Re: [cia-drugs] Re: FW: Police Being Trained to Shoot to Kill the Homeless, Jobless, and Food Rioters
lol gun nuts. Last year, the county sheriff up here sent 4 men to arrest one of my neighbors. He was accused of domestic violence. The 4 deputies came with M-16's and 2 had night vision scopes. They hid, commando style, iamong the sage on the edge of the man's acerage. When he pulled up they all rushed him screaming, swat style. They seemed very disappointed when the man knelt down and surrendered. That could have turned into one bloody mess, all over an ACCUSATION. Gun nuts. Give me my rights to own firearms ANY DAY. I want protection from THOSE kinds of people. The ones who can get away with literal murder. On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 9:33 PM, muckblit muckb...@yahoo.com wrote: There is a general conditioning of white people who do not listen to rap music and are not too deeply programmed by government work. Yesterday: A man parked on my street and talked to a mutual friend. Then he walked with a gun for a while. Police cordoned off the next road over. He gave himself up. I thank God for that, but it illustrates what happens when the gun nuts get up against it. They try to eat their guns, but hopefully learn to seek other weapons or tools for the real scenario at hand which is not the one they were conditioned to expect by GunsAmmo or vidgames. The anniversary week of the Tate-LaBianca killins, when Susan Adkins died, 2009, I heard a man talking about shooting everybody where he lives. He didn't. He knew George Rodan and David Koresh. He's more adaptable than the ones who are shooting themselves so far, around the CIA building. Winchester always had a high suicide rate and that's the fox hunter country a lot of these golfers come from, with their high expectations and low threshold of pain. I feel physical pain myself, and it's not angina. OK, then there are the violent videogamers, some of whom venture on into gun nut meditations: http://www.gamespy.com/articles/107/1072928p1.html A new study published in the March issue of the American Psychological Association's Psychological Bulletin states that violent videogames (VVGs) increase aggression, desensitize gamers to violence, and create anti-social behavior. http://vigilantcitizen.com/?p=3306 http://pseudoccultmedia.blogspot.com/2009/11/rihanna-imprisoned-mannekitten.html The http://vigilantcitizen.com/?p=3306Russian Roulettehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_roulettetheme is important in terms of programming as it is a mechanism used in suicide programming; which ties into the general aspect of this (and the overarching theme of the video) with Rihanna risking her life, willing to die for her boyfriend/handler. If we are using the whole Chris Brown domestic abuse example as a reference here; Russian roulette probably symbolizes the mental state of women who stay in abusive relationships (which is very much associated with and quite similar to mind control programming; it's obviously difficult for some people to comprehend but 'mind control' extends to simple manipulation of a partner through verbal abuse as well as the extreme end of the scale in trauma-based mind control programming). In the room she is playing Russian roulette with her boyfriend (this another symbolic dissociative hallucination/dream scene, shown by how the video cuts from her in a dissociative state in the cell and the Russian roulette room) also note the spinning fan/air vent, which I believe is conscious symbolism if you take into account the revolver used in Russian roulette where you spin the chamber to play the game (more spinning/dissociation suggestions and confusion having no idea which exact chamber the bullet is in) before causing severe head trauma if it goes off. The song's lyrics also relate to this metaphorical (and more literal if it's related to suicide programming and/or willingly dying for your programmer) psychological theme: *Take a breath, take it deep Calm yourself, he says to me If you play, you play for keeps Take a gun, and count to three I'm sweating now, moving slow No time to think, my turn to go* *[Chorus ] And you can see my heart beating You can see it through my chest And I'm terrified but I'm not leaving Know that I must must pass this test So just pull the trigger* *Say a prayer to yourself He says close your eyes Sometimes it helps And then I get a scary thought That he's here means he's never lost* *(Chorus)* *As my life flashes before my eyes I'm wondering will I ever see another sunrise? So many won't get the chance to say goodbye But it's too late too pick up the value of my life* *(Chorus) * The Transhumanist and Police State Agenda in Pop Music http://vigilantcitizen.com/?p=3306 --- In cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com, Mary Hartman hartmanmar...@... wrote: When a CIA lackey was in training he was reading a book written by a military shrink that dealt with teaching soldiers to enjoy killing. Clearly the technique they are using has flaws because
