[cia-drugs] HITLER WAS A BRITISH AGENT
http://www.angelfire.com/trek/spymaster/auth.htm HITLER WAS A BRITISH AGENT a brilliant analysis of the deception of war by Greg Hallett and the Spymaster. ABOUT THE AUTHORS The authors' wake up each morning quite surprised they are still breathing. The Spymaster has worked in a background of undeclared hostilities over many years. He has gone undercover amongst Nazis, Communists, Marxists and some of the most vicious gangs of criminals in New Zealand. Several times other people have been killed in his place in cases of mistaken identity. The Spymaster has been arrested more times than he can remember and by more outfits than he can remember. He has been on both sides of enforcement operations. He has an in-depth knowledge of offenders in New Zealand and is often sought out by people in high places. Former Prime Minister Rob Muldoon once said of him, "If St Peter ever made a mistake and let you into heaven, there'd be a fistfight in five minutes". Greg Hallett trained in various psychological models in parallel with his architecture degree and training. He travelled widely behind the Iron Curtain during the Cold War, hitchhiking on planes, making bunks out of airmail bags, to party and report between cities. His contacts in Eastern Europe led to deep penetration of the Soviet State, how it functioned and how it was to colonise the West. It was these qualifications that led him to buy buildings in Moscow immediately after the Berlin Wall fell. This led to interviews with the KGB and their revelations about the planned sex-communism and deconstruction of Westerners. What they had planned for the West happened in the West. Equally all modern history can be dated back to 1945. What Hitler planned for the world happened to the world over the next sixty years. INTELLIGENCE TALES When Hallett teamed up with the Spymaster they found they had many of the insights and historical answers to many of the controversies of Europe from WWII to the Cold War and the present . . . not completely disregarding aspects of the future. In listening to each other's stories they noticed a lot of common ground and have attempted to lay this bare for you. "Take of it what you will. We don't expect you to reject sixty years of official history overnight, but we do expect you to view it with new-found suspicion." "Any serious attempt at the truth creates controversy and we expect Hitler was a British Agent to be considered as the most expedient option of creating war." The Spymaster says that he will often go on operations and end up in entirely the wrong place with the wrong people at the wrong time, but always much wiser. Through such coincidences, history is often more explicable to the ordinary man than a lot of complicated analysis. We found "filling-in-the-gaps analysis" to be a primary cause of ill-informed history. As such, Hallett and the Spymaster have teamed up to give you this riveting insight into how the enemies of war are created and how enemies work together to prolong and expand wars. This authoritative and unique insider's look at Hitler outlines his missing year, his British psychological training and financial support, his British-linked minders, and the British sabotage of the Hitler assassination attempts. It outlines in great detail, Operation WINNIE THE POOH, Hitler's escape out of Berlin on 2 May 1945, who he flew with, what planes he caught, their serial numbers, where he flew to, who greeted him, where he spent the remainder of his life and what he eventually died of. FILE THEFT WWII has passed its 60-year suppression rule. Despite this, information coming out about WWII is still controlled as it reflects on how the current wars are carried out. File theft is such common practise it is a forerunner to any elevation. Two Intelligence agencies have regularly stolen Hitler was a British Agent and "it has been read at the highest levels" during the final phases of writing. As quickly as it was written it was stolen and in August 2005 word got back that they would let it out. This came with further inside information and at least one historical act. The question remains . . . did the theft of Hitler was a British Agent in disk form on 11 May 2005 cause the Tavistock Square bombing on 7 July 2005? HITLER WAS A BRITISH AGENT Living Libraries Adolf Hitler The Incestuous Catholic Jew Adolf Hitler in Britain Hitler's Sexuality Hitler's Psychiatric Condition Hitler's Deconstruction Body Doubles Hess and Hess Fly to Britain Dunkirk James Bond Pearl Harbor Dieppe Anthony Blunt Wallis Simpson and King Edward VIII Operation JAMES BOND Operation WINNIE THE POOH Lost Leaders Churchill, Hitler and Stalin Work Together Afterword Appendices Bibliography Perfect bound, 467 pages. Includes photographs, appendices,
[cia-drugs] [Fwd: Federici at CSPAN 3 live now]
Original Message http://www.c-span.org/watch/cspan3_rm.asp?Cat=TVCode=CS3 Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ Please let us stay on topic and be civil. OM SPONSORED LINKS United state bankruptcy court western district of texas United state life insurance United state patent United state patent search United states patent office United state flag YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "cia-drugs" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[cia-drugs] Fwd: It Happened Here
