erroring out
Hi All, I have not touched sysroot at all. The only thing that I changed was the GYP_DEFINES and I did the gclient sync. That broke the whole thing. Does anyone know how I could get back to the old revision of source ? Thanks, Sofia On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Antoine Labour pi...@chromium.org wrote: On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Sofia Tahseen sofia.tahs...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Antoine/All, This is what I did: export GYP_DEFINES=target_arch=arm sysroot=~/x-tools/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/sys-root disable_nacl=1 use_system_ffmpeg=1 gclient runhooks --force gclient sync export CROSSTOOL=/home/adas/0_Data/0_Lin/091203_Chromium_OS/toolchain/arm-2009q1/bin/arm-none-linux-gnueabi export CXX=$CROSSTOOL-g++ export CC=$CROSSTOOL-gcc export AR=$CROSSTOOL-ar export AS=$CROSSTOOL-as export RANLIB=$CROSSTOOL-ranlib export LD=$CROSSTOOL-ld And then I run the make command make -r -j6 BUILDTYPE=Release chrome 21 |tee ./makelog.txt To my suprise, the build is erroring out... I am attaching the makelog for this. Really appreciate your help on this. Thanks, Sofia The very first target compilation steps fails with missing standard headers, which would point at a sysroot problem... Antoine On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Sofia Tahseen sofia.tahs...@gmail.comwrote: Yes it was erroring out at the same point S32A_Opaque_BlitRow32_neon...but I had not done gclient runhooks --force...Now I am re-doing it...Lets wait and see how this works. On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Erik Corry erik.co...@gmail.comwrote: 2009/12/14 Sofia Tahseen sofia.tahs...@gmail.com Hi Antoine, I did exactly what you said-- not set armv7=1 in gyp_defines. export GYP_DEFINES=target_arch=arm sysroot=~/x-tools/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/sys-root disable_nacl=1 use_system_ffmpeg=1 I rebuilt chromium. And then I reset my kernel so that it does not use NEON. This does not help and the browser keeps crashing again even though I do not set armv7=1 in gyp_defines. So is there a way to disable neon settings on chromium browser and make chromium working on a hardware that does not support NEON? Is it still crashing in S32A_Opaque_BlitRow32_neon ? Thanks, Sofia On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Antoine Labour pi...@chromium.orgwrote: On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Sofia Tahseen sofia.tahs...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Joel/Erik/All, I don't think armv5 is an issue. Reason being I used the jaunty armv5 libraries to build chrome. I tried to debug the issue with gdb. gdb chrome GNU gdb 6.8-debian Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type show copying and show warranty for details. This GDB was configured as arm-linux-gnueabi... (gdb) (gdb) run Starting program: /home/adas/Release/chrome [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 0x4112ac80 (LWP 9722)] [New Thread 0x41d49440 (LWP 9727)] [New Thread 0x42549440 (LWP 9728)] [New Thread 0x42d49440 (LWP 9729)] [New Thread 0x43549440 (LWP 9730)] [New Thread 0x43d49440 (LWP 9731)] [New Thread 0x44549440 (LWP 9732)] [New Thread 0x44d49440 (LWP 9733)] [New Thread 0x44d69440 (LWP 9734)] [New Thread 0x458ff440 (LWP 9738)] [New Thread 0x460ff440 (LWP 9739)] [Thread 0x460ff440 (LWP 9739) exited] Program received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction. [Switching to Thread 0x4112ac80 (LWP 9722)] 0x0081caec in S32A_Opaque_BlitRow32_neon () Current language: auto; currently asm The error S32A_Opaque_BlitRow32_neon () had to do something with the floating point setting of the kernel. I checked my kernel configuration and neon was not set. So I set it and it rebuild my kernel and booted my jaunty. Now it works perfectly...without any crashes. Key : In order to run chromium we need to set the neon in the kernel configuration. Note, if you don't set armv7=1 when you build chromium, it shouldn't use the NEON paths, so you shouldn't run into that problem. But it's better to enable it in the kernel if your hardware supports it. Antoine Regards, Sofia On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 2:27 AM, Erik Corry erik.co...@gmail.comwrote: 2009/12/10 Sofia Tahseen sofia.tahs...@gmail.com: You are so right, Joel... I corrected my .so and now I could build the chrome browser ...finally!! I copied the whole /src/out/Release directory to my jaunty on the BeagleBoard(256MB RAM). I try to launch chrome through: ./chrome It starts up chrome, and then immediately kills chrome. I get an Illegal Instruction. I restart and I can now see chrome as shown in the attachment but I cannot browse. When I reload the page, it again kills chrome saying Illegal instruction. Has anyone seen this before? I have my proxy settings set
Re: [chromium-dev] Re: Building chromium for arm--erroring out
Has anyone been able to successfully build chromium for arm after doing a gclient sync(meaning on the latest source code) ???Can someone please verify this ? On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Sofia Tahseen sofia.tahs...@gmail.comwrote: Hi All, I have not touched sysroot at all. The only thing that I changed was the GYP_DEFINES and I did the gclient sync. That broke the whole thing. Does anyone know how I could get back to the old revision of source ? Thanks, Sofia On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Antoine Labour pi...@chromium.orgwrote: On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Sofia Tahseen sofia.tahs...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Antoine/All, This is what I did: export GYP_DEFINES=target_arch=arm sysroot=~/x-tools/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/sys-root disable_nacl=1 use_system_ffmpeg=1 gclient runhooks --force gclient sync export CROSSTOOL=/home/adas/0_Data/0_Lin/091203_Chromium_OS/toolchain/arm-2009q1/bin/arm-none-linux-gnueabi export CXX=$CROSSTOOL-g++ export CC=$CROSSTOOL-gcc export AR=$CROSSTOOL-ar export AS=$CROSSTOOL-as export RANLIB=$CROSSTOOL-ranlib export LD=$CROSSTOOL-ld And then I run the make command make -r -j6 BUILDTYPE=Release chrome 21 |tee ./makelog.txt To my suprise, the build is erroring out... I am attaching the makelog for this. Really appreciate your help on this. Thanks, Sofia The very first target compilation steps fails with missing standard headers, which would point at a sysroot problem... Antoine On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Sofia Tahseen sofia.tahs...