Re: [cia-drugs] China Wants Its Own 'New World Order' To Oppose US Version
Once they merge with Europe, since they're on the same continent, we'll have Eurasia. Hmmm... Vigilius Haufniensis wrote: http://novus.liber.us/2007/08/27/china-wants-its-own-new-world-order-to-oppose-us-version/ Storm Warning: The Unlearned Lessons Of Katrina How American Special Forces organised the evacuation of Al Qaeda to Kashmir China Wants Its Own New World Order To Oppose US Version
[cia-drugs] Re: [political-research] Dick Eastman Apologizes for His Antisemitism
Kris, Remember when Sean/Chip would not admit that the war in Iraq was about OIL? Are you familiar with Nico Haupt. I saw him at Fetzer's 911 book rollout event back in April 2007 at VOX POP in Brooklyn NY with Sander Hicks. Let's just put it like this: Nico is wrapped a bit too tight. He was gaunt and chain smoking cigarettes and claiming everybody was disinfo and CIA in a highly precise german accent. He has aligned himself with Webfairy and believes the planes crashing into WTC were not real, not possible. Fetzer believes that in addition to the planes and explosives, there must have been something like scalar weapons or mininukes used because the towers collapsed too fast. Nico thinks Fetzer is making progress in having made this accomodation but is still far off the mark. I told Fetzer that the minute you bring in the miraculous and magical stuff into the equation, you turn people off - better to just state what could not be a sufficient cause and leave it at that. 9/11/07 should be an interesting day in NYC. Whast do you think Victor Thorn and Lisa Guliani will be doing? --- In cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com, RoadsEnd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Chip, you really are quite the gag-puller. Peace, Kris Millegan On Aug 28, 2007, at 10:44 AM, Sean McBride wrote: I'm not sure this post contributes to inter-ethnic amity, but Eastman has rather invited it. Generally, if you kick other ethnic or religious groups hard in sensitive areas, they will kick back. It's all purely Pavlovian. By the way, I've never allowed Dick Eastman to post here because of this problem he has. I think he's a sincere truth seeker with some original insights about deep politics, but injecting any form of bigotry into these discussions makes it impossible to proceed rationally. He needs to rework his world model from the ground up. tigerbengalis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: He's still an asshat, no doubt still an anti-Semitic moron, and probably has a closet full of porn. Sean McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My comment: Dick Eastman deserves some credit for acknowledging and apologizing for the antisemitism which disfigures quite a few of his posts. (And Mark Bilk and I deserve some credit for confronting him about this antisemitism.) No one is beyond redemption -- perhaps Eastman will begin to think more clearly about these issues in the future. A basic rule of thumb: judge people as individuals, not as members of ethnic, religious or national groups. Don't attack entire groups of people on the basis of ethnic, religious or national stereotypes. It's the American Way. All forms of obsessive ethnic and religious bigotry are much like alcoholism -- the victims of this disease need help. Deep inside all bigots know that they have a psychological problem and that this is no way to live. Dick Eastman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Dick Eastman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: When I attacked Jewish culture in my last post -- I crossed over into Hitlerland. Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 00:55:48 -0700 I have let myself become unjustly critical of Jews as a group -- greatly harming the effort of bringing to justice individual (Jewish) perpetrators of specific monstrous crimes and social problems Mark Bilk warned me this would happen. As some find it hard not to blame the white man in general -- so this white man has gone and slandered innocent Jews (by bunching them with the guilty ones.) Guilt belongs only to individuals. Collective guilt is unjust. And to attack a people and their entire culture is to engage in collective guilt. I probably won't quit posting -- never seem to be able to do that for long. But you and I know that I have a problem. It doesn't matter how right I am on some things -- better to let the guilty go free than to condemn the innocent. Dick Eastman Yakima, Washington p.s. in case you are confused -- I am referring to my post: Re: Weaponized Porn -- letters and responses -- oi vey! Park yourself in front of a world of choices in alternative vehicles. Visit the Yahoo! Auto Green Center.