Begin forwarded message:From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: November 16, 2005 6:42:41 PM PSTTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: It Happened Here http://www.buzzflash.com/hartmann/05/11/har05011.html "They Thought They Were Free" By Milton Mayer Thom Hartmann's "Independent Thinker" Book of the Month Reviewsnip Among Mayer's stories are some of the most telling aspects of how the Nazis came to take over Germany (and much of Europe). I first quoted them a year ago in a Common Dreams article linked from BuzzFlash titled The Myth of National Victimhood. I noted that Mayer told how one of his friends said: What happened here was the gradual habituation of the people, little by little, to being governed by surprise; to receiving decisions deliberated in secret; to believing that the situation was so complicated that the government had to act on information which the people could not understand, or so dangerous that, even if the people could understand it, it could not be released because of national securityAs a friend of Mayer's noted, and Mayer recorded in his book: This separation of government from people, this widening of the gap, took place so gradually and so insensibly, each step disguised (perhaps not even intentionally) as a temporary emergency measure or associated with true patriotic allegiance or with real social purposes. And all the crises and reforms (real reforms, too) so occupied the people that they did not see the slow motion underneath, of the whole process of government growing remoter and remoter. ... To live in this process is absolutely not to be able to notice it - please try to believe me - unless one has a much greater degree of political awareness, acuity, than most of us had ever had occasion to develop. Each step was so small, so inconsequential, so well explained or, on occasion, "regretted," that, unless one were detached from the whole process from the beginning, unless one understood what the whole thing was in principle, what all these "little measures" that no "patriotic German" could resent must some day lead to, one no more saw it developing from day to day than a farmer in his field sees the corn growing. One day it is over his head. In this conversation, Mayer's friend suggests that he wasn't making an excuse for not resisting the rise of the fascists, but simply pointing out an undisputable reality. This, he suggests, is how fascism will always take over a nation. "Pastor Niemoller spoke for the thousands and thousands of men like me when he spoke (too modestly of himself) and said that, when the Nazis attacked the Communists, he was a little uneasy, but, after all, he was not a Communist, and so he did nothing: and then they attacked the Socialists, and he was a little uneasier, but, still, he was not a Socialist, and he did nothing; and then the schools, the press, the Jews, and so on, and he was always uneasier, but still he did nothing. And then they attacked the Church, and he was a Churchman, and he did something - but then it was too late." "Yes," I said. "You see," my colleague went on, "one doesn't see exactly where or how to move. Believe me, this is true. Each act, each occasion, is worse than the last, but only a little worse. You wait for the next and the next. You wait for the one great shocking occasion, thinking that others, when such a shock comes, will join with you in resisting somehow. You don't want to act, or even to talk, alone; you don't want to 'go out of your way to make trouble.' Why not? - Well, you are not in the habit of doing it. And it is not just fear, fear of standing alone, that restrains you; it is also genuine uncertainty. "Uncertainty is a very important factor, and, instead of decreasing as time goes on, it grows. Outside, in the streets, in the general community, everyone is happy. One hears no protest, and certainly sees none. You know, in France or Italy there will be slogans against the government painted on walls and fences; in Germany, outside the great cities, perhaps, there is not even this. In the university community, in your own community, you speak privately to your colleagues, some of whom certainly feel as you do; but what do they say? They say, 'It's not so bad' or 'You're seeing things' or 'You're an alarmist.' "And you are an alarmist. You are saying that this must lead to this, and you can't prove it. These are the beginnings, yes; but how do you know for sure when you don't know the end, and how do you know, or even surmise, the end? On the one hand, your enemies, the law, the regime, the Party, intimidate you. On the other, your colleagues pooh-pooh you as pessimistic or even neurotic. ... "But the one great shocking occasion, when tens or hundreds or thousands will join with you, never comes. That's the difficulty. If the last and worst act of the whole regime had come immediately after the first and the smallest, thousands, yes, millions would have been
[cia-drugs] Fwd: [Spy News] Spy Agency Bugged 1,800 High-Profile Figures