Re: [cia-drugs] Re: FW: Police Being Trained to Shoot to Kill the Homeless, Jobless, and Food Rioters
Very good post Michael. On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 9:16 PM, micha...@midcoast.com wrote: It is not necessary to teach killing enjoyment. It is programmed in. A good deal of PTSD (shell shock, battle fatigue) is the product of a 'moral' person not being able to handle this feeling. It is rarely even addressed in literature. However, there are a few exceptions. 1- Mario Puzo's Godfather: Where Michael kills the police captain in the restaurant and almost forgets to drop the gun on the way to the get-away car. Before entering the car he exclaims to himself, My God, it is just like sex. 2- Lawrence of Arabia. This is both in Seven Pillars of Wisdom and the movie. Lawrence complains to General Gordon that he does not wish to return to the desert, the killing bothers him. The general makes some remark about all hating it but it necessary. Lawrence then says, You don't understand, sir. I enjoy it. General Gordon does understand and there is nothing he can say. He must then order Lawrence. Serial murders are almost always the result of some angry action and the perpetrator suddenly getting an unexpected rush and that rush setting off an addictive pattern to try to repeat it. Law enforcement does always attract those who enjoy hurting others, lording over them. Good management needs spend much time weeding this out. If this 'natural sickness' goes to management level all hell can break loose in a covered way. Such is life. When a CIA lackey was in training he was reading a book written by a military shrink that dealt with teaching soldiers to enjoy killing. Clearly the technique they are using has flaws because suicide among our soldiers is at an all-time high; but given the psychological make-up of many who enter the law enforcement field, it may turn out to be an effective technique for use here at home. --- On Mon, 3/1/10, muckblit muckb...@yahoo.com muckblit%40yahoo.com wrote: From: muckblit muckb...@yahoo.com muckblit%40yahoo.com Subject: [cia-drugs] Re: FW: Police Being Trained to Shoot to Kill the Homeless, Jobless, and Food Rioters To: cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com cia-drugs%40yahoogroups.com Date: Monday, March 1, 2010, 9:24 PM  Although there are four crematoria around the CIA blue building in Westfield(Bilderber ger meeting site for Hillary Clinton and Obama) Chantilly, VA, the very first things that come to mind are Jena Six, the Southern Gun Nut Mentality, and let me see if I can find the clipping to show this is yet another degree of foolish brother Cain's denialism. Yes, He encouraged the officers to come up with a plausible story that would allow him to conclude that the shooting was justified http://www.nytimes. com/2010/ 02/25/us/ 25orleans. html Lieutenant Lohman, 42 and now retired, concluded shortly after arriving on the scene that the shooting was legally unjustified, federal authorities said. He encouraged the officers to come up with a plausible story that would allow him to conclude that the shooting was justified, the authorities said...When another police investigator told Lieutenant Lohman that he was going to plant a gun under the bridge to bolster the story that the officers were being fired at, Lieutenant Lohman went along, and even asked if the gun was traceable, the authorities said...At the encouragement of Lieutenant Lohman, the officers who were involved made up details, the authorities said, like a claim that one victim had reached for a shiny object in his waistband... At one point, according to the documents, Mr. Lohman was frustrated that the cover-up story in the report, which was drafted by a police sergeant, was not logical, so he drew up one of his own, which broadly changed details to fit the false story. The sergeant later replaced that report with a shorter one that was changed to fit the audiotaped statements of the police who were involved. -- Forwarded Message From: dasg...@... dasg...@... Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 23:10:48 EST To: Robert Millegan ramille...@. .. Cc: ema...@..., j...@..., jim6...@..., christian.ream@ ... Subject: Police Being Trained to Shoot to Kill the Homeless, Jobless, and Food Rioters Louisiana Cops Plan for End of the World Scenario http://www.prisonpl anet.com/ louisiana- cops-plan- for-%e2%80% 9cend-of- the-world% e2%80%9d- scenario. html Kurt Nimmo Infowars.com, February 28, 2010 Police in Louisiana's Bossier Parish are training for an end of the world scenario, according to the Shreveport Times http://www.shrevepo rttimes.com/ article/20100227 /NEWS01/2270314/ 1060/NEWS01 .  http://www.shrevepo rttimes.com/ article/20100227 /NEWS01/2270314/ 1060/NEWS01 The program is dubbed Operation Exodus, inspired in part from the Book of Exodus in the Bible. Parish Sheriff Larry Deen told the newspaper the buck stops with him. The liability stops with Larry Deen.
[cia-drugs] FW: Chilcot Inquiry's Can of Worms: Bush's Wars Planned BEFORE 9/11 and 9/11 TOO?