Re: [cia-drugs] Re: [political-research] Dick Eastman Apologizes for His Antisemitism
Did you notice who was on the History Channel as the big Debunker, ol' J.F. Chipper, himself. Now, isn't it funny that the biggest debunker (Democracy Now and now the History Channel) has NO (Well, not under his name) presence in the email community about 9-11. Peace, K On Aug 28, 2007, at 12:10 PM, mark urban wrote: Kris, Remember when Sean/Chip would not admit that the war in Iraq was about OIL? Are you familiar with Nico Haupt. I saw him at Fetzer's 911 book rollout event back in April 2007 at VOX POP in Brooklyn NY with Sander Hicks. Let's just put it like this: Nico is wrapped a bit too tight. He was gaunt and chain smoking cigarettes and claiming everybody was disinfo and CIA in a highly precise german accent. He has aligned himself with Webfairy and believes the planes crashing into WTC were not real, not possible. Fetzer believes that in addition to the planes and explosives, there must have been something like scalar weapons or mininukes used because the towers collapsed too fast. Nico thinks Fetzer is making progress in having made this accomodation but is still far off the mark. I told Fetzer that the minute you bring in the miraculous and magical stuff into the equation, you turn people off - better to just state what could not be a sufficient cause and leave it at that. 9/11/07 should be an interesting day in NYC. Whast do you think Victor Thorn and Lisa Guliani will be doing? --- In cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com, RoadsEnd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Chip, you really are quite the gag-puller. Peace, Kris Millegan On Aug 28, 2007, at 10:44 AM, Sean McBride wrote: I'm not sure this post contributes to inter-ethnic amity, but Eastman has rather invited it. Generally, if you kick other ethnic or religious groups hard in sensitive areas, they will kick back. It's all purely Pavlovian. By the way, I've never allowed Dick Eastman to post here because of this problem he has. I think he's a sincere truth seeker with some original insights about deep politics, but injecting any form of bigotry into these discussions makes it impossible to proceed rationally. He needs to rework his world model from the ground up. tigerbengalis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: He's still an asshat, no doubt still an anti-Semitic moron, and probably has a closet full of porn. Sean McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My comment: Dick Eastman deserves some credit for acknowledging and apologizing for the antisemitism which disfigures quite a few of his posts. (And Mark Bilk and I deserve some credit for confronting him about this antisemitism.) No one is beyond redemption -- perhaps Eastman will begin to think more clearly about these issues in the future. A basic rule of thumb: judge people as individuals, not as members of ethnic, religious or national groups. Don't attack entire groups of people on the basis of ethnic, religious or national stereotypes. It's the American Way. All forms of obsessive ethnic and religious bigotry are much like alcoholism -- the victims of this disease need help. Deep inside all bigots know that they have a psychological problem and that this is no way to live. Dick Eastman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Dick Eastman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: When I attacked Jewish culture in my last post -- I crossed over into Hitlerland. Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 00:55:48 -0700 I have let myself become unjustly critical of Jews as a group -- greatly harming the effort of bringing to justice individual (Jewish) perpetrators of specific monstrous crimes and social problems Mark Bilk warned me this would happen. As some find it hard not to blame the white man in general -- so this white man has gone and slandered innocent Jews (by bunching them with the guilty ones.) Guilt belongs only to individuals. Collective guilt is unjust. And to attack a people and their entire culture is to engage in collective guilt. I probably won't quit posting -- never seem to be able to do that for long. But you and I know that I have a problem. It doesn't matter how right I am on some things -- better to let the guilty go free than to condemn the innocent. Dick Eastman Yakima, Washington p.s. in case you are confused -- I am referring to my post: Re: Weaponized Porn -- letters and responses -- oi vey! Park yourself in front of a world of choices in alternative vehicles. Visit the Yahoo! Auto Green Center. Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ Please let us stay on topic and be civil. OM Yahoo! Groups Links
[cia-drugs] Fwd: [political-research] Dick Eastman Apologizes for His Antisemitism