Begin forwarded message:From: "Mario Profaca" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: November 16, 2005 7:16:48 PM PSTTo: "!SPY NEWS" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [Spy News] Spy Agency Bugged 1,800 High-Profile FiguresReply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://times.hankooki.com/lpage/nation/200511/kt200511161729970.htmSpy Agency Bugged 1,800 High-Profile FiguresBy Kim RahnStaff Reporterhttp://photo.hankooki.com/gisaphoto/20051116/ensor200511162007590Spy.jpgLim Dong-won, left, and Shin Gunn, former National Intelligence Service(NIS) directors, walk out of the Seoul Central District Prosecutors’ Officein southern Seoul Tuesday night to head for the Seoul Detention Center,after arrest warrants were issued on charges of directing the NIS’ illegalwiretapping./ YonhapThe nation’s spy agency eavesdropped cell phone conversations of some 1,800high-profile figures such as politicians and businessmen, including formerpresident Kim Young-sam, during the Kim Dae-jung administration, accordingto the prosecution.Prosecutors announced the details of the National Intelligence Service (NIS)’s illegal wiretapping operation Tuesday night when arrest warrants forformer agency chiefs were issued.Lim Dong-won, 71, who headed the NIS from 1999 to 2001, and Shin Gunn, 64,who succeeded Lim as director through 2003, were arrested on charges ofdirecting intelligence agents to spy on high-profile figures.They received six to 10 reports everyday about the tapped conversations ofthose on the top-class watch list, and encouraged the tapping unit tocollect more information about them, according to the prosecution.The court warrant and the prosecution’s investigation showed that the agency’s illegal activities had not only involved key figures but includedsurveillance on leaders at large, with 1,800 phone numbers recorded on thebugging devices.Those whose cell phone conversations were eavesdropped included formerpresident Kim Young-sam, who preceded Kim Dae-jung.The prosecution said the NIS tapped a conversation between Kim and formerGrand National Party (GNP) lawmaker Park Chong-ung, who staged a hungerstrike in protest against the government’s tax investigation into newspapercompanies in 2001.Opposition party lawmakers who conflicted with the government over severalissues were also under surveillance, as well as conservative writer JiMan-won who criticized the former government’s sunshine policy, and formerGNP lawmaker Kang Sam-jae who was involved in a scandal in 2000 about theNIS fund embezzlement.The spy agency also watched the movements of Lee Hyong-taek, formerpresident Kim’s nephew-in-law who was involved in a financial-politicalscandal perpetrated by venture businessman Lee Yong-ho.Park Jie-won, then chief presidential secretary and confidential aide ofex-president Kim, could not avoid surveillance regarding the scandal of SuziKim who was condemned as a North Korean spy by the NIS in an attempt tosilence the anti-government movement.The NIS also spied on the government’s sunshine policy and Hyundai Asan’sbusiness with the North, by wiretapping cell phone conversations between thelate Chung Mong-hun, former Asan chairman, and Kim Yoon-kyu, former vicechairman of the group.Issuing the arrest warrants, the court said it decided to arrest themdespite their contributions to the nation and Lim’s old age, due to theseverity of the matter.Following the arrest of the former directors, the prosecution will now focuson revealing how the spy agency made use of the collected information.Former president Kim’s aides strongly denounced the arrest, calling itimmoral and unfair. ``Those who protected the nation were arrested whileprofessor Kang Jeong-koo, who offended the national identity by makingremarks in violation of the national security law, was not,’’ Kim’s aideChoi Kyong-hwan said.The former president had demanded the prosecution retract the warrantrequest.Ruling Uri Party’s interim chairman Chung Sye-kyun expressed his regretabout their arrest, saying the people would think it judicially unsound.``They were arrested despite their contributions to improving inter-Koreanrelations. The prosecution should make efforts to uncover illegal operationsduring the Kim Young-sam government,’’ Chung said.While criticizing the former administration’s systematic wiretappingoperation, the GNP is closely watching the case, as further investigationsmay also implicate the opposition party in illegal activities during the KimYoung-sam government.[EMAIL PROTECTED]11-16-2005 17:31 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- FONT COLOR="#99"Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page/FONTA HREF=""http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/TySplB/TM">http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/TySplB/TM"BClick Here!/B/A~- -__ ___ _ ___ __ ___ _ _ _ __ /-_|-0-\-V-/-\|-|-__|-|-|-/-_| \_-\--_/\-/|-\\-|-_||-V-V-\_-\ |__/_|--//-|_|\_|___|\_A_/|__/
[cia-drugs] Woodward admission raises questions in leak case
http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/nation/ny-uscia1117,0,903942.story?coll=ny-nation-big-pix Woodward admission raises questions in leak case BY TOM BRUNE WASHINGTON BUREAU November 16, 2005, 9:51 PM EST WASHINGTON -- A Bush administration official's belated admission in recent weeks that he told the Washington Post's Bob Woodward in mid-June 2003 about covert CIA officer Valerie Plame raises new questions in the special counsel's two-year-old leak investigation. That admission ends two years of secrecy between source and reporter, and in the process raises concerns about Woodward's role as a journalist, the special counsel's probe and the perjury indictment of former aide I. Lewis Libby, as well as the White House's cooperation in the investigation. Attorneys for Libby called the revelation a "bombshell" for Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald's case against their client, but attorneys familiar with the probe said it might not be enough to get Libby off. Yesterday began with Woodward's statement in the Washington Post that he had testified under oath about an unnamed official telling him in June 2003 about Plame. And it ended with Woodward apologizing to the Post's top editor, Leonard Downie, for not telling him about it for two years. "I apologized because I should have told him much sooner," Woodward told the Post. "I hunkered down. I'm in the habit of keeping secrets. I didn't want anything out there that was going to get me subpoenaed." Until now, Woodward had not been connected to the investigation into the leak of Plame's identity, which her husband, Joseph Wilson, has said was a White House attempt to undercut his criticism of its pre-war Iraq intelligence on weapons of mass destruction. But Woodward said in a statement published yesterday that he had testified in a lawyer's office about parts of interviews with three current or former Bush officials that related to the outing of Plame. He said Fitzgerald contacted him Nov. 3, after one of the officials notified Fitzgerald about telling Woodward that "Wilson's wife worked for the CIA" as an analyst on weapons of mass destruction. The timing of that interview, mid-June 2003, would make the unnamed official the first to tell a reporter about Plame, not Libby, the vice president's former chief of staff. Ted Wells, one of Libby's attorneys, said Woodward's disclosure undercut Fitzgerald's five-count indictment charging Libby with lying when he said he learned about Plame from reporters, rather than the CIA, State Department and Vice President Dick Cheney. Wells said the disclosure shows Fitzgerald's statement at his Oct. 28 news conference that Libby was the first official to tell a reporter about Plame "was totally inaccurate." Fitzgerald said Libby was the "first known" official to do it, however. Wells added that Woodward said in two interviews in June 2003 that Libby did not mention Plame, undermining Fitzgerald's case that Libby sought to discredit Wilson. Floyd Abrams, who represents The New York Times in the leak case, said, "I don't think it seems to have much effect on the core of the charge against Mr. Libby." The identity of the official who spoke with Woodward is unknown. But the official's decision to come forward in recent weeks raises the issue of whether other officials have withheld information and whether the White House is aware of them. The White House declined to comment. In October 2003, President George W. Bush pledged cooperation with the investigation, and investigators requested and subpoenaed all records of contacts with reporters. = http://www.cloakanddagger.de/media/HEADLINES%20PAGE/cloak_news_toronto__updated_pos.htm Cloak News Toronto - UPDATED posted OCT.29/05 Cloak News Toronto - UPDATED Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald under National Security guidelines sealed two Grand Jury Indictments. Tom Heneghan (special Cloak guest) who has been on the forefront releasing first news on the work of the Grand Juries, has learned that RICHARD PERLE and PAUL WOLFOWITZ have been indicted (under seal) for violations of the Espionage Act and for misuse of classified information. V.P. CHENEY named as unindicted co-conspirator. White House National Security Advisor STEVE HADLEY has flipped. Stay with Cloak News and stay ahead of the Mass Media parade. More to come in the Member's Archives if we are not shut down by the Bush White House Internet Police. (W.H.I.P.) Who Might Be The Other 22 Sealed Felons? http://www.thinkprogress.org/leak-scandal#hadley Deputy National Security Advisor (2001-2005); National Security Advisor (2005-Present) ROVE COMMUNICATED HIS CONVERSATION WITH COOPER TO HADLEY: After Karl Rove spoke to Time magazine reporter Matt Cooper about Joseph Wilson (according to Cooper, this was the first time he learned of Plames identity), Rove wrote Hadley an email. The July 11, 2003 email said: Matt Cooper called to give me a heads-up that hes got a welfare reform
[cia-drugs] Abramoff--See Jack’s Back Door
http://www.sandersresearch.com/Sanders/NewsManager/index.aspx Jack’s Back Door November 15, 2005 Linda Minor While special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald proceeds with his hush-hush investigation of Scooter Libby, a high-level official with front-door entry into executive decision-making channels, another equally fascinating inquiry is drawing to a close within the Senate’s Committee on Indian Affairs, chaired by Senator John McCain. On November 2, the Committee completed its last of four scheduled hearings into lobbying activities engaged in by Jack Abramoff and Michael Scanlon on behalf of an assortment of Indian tribes. A key witness, Italia Federici, is now the fuse which may ignite the next scandal involving yet another Bush Administration cabinet member—Secretary Gale Norton of the Department of Interior. More » Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ Please let us stay on topic and be civil. OM SPONSORED LINKS United state bankruptcy court western district of texas United state life insurance United state patent United state patent search United states patent office United state flag YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "cia-drugs" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[cia-drugs] Andean Nations Seek U.S. Patent Protection for Native Medicines