-- Forwarded Message From: dasg...@aol.com dasg...@aol.com Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 06:02:02 EST To: Robert Millegan ramille...@aol.com Cc: ema...@aol.com, j...@aol.com, jim6...@cwnet.com, christian.r...@daegis.com Subject: Chilcot Inquiry's Can of Worms: Bush's Wars Planned BEFORE 9/11 and 9/11 TOO? Blair warned in 2000 Iraq war was illegal Secret papers withheld by Chilcot inquiry reveal Foreign Office fears over invasion The Iraq strategy paper was commissioned by Sir William Patey, head of Middle East policy at the Foreign Office, in advance of the November 2000 presidential election that brought George W. Bush into the White House By Michael Savage, Political Correspondent http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/blair-warned-in-2000-iraq-war-wa s-illegal-1914293.html Tuesday, 2 March 2010 An invasion of Iraq was discussed within the Government http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/blair-warned-in-2000-iraq-war-w as-illegal-1914293.html# more than two years before military action was taken with Foreign Office mandarins warning that such an invasion would be illegal, that it would claim considerable casualties and could lead to the breakdown of Iraq, The Independent can reveal. The extent of Whitehall opposition to the policy eventually backed by Tony Blair emerges just three days before Gordon Brown will appear at the Iraq Inquiry, where he will be asked to explain his role in the Government's decision to invade. Secret Foreign Office strategy papers drawn up by senior civil servants at the end of 2000 have been obtained by this newspaper and are published for the first time today. The Iraq: future strategy document considers options for dealing with the belligerent Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein. It is one of the key documents that Sir John Chilcot's Iraq Inquiry has declined to release. A policy of regime overthrow is proposed, but roundly condemned. In an eerily portentous assessment of the consequences of taking military http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/blair-warned-in-2000-iraq-war-w as-illegal-1914293.html# action, it states: Such a policy would command no useful international support. An overt attempt to be successful would require a massive military effort, probably including a land invasion: this would risk considerable casualties and, possibly, extreme last-ditch acts of deterrence or defiance by Saddam. The mandarins add: It would also be illegal. Covert attempts, on the other hand, seem very unlikely to succeed and run the risk of fragmenting Iraq, which runs clearly contrary to our wider interests in the region. Iraq descended into violence in the wake of the March 2003 invasion. Hundreds of thousands of Iraqis were killed in the aftermath, as well as more than 100 British troops. The document also calls into question Mr Blair's claim that using troops to bring down Saddam Hussein was only discussed after the 9/11 terror attacks on New York http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/blair-warned-in-2000-iraq-war-w as-illegal-1914293.html# and will increase pressure on the inquiry to call Mr Blair back to give further public evidence this summer. Nick Clegg, the Liberal Democrats' leader, said it was yet more damning evidence against Mr Blair's decision to take Britain http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/blair-warned-in-2000-iraq-war-w as-illegal-1914293.html# to war in Iraq. He also warned that the fact that the document had not been published by the Chilcot inquiry raised serious questions about its powers to reveal sensitive material. The Government has retained the power to veto publication of classified documents. Protocols agreed between the Chilcot team and Whitehall hand the final say on publication of disputed documents to the head of the Civil Service, Sir Gus O'Donnell. Requests to secure the document using the Freedom of Information Act were initially refused. However, the Foreign Office eventually agreed to release a redacted version with the views of the United States blacked out after The Independent demanded an internal review. Releasing the paper would make Government more accountable and increase trust, the Foreign Office conceded. There is public interest in being able to assess the quality of advice being given to ministers and subsequent decision-making. Critics of the decision to go to war pounced on the document. Days before Gordon Brown will try to defend his role at the heart of the Government that took us to war, this is yet more damning evidence against the attempt to justify the invasion of Iraq, Mr Clegg said. The Foreign Office was clearly advising against regime change as illegal and counter to our national interest. The strategy paper was commissioned by Sir William Patey, then head of Middle East policy at the Foreign Office, ahead of the November 2000 presidential election which brought George Bush to
[cia-drugs] FW: It's Government of the Rich, by the Rich, for the Rich, in Great Britain Too