@gmail.comwrote: Yes it was erroring out at the same point S32A_Opaque_BlitRow32_neon...but I had not done gclient runhooks --force...Now I am re-doing it...Lets wait and see how this works. On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Erik Corry erik.co...@gmail.comwrote: 2009/12/14 Sofia Tahseen sofia.tahs...@gmail.com Hi Antoine, I did exactly what you said-- not set armv7=1 in gyp_defines. export GYP_DEFINES=target_arch=arm sysroot=~/x-tools/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/sys-root disable_nacl=1 use_system_ffmpeg=1 I rebuilt chromium. And then I reset my kernel so that it does not use NEON. This does not help and the browser keeps crashing again even though I do not set armv7=1 in gyp_defines. So is there a way to disable neon settings on chromium browser and make chromium working on a hardware that does not support NEON? Is it still crashing in S32A_Opaque_BlitRow32_neon ? Thanks, Sofia On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Antoine Labour pi...@chromium.orgwrote: On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Sofia Tahseen sofia.tahs...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Joel/Erik/All, I don't think armv5 is an issue. Reason being I used the jaunty armv5 libraries to build chrome. I tried to debug the issue with gdb. gdb chrome GNU gdb 6.8-debian Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type show copying and show warranty for details. This GDB was configured as arm-linux-gnueabi... (gdb) (gdb) run Starting program: /home/adas/Release/chrome [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 0x4112ac80 (LWP 9722)] [New Thread 0x41d49440 (LWP 9727)] [New Thread 0x42549440 (LWP 9728)] [New Thread 0x42d49440 (LWP 9729)] [New Thread 0x43549440 (LWP 9730)] [New Thread 0x43d49440 (LWP 9731)] [New Thread 0x44549440 (LWP 9732)] [New Thread 0x44d49440 (LWP 9733)] [New Thread 0x44d69440 (LWP 9734)] [New Thread 0x458ff440 (LWP 9738)] [New Thread 0x460ff440 (LWP 9739)] [Thread 0x460ff440 (LWP 9739) exited] Program received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction. [Switching to Thread 0x4112ac80 (LWP 9722)] 0x0081caec in S32A_Opaque_BlitRow32_neon () Current language: auto; currently asm The error S32A_Opaque_BlitRow32_neon () had to do something with the floating point setting of the kernel. I checked my kernel configuration and neon was not set. So I set it and it rebuild my kernel and booted my jaunty. Now it works perfectly...without any crashes. Key : In order to run chromium we need to set the neon in the kernel configuration. Note, if you don't set armv7=1 when you build chromium, it shouldn't use the NEON paths, so you shouldn't run into that problem. But it's better to enable it in the kernel if your hardware supports it. Antoine Regards, Sofia On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 2:27 AM, Erik Corry erik.co...@gmail.comwrote: 2009/12/10 Sofia Tahseen sofia.tahs...@gmail.com: You are so right, Joel... I corrected my .so and now I could build the chrome browser ...finally!! I copied the whole /src/out/Release directory to my jaunty on the BeagleBoard(256MB RAM). I try to launch chrome through: ./chrome It starts up chrome, and then immediately kills chrome. I
Re: [chromium-dev] Re: Building chromium for arm--erroring out
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Sofia Tahseen sofia.tahs...@gmail.comwrote: Has anyone been able to successfully build chromium for arm after doing a gclient sync(meaning on the latest source code) ???Can someone please verify this ? We now have a buildbot for it (thanks bradn!), see http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/waterfall/builders/Chromium%20Arm It is green at the moment. Antoine On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Sofia Tahseen sofia.tahs...@gmail.comwrote: Hi All, I have not touched sysroot at all. The only thing that I changed was the GYP_DEFINES and I did the gclient sync. That broke the whole thing. Does anyone know how I could get back to the old revision of source ? Thanks, Sofia On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Antoine Labour pi...@chromium.orgwrote: On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Sofia Tahseen sofia.tahs...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Antoine/All, This is what I did: export GYP_DEFINES=target_arch=arm sysroot=~/x-tools/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/sys-root disable_nacl=1 use_system_ffmpeg=1 gclient runhooks --force gclient sync export CROSSTOOL=/home/adas/0_Data/0_Lin/091203_Chromium_OS/toolchain/arm-2009q1/bin/arm-none-linux-gnueabi export CXX=$CROSSTOOL-g++ export CC=$CROSSTOOL-gcc export AR=$CROSSTOOL-ar export AS=$CROSSTOOL-as export RANLIB=$CROSSTOOL-ranlib export LD=$CROSSTOOL-ld And then I run the make command make -r -j6 BUILDTYPE=Release chrome 21 |tee ./makelog.txt To my suprise, the build is erroring out... I am attaching the makelog for this. Really appreciate your help on this. Thanks, Sofia The very first target compilation steps fails with missing standard headers, which would point at a sysroot problem... Antoine On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Sofia Tahseen sofia.tahs...@gmail.com wrote: Yes it was erroring out at the same point S32A_Opaque_BlitRow32_neon...but I had not done gclient runhooks --force...Now I am re-doing it...Lets wait and see how this works. On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Erik Corry erik.co...@gmail.comwrote: 2009/12/14 Sofia Tahseen sofia.tahs...@gmail.com Hi Antoine, I did exactly what you said-- not set armv7=1 in gyp_defines. export GYP_DEFINES=target_arch=arm sysroot=~/x-tools/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/sys-root disable_nacl=1 use_system_ffmpeg=1 I rebuilt chromium. And then I reset my kernel so that it does not use NEON. This does not help and the browser keeps crashing again even though I do not set armv7=1 in gyp_defines. So is there a way to disable neon settings on chromium browser and make chromium working on a hardware that does not support NEON? Is it still crashing in S32A_Opaque_BlitRow32_neon ? Thanks, Sofia On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Antoine Labour pi...@chromium.orgwrote: On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Sofia Tahseen sofia.tahs...