[cia-drugs] Accessories after the fact if no prosecutions of AWOL Bush et al
48. President Bush et al, need to be prosecuted for war crimes. President Bush and all those Congress members who voted for this resolution are guilty of the war crime, breach of the peace and the Resolution Authorizing of Force Against Iraq was Unconstitutional. The US Supreme Court is also guilty of being an accessory after the fact to a war crime because they failed to declare this resolution unconstitutional. This is the second time the US Supreme Court has been an accessory after the fact, for failing to rule that the Vietnam war was an undeclared war and therefore, unconstitutional, US v. Sisson, 1968. On October 10, the House and Senate passed identical resolutions authorizing the use of force against Iraq, H.J. Res. 114/S.J. Res. 45. The final vote in the House was 296-133 for the resolution, and 77-23 in favor in the Senate. The joint resolution provides broad authorization for the President to wage unilateral, preemptive war against Iraq at his discretion. Authorization for Use of Unilateral Force. The President is authorized to use the Armed Forces of the United States as he determines to be necessary and appropriate in order to 1.) defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq; and 2.) enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council Resolutions regarding Iraq. The resolution did not provide any standards by which the President should make these determinations or any mechanism through which the Congress could challenge the President's determinations. Congress surrendered its constitutional responsibilities for overseeing U.S. foreign and military policies, to declare WAR. It is a matter of defining what WAR means, that is invading Iraq, defeating its army, overthrowing the incumbent government, and followed by an occupation or annexing Iraq as a US territory.. The UN Security Council-not the U.S.- is responsible for enforcing UN Security Council resolutions. Although the congressional resolution supported efforts to work cooperatively with the UN, ultimately it left the enforcement of Security Council resolutions in the hands of the President, usurping the UN role. Under the UN Charter, attacks by individual states against other nations are justified only in response to an actual attack or in cases of imminent threat of attack, not a continuing threat. The international community strongly supported the resumption and completion of UN weapons inspections. Weapons inspectors were ready to return to Iraq, and Iraq has signaled its willingness to admit them to all sites covered by UN Security Council resolutions. President Bush refused to allow a reasonable time for UN weapons inspections and disarmament efforts to be carried out successfully before pursuing other actions. The UN Security Council-not the President of the U.S. had the authority to determine when inspections and other peaceful, diplomatic efforts have failed. The US Congressional resolution did not set limits on what constitutes the necessary and appropriate use of force, for example the use of depleted uranium armed weapons. There was no date of expiration for the authorization of force in Iraq, and the resolution did not address the possibility of long-term U.S. occupation of Iraq and nation building. The resolution to use force in Afghanistan against terrorists - September 14, 2001. That the President is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such nations, organizations or persons. This resolution authorizes the use of military force in specified, limited circumstances. The war against Afghanistan is clearly illegal. It constitutes armed aggression against any nation they US feels like invading.AWOL Bush et al, failed on three separate occasions to get formal authority from the UN Security Council. The Montreal Sabotage Convention to which the United States was party. It has an entire regime to deal with all issues in dispute here, including access to the International Court of Justice to resolve international disputes arising under the Treaty such as the extradition of Bin Laden. The Bush administration completely ignored this treaty. They paid no attention any of the other 12 international treaties dealing with acts of terrorism that could have been applied to handle this manner in a peaceful, lawful way. AWOL Bush went to the United National Security Council to get a resolution authorizing the use of military force against Afghanistan and Al Qaeda. He failed. The first Security Council resolution refused to call what happened on September 11 an armed attack - that is by one state against another state. Rather they called it terrorist attacks.