-- Forwarded Message From: dasg...@aol.com dasg...@aol.com Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 06:47:23 EST To: Robert Millegan ramille...@aol.com Cc: ema...@aol.com, j...@aol.com, jim6...@cwnet.com Subject: It's Government of the Rich, by the Rich, for the Rich, in Great Britain Too In 2009, the Prime Minister of Belize http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_Minister_of_Belize told its parliament: Ashcroft is an extremely powerful man.. His net worth may well be equal to Belize's entire GDP. He is nobody to cross. ² In 1981, Belize had gained independence from the UK. Seeing the opportunity to build an off-shore operations base, in 1984 Ashcroft formed Belize Holdings (BHI), which became the vehicle for an acquisition spree during the 1980s ... By the late 1980s, BHI had become one of the largest holding companies in Belize, with direct interests in or holdings in a vast number of industries via its main operating company Stargate Ltd. In 1987, BHI led the formation of Belize Bank Holdings (BBH), which took control of Belize Bank http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belize_Bank from Royal Bank of Canada http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Bank_of_Canada . Belize Bank became the country's largest financial institution, controlling some 50 percent of the market. BBH developed local and international interests in facilities services, employment outsourcing, finance, security, and tele-communications. Belize Bank itself held a majority stake in Belize Telemedia Limited http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belize_Telemedia , until it was nationalised by the Government of Belize. The rapid nationalisation came after years of litigation wherein Ashcroft was accused of tax evasion as well as various abuses of corporate power ... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Ashcroft,_Baron_Ashcroft http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Ashcroft,_Baron_Ashcroft Tory party has been bought like a 'banana republic', says Huhne By Andy McSmith and Nigel Morris, Deputy Political Editor The Independent (UK), 2 March 2010 http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/tory-party-has-been-bought-like- a-banana-republic-says-huhne-1914290.html Michael Ashcroft, the billionaire Tory peer [=life-member of the House of Lords], has not paid any income tax on his vast overseas earnings for more than 10 years, it was revealed yesterday. The revelation of his non-dom tax status, dragged out through the Freedom of Information Act, is an acute embarrassment for the Tories. It proves the party's deputy chairman, who is playing a pivotal role in the election campaign, was passing laws in the House of Lords while avoiding tax on most of his fortune. It also adds to the impression in voters' minds of the Conservatives as a party for the very rich. When he was awarded a peerage, 10 years ago, Lord Ashcroft gave a clear and unequivocal assurance that he would become a permanent UK resident. William Hague, the former Tory leader who nominated Lord Ashcroft for a peerage, hailed that assurance as being worth tens of millions to the British Treasury, as the peer started paying UK taxes on his vast wealth. But Lord Ashcroft has now disclosed that under a deal he brokered with the tax authorities he became a long-term resident of the UK, without being domiciled here. The distinction meant that he did not need to pay tax http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/tory-party-has-been-bought-like -a-banana-republic-says-huhne-1914290.html# on the bulk of his fortune, which was made abroad, provided that he did not bring it into the country. In a statement posted on his website yesterday, Lord Ashcroft said that during his private negotiations with the UK tax authorities, it was officially confirmed that the interpretation in the first undertaking of the words 'permanent residence' was to be that of 'a long-term resident' of the UK. I agreed to this and finally took up my seat in the House of Lords in October 2000. Throughout the last 10 years, I have been declaring all my UK income to HM Revenue. My precise tax status therefore is that of a non-dom. He also published the text of the letter he wrote to Mr Hague in March 2000, in which he promised to take up permanent residence in the UK by the end of that calendar year. He added that he had given his backing to a plan by David Cameron which would prevent any peers or MPs from having non-dom status, and that he plans to remain in the House of Lords for many years to come. His statement was welcomed yesterday by Mr Cameron, who said: I am delighted that Lord Ashcroft has come out and said 'Right, you want to know the undertakings I gave here they are, you want to know my tax status here it is'. Lord Ashcroft was first nominated for a peerage by Mr Hague in 1999, but he was rejected by the Honours Scrutiny Committee because he was a tax exile. On his website, he refers to Belize, in Central America, as his home.
[cia-drugs] FW: The Young Have No Jobs but the Old Get Social Security, so .. MUG THE GEEZERS!