http://quote.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=1086sid=abSfNYoY8Yfgrefer=news_index Andean Nations Seek U.S. Patent Protection for Native Medicines Nov. 17 (Bloomberg) -- Colombia, Ecuador and Peru are turning the tables on U.S. trade negotiators accustomed to winning tough safeguards for drug patents by demanding similar protections for traditional therapies such as roots and leaves. Demands for protections against what these nations call the misappropriation of traditional knowledge will be one of the most contentious issues during trade talks this week and next in Washington, Ecuadorian trade minister Jorge Illingworth and other officials say. The demands threaten to create new problems for drugmakers, such as Merck Co. and Pfizer Inc., that are seeking to patent medicines, and to derail President George W. Bush's two-year effort to reach a trade agreement with the three nations. ``It's the law of unintended consequences,'' said Michael Gollin, founder of Public Interest Intellectual Property Advisors in Washington, which provides free legal counsel to poor countries in patent disputes. For years the U.S. has pushed these nations to strengthen their patent rules, he said, ``and now the countries are learning to use these to their own advantage.'' The Andean nations want ``minor'' protections for their native plants and the ways they are used, such as a rule requiring companies to inform indigenous tribes of any patent applications based on traditional knowledge and negotiate payment, according to Carlos Correa, a Buenos Aires-based consultant to those nations. `Redirect the Rules' ``Existing rules protect things that are made in labs, not things taken from the wild or cultivated over generations,'' said Renee Marlin-Bennett, chairwoman of the Global Intellectual Property Project at American University in Washington. The proposed changes would ``redirect the rules to rectify some of the embedded imbalance'' between rich and poor, she said. While it's difficult to quantify the magnitude of the issue, the nations are moving to catalog it. Peru's government created a commission on so-called biopiracy that has identified 10 plant species of local origin over which patents have been granted or applied for in the U.S., Europe or Japan, according to Manuel Ruiz Muller, director of the Lima-based patent association Programa de Asuntos Internacionales y Biodiversidad. In 2001, South Hackensack, New Jersey-based Pure World Botanicals Inc. won a patent for an ingredient in the Peruvian plant maca and is now marketing it as a ``natural Viagra.'' The Peruvian commission is preparing a legal challenge, Ruiz said. `The Last Days' Chris Kilham, a consultant for Avignon, France-based Naturex, which now owns Pure World, said the company's patents are legitimate. Still, he said Pure World erred in not sharing the patent rights with Peruvian communities. ``They didn't do anything illegal, but it really was the last days of a particular way of doing business,'' said Kilham, a scientist who helped interest Pure World in maca. He was speaking in response to a request to the company for comment. In 1988 the U.S. issued a patent to Austrian scientist Klaus Keplinger for an alkaloid that can treat tumors. The basis of that was a plant called uncaria tomentosa, or cat's claw, that Peruvians use to treat inflammation, according to a letter sent by the Sierra Club and other environmental groups to U.S. Trade Representative Rob Portman in July. These examples are isolated but are likely to grow as more prospectors head to out-of-the-way destinations to search for new drug breakthroughs, Marlin-Bennett and others say. The U.S. says it has investigated most of the frequently cited examples of biopiracy and found little supporting evidence. `Significant Concerns' The U.S. has ``significant concerns'' about the explicit notification proposal, and instead is offering compromises that will guard against patent abuses, a U.S. trade official said. The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, declined to detail the compromises, saying the negotiations are ongoing. ``We all share the objective of having a patent system that works well,'' said John Stubbs, a spokesman for the U.S. trade office. Representatives of pharmaceutical companies such as New York-based Pfizer and Whitehouse Station, New Jersey-based Merck oppose acceding to the Andean nations' demands, saying their solution addresses a problem that doesn't
[cia-drugs] Peru to sign free trade pact with US even if unilaterally
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2005-11/17/content_3793620.htm Peru to sign free trade pact with US even if unilaterally LIMA, Nov. 16 (Xinhuanet) -- Peru will sign a free trade agreement with the United States even if its Andean neighbors Colombia and Ecuador do not participate, the country's chief negotiator Pablo de la Flor said on Wednesday. But he warned that there is still a lot of work to be done on the pact, which has been under consideration for 18 months. "I hope we will be able to close the negotiations along with our Andean partners," De La Flor told Peruvian radio by telephone from the the US capital Washington, on the third day of a new round of negotiation between representatives of the United States,Colombia, Peru and Ecuador. Bolivian officials have also attended the meetings as observers. If a group