[cia-drugs] Obama's Afghanistan Insanity || Oliver Stone / Moyers
Obama's Afghanistan Insanity || Oliver Stone / Moyers video: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/WarOnError/message/1376
[cia-drugs] Copenhagen climate summit in disarray
Copenhagen climate summit in disarray after leaked documents show agreement that hands more power to rich countries The UN Copenhagen climate talks are in disarray today after developing countries reacted furiously to leaked documents that show world leaders will next week be asked to sign an agreement that hands more power to rich countries and sidelines the UN's role in all future climate change negotiations. The document is also being interpreted by developing countries as setting unequal limits on per capita carbon emissions for developed and developing countries in 2050; meaning that people in rich countries would be permitted to emit nearly twice as m... http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/dec/08/copenhagen-climate-summit-disarray-danish-text == Copenhagen's Hidden Agenda: The Multibillion Trade in Carbon Derivatives Architect of Credit Default Swaps behind the Development of Carbon Derivatives by Washington's Blog http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=vaaid=16449 - more climategate info here: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/climategate/
[cia-drugs] Liberals Are Useless
Liberals Are Useless http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/liberals_are_useless_20091206/ Chris Hedges Dec 7, 2009
[cia-drugs] CIA Heart Attack Gun?
http://www.examiner.com/x-6495-US-Intelligence-Examiner~y2009m11d29-CIA-secret-weapon-of-assassination Check Out the CIA Heart Attack Gun, De-Classified in 1975, Mentioned on the Show! Click Here For the Story CIA secret weapon of assassination 091129_cia_weapon.jpg
[cia-drugs] Conspiracy Theory HAARP Jesse Ventura - p1
Conspiracy Theory HAARP Jesse Ventura - p1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uh2gbJA898s
Re: [cia-drugs] CIA Heart Attack Gun?
Hit with electronic LSD developed by Astronics. In light amounts it is like some pot. In fact that amount tried by Tip ONeal in part of demonstration. In larger amounts it is freaky but only really upsets if you are not prepared. Naval Intel did this to me after interrogation the night of April 13th, 1984. I gave three names, Pavlita, C.W. Cho, and Kozyrev. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikolai_Aleksandrovich_Kozyrev I had paperwork on the first two but not on Kozyrev. The way it works the first time you relax you get major high. Set and setting is everything so I freaked big time. It was turned up. On either May 8th or 9th buried in the back of the New York Times was an article on a Sergi Koslov, a Soviet mathematician visiting Pasadena in some sort of exchange program. The same methods were used on him. This was the guy who later also freaked at Dullas claiming CIA was trying to mind control him. Shrinks brought in, etc. The interrogation was taped by Navy with my knowledge and permission. Seems that I slur a bit and my spoken Kozyrev was mistaken for Koslov. I did not give a first name. TASS had a fit. First and only time, (not including ultrasound waves at embassy deal), that I ever heard of wherein one major power accused another of mind control. We were obliged to print the accusation in our major media. There have been a number of times that I sensed this device was used in jury tampering. Once was in the Reagan Secretary of Labor RICO trial: Raymond Donovan http://www.nytimes.com/1987/05/24/nyregion/mistrial-rejected-in-donovan-case-despite-protests.html?pagewanted=all Not upset anymore. In fact under circumstances it was nice I was not whacked. Michael Donovan http://www.examiner.com/x-6495-US-Intelligence-Examiner~y2009m11d29-CIA-secret-weapon-of-assassination Check Out the CIA Heart Attack Gun, De-Classified in 1975, Mentioned on the Show! Click Here For the Story CIA secret weapon of assassination
[cia-drugs] Oliver Stone Says US Is Falling of Own Weight
In Part One of Bill Moyers' interview of Oliver Stone, Stone says http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/12042009/watch.html that the US will fall of its own weight like the Soviet Union did: http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/12042009/watch.html Oliver Stone gives one example of how we are falling of our own weight, that of offending the Pashtun tribe which lives in both Afghanistan and Pakistan, and that then the Pashtuns and the other Afghans who are not Taliban will all join with Taliban against the foreign invader who offends them all. The US is buying off all parties, just like the real surge in Iraq was only a cash surge that bribed off those who had been inflicting casualties on US troops. Stone predicts that buying off all the warlords in Afghanistan while killing 50 people at a wedding party will not win the hearts and minds. A ridiculous proposition of winning hearts and minds by offending the hearts and minds will only benefit the war merchants(mongers). The people will take the US money and still send the empire packing. At home and