-- Forwarded Message From: dasg...@aol.com dasg...@aol.com Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 08:10:13 EST To: Robert Millegan ramille...@aol.com Cc: ema...@aol.com, j...@aol.com, jim6...@cwnet.com, christian.r...@daegis.com Subject: The Young Have No Jobs but the Old Get Social Security, so .. MUG THE GEEZERS! Oh dear, oh dear, whatever shall we do? Life would be GRAND if only we didn't have to waste our trillions in tax-free unearned income on the 'help.' Why are there SO MANY of them now? What's the un-messiest way to 'thin the herd'? What did we use on the bees that bothered our rosebuds? Greek crisis may store hidden benefits for Europe Brian Love http://blogs.reuters.com/search/journalist.php?edition=usn=brian.love; , European Economics Correspondent - Analysis Mar 2, 2010 http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6211DP20100302 PARIS (Reuters) - Greece's debt crisis may end up helping Europe in the long run if it pressures governments to start addressing the potentially colossal costs of pensions and healthcare in coming decades. During the boom years of the past decade, racy rates of economic growth and ultra-cheap credit gave governments less incentive to prepare for a looming surge in the retiree population, and they were under little if any financial market pressure to do so. But pension reforms being launched in Spain, France and Greece suggest the Greek crisis is now focusing governments' attention on those problems, and even giving them the political cover to act. Greece's woes have dragged everyone's longer-term fiscal prospects under the harsh lights of the interrogation room, and several countries have realized that in the longer term, they're all like Greece, said UniCredit economist Marco Annunziata. One quick look at the consequences seems to be enough to send them scrambling for remedial action. If that is the case, we should all be grateful to Greece. Politicians facing voters every few years tend to balk at reforms that compromise their hopes of a return to office but pension age increases would conceivably be harder to reverse than tax hikes. And the pressure is on right now. Indeed, the debts that the financial markets are so nervous about in Greece and several other European countries are dwarfed by estimates of the burden on governments if their commitment to future pensions is added to the mix. U.S. economist Jagadeesh Gokhale calculates that adding all such off balance sheet liabilities would leave Greece with a debt worth 875 percent of gross domestic product rather than the 120 percent of GDP officially forecast for this year. For the EU as a whole, the burden would have to be restated at more than 434 percent of GDP, roughly five times the official count. He estimates Spain's total burden at 244 percent of GDP, Germany's 418 percent, Britain's at 442 percent and France's at 549 percent, versus a Greece-like U.S. figure of 890 percent. Gokhale, who wrote a report on the issue last year for the Cato Institute, a Washington think-tank, uses his figures to argue that governments should gradually withdraw and let the private sector handle pensions and healthcare. RAISING RETIREMENT AGE But that ignores another option; pension and healthcare benefits are a social contract any government can rewrite and that is what Greece, Spain and soon probably France are doing by raising the retirement age at which people are entitled to a pension. In Britain, the opposition Conservative party is promising to do something similar if it wins an election later this year and the Danish government spoke again of reforming the country's early retirement system when it said last week it would step up fiscal consolidation efforts in the years ahead. Street protests last week over plans to raise Spain's retirement age to 67 from 65 show how fast the Socialist government there chose in the face of immediate pressures to take steps that will ease the longer-term financial strains of an aging population. Greece, desperate to convince debt investors that it can fix its ragged public finances, is also considering plans to raise average retirement age to 63 from 61 along with tax reforms and a brief amnesty for tax evaders that may boost notoriously weak government revenues longer term. And in France, President Nicolas Sarkozy is working on more reforms of the pay-as-you-go pension system that could feasibly push retirement age beyond a current average of 60, in addition to other structural cost-cutting steps such as non-replacement of one in two retiring civil servants. The reasons for taking such painful measures have been clear for some time but are becoming more so as financial markets grow wiser to the extra debt governments are saddled with as they emerge from recession. For much of the time since it joined the monetary union in 2001, Greece enjoyed trouble-free access to relatively cheap
[cia-drugs] FW: If We LET Them, They'll Work Us TO DEATH While Making Us PAY for the Privilege