Begin forwarded message: From: RoadsEnd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: August 28, 2007 1:03:27 PM PDT To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: RoadsEnd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [political-research] Dick Eastman Apologizes for His Antisemitism For what record? You record of deceit, shams and boilerplate? Blog isn't email. Sean McBride is the web persona of Chip Berlet. Peace, Kris Millegan On Aug 28, 2007, at 12:43 PM, Sean McBride wrote: For the record: it's still the case that I've never met with or communicated with Chip Berlet, nor have I barely thought of him since the last time this subject came up. I just did a quick search on Berlet and discovered that he now has a blog here: http://chipberlet.blogspot.com/ Frankly, to indulge in a bit of braggadocio, I think political- research and my Google Reader Shared Items page cover a much wider range of interesting topics than Berlet's blog. He seems to be mostly focused on Dominionism these days, and not much else. I must admit that I do agree with his views on that subject, as no doubt do most of the readers of this list. I favor the term Christian Armageddonists to describe the phenomenon. RoadsEnd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Chip, you really are quite the gag-puller. Peace, Kris Millegan On Aug 28, 2007, at 10:44 AM, Sean McBride wrote: I'm not sure this post contributes to inter-ethnic amity, but Eastman has rather invited it. Generally, if you kick other ethnic or religious groups hard in sensitive areas, they will kick back. It's all purely Pavlovian. By the way, I've never allowed Dick Eastman to post here because of this problem he has. I think he's a sincere truth seeker with some original insights about deep politics, but injecting any form of bigotry into these discussions makes it impossible to proceed rationally. He needs to rework his world model from the ground up. tigerbengalis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: He's still an asshat, no doubt still an anti-Semitic moron, and probably has a closet full of porn. Sean McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My comment: Dick Eastman deserves some credit for acknowledging and apologizing for the antisemitism which disfigures quite a few of his posts. (And Mark Bilk and I deserve some credit for confronting him about this antisemitism.) No one is beyond redemption -- perhaps Eastman will begin to think more clearly about these issues in the future. A basic rule of thumb: judge people as individuals, not as members of ethnic, religious or national groups. Don't attack entire groups of people on the basis of ethnic, religious or national stereotypes. It's the American Way. All forms of obsessive ethnic and religious bigotry are much like alcoholism -- the victims of this disease need help. Deep inside all bigots know that they have a psychological problem and that this is no way to live. Dick Eastman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Dick Eastman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: When I attacked Jewish culture in my last post -- I crossed over into Hitlerland. Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 00:55:48 -0700 I have let myself become unjustly critical of Jews as a group -- greatly harming the effort of bringing to justice individual (Jewish) perpetrators of specific monstrous crimes and social problems Mark Bilk warned me this would happen. As some find it hard not to blame the white man in general -- so this white man has gone and slandered innocent Jews (by bunching them with the guilty ones.) Guilt belongs only to individuals. Collective guilt is unjust. And to attack a people and their entire culture is to engage in collective guilt. I probably won't quit posting -- never seem to be able to do that for long. But you and I know that I have a problem. It doesn't matter how right I am on some things -- better to let the guilty go free than to condemn the innocent. Dick Eastman Yakima, Washington p.s. in case you are confused -- I am referring to my post: Re: Weaponized Porn -- letters and responses -- oi vey! Park yourself in front of a world of choices in alternative vehicles. Visit the Yahoo! Auto Green Center. = =
[cia-drugs] Tarpley on the Kennebunkport Warning