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Joel/Erik/All, I don't think armv5 is an issue. Reason being I used the jaunty armv5 libraries to build chrome. I tried to debug the issue with gdb. gdb chrome GNU gdb 6.8-debian Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type show copying and show warranty for details. This GDB was configured as arm-linux-gnueabi... (gdb) (gdb) run Starting program: /home/adas/Release/chrome [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 0x4112ac80 (LWP 9722)] [New Thread 0x41d49440 (LWP 9727)] [New Thread 0x42549440 (LWP 9728)] [New Thread 0x42d49440 (LWP 9729)] [New Thread 0x43549440 (LWP 9730)] [New Thread 0x43d49440 (LWP 9731)] [New Thread 0x44549440 (LWP 9732)] [New Thread 0x44d49440 (LWP 9733)] [New Thread 0x44d69440 (LWP 9734)] [New Thread 0x458ff440 (LWP 9738)] [New Thread 0x460ff440 (LWP 9739)] [Thread 0x460ff440 (LWP 9739) exited] Program received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction. [Switching to Thread 0x4112ac80 (LWP 9722)] 0x0081caec in S32A_Opaque_BlitRow32_neon () Current language: auto; currently asm The error S32A_Opaque_BlitRow32_neon () had to do something with the floating point setting of the kernel. I checked my kernel configuration and neon was not set. So I set it and it rebuild my kernel and booted my jaunty. Now it works perfectly...without any crashes. Key : In order to run chromium we need to set the neon in the kernel configuration. Note, if you don't set armv7=1 when you build chromium, it shouldn't use the NEON paths, so you shouldn't run into that problem. But it's better to enable it in the kernel if your hardware supports it. Antoine Regards, Sofia On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 2:27 AM, Erik Corry erik.co...@gmail.comwrote: 2009/12/10 Sofia Tahseen sofia.tahs...@gmail.com: You are so right, Joel... I corrected my .so and now
Re: [chromium-dev] Re: Building chromium for arm--erroring out
Hi Antoine, I did exactly what you said-- not set armv7=1 in gyp_defines. export GYP_DEFINES=target_arch=arm sysroot=~/x-tools/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/sys-root disable_nacl=1 use_system_ffmpeg=1 I rebuilt chromium. And then I reset my kernel so that it does not use NEON. This does not help and the browser keeps crashing again even though I do not set armv7=1 in gyp_defines. So is there a way to disable neon settings on chromium browser and make chromium working on a hardware that does not support NEON? Thanks, Sofia On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Antoine Labour pi...@chromium.org wrote: On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Sofia Tahseen sofia.tahs...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Joel/Erik/All, I don't think armv5 is an issue. Reason being I used the jaunty armv5 libraries to build chrome. I tried to debug the issue with gdb. gdb chrome GNU gdb 6.8-debian Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type show copying and show warranty for details. This GDB was configured as arm-linux-gnueabi... (gdb) (gdb) run Starting program: /home/adas/Release/chrome [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 0x4112ac80 (LWP 9722)] [New Thread 0x41d49440 (LWP 9727)] [New Thread 0x42549440 (LWP 9728)] [New Thread 0x42d49440 (LWP 9729)] [New Thread 0x43549440 (LWP 9730)] [New Thread 0x43d49440 (LWP 9731)] [New Thread 0x44549440 (LWP 9732)] [New Thread 0x44d49440 (LWP 9733)] [New Thread 0x44d69440 (LWP 9734)] [New Thread 0x458ff440 (LWP 9738)] [New Thread 0x460ff440 (LWP 9739)] [Thread 0x460ff440 (LWP 9739) exited] Program received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction. [Switching to Thread 0x4112ac80 (LWP 9722)] 0x0081caec in S32A_Opaque_BlitRow32_neon () Current language: auto; currently asm The error S32A_Opaque_BlitRow32_neon () had to do something with the floating point setting of the kernel. I checked my kernel configuration and neon was not set. So I set it and it rebuild my kernel and booted my jaunty. Now it works perfectly...without any crashes. Key : In order to run chromium we need to set the neon in the kernel configuration. Note, if you don't set armv7=1 when you build chromium, it shouldn't use the NEON paths, so you shouldn't run into that problem. But it's better to enable it in the kernel if your hardware supports it. Antoine Regards, Sofia On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 2:27 AM, Erik Corry erik.co...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/12/10 Sofia Tahseen sofia.tahs...@gmail.com: You are so right, Joel... I corrected my .so and now I could build the chrome browser ...finally!! I copied the whole /src/out/Release directory to my jaunty on the BeagleBoard(256MB RAM). I try to launch chrome through: ./chrome It starts up chrome, and then immediately kills chrome. I get an Illegal Instruction. I restart and I can now see chrome as shown in the attachment but I cannot browse. When I reload the page, it again kills chrome saying Illegal instruction. Has anyone seen this before? I have my proxy settings set too.. This could be anything, but it might be this bug in some versions of gcc: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39604 If that's it then adding -fno-tree-sink to the flags used for V8 will help. It's a bug that only shows up on ARM and only on some versions of gcc. Any help is highly appreciated. Thanks, Sofia On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Joel Stanley j...@chromium.org wrote: On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 05:14, Sofia Tahseen sofia.tahs...@gmail.com wrote: /home/adas/0_Data/0_Lin/091203_Chromium_OS/toolchain/arm-2009q1/bin/../lib/gcc/arm-none-linux-gnueabi/4.3.3/../../../../arm-none-linux-gnueabi/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /home/adas/x-tools/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/sys-root/usr/lib/librt.so when searching for -lrt The errors are indicative of trying to link against libraries from a different platform. To confirm: check the output of $ 'file /home/adas/x-tools/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/sys-root/usr/lib/librt.so I suspect it will tell you it's a symbolic link to /lib/librt.so.1, which itself is a symbolic link to /lib/librt-2.10.2.so - note these paths are relative to /, not to your sysroot directory. You have two slightly solutions - adjust the symlinks in sys-root/usr/lib so they point to the files in sys-root//lib - replace the smymlinks with the actual libraries, ie copy files from sys-root/lib to sys-root/usr/lib I would be happy to hear a neater solution for this, but the above worked for me. Cheers, Joel -- Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com View archives, change email options, or