abroad, the empire is showing signs of falling under its own weight. First Venezuela shrugged off an old school CIA coup like a body surviving silly H1N1 swine flu without buying a vaccine from CIA or United Fruit. Then Honduras threw off an old School of the Americas style coup. Where does AFRICOM live? Stuttgart of the ice people. No African nation wants CIA coups either. From where does CIA supply weapons to Liberian enemies of Liberia's democratically elected government? Minnesota. An African consensus parallels the Latin American consensus. CIA would not allow democracy in any latin american country, so latin americans came to the US and voted for Obama. Africa sent AFRICOM packing, to Stuttgart. Liberia sent the warlords packing, to Minnesota. Oliver Stone promises that the crusade to nowhere will collapse and return to the US like School of the Americas returned from latin america, rejected like AFRICOM was by every African nation. Now I would like to show you the same thing happening at home. CIA conned FBI suits into making pedophile blackmail videos with children kidnapped by CIA. Franklin, Presidio, Boystown, Mae Hong San orphanage, and FBI kidnapped the Lindbergh baby, figuratively, by making pedophile videos with CIA kidnapped children at APEC conferences in Seattle and Bangkok. http://www.google.com/search?q=fbi+apec+prostitutes http://whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/ECHELON/apec2.html FBI pedophile videomaking explains why FBI actively suppressed the Franklin pedophile investigation(see The Franklin Scandal http://trineday.com by Nick Bryant, published by http://trineday.com ) First FBI makes pedo porn blackmail videos, then suppresses a pedophile scandal, as a load of slimy filth oozes down hill of its own weight. Once upon a time a hotel owner called the suits and told them that John Dillenger was at the hotel. The suits showed up and killed the hotel owner and his wife but the bad guys had left already. At Waco, same story, save the women and children by shooting them all. Suits are as suits do, but it only gets worse. CIA took over FBI, FBI pushes local law enforcement around, but the suits do not teach CIA grade tradecraft to their low levels. That is where things totally collapse. When the CIA supports a repressive, corrupt government, they do so according to common sense. When the FBI suits chase amateurs to bother locals who get out of line, the amateurs do whatever they want. Maybe they feel like assassinating a witness, but they don't really know how, so they blow that. Then what? Assassination was the last thing on CIA's list, but the amateurs tried that first, and failed. How about discreditation? Sure, fail to kill a witness, then make the witness look crazy for crying conspiracy. So the amateurs have the police chief put on his swat tu-tu and go tell a carpenter that the witness is a hoe and a drunk. The carpenter looks at the tu-tu, looks at the ferrie, wonders why a carpenter should care if a paying client is a hoe or a drunk, but knows there is a conspiracy if the police chief is dancing around in a swat tu-tu. The chief showing up in person proves that there is a conspiracy, looking crazier in his swat tutu than anybody he must have scared lately. The ferrie chieftain might be a Franklin-FBI pedo pimp, and the febrile amateur violates the first rule of psychological operations, that before you start with black propaganda, which should be based on the truth, that you should establish your game with white propaganda, which is the truth but only part of the truth. So the amateurs prove that there is a conspiracy, by sending out the police chief, to lie nakedly, without a shred of truth. Amateurs! They were supposed to start with bribery, then intimidation, then white propaganda, then black propaganda, then starting beating and killing. They got the order backwards. The police state is falling of its own weight, as CIA got
[cia-drugs] Re: CIA Blackwater
- From: ruxpert Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 12:58 PM Subject: Re: CIA Blackwater cia is criminal cancer that must be rectified so/and to be more accountably/beneficially applied brainpower FOR America, instead of Cancer Against America! most nasty open-conspiracy / espionage against America's Dream Meme DNA Mandate of Transparent/Accountability is: Government Secrecy = National Security Putrid Mega Intellectual Crime Against The Heart Soul of America! ;-) - From: rob...@aol.com Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 5:57 AM Subject: Re: CIA Blackwater If they are CIA then they have carte blanche to do whatever they like, with no legal consequences. As a private company wouldn't they have to follow the laws? - Original Message - From: ruxpert Sent: Friday, 4 December 2009 Subject: CIA Blackwater Tycoon, Contractor, Soldier, Spy Blackwater founder reveals he was following orders of CIA throughout his career, including participation in an assassination program. Blackwater has not been an private-contractor army after all but a CIA asset. Vanity Fair, 2009 Dec 3 http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2010/01/blackwater-201001