http://www.911blogger.com/node/10925 Tarpley on the Kennebunkport Warning ( Home ยป Tarpley on the... ) Submitted by Reprehensor on Tue, 08/28/2007 - 1:56pm. Webster Tarpley Tarpley offers some evidence that led to the formulation of the Kennebunkport Warning, and will be dedicating his Thursday, August 30 GCN program, broadcast from 7-9pm Central on Network 4, to discussing the evidence for the coming Bush-Cheney aggression against Iran, to be predicated on a new 9/11 and/or a new Gulf of Tonkin provocation. Several readers of the Kennebunkport Warning have requested documentation on the evidence referred to in that document. I am enclosing my July 21, 2007 summary entitled Cheney Determined to Strike in US with WMD this Summer, plus a portfolio of selected news stories covering July and August of 2007. (both items attached below) I have also included an early description of the Cheney doctrine by Philip Giraldi from August, 2005. This evidence could be supplemented, but it is already conclusive. It would be foolhardy in the extreme for serious antiwar activists to ignore the grave danger of an upcoming attack on Iran, predicated on a new 9/11 and/or a new Gulf of Tonkin. I send this out in the hopes that it will promote a a vigorous open debate on these matters as we approach the sixth anniversary of 9/11. A well-known Democratic member of the House of Representatives has repeatedly told individual supporters that the top leadership of the Democratic Party has explicitly approved an attack on Iran. Mrs. Clinton is openly offering herself as the politician best qualified to take over in the wake of such an event. It is therefore the task of genuine antiwar activists, together with institutional forces within the government and the military, plus certain international factions, to ward off this looming catastrophe. Webster G. Tarpley Washington DC ... See also this new article at The Raw Story: Study: US preparing 'massive' military attack against Iran. Kennebunkport Warning Evidence U.S. Terror Attack - 'Ninety Days at Most' Wednesday, July 13, 2005 As you can see, this terror warning is a hoax/fake article. The printer friendly date reveals that the new 2007 article is a reprint of a 2005 article. See link below for more details. If Tarpley wants more evidence he can use my research here: http://arabesque911.blogspot.com/2007/08/next-911-predictions-propaganda... Submitted by Arabesque on Tue, 08/28/2007 - 2:18pm.
[cia-drugs] Re: [political-research] Dick Eastman Apologizes for His Antisemitism
Chip Berlet is a spook, which makes Sean McBride another name for a spook. Peace, Kris Millegan On Aug 28, 2007, at 12:43 PM, Sean McBride wrote: For the record: it's still the case that I've never met with or communicated with Chip Berlet, nor have I barely thought of him since the last time this subject came up. I just did a quick search on Berlet and discovered that he now has a blog here: http://chipberlet.blogspot.com/ Frankly, to indulge in a bit of braggadocio, I think political- research and my Google Reader Shared Items page cover a much wider range of interesting topics than Berlet's blog. He seems to be mostly focused on Dominionism these days, and not much else. I must admit that I do agree with his views on that subject, as no doubt do most of the readers of this list. I favor the term Christian Armageddonists to describe the phenomenon. RoadsEnd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Chip, you really are quite the gag-puller. Peace, Kris Millegan On Aug 28, 2007, at 10:44 AM, Sean McBride wrote: I'm not sure this post contributes to inter-ethnic amity, but Eastman has rather invited it. Generally, if you kick other ethnic or religious groups hard in sensitive areas, they will kick back. It's all purely Pavlovian. By the way, I've never allowed Dick Eastman to post here because of this problem he has. I think he's a sincere truth seeker with some original insights about deep politics, but injecting any form of bigotry into these discussions makes it impossible to proceed rationally. He needs to rework his world model from the ground up. tigerbengalis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: He's still an asshat, no doubt still an anti-Semitic moron, and probably has a closet full of porn. Sean McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My comment: Dick Eastman deserves some credit for acknowledging and apologizing for the antisemitism which disfigures quite a few of his posts. (And Mark Bilk and I deserve some credit for confronting him about this antisemitism.) No one is beyond redemption -- perhaps Eastman will begin to think more clearly about these issues in the future. A basic rule of thumb: judge people as individuals, not as members of ethnic, religious or national groups. Don't attack entire groups of people on the basis of ethnic, religious or national stereotypes. It's the American Way. All forms of obsessive ethnic and religious bigotry are much like alcoholism -- the victims of this disease need help. Deep inside all bigots know that they have a psychological problem and that this is no way to live. Dick Eastman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Dick Eastman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: When I attacked Jewish culture in my last post -- I crossed over into Hitlerland. Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 00:55:48 -0700 I have let myself become unjustly critical of Jews as a group -- greatly harming the effort of bringing to justice individual (Jewish) perpetrators of specific monstrous crimes and social problems Mark Bilk warned me this would happen. As some find it hard not to blame the white man in general -- so this white man has gone and slandered innocent Jews (by bunching them with the guilty ones.) Guilt belongs only to individuals. Collective guilt is unjust. And to attack a people and their entire culture is to engage in collective guilt. I probably won't quit posting -- never seem to be able to do that for long. But you and I know that I have a problem. It doesn't matter how right I am on some things -- better to let the guilty go free than to condemn the innocent. Dick Eastman Yakima, Washington p.s. in case you are confused -- I am referring to my post: Re: Weaponized Porn -- letters and responses -- oi vey! Park yourself in front of a world of choices in alternative vehicles. Visit the Yahoo! Auto Green Center. =
[cia-drugs] Monetary Policy and Weaseling Out of Debt
http://www.theoildrum.com/node/2921 Monetary Policy and Weaseling Out of Debt Posted by Gail the Actuary on August 28, 2007 - 3:00pm Topic: Economics Tags: balance of payments, debt This is some correspondence between me and an an individual known here as Shunyata. Shunyata is an individual who is involved with managing financial derivatives. Shunyata's education and careers have spanned several disciplines, including actuarial science, statistics, mechanical engineering, and financial engineering. These have given him a breadth of perspective on the world's financial situation. Dear Shunyata, Some of the financial things I have been reading lately are downright alarming. I keep seeing comments by people concerned that other countries will cut off the US debt spigot. One concern is the huge amount of sliced and diced debt that has been sold around the world with very questionable assets behind it. Another is the US Balance of Payments: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/21... A third issue is the extent to which countries are unhappy about the US overstepping bounds militarily. Any thoughts? Sincerely, Gail Dear Gail, At the risk of sharing too much opinion, I will speak frankly about my perspective. Of course these are entirely my PERSONAL opinions. The current prosperity of the US is the same prosperity seen in a person with a large home loan, a large car loan, and a mountain of credit card debt. He's living lavishly and living at the mercy of his creditors. The US is VERY affluent and has a LOT of debt. And taking the Machiavellian view, the US likes spending other people's money and has no wish balance its accounts if it can borrow without genuinely repaying. How do interest bearing loans get repaid? There are three ways: 1. Devote your future productivity to repaying principal and interest (this is painful and no one wants to think about this). 2. Expand your monetary wealth through efficiency gain (exceedingly difficult) or converting your assets to cash (e.g. pumping oil out of the ground or consuming other endowments). 3. Inflate your way out of debt (more on this, and this scares me the most). A huge amount of our expanding economy (and hence easy debt repayment) has come from consumption of our natural endowments. You only need to look at the correlation between energy consumption and GDP, both across time and across nations, to see that we have been relying heavily on 'spending the inheritance'. This realization will slowly dawn on us, although not voluntarily, and we will modify our behavior accordingly whether we like it or not. There is a nice graphic comparing a photo of the dark side of earth from space with a map coded for per capita GDP. It shows electric lights (energy consumption) line up exactly with per capita GDP! The inflation angle is more insidious because we are talking about monetary policy. So long as people think they NEED dollars, the US can print as many as they like and in effect simply print money to pay off its debts. In the '70s we went off the gold standard (so that a dollar's value is based in demand for dollars rather than intrinsic value) and negotiated with the Saudis to trade physical protection from hostile neighbors for an agreement to conduct all oil transactions in dollars. What a coup! Now everyone who needs oil needs dollars and we are all too happy to provide them. (There is evidence/conjecture that dropping the gold standard and establishing dollar-denominated oil was a deliberate, coordinated plan.) Rising oil prices are our friend because we can print more money to pay off our debts and at the same time mitigate the US impact of rising oil prices. After all, there are more dollars floating around to buy it! Why do you think the economy hasn't been crushed by $70 oil and $3 gasoline? This coup is threatened from several fronts: 1. Economically competing countries like China hold vast reserves of these dollars we have been printing. They are also wise to the fact that their dollar reserves are being eroded away by the day as we print more dollars. (The Saudis are also well aware of this. They are are effectively only getting$50/bbl thanks to the diluted dollar.) They have begun selling their dollars thereby reducing the global demand for dollars and our ability to inflate our way out of debt. Heaven help us if we ever really annoy them. They could destroy our country over night by flooding the world with dollars - more certainly than a nuclear strike! In fact, China has leaked military documents to this effect! 