Re: [chromium-dev] Re: Building chromium for arm--erroring out
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Sofia Tahseen sofia.tahs...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Antoine, I did exactly what you said-- not set armv7=1 in gyp_defines. export GYP_DEFINES=target_arch=arm sysroot=~/x-tools/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/sys-root disable_nacl=1 use_system_ffmpeg=1 I rebuilt chromium. Did you run gclient runhooks --force after changing GYP_DEFINES ? That's necessary to apply the changes. And then I reset my kernel so that it does not use NEON. This does not help and the browser keeps crashing again even though I do not set armv7=1 in gyp_defines. So is there a way to disable neon settings on chromium browser and make chromium working on a hardware that does not support NEON? If you build with make chrome V=1 it shows the command line when it compile things. You should make sure that -march=armv7-a isn't present on the g++ lines. If it is not, the compiler should refuse NEON assembly... Antoine Thanks, Sofia On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Antoine Labour pi...@chromium.orgwrote: On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Sofia Tahseen sofia.tahs...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Joel/Erik/All, I don't think armv5 is an issue. Reason being I used the jaunty armv5 libraries to build chrome. I tried to debug the issue with gdb. gdb chrome GNU gdb 6.8-debian Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type show copying and show warranty for details. This GDB was configured as arm-linux-gnueabi... (gdb) (gdb) run Starting program: /home/adas/Release/chrome [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 0x4112ac80 (LWP 9722)] [New Thread 0x41d49440 (LWP 9727)] [New Thread 0x42549440 (LWP 9728)] [New Thread 0x42d49440 (LWP 9729)] [New Thread 0x43549440 (LWP 9730)] [New Thread 0x43d49440 (LWP 9731)] [New Thread 0x44549440 (LWP 9732)] [New Thread 0x44d49440 (LWP 9733)] [New Thread 0x44d69440 (LWP 9734)] [New Thread 0x458ff440 (LWP 9738)] [New Thread 0x460ff440 (LWP 9739)] [Thread 0x460ff440 (LWP 9739) exited] Program received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction. [Switching to Thread 0x4112ac80 (LWP 9722)] 0x0081caec in S32A_Opaque_BlitRow32_neon () Current language: auto; currently asm The error S32A_Opaque_BlitRow32_neon () had to do something with the floating point setting of the kernel. I checked my kernel configuration and neon was not set. So I set it and it rebuild my kernel and booted my jaunty. Now it works perfectly...without any crashes. Key : In order to run chromium we need to set the neon in the kernel configuration. Note, if you don't set armv7=1 when you build chromium, it shouldn't use the NEON paths, so you shouldn't run into that problem. But it's better to enable it in the kernel if your hardware supports it. Antoine Regards, Sofia On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 2:27 AM, Erik Corry erik.co...@gmail.comwrote: 2009/12/10 Sofia Tahseen sofia.tahs...@gmail.com: You are so right, Joel... I corrected my .so and now I could build the chrome browser ...finally!! I copied the whole /src/out/Release directory to my jaunty on the BeagleBoard(256MB RAM). I try to launch chrome through: ./chrome It starts up chrome, and then immediately kills chrome. I get an Illegal Instruction. I restart and I can now see chrome as shown in the attachment but I cannot browse. When I reload the page, it again kills chrome saying Illegal instruction. Has anyone seen this before? I have my proxy settings set too.. This could be anything, but it might be this bug in some versions of gcc: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39604 If that's it then adding -fno-tree-sink to the flags used for V8 will help. It's a bug that only shows up on ARM and only on some versions of gcc. Any help is highly appreciated. Thanks, Sofia On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Joel Stanley j...@chromium.org wrote: On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 05:14, Sofia Tahseen sofia.tahs...@gmail.com wrote: /home/adas/0_Data/0_Lin/091203_Chromium_OS/toolchain/arm-2009q1/bin/../lib/gcc/arm-none-linux-gnueabi/4.3.3/../../../../arm-none-linux-gnueabi/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /home/adas/x-tools/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/sys-root/usr/lib/librt.so when searching for -lrt The errors are indicative of trying to link against libraries from a different platform. To confirm: check the output of $ 'file /home/adas/x-tools/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/sys-root/usr/lib/librt.so I suspect it will tell you it's a symbolic link to /lib/librt.so.1, which itself is a symbolic link to /lib/librt-2.10.2.so - note these paths are relative to /, not to your sysroot directory. You have two slightly solutions
Re: [chromium-dev] Re: Building chromium for arm--erroring out
2009/12/14 Sofia Tahseen sofia.tahs...@gmail.com Hi Antoine, I did exactly what you said-- not set armv7=1 in gyp_defines. export GYP_DEFINES=target_arch=arm sysroot=~/x-tools/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/sys-root disable_nacl=1 use_system_ffmpeg=1 I rebuilt chromium. And then I reset my kernel so that it does not use NEON. This does not help and the browser keeps crashing again even though I do not set armv7=1 in gyp_defines. So is there a way to disable neon settings on chromium browser and make chromium working on a hardware that does not support NEON? Is it still crashing in S32A_Opaque_BlitRow32_neon ? Thanks, Sofia On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Antoine Labour pi...@chromium.orgwrote: On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Sofia Tahseen sofia.tahs...