-- Forwarded Message From: dasg...@aol.com dasg...@aol.com Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 10:21:32 EST To: Robert Millegan ramille...@aol.com Cc: ema...@aol.com, j...@aol.com, jim6...@cwnet.com, christian.r...@daegis.com Subject: If We LET Them, They'll Work Us TO DEATH While Making Us PAY for the Privilege Average age at death by Age at retirement Dr. Ephrem (Siao Chung) Cheng study (http://faculty.kfupm.edu.sa... http://faculty.kfupm.edu.sa ) This is something we all would like to believe is true -- that there is an inverse relationship between the age we retire and the age that we expect to die. According to a study conducted by Dr. Ephrem, based on data of pensioners from Boeing Aerospace, the earlier we retire, the longer our life span is going to be. For example, if we retire at around the age of 50, we would expect to live to age 86, another 36 years old.In contrast, if we retire later at age 65, we would expect to live only for another 2 years. Normal retirement age is 65, and yet this study of Boeing employees supports only another 2 years of life span. However, we need to understand the biases [reflected] by this result -- this experience is based on one particular group and may not apply to everybody in the broadest sense. But it seems to make sense that if we do retire early, we could escape from the pressure of work and could expect to live longer. Just as with any other results of experience data, we have to be cautious. - http://www.babyboomercaretaker.com/retirement/early-retirement/Study-On-Life-E xpectancy-Based-On-Early-Retirement.html Study On Life Expectancy Based On Early Retirement Earlier it was believed that people who took early retirement ended up having longer life expectancy compared to people who retired at normal age of retirement. However, this belief has now been proven wrong after researchers conducted a study on life expectancy based on early retirement. The study on life expectancy based on early retirement was conducted in Texas over a period of 26 years. More than 3,500 employees of Shell Oil were studied during this period. The researchers studied the lives of employees who retired at the ages of 55, 60 and 65 and they also studied employees who continued working at the ages of 55 and 60. The employees came from all grades. During the course of the study, researchers found that early retirement was not at all connected to higher or increased life expectancy. In fact, it was discovered that employees who retired early, at age 55, were more likely to die before those who continued to work. The study found that mortality rate was twice as high in the first ten years after retirement at the age of 55. Unfortunately the study could not calculate the average life expectancy of the workers ! because many of them were still alive [after retiring] when the study concluded. - Retirement Age vs Life Expectancy: Why Social Security Is Going Broke http://www.tommcmahon.net/2009/05/retirement-age-vs-life-expectancy-why-social -security-is-going-broke.html http://mjperry.blogspot.com/2009/04/chart-of-day-retirement-age-v-life.html - You can have healthcare, to keep you alive, or Social Security, to cover the bare-minimum cost of living, but NOT BOTH. Take your choice. Very soon all the bankers, insurers and accountants who like to call themselves your government will FORCE you to make a choice. Object and you won't get EITHER! Their logic is as simple as the math. If government is allowed to raise the age of retirement to the age of life expectancy --age 77 as of 2010-- that big chunk of cash they've taken out of every paycheck, picking your pocket in the guise of deductions for Social Security, is 100% profit for THEM -- not a single penny will ever return to YOU as promised. What the governmen will tell you, of course, is that (like any Ponzi scheme) the money you never got will go back into the System to replenish the general fund, in order to provide Social Security for OTHERS when THEY retire. However, keep in mind that NO ONE ELSE who waits until age 77 to retire will live long enough to see that money EITHER! So where does all the money you've *involuntarily* entrusted to the government to save for YOUR retirement GO? To the government, who spends it as fast as you give it to them, for the sheer pleasure of it, without a care in the world, no thought of tomorrow. And why not, when millions of Americans keep on giving them blank checks like this? In pure and simple terms, Social Security is not 'your' savings, it's your LOSS -- it's the old wolf of INCOME TAX in sheep's clothing, government's best friend. Social Security is the GOVERNMENT's own retirement plan -- it retired long ago on it, so why should it WORK for YOU?
[cia-drugs] FW: How 'unwitting' were the 'dual nationals' whose passports were used by Mossad?
-- Forwarded Message From: dasg...@aol.com dasg...@aol.com Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 23:25:29 EST To: Robert Millegan ramille...@aol.com Cc: ema...@aol.com, j...@aol.com, jim6...@cwnet.com Subject: How 'unwitting' were the 'dual nationals' whose passports were used by Mossad? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sayanim Sayanim (plural; singular Sayan; Hebrew http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hebrew_(language) : helpers, assistants) refers to [non-Israeli] Jews who provide assistance to the Mossad http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mossad . Generally-speaking, these Zionist volunteers are asked to engage in technically legal activities that will not bring them into trouble with the authorities. There are exceptions, however -- as for example in the case of Jonathan Pollard http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonathan_Pollard , the U.S. Naval intelligence employee who engaged in espionage on behalf of Israel's intelligence agencies and whose exposure by the FBI http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FBI strained relations between the U.S. and Israel. Victor Ostrovsky http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victor_Ostrovsky , a former Mossad katsa http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katsa turned author, has written extensively about the activities of sayanim, as has Gordon Thomas. According to Ostrovsky and Thomas, sayanim provide [tactical support services] to Mossad officers operating abroad in their countries. This support can include facilitating medical care, money, logistics, and even overt intelligence gathering. They [are usually chosen from among] Judges, Court Clerks, Expert Witnesses, Child Protective Service Workers, Assistant District Attorneys, Police Officers, or anyone with sufficient power [to intervene] in other people's lives, and [in that role] they [are sworn to] do anything for the State of Israel http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_of_Israel against its enemies or those perceived to be unfavorable to Israeli policy. Sayanim are supposedly not directly involved in intelligence operations, and are only paid for their expenses. Sayanim must be 100% Jewish. They live abroad and are not Israeli citizens although granted dual citizenship, but many are reached through their relatives in Israel. Katsas http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katsa are [the case officers] in charge of the sayanim, and most active sayanim will be visited by a katsa once every three months or so, which for the katsa means two to four face-to-face meetings a day, along with numerous conversations by telephone. The sayanim system allows the Mossad to work with a skeleton crew. That's why, for example, a CIA station would employ about 100 people while a comparable Mossad station would need only six or seven. The existence of so many 'volunteers' allows intelligence to be gathered cheaply. http://theinfounderground.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6t=5384 http://theinfounderground.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6t=5384 Hundreds of Thousands of 'Sayanim' in the United States Israel has one million sayanim worldwide, according to Gordon Thomas who wrote Gideon's Spies, The Secret History of the Mossad (the Israeli intelligence service.) Mr Thomas has also written books on the CIA and MI5 and MI6. The word sayanim comes from the Hebrew word to help. In an interview Gordon Thomas said these one million helpers were recruited by the Mossad primarily to gather information around the world. Mr Thomas said they feed information daily to their nearest Israeli consulate. Israel has an army of translators who translate information which is then assembled by the Mossad. The Mossad only has 1,500 agents, They could not operate without their million sayanim or helpers. If we assume that one-third of all Jews in the world live in America, we could reasonably infer that there are approximately 350,000 sayanim, or Mossad agents, in the United States. In a previous interview published at Jeff Rense's website Gordon Thomas said there were 15,000 sayanim in America with military training who were called upon by former Mossad Operations Director Rafael (Rafi) Eitan during an alert on the anniversary of 9-11 in 2003. Mr Thomas said many of these men had police duties and hence powers in either federal or local agencies. I would conclude that the 15,000 sayanim in America only refers to armed agents with military training. The other 335,000, not part of the domestic Zionist paramilitary force, are just SPIES. How 'unwitting' were the British Israelis? The dual nationals linked to Al Mabhouh's assassination aren't necessarily as innocent as people think they are ... * By Linda S. Heard * Gulf News, March 2, 2010 * http://gulfnews.com/opinions/columnists/how-unwitting-were-the-british-israeli s-1.590561 At last, a team of detectives from Britain's Serious Organised Crimes Agency is in Israel
Re: [cia-drugs] FW: If We LET Them, They'll Work Us TO DEATH While Making Us PAY for the Privilege
The good news: One characteristic of longevity is (quote) ...keen interest in current events... This is from a study done by my grandfather, one of the founders of psychiatry in the US, Dr. Stephen P. Jewett. His studies are now being quoted by new age writer Deepak Chopra. The links are funny on this, tested and did not work. But if you google Deekpak Chopra and Jewett it comes up first. m -- Forwarded Message From: dasg...@aol.com dasg...@aol.com Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 10:21:32 EST To: Robert Millegan ramille...@aol.com Cc: ema...@aol.com, j...@aol.com, jim6...@cwnet.com, christian.r...@daegis.com Subject: If We LET Them, They'll Work Us TO DEATH While Making Us PAY for the Privilege Average age at death by Age at retirement Dr. Ephrem (Siao Chung) Cheng study (http://faculty.kfupm.edu.sa... http://faculty.kfupm.edu.sa ) This is something we all would like to believe is true -- that there is an inverse relationship between the age we retire and the age that we expect to die. According to a study conducted by Dr. Ephrem, based on data of pensioners from Boeing Aerospace, the earlier we retire, the longer our life span is going to be. For example, if we retire at around the age of 50, we would expect to live to age 86, another 36 years old.In contrast, if we retire later at age 65, we would expect to live only for another 2 years. Normal retirement age is 65, and yet this study of Boeing employees supports only another 2 years of life span. However, we need to understand the biases [reflected] by this result -- this experience is based on one particular group and may not apply to everybody in the broadest sense. But it seems to make sense that if we do retire early, we could escape from the pressure of work and could expect to live longer. Just as with any other results of experience data, we have to be cautious. - http://www.babyboomercaretaker.com/retirement/early-retirement/Study-On-Life-E xpectancy-Based-On-Early-Retirement.html Study On Life