2. Several countries are moving to euro-denominated oil bourses - further eroding demand for dollars. The first Iraq invasion was within a few months of Saddam moving to set up just such a bourse. Iran launched one earlier this year. Unfortunately I'd say a US military reaction is within
[cia-drugs] Announcement Of 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal
Announcement Of 9/11 War Crimes Tribunalhttp://peaceinspace.blogs.com/911/2007/08/announcement-of.html **NEW YORK, N.Y. - International Lawyer Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd, who is a Judge on the Kuala Lumpur International War Crimes Tribunal, will make a public call for an International Citizen's 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal. He will speak at Ready for Mainstream, a 9/11 Anniversary Conference ( Sept.8-9, 2007) at Cooper Union, 7th St and 4th Avenue, New York. Information: http://www.ready4mainstream.ny911truth.org/index.html According to Leuren Moret and Alfred Webre, 9/11 was a False Flag Operation to provide a pretext to engage in Genocidal Ecocidal Depleted Uranium (DU) bombing of Central Asia (Afghanistan and Iraq) in order to secure vast oil and uranium reserves; to roll out a Terror-based National Security state-system world-wide; to implement the final stages of a world Depopulation policy; and to trigger a World War III conflagration. Since 1945, under the Nuremberg Principles, causing aggressive war constitutes the most serious of War Crimes. The International Citizen's 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal would be convened under the jurisdiction of the Kuala Lumpur International War Crimes Tribunal, established in February 2007 as a permanent citizen's Tribunal by The Perdana Global Peace Organization, chaired by Tun Dr. Mahathir bin Mohamad, former Prime Minister of Malaysia, who is the first prominent world leader to take up the depleted uranium (DU) radiation issue as an instrumentality of the Depopulation policy. As a matter of law, there is a sufficient quantum of evidence for the appointment of an independent prosecutor under Article III(3) of the U.S. Constitution to prosecute treason against President GW Bush; Vice President Richard B. Cheney; and the Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld for the armed attack upon the United States on September 11, 2001, in the guise of a False Flag Operation. *U.S. Congress fails to Act* The establishment of an International Citizen's 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal is justified, given that official institutions in the U.S. have failed to assign legal accountability for the False Flag Operation of 9/11. Representative John Conyers, Jr., Chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee and his senior staff personally reviewed the 9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act and Congressional Memorandum following the 2006 U.S. Mid-term Election and Senior Staff met twice with representatives of the 9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act. The Chairman refused to introduce the Act, despite support for the Act by his Senior Staff. The 9/11 Commission failed to take testimony under oath from Bush and Cheney, and reached fraudulent conclusions. *9/11 As A War Crime* The False Flag Operation of 9/11 was the pretext for, and an integral part of the planning and execution of the illegal War of Aggression in 2001 against Afghanistan and of War Crimes committed by the United States in Afghanistan, as found by the Final Judgment, International Criminal Tribunal for Afghanistan at Tokyo. The Court found the use of Depleted Uranium (DU) weapons in Afghanistan to constitute War Crimes, Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity, and Omnicide. The False Flag Operation of 9/11 is a legal component of these War Crimes, and the perpetrators of 9/11 are guilty Aggressive War, Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity, and War Crimes. *I**nformation:* 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal: http://peaceinspace.blogs.com/911/ URL of this article: http://peaceinspace.blogs.com/911/2007/08/announcement-of.html
[cia-drugs] Greenpeace(1)Evans-spiritofLiberty..(2)Roy Beck(3)Cronyn(4)