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Joel/Erik/All, I don't think armv5 is an issue. Reason being I used the jaunty armv5 libraries to build chrome. I tried to debug the issue with gdb. gdb chrome GNU gdb 6.8-debian Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type show copying and show warranty for details. This GDB was configured as arm-linux-gnueabi... (gdb) (gdb) run Starting program: /home/adas/Release/chrome [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 0x4112ac80 (LWP 9722)] [New Thread 0x41d49440 (LWP 9727)] [New Thread 0x42549440 (LWP 9728)] [New Thread 0x42d49440 (LWP 9729)] [New Thread 0x43549440 (LWP 9730)] [New Thread 0x43d49440 (LWP 9731)] [New Thread 0x44549440 (LWP 9732)] [New Thread 0x44d49440 (LWP 9733)] [New Thread 0x44d69440 (LWP 9734)] [New Thread 0x458ff440 (LWP 9738)] [New Thread 0x460ff440 (LWP 9739)] [Thread 0x460ff440 (LWP 9739) exited] Program received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction. [Switching to Thread 0x4112ac80 (LWP 9722)] 0x0081caec in S32A_Opaque_BlitRow32_neon () Current language: auto; currently asm The error S32A_Opaque_BlitRow32_neon () had to do something with the floating point setting of the kernel. I checked my kernel configuration and neon was not set. So I set it and it rebuild my kernel and booted my jaunty. Now it works perfectly...without any crashes. Key : In order to run chromium we need to set the neon in the kernel configuration. Note, if you don't set armv7=1 when you build chromium, it shouldn't use the NEON paths, so you shouldn't run into that problem. But it's better to enable it in the kernel if your hardware supports it. Antoine Regards, Sofia On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 2:27 AM, Erik Corry erik.co...@gmail.comwrote: 2009/12/10 Sofia Tahseen sofia.tahs...@gmail.com: You are so right, Joel... I corrected my .so and now I could build the chrome browser ...finally!! I copied the whole /src/out/Release directory to my jaunty on the BeagleBoard(256MB RAM). I try to launch chrome through: ./chrome It starts up chrome, and then immediately kills chrome. I get an Illegal Instruction. I restart and I can now see chrome as shown in the attachment but I cannot browse. When I reload the page, it again kills chrome saying Illegal instruction. Has anyone seen this before? I have my proxy settings set too.. This could be anything, but it might be this bug in some versions of gcc: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39604 If that's it then adding -fno-tree-sink to the flags used for V8 will help. It's a bug that only shows up on ARM and only on some versions of gcc. Any help is highly appreciated. Thanks, Sofia On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Joel Stanley j...@chromium.org wrote: On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 05:14, Sofia Tahseen sofia.tahs...@gmail.com wrote: /home/adas/0_Data/0_Lin/091203_Chromium_OS/toolchain/arm-2009q1/bin/../lib/gcc/arm-none-linux-gnueabi/4.3.3/../../../../arm-none-linux-gnueabi/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /home/adas/x-tools/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/sys-root/usr/lib/librt.so when searching for -lrt The errors are indicative of trying to link against libraries from a different platform. To confirm: check the output of $ 'file /home/adas/x-tools/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/sys-root/usr/lib/librt.so I suspect it will tell you it's a symbolic link to /lib/librt.so.1, which itself is a symbolic link to /lib/librt-2.10.2.so - note these paths are relative to /, not to your sysroot directory. You have two slightly solutions - adjust the symlinks in sys-root/usr/lib so they point to the files in sys-root//lib - replace the smymlinks with the actual libraries, ie copy files from sys-root/lib to sys-root/usr/lib I would be happy to hear a neater solution for this, but the above worked for me. Cheers, Joel
Re: [chromium-dev] Re: Building chromium for arm--erroring out
Yes it was erroring out at the same point S32A_Opaque_BlitRow32_neon...but I had not done gclient runhooks --force...Now I am re-doing it...Lets wait and see how this works. On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Erik Corry erik.co...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/12/14 Sofia Tahseen sofia.tahs...@gmail.com Hi Antoine, I did exactly what you said-- not set armv7=1 in gyp_defines. export GYP_DEFINES=target_arch=arm sysroot=~/x-tools/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/sys-root disable_nacl=1 use_system_ffmpeg=1 I rebuilt chromium. And then I reset my kernel so that it does not use NEON. This does not help and the browser keeps crashing again even though I do not set armv7=1 in gyp_defines. So is there a way to disable neon settings on chromium browser and make chromium working on a hardware that does not support NEON? Is it still crashing in S32A_Opaque_BlitRow32_neon ? Thanks, Sofia On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Antoine Labour pi...@chromium.orgwrote: On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Sofia Tahseen sofia.tahs...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Joel/Erik/All, I don't think armv5 is an issue. Reason being I used the jaunty armv5 libraries to build chrome. I tried to debug the issue with gdb. gdb chrome GNU gdb 6.8-debian Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type show copying and show warranty for details. This GDB was configured as arm-linux-gnueabi... (gdb) (gdb) run Starting program: /home/adas/Release/chrome [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 0x4112ac80 (LWP 9722)] [New Thread 0x41d49440 (LWP 9727)] [New Thread 0x42549440 (LWP 9728)] [New Thread 0x42d49440 (LWP 9729)] [New Thread 0x43549440 (LWP 9730)] [New Thread 0x43d49440 (LWP 9731)] [New Thread 0x44549440 (LWP 9732)] [New Thread 0x44d49440 (LWP 9733)] [New Thread 0x44d69440 (LWP 9734)] [New Thread 0x458ff440 (LWP 9738)] [New Thread 0x460ff440 (LWP 9739)] [Thread 0x460ff440 (LWP 9739) exited] Program received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction. [Switching to Thread 0x4112ac80 (LWP 9722)] 0x0081caec in S32A_Opaque_BlitRow32_neon () Current language: auto; currently asm The error S32A_Opaque_BlitRow32_neon () had to do something with the floating point setting of the kernel. I checked my kernel configuration and neon was not set. So I set it and it rebuild my kernel and booted my jaunty. Now it works perfectly...without any crashes. Key : In order to run chromium we need to set the neon in the kernel configuration. Note, if you don't set armv7=1 when you build chromium, it shouldn't use the NEON paths, so you shouldn't run into that problem. But it's better to enable it in the kernel if your hardware supports it. Antoine Regards, Sofia On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 2:27 AM, Erik Corry erik.co...@gmail.comwrote: 2009/12/10 Sofia Tahseen sofia.tahs...