deal is not possible, Peru will act "in strict defense of its interests" and sign alone, he said. "Our responsibility is to look after the interests of Peru and reach the best agreement possible," he said. Meanwhile, Ecuadorian negotiators said they were in no hurry tosign a free trade pact with the United States, though they did expect an agreement at the end of this month. Once it is signed, the signatories will have 90 days to review the deal, which experts said is most likely to be completed in March 2006. De La Flor said Peru and the United States have agreed on some technology transfer mechanisms on Tuesday. He stressed the vital importance of technology transfer, sayingwithout this, "there is no chance of having a coherent regime" because the United States is completely inflexible on intellectual property rights. The negotiator said Peru promised to add new offenses to the country's penal code, including labeling and packing pirate CDs and software. Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ Please let us stay on topic and be civil. OM YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "cia-drugs" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[cia-drugs] Ukrainian 2006 election: the game for the USA and Russia
http://en.ura-inform.com/archive/?/2005/11/17/~/45300 Ukrainian 2006 election: the game for the USA and Russia 18:17 17.11.2005 Russian Federations intrusion into the course of the parliamentary election in Ukraine is unavoidable, considers the director of the European Institute of Integration and Development, known political scientist Dmytro Vydrin. ForUm announced that. External intrusion in more or less hidden forms always was, is and will be. The election never happens without intrusion of the third party in a certain way. Either intellectually assisting certain forces or financially assisting through grants and technical aid. In our case the intrusion, however indirect, is unavoidable, said the political scientist. According to Vydrin, Russia currently applies their new strategy: they work not with contenders but with the winners. Therefore our northern neighbor will pay attention to all potential future winners. The talks are conducted with all potential winners. Finally, Russia will be involved into the big game with those who finally win. The strategy is changed radically. Previously Russia tried to play with contenders, now only with the winners, said the political scientist, and added that apart of Russia, all countries of Europe having sympathies of their own will be intruding the election. Therefore, there will be the intensive attention from the EU, first of all, Germany, and, certainly, from the States. Large players are playing geopolitics, and there are quite few of them: Russia, USA and Europe. There are no more players of such a scale, considers Vydrin. The BYuT fraction member MP Andriy Shkil stated the following: I think there will be intrusion to the election, including the ones from Russia. I hope, they will be within the allowed limits, without direct impact on the result, however no one doubts that they will take place. I consider that the experience from the previous election made the agitators of the professional intrusion learn to react on initiants more adequately. According to the MP, he does not see an atmosphere of supporting NSNU or BYuT coming from Russia about which some experts say, but the fact that Russian officials attitude toward Ukraine became much more loyal is non-doubtful. Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ Please let us stay on topic and be civil. OM YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "cia-drugs" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[cia-drugs] U.S.-China summit, and two triangles
http://www.koreaherald.co.kr/SITE/data/html_dir/2005/11/18/200511180005.asp U.S.-China summit, and two triangles With the summit meeting between President George W. Bush and President Hu Jintao approaching, attention is being paid to how symbolism and substance will be managed. China wants to be seen as an "equal partner" with the United States while presenting an acceptable face of the rising China. The United States tries to send a "clear message" that it opposes, for example, China's non-transparent military modernization and unfair trade behavior while maintaining cooperation for counter-terrorism and counter-proliferation. President Hu's meeting with President Bush comes while strains are testing the U.S.-Chinese cooperation that emerged after 9/11. On the list of areas of concern for Presidents Hu and Bush may be military build-up, energy, and trade. Above all, President Hu wants the United States to ease off on its rhetoric about China's military threat and stop pushing arms to Taiwan. The Pentagon said in a report in July that China's growing military could endanger other Asia-Pacific countries, which was notable in that the Bush administration, for the first time, branded China as a threat to the Asia-Pacific region, not just to Taiwan. In August, state-controlled CNOOC Ltd. dropped its bid to buy Unocal Corp. after claims that the deal could threaten U.S. security. Also in August, U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice told the New York Times that China must make significant changes in its economic policy. Rice expressed concern about China's military buildup and its record on human rights and religious freedom. In remarks to the National Committee on U.S.