Tue, 28 Aug 2007 15:32:07 -0400 (EDT) From: Greenpeace [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Good News for Whales Dear Theresa J, August 28, 2007 There's a storm brewing off the coast of Massachusetts that's threatening the future of wind energy for the entire country. In the face of global warming, there are a few powerful forces giving the cold shoulder to what could be America's first offshore wind farm - mostly because they believe it would blemish their million-dollar views. The Cape Wind project would offset up to 113 million gallons of oil and would be like taking 175,000 cars off the road to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Even though more than 80% of Massachusetts residents support the project, a select few, including Senator Ted Kennedy who's compound would face the wind farm, are standing in the way of progress and jeopardizing the entire effort. That's why we've hit the airwaves and targeted the opposition with television ads aired all across New England. If you haven't seen these ads, check them out. But this fight isn't just local. We need YOUR help to get Congress on track and make offshore wind a reality. Tell Congress to blow off millionaire complaints and do what's right for the country. TAKE ACTION! As we look for ways to combat global warming and increase renewable energy, the answers really are blowing in the wind! We need your help to show even more public support for Cape Wind and renewable energy. Take action and tell the Chairman of the Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming that he should support this visionary project. Your Friend, Kate Smolski Global Warming Campaigner *** I was just as shocked as you were last year when Iceland announced they were going to restart their commercial whaling program. Well, I'm happy to tell you that at least for this year, the commercial hunt seems to have come to an end. When Iceland announced that they were issuing a permit to hunt 39 whales including 9 endangered fin whales, I couldn't believe my ears. Last year, the Icelandic whalers killed 7 minkes and 7 endangered fin whales, only a fraction of their quota. But around the world, more than 100,000 activists have pressured Iceland in the wake of their whaling efforts, and it seems to have worked - at least for now. With almost no market in Iceland and fears that the meat might be contaminated with toxic chemicals, the hunt has been a disaster. They still haven't made the results of the contamination testing on whale meat public, but they can't seem to convince anyone to buy their whale meat regardless. Iceland has said they won't issue new permits until the market conditions for whale meat improve and they get permission to export whale products to Japan. Well, I've got some news for the Icelandic government: there's no market for whale meat in Japan either. Japan is having trouble selling the thousands of tons of whale meat it already has in storage from its own Southern Ocean scientific hunt. Since the Icelandic government is ready to admit that there isn't any market for commercial whale meat, they might as well face up to the facts: there's no legitimate scientific reason for killing whales either. It's time for Iceland to hang up those harpoons for good! Your friend, John Hocevar Oceans Campaigner * 3 Ways to Help 1: Donate Now Help Greenpeace Take a Stand. Become a Member Today. 2: Take Action Visit our Action Center and take action today. 3: Tell a Friend Forward this message to a friend. Help spread the word. Week of Action Feel up to the challenge? Sign up to be part a delivery event now! You won't want to miss out on this amazing opportunity to do something about global warming. Read The Book This newly published book is receiving rave reviews. The authors take you up close and personal to the Cape Wind project and it's controversial history. The book also has a blog with the latest entry titled, Greenpeace at it again. 702 H Street, NW Suite 300 Washington, D.C. 20001 (800) 326-0959 You received this mailing because you are subscribed to our mailing list. If you need to update your information or prefer not to receive these mailings in the future click here to update your account. We value your privacy. If you have any questions about how we use your information please read our privacy policy. Are you stepping lightly at work? Jack Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] Add to Address Book Add Mobile Alert Yahoo! DomainKeys has confirmed that this message was sent by yahoo.com. Learn more Subject: Secure The Border Crusade 2008 http://www.spiritofliberty.net/crusades.php To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dear Bill, Please check out http://www.spiritofliberty.net/crusades.php and give me your thoughts on planning the 2008 Crusade. Dean Allen PS I sent
[cia-drugs] Re: Announcement Of 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal
This should have just about the same effect on the criminals as urinating on the chain link fence around the WTC site. I'm sorry to be so cynical, but the criminals still have their hands on the levers of power. The only way the criminals can be messed with is if you hit them in the pocket. A general strike or selective boycotts would be a good way to fight back, but such things require resolve and moral courage. The soft, well fed rabbits who pass for citizens in the USA just do not want to give up one iota of creature comfort to make a stand. As long as I can buy Burberry overcoats and plasma TVs on the cheap from Costco, who am I to complain. Look at the poor bastards who get blown to pieces in Iraq. There is no outcry in the general population over this dirty, illegal war, because the cannon fodder is taken from the poor and disaffected, the deceived and disenfranchised. Not instituting a draft was a brilliant strategy, because throwaway people are being shovelled at far away problems. There is a subtle inequity here - a subrosa confidence that the Iraq war will cleanse the general population of useless eaters and evolutionary deadenders. Where is Tyler Durden when you need him?!!! --- In cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com, CAMPAIGN FOR A POSITIVE FUTURE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Announcement Of 9/11 War Crimes Tribunalhttp://peaceinspace.blogs.com/911/2007/08/announcement- of.html **NEW YORK, N.Y. - International Lawyer Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd, who is a Judge on the Kuala Lumpur International War Crimes Tribunal, will make a public call for an International Citizen's 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal. He will speak at Ready for Mainstream, a 9/11 Anniversary Conference ( Sept.8-9, 2007) at Cooper Union, 7th St and 4th Avenue, New York. Information: http://www.ready4mainstream.ny911truth.org/index.html According to Leuren Moret and Alfred Webre, 9/11 was a False Flag Operation to provide a pretext to engage in Genocidal Ecocidal Depleted Uranium (DU) bombing of Central Asia (Afghanistan and Iraq) in order to secure vast oil and uranium reserves; to roll out a Terror-based National Security state-system world-wide; to implement the final stages of a world Depopulation policy; and to trigger a World War III conflagration. Since 1945, under the Nuremberg Principles, causing aggressive war constitutes the most serious of War Crimes. The International Citizen's 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal would be convened under the jurisdiction of the Kuala Lumpur International War Crimes Tribunal, established in February 2007 as a permanent citizen's Tribunal by The Perdana Global Peace Organization, chaired by Tun Dr. Mahathir bin Mohamad, former Prime Minister of Malaysia, who is the first prominent world leader to take up the depleted uranium (DU) radiation issue as an instrumentality of the Depopulation policy. As a matter of law, there is a sufficient quantum of evidence for the appointment of an independent prosecutor under Article III(3) of the U.S. Constitution to prosecute treason against President GW Bush; Vice President Richard B. Cheney; and the Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld for the armed attack upon the United States on September 11, 2001, in the guise of a False Flag Operation. *U.S. Congress fails to Act* The establishment of an International Citizen's 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal is justified, given that official institutions in the U.S. have failed to assign legal accountability for the False Flag Operation of 9/11. Representative John Conyers, Jr., Chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee and his senior staff personally reviewed the 9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act and Congressional Memorandum following the 2006 U.S. Mid-term Election and Senior Staff met twice with representatives of the 9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act. The Chairman refused to introduce the Act, despite support for the Act by his Senior Staff. The 9/11 Commission failed to take testimony under oath from Bush and Cheney, and reached fraudulent conclusions. *9/11 As A War Crime* The False Flag Operation of 9/11 was the pretext for, and an integral part of the planning and execution of the illegal War of Aggression in 2001 against Afghanistan and of War Crimes committed by the United States in Afghanistan, as found by the Final Judgment, International Criminal Tribunal for Afghanistan at Tokyo. The Court found the use of Depleted Uranium (DU) weapons in Afghanistan to constitute War Crimes, Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity, and Omnicide. The False Flag Operation of 9/11 is a legal component of these War Crimes, and the perpetrators of 9/11 are guilty Aggressive War, Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity, and War Crimes. *I**nformation:* 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal: http://peaceinspace.blogs.com/911/ URL of this article: http://peaceinspace.blogs.com/911/2007/08/announcement-of.html