@gmail.com: You are so right, Joel... I corrected my .so and now I could build the chrome browser ...finally!! I copied the whole /src/out/Release directory to my jaunty on the BeagleBoard(256MB RAM). I try to launch chrome through: ./chrome It starts up chrome, and then immediately kills chrome. I get an Illegal Instruction. I restart and I can now see chrome as shown in the attachment but I cannot browse. When I reload the page, it again kills chrome saying Illegal instruction. Has anyone seen this before? I have my proxy settings set too.. This could be anything, but it might be this bug in some versions of gcc: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39604 If that's it then adding -fno-tree-sink to the flags used for V8 will help. It's a bug that only shows up on ARM and only on some versions of gcc. Any help is highly appreciated. Thanks, Sofia On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Joel Stanley j...@chromium.org wrote: On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 05:14, Sofia Tahseen sofia.tahs...@gmail.com wrote: /home/adas/0_Data/0_Lin/091203_Chromium_OS/toolchain/arm-2009q1/bin/../lib/gcc/arm-none-linux-gnueabi/4.3.3/../../../../arm-none-linux-gnueabi/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /home/adas/x-tools/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/sys-root/usr/lib/librt.so when searching for -lrt The errors are indicative of trying to link against libraries from a different platform. To confirm: check the output of $ 'file /home/adas/x-tools/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/sys-root/usr/lib/librt.so I suspect it will tell you it's a symbolic link to /lib/librt.so.1, which itself is a symbolic link to /lib/librt-2.10.2.so - note these paths are relative to /, not to your sysroot directory. You have two slightly solutions - adjust the symlinks in sys-root/usr/lib so they
Re: [chromium-dev] Re: Building chromium for arm--erroring out
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Sofia Tahseen sofia.tahs...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Antoine/All, This is what I did: export GYP_DEFINES=target_arch=arm sysroot=~/x-tools/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/sys-root disable_nacl=1 use_system_ffmpeg=1 gclient runhooks --force gclient sync export CROSSTOOL=/home/adas/0_Data/0_Lin/091203_Chromium_OS/toolchain/arm-2009q1/bin/arm-none-linux-gnueabi export CXX=$CROSSTOOL-g++ export CC=$CROSSTOOL-gcc export AR=$CROSSTOOL-ar export AS=$CROSSTOOL-as export RANLIB=$CROSSTOOL-ranlib export LD=$CROSSTOOL-ld And then I run the make command make -r -j6 BUILDTYPE=Release chrome 21 |tee ./makelog.txt To my suprise, the build is erroring out... I am attaching the makelog for this. Really appreciate your help on this. Thanks, Sofia The very first target compilation steps fails with missing standard headers, which would point at a sysroot problem... Antoine On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Sofia Tahseen sofia.tahs...@gmail.comwrote: Yes it was erroring out at the same point S32A_Opaque_BlitRow32_neon...but I had not done gclient runhooks --force...Now I am re-doing it...Lets wait and see how this works. On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Erik Corry erik.co...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/12/14 Sofia Tahseen sofia.tahs...@gmail.com Hi Antoine, I did exactly what you said-- not set armv7=1 in gyp_defines. export GYP_DEFINES=target_arch=arm sysroot=~/x-tools/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/sys-root disable_nacl=1 use_system_ffmpeg=1 I rebuilt chromium. And then I reset my kernel so that it does not use NEON. This does not help and the browser keeps crashing again even though I do not set armv7=1 in gyp_defines. So is there a way to disable neon settings on chromium browser and make chromium working on a hardware that does not support NEON? Is it still crashing in S32A_Opaque_BlitRow32_neon ? Thanks, Sofia On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Antoine Labour pi...@chromium.orgwrote: On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Sofia Tahseen sofia.tahs...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Joel/Erik/All, I don't think armv5 is an issue. Reason being I used the jaunty armv5 libraries to build chrome. I tried to debug the issue with gdb. gdb chrome GNU gdb 6.8-debian Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type show copying and show warranty for details. This GDB was configured as arm-linux-gnueabi... (gdb) (gdb) run Starting program: /home/adas/Release/chrome [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 0x4112ac80 (LWP 9722)] [New Thread 0x41d49440 (LWP 9727)] [New Thread 0x42549440 (LWP 9728)] [New Thread 0x42d49440 (LWP 9729)] [New Thread 0x43549440 (LWP 9730)] [New Thread 0x43d49440 (LWP 9731)] [New Thread 0x44549440 (LWP 9732)] [New Thread 0x44d49440 (LWP 9733)] [New Thread 0x44d69440 (LWP 9734)] [New Thread 0x458ff440 (LWP 9738)] [New Thread 0x460ff440 (LWP 9739)] [Thread 0x460ff440 (LWP 9739) exited] Program received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction. [Switching to Thread 0x4112ac80 (LWP 9722)] 0x0081caec in S32A_Opaque_BlitRow32_neon () Current language: auto; currently asm The error S32A_Opaque_BlitRow32_neon () had to do something with the floating point setting of the kernel. I checked my kernel configuration and neon was not set. So I set it and it rebuild my kernel and booted my jaunty. Now it works perfectly...without any crashes. Key : In order to run chromium we need to set the neon in the kernel configuration. Note, if you don't set armv7=1 when you build chromium, it shouldn't use the NEON paths, so you shouldn't run into that problem. But it's better to enable it in the kernel if your hardware supports it. Antoine Regards, Sofia On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 2:27 AM, Erik Corry erik.co...@gmail.comwrote: 2009/12/10 Sofia Tahseen sofia.tahs...@gmail.com: You are so right, Joel... I corrected my .so and now I could build the chrome browser ...finally!! I copied the whole /src/out/Release directory to my jaunty on the BeagleBoard(256MB RAM). I try to launch chrome through: ./chrome It starts up chrome, and then immediately kills chrome. I get an Illegal Instruction. I restart and I can now see chrome as shown in the attachment but I cannot browse. When I reload the page, it again kills chrome saying Illegal instruction. Has anyone seen this before? I have my proxy settings set too.. This could be anything, but it might be this bug in some versions of gcc: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39604 If that's it then adding -fno-tree-sink to the flags used for V8 will help. It's a bug that only shows up on ARM and only on some versions of gcc. Any help is highly