Expectancy Based On Early Retirement Earlier it was believed that people who took early retirement ended up having longer life expectancy compared to people who retired at normal age of retirement. However, this belief has now been proven wrong after researchers conducted a study on life expectancy based on early retirement. The study on life expectancy based on early retirement was conducted in Texas over a period of 26 years. More than 3,500 employees of Shell Oil were studied during this period. The researchers studied the lives of employees who retired at the ages of 55, 60 and 65 and they also studied employees who continued working at the ages of 55 and 60. The employees came from all grades. During the course of the study, researchers found that early retirement was not at all connected to higher or increased life expectancy. In fact, it was discovered that employees who retired early, at age 55, were more likely to die before those who continued to work. The study found that mortality rate was twice as high in the first ten years after retirement at the age of 55. Unfortunately the study could not calculate the average life expectancy of the workers ! because many of them were still alive [after retiring] when the study concluded. - Retirement Age vs Life Expectancy: Why Social Security Is Going Broke http://www.tommcmahon.net/2009/05/retirement-age-vs-life-expectancy-why-social -security-is-going-broke.html http://mjperry.blogspot.com/2009/04/chart-of-day-retirement-age-v-life.html - You can have healthcare, to keep you alive, or Social Security, to cover the bare-minimum cost of living, but NOT BOTH. Take your choice. Very soon all the bankers, insurers and accountants who like to call themselves your government will FORCE you to make a choice. Object and you won't get EITHER! Their logic is as simple as the math. If government is allowed to raise the age of retirement to the age of life expectancy --age 77 as of 2010-- that big chunk of cash they've taken out of every paycheck, picking your pocket in the guise of deductions for Social Security, is 100% profit for THEM -- not a single penny will ever return to YOU as promised. What the governmen will tell you, of course, is that (like any Ponzi scheme) the money you never got will go back into the System to replenish the general fund, in order to provide Social Security for OTHERS when THEY retire. However, keep in mind that NO ONE ELSE who waits until age 77 to retire will live long enough to see that money EITHER! So where does all the money you've *involuntarily* entrusted to the government to save for YOUR retirement GO? To the government, who spends it as fast as you give it to them, for the sheer pleasure of it, without a care in the world, no
[cia-drugs] EXAMINER: UK releases past UFO reports, will destroy future UFO reports, avoids government ET/UFO “conspiracy ”
UK releases past UFO reports, will destroy future UFO reports, avoids government ET/UFO “conspiracy” March 1, 11:00 PMSeattle Exopolitics Examinerhttp://www.examiner.com/x-2912-Seattle-Exopolitics-ExaminerAlfred Lambremont Webre U.K. MoD: Illustration of UFOs and EBEs, Heathrow Airport, 7/13/93 In a remarkable policy tour de force disclosed on February 18, 2010, a purported year of “official extraterrestrial disclosure”, the U.K. Ministry of Defence of Defence has engaged in yet another serial data dumphttp://ufos.nationalarchives.gov.uk/of multiple UFO and extraterrestrial files, without any accompanying scientific, cosmological, exopolitical narrative or framework of analysis. The U.K. Ministry of Defence also revealed in a secret memohttp://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/mod-to-destroy-future-ufo-reports-1913389.htmldated Nov. 11, 2009, and released Feb. 28, 2010 by freedom of information (FOI) release to Dr. David Clarke, a U.K. UFO expert, that Reported sightings received from other sources should be answered by a standard letter and... should be retained for 30 days and then destroyed, largely removing any future FOI liability and negating the need to release future files post-November 30 2009. Exhibiting an embattled mentality regarding the communications with other governments on extraterrestrial and UFO issues and the exopolitical research community, the U.K. Ministry of Defence secret memohttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1254369/Deny-knowledge-How-Ministry-Defence-handles-reported-UFO-sightings.htmlstates, We have deliberately avoided formal approaches to other Governments on this issue. Such approaches would become public when the relevant UFO files are released, and would be viewed by 'ufologists' as evidence of international collaboration and conspiracy. The patent note of desperation and incoherence in the latest U.K. ministry of defence public ET/UFO strategy (or lack thereof) demonstrates how the extraterrestrial embargo jointly commenced by the U.S. and U.K. intelligence forces with the 1953 U.S. CIA Robertson Panelhttp://www.cufon.org/cufon/robert.htmis now deteriorating. It is most plausible that the U.K. Ministry of Defence, like its counterpart the U.S. Department of Defense, wants to concentrate on its secret compartmentalized programs with extraterrestrial civilizations, while shutting down all of its mechanisms for collecting public reports of UFOs. Continues at: http://www.examiner.com/x-2912-Seattle-Exopolitics-Examiner~y2010m3d1-UK-releases-past-UFO-reports-will-destroy-future-UFO-reports-avoids-government-ETUFO-conspiracyhttp://www.examiner.com/x-2912-Seattle-Exopolitics-Examiner%7Ey2010m3d1-UK-releases-past-UFO-reports-will-destroy-future-UFO-reports-avoids-government-ETUFO-conspiracy