-China Relations on Sept. 21, Deputy Secretary of State Robert Zoellick implied that China should respect U.S.-centered order, saying "U.S. concerns will grow if China seeks to maneuver toward a preponderance of power in Asia." On the other hand, China said it was committed to peaceful development and would never use nuclear weapons first, as it outlined its arms control policy on Sept. 1 ahead of President Hu's visit to the United Nations. In the position paper - "China's Endeavors for Arms Control, Disarmament and Non-Proliferation" - Beijing said it had always favored nuclear disarmament, and called for restraint from other nations. Another interesting point was that it said a balance must be struck between non-proliferation and the peaceful use of nuclear energy. This implies that the United States needs to show some flexibility over the issue of North Korea's peaceful use of nuclear energy. The Bush administration has praised China for pushing North Korea to rejoin six-party talks and agree on the Sept. 19 Joint Statement. China's constructive and decisive role in resolving the North Korean nuclear problem will surely contribute to diluting mutual suspicions between Beijing and Washington on other strategic fronts. The jury is still out on whether China will play that decisive role to make North Korea implement the Joint Statement. In his book on post-Cold War geopolitics, "The Grand Chessboard," Zbigniew Brzezinski underscores the existing and potential rivalry in Asia between China and the United States. According to Brzezinski, China regards America as the perpetrator of this rivalry. "Through its Asian presence and support of Japan," he explains, the United States "stands in the way of China's external aspirations." He goes on to make the interesting assertion that the focal point of this Sino-American rivalry will be Korea. Although this assertion may be far-fetched, there is much truth in the notion that the two powers will be increasingly intensifying their competition. However, a closer look at the current situation suggests a still newer phenomenon - the emergence of a single, more powerful triangular relationship that encompasses China, the United States and all of the Korean Peninsula. This new pattern is developing as both China and the United States begin to see the Korean Peninsula not only as a geographical area which houses two Koreas, but also as a place where Korea as a nation is located. The increasing prospects for Korean unification will make it all the more necessary for the two powers to begin to adjust their thinking about Korea. Another notable triangle in Northeast Asia consists of China, Japan, and the United States. However, recent developments signal the advent of a U.S.-China-Japan triangle that is fundamentally different from the preexisting model. The U.S.-China-Japan triangle played the role of a balancer in Sino-Japan relations during the Clinton era: the United States maintained the status quo of its alliance with Japan while defining its relations with China as a strategic partnership. Conversely, the Bush administration has bolstered the U.S.-Japan alliance while sustaining a system of cooperation with China on counter-terrorism
[cia-drugs] Rathergate Pays for Fired CBS Producer
http://www.aim.org/media_monitor_print/4175_0_2_0/ Rathergate Pays for Fired CBS Producer By Cliff Kincaid | November 17, 2005 This means that Mapes had the evidence exonerating Bush of the malicious charge of going into the National Guard to avoid Vietnam. Fired CBS News producer Mary Mapes claims that the panel that investigated her use of forged documents to damage President Bush wasn't able to figure out whether the documents were real. But the panel didn't take the time to do so. We have heard this claim from other defenders of Mapes and CBS. It's worth repeating, since the Mapes book on the scandal has been released, why we had concluded with good reason that the documents CBS used on the air were forged. We noted at the time-and will repeat here-that we consulted Herbert Romerstein, a retired government expert on anti-American and communist propaganda activities who specialized in uncovering and exposing Soviet forgeries used against the U.S. in the Cold War. "Documents cannot stand on their own two feet," he told us. "There has to be a provenance for them-tracing them to their origin or the personal possession of someone. The fact that the CBS documents had no provenance makes them suspicious in the first place. In this case, somebody gave the documents to CBS and lied about where he got them. That should have been enough evidence that they were phony." Romerstein said that document examiners "also have to look at the content of the documents. In the case of the CBS documents, they had the wrong type face. The type-face didn't exist when the documents were supposedly typed. When you're dealing with an inaccurate or suspect document, then you can only conclude that it was a forgery." There is something else that we should set straight. The Thornburgh/Boccardi report into the scandal did reveal on page 130 that Mapes had documented information in her possession before the controversial broadcast that George W. Bush, while in the Texas Air National Guard, "did volunteer for service in Vietnam but was turned down in favor of more experienced pilots." This information is critical because Rather, in the broadcast, insinuated that Bush was among the "many well-connected young men [who tried to] pull strings and avoid service in Vietnam." This means that Mapes had the evidence exonerating Bush of the malicious charge of going into the National Guard to avoid Vietnam. The report shows that there were multiple credible sources to prove that he was in fact willing to go to Vietnam as a pilot. However, CBS News deliberately kept this information from its viewers. The Mapes book is titled, Truth and Duty: The Press, the President and the Privilege of Power. She abused her power and concealed the truth. For this, she was reportedly paid in the high six figures. Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ Please let us stay on topic and be civil. OM SPONSORED LINKS United state bankruptcy court western district of texas United state life insurance United state patent United state patent search United states patent office United state flag YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "cia-drugs" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[cia-drugs] Freeh: 9-11 panel ignored 'Able Danger'
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/printer-friendly.asp?ARTICLE_ID=47455 "Have the 9-11 commissioners appear as witnesses Freeh Great idea. Ask Jamie Gorelick about Bojinka and watch the commission members run for cover. JR Thursday, November 17, 2005 DAY OF INFAMY 2001Freeh: 9-11 panel ignored 'Able Danger'Ex-FBI director rebukes commission on crucial Atta revelation Posted: November 17, 20052:03 p.m. Eastern ©2005WorldNetDaily.com Mohamed AttaFormer FBI chief Louis Freeh rebuked the 9-11 commission in a Wall Street Journal column today for ignoring recent revelations by the military operation "Able Danger," which concluded Mohamed Atta had been identified as an al-Qaida agent operating in the U.S. prior to the attacks he helped orchestrate. The commission issued a report Tuesday that criticized the U.S. government for not doing enough to keep nuclear weapons out of the hands of terrorists. The panel formally disbanded, but members are organized now as the 9/11 Public Discourse Project to track implementation of its major 2004 report. Freeh, author of the newly released "My FBI," called the panel a "self-perpetuating and privately funded group of lobbyists and lawyers" that offers a "'back-seat' take" on "how things ought to be on the 'front lines.'" Able Danger, he said, has "cast light on a missed opportunity that could have potentially prevented 9-11." The operation identified Atta by name, and possibly by photograph, Freeh said, but military officers inexplicably were prevented from sharing the critical information with FBI agents. Louis Freeh The former Clinton administration FBI director wants to know if Able Danger intelligence was provided to the 9-11 commission prior to the finalization of its report, and, if so, why it was not explored. In sum, he asks, "what did the 9/11 commissioners and their staff know about Able Danger and when did they know it?" The panel has concluded that the intelligence about Atta "was not historically significant." Freeh writes: "This astounding conclusion in combination with the failure to investigate Able Danger and incorporate it into its findings raises serious challenges to the commission's credibility and, if the facts prove out, might just render the commission historically insignificant itself." Freeh recalls Able Danger surfaced in the news in mid-August when U.S. Army Col. Anthony Shaffer, a veteran intelligence officer, publicly revealed his team had identified Atta and three other 9-11 hijackers by mid-2000 but were prevented by military lawyers from giving the information to the FBI. Shaffer's assertion was confirmed one week later by Navy Capt. Scott J. Phillpott, a U.S. Naval Academy graduate who managed Able Danger for the Pentagon's Special Operations Command. The Pentagon initially stated, Aug. 18, "a probe" found nothing to back the claims, but two weeks later, Defense Department officials acknowledged an inquiry came up with three more people "who recall seeing an intelligence briefing slide that identified the ringleader of the 9-11 attacks a year before the hijackings and terrorist strikes." These officials said the related documents and electronic files were "destroyed under standing orders that limit the military's use of intelligence gathered about people in the United States." In September, however, the Pentagon blocked several military officers from testifying at an open congressional hearing about the Able Danger program. Freeh criticizes the 9-11 panel's chairman, Thomas Kean, for reacting to Able Danger "with the standard Washington PR approach," demanding the Pentagon conduct an investigation to evaluate the credibility of Shaffer and Phillpott instead of the issue itself. The final 9-11 commission report, Freeh points out, concluded "American intelligence agencies were unaware of Mr. Atta until the day of the attacks." "This now looks to be embarrassingly wrong," Free writes. "Yet amazingly, commission leaders acknowledged on Aug. 12 that their staff in fact met with a Navy officer 10 days before releasing the report, who 'asserted that a highly classified intelligence operation, Able Danger, had identified Mohamed Atta to be a member of an al-Qaida cell located in Brooklyn.'" Freeh says it's no wonder the families of 9-11 victims were outraged by the revelations and