Re: [chromium-dev] Re: Building chromium for arm--erroring out
2009/12/10 Sofia Tahseen sofia.tahs...@gmail.com: You are so right, Joel... I corrected my .so and now I could build the chrome browser ...finally!! I copied the whole /src/out/Release directory to my jaunty on the BeagleBoard(256MB RAM). I try to launch chrome through: ./chrome It starts up chrome, and then immediately kills chrome. I get an Illegal Instruction. I restart and I can now see chrome as shown in the attachment but I cannot browse. When I reload the page, it again kills chrome saying Illegal instruction. Has anyone seen this before? I have my proxy settings set too.. This could be anything, but it might be this bug in some versions of gcc: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39604 If that's it then adding -fno-tree-sink to the flags used for V8 will help. It's a bug that only shows up on ARM and only on some versions of gcc. Any help is highly appreciated. Thanks, Sofia On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Joel Stanley j...@chromium.org wrote: On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 05:14, Sofia Tahseen sofia.tahs...@gmail.com wrote: /home/adas/0_Data/0_Lin/091203_Chromium_OS/toolchain/arm-2009q1/bin/../lib/gcc/arm-none-linux-gnueabi/4.3.3/../../../../arm-none-linux-gnueabi/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /home/adas/x-tools/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/sys-root/usr/lib/librt.so when searching for -lrt The errors are indicative of trying to link against libraries from a different platform. To confirm: check the output of $ 'file /home/adas/x-tools/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/sys-root/usr/lib/librt.so I suspect it will tell you it's a symbolic link to /lib/librt.so.1, which itself is a symbolic link to /lib/librt-2.10.2.so - note these paths are relative to /, not to your sysroot directory. You have two slightly solutions - adjust the symlinks in sys-root/usr/lib so they point to the files in sys-root//lib - replace the smymlinks with the actual libraries, ie copy files from sys-root/lib to sys-root/usr/lib I would be happy to hear a neater solution for this, but the above worked for me. Cheers, Joel -- Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -- Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
Re: [chromium-dev] Re: Building chromium for arm--erroring out
Hi Joel/Erik/All, I don't think armv5 is an issue. Reason being I used the jaunty armv5 libraries to build chrome. I tried to debug the issue with gdb. gdb chrome GNU gdb 6.8-debian Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type show copying and show warranty for details. This GDB was configured as arm-linux-gnueabi... (gdb) (gdb) run Starting program: /home/adas/Release/chrome [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 0x4112ac80 (LWP 9722)] [New Thread 0x41d49440 (LWP 9727)] [New Thread 0x42549440 (LWP 9728)] [New Thread 0x42d49440 (LWP 9729)] [New Thread 0x43549440 (LWP 9730)] [New Thread 0x43d49440 (LWP 9731)] [New Thread 0x44549440 (LWP 9732)] [New Thread 0x44d49440 (LWP 9733)] [New Thread 0x44d69440 (LWP 9734)] [New Thread 0x458ff440 (LWP 9738)] [New Thread 0x460ff440 (LWP 9739)] [Thread 0x460ff440 (LWP 9739) exited] Program received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction. [Switching to Thread 0x4112ac80 (LWP 9722)] 0x0081caec in S32A_Opaque_BlitRow32_neon () Current language: auto; currently asm The error S32A_Opaque_BlitRow32_neon () had to do something with the floating point setting of the kernel. I checked my kernel configuration and neon was not set. So I set it and it rebuild my kernel and booted my jaunty. Now it works perfectly...without any crashes. Key : In order to run chromium we need to set the neon in the kernel configuration. Regards, Sofia On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 2:27 AM, Erik Corry erik.co...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/12/10 Sofia Tahseen sofia.tahs...@gmail.com: You are so right, Joel... I corrected my .so and now I could build the chrome browser ...finally!! I copied the whole /src/out/Release directory to my jaunty on the BeagleBoard(256MB RAM). I try to launch chrome through: ./chrome It starts up chrome, and then immediately kills chrome. I get an Illegal Instruction. I restart and I can now see chrome as shown in the attachment but I cannot browse. When I reload the page, it again kills chrome saying Illegal instruction. Has anyone seen this before? I have my proxy settings set too.. This could be anything, but it might be this bug in some versions of gcc: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39604 If that's it then adding -fno-tree-sink to the flags used for V8 will help. It's a bug that only shows up on ARM and only on some versions of gcc. Any help is highly appreciated. Thanks, Sofia On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Joel Stanley j...@chromium.org wrote: On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 05:14, Sofia Tahseen sofia.tahs...@gmail.com wrote: /home/adas/0_Data/0_Lin/091203_Chromium_OS/toolchain/arm-2009q1/bin/../lib/gcc/arm-none-linux-gnueabi/4.3.3/../../../../arm-none-linux-gnueabi/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /home/adas/x-tools/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/sys-root/usr/lib/librt.so when searching for -lrt The errors are indicative of trying to link against libraries from a different platform. To confirm: check the output of $ 'file /home/adas/x-tools/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/sys-root/usr/lib/librt.so I suspect it will tell you it's a symbolic link to /lib/librt.so.1, which itself is a symbolic link to /lib/librt-2.10.2.so - note these paths are relative to /, not to your sysroot directory. You have two slightly solutions - adjust the symlinks in sys-root/usr/lib so they point to the files in sys-root//lib - replace the smymlinks with the actual libraries, ie copy files from sys-root/lib to sys-root/usr/lib I would be happy to hear a neater solution for this, but the above worked for me. Cheers, Joel -- Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -- Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
Re: [chromium-dev] Re: Building chromium for arm--erroring out
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Sofia Tahseen sofia.tahs...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Joel/Erik/All, I don't think armv5 is an issue. Reason being I used the jaunty armv5 libraries to build chrome. I tried to debug the issue with gdb. gdb chrome GNU gdb 6.8-debian Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type show copying and show warranty for details. This GDB was configured as arm-linux-gnueabi... (gdb) (gdb) run Starting program: /home/adas/Release/chrome [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 0x4112ac80 (LWP 9722)] [New Thread 0x41d49440 (LWP 9727)] [New Thread 0x42549440 (LWP 9728)] [New Thread 0x42d49440 (LWP 9729)] [New Thread 0x43549440 (LWP 9730)] [New Thread 0x43d49440 (LWP 9731)] [New Thread 0x44549440 (LWP 9732)] [New Thread 0x44d49440 (LWP 9733)] [New Thread 0x44d69440 (LWP 9734)] [New Thread 0x458ff440 (LWP 9738)] [New Thread 0x460ff440 (LWP 9739)] [Thread 0x460ff440 (LWP 9739) exited] Program received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction. [Switching to Thread 0x4112ac80 (LWP 9722)] 0x0081caec in S32A_Opaque_BlitRow32_neon () Current language: auto; currently asm The error S32A_Opaque_BlitRow32_neon () had to do something with the floating point setting of the kernel. I checked my kernel configuration and neon was not set. So I set it and it rebuild my kernel and booted my jaunty. Now it works perfectly...without any crashes. Key : In order to run chromium we need to set the neon in the kernel configuration. Note, if you don't set armv7=1 when you build chromium, it shouldn't use the NEON paths, so you shouldn't run into that problem. But it's better to enable it in the kernel if your hardware supports it. Antoine Regards, Sofia On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 2:27 AM, Erik Corry erik.co...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/12/10 Sofia Tahseen sofia.tahs...@gmail.com: You are so right, Joel... I corrected my .so and now I could build the chrome browser ...finally!! I copied the whole /src/out/Release directory to my jaunty on the BeagleBoard(256MB RAM). I try to launch chrome through: ./chrome It starts up chrome, and then immediately kills chrome. I get an Illegal Instruction. I restart and I can now see chrome as shown in the attachment but I cannot browse. When I reload the page, it again kills chrome saying Illegal instruction. Has anyone seen this before? I have my proxy settings set too.. This could be anything, but it might be this bug in some versions of gcc: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39604 If that's it then adding -fno-tree-sink to the flags used for V8 will help. It's a bug that only shows up on ARM and only on some versions of gcc. Any help is highly appreciated. Thanks, Sofia On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Joel Stanley j...@chromium.org wrote: On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 05:14, Sofia Tahseen sofia.tahs...@gmail.com wrote: /home/adas/0_Data/0_Lin/091203_Chromium_OS/toolchain/arm-2009q1/bin/../lib/gcc/arm-none-linux-gnueabi/4.3.3/../../../../arm-none-linux-gnueabi/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /home/adas/x-tools/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/sys-root/usr/lib/librt.so when searching for -lrt The errors are indicative of trying to link against libraries from a different platform. To confirm: check the output of $ 'file /home/adas/x-tools/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/sys-root/usr/lib/librt.so I suspect it will tell you it's a symbolic link to /lib/librt.so.1, which itself is a symbolic link to /lib/librt-2.10.2.so - note these paths are relative to /, not to your sysroot directory. You have two slightly solutions - adjust the symlinks in sys-root/usr/lib so they point to the files in sys-root//lib - replace the smymlinks with the actual libraries, ie copy files from sys-root/lib to sys-root/usr/lib I would be happy to hear a neater solution for this, but the above worked for me. Cheers, Joel -- Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -- Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
Re: [chromium-dev] Re: Building chromium for arm--erroring out
No, I believe the correct way is
va_list ap;
va_start(ap, msg);
std::string str;
StringAppendV(result, format, ap);
va_end(ap);
XmlReader* reader = static_castXmlReader*(context);
reader-errors_.append(str);
Weird that there's no StringPrintV() in string_util.
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Antoine Labour pi...@chromium.org wrote:
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 2:50 PM, SOFIA TAHSEEN dnk...@motorola.com wrote:
Hi Antoine/Joel,
When I try to build using the following make command I get the error as
below...Have you seen this earlier :
make -r -j3 BUILDTYPE=Release chrome
(I have a dual core so used -j3)
CXX(target)
out/Release/obj.target/common/chrome/common/histogram_synchronizer.o
CXX(target)
out/Release/obj.target/common/chrome/common/important_file_writer.o
CXX(target)
out/Release/obj.target/common/chrome/common/jstemplate_builder.o
CXX(target) out/Release/obj.target/common/chrome/common/libxml_utils.o
CXX(target) out/Release/obj.target/common/chrome/common/logging_chrome.o
cc1plus: warnings being treated as errors
chrome/common/libxml_utils.cc: In static member function 'static void
XmlReader::GenericErrorCallback(void*, const char*, ...)':
chrome/common/libxml_utils.cc:38: error: cannot pass objects of non-POD
type 'struct va_list' through '...'; call will abort at runtime
make: *** [out/Release/obj.target/common/chrome/common/libxml_utils.o]
Error 1
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
+chromium-dev
Sofia, I haven't seen that error. Which compiler did you end up using ?
However the code does look suspicious, passing va_list through ...:
void XmlReader::GenericErrorCallback(void* context, const char* msg, ...) {
va_list args;
va_start(args, msg);
XmlReader* reader = static_castXmlReader*(context);
reader-errors_.append(StringPrintf(msg, args));
}
Chromium C++ experts: Is that supposed to be legal, or even portable ? It
sounds like StringAppendV would be preferable here.
Antoine
--
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe:
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
--
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe:
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
