[cia-drugs] Census Blamed in RoundUp of Americans

[homepulse]

http://www.newworldorderreport.com/Default.aspx?tabid=266&ID=2552 

The Census Bureau was deeply involved in the roundup and internment of 
Japanese Americans. Included identifying concentrations of people of 
Japanese ancestry in geographic units as small as city blocks and a 
willingness to disclose names and addresses 


Census blamed in internment of Japanese 
Scholars study wartime bureau 

March 17, 2000 

By STEVEN A. HOLMES 
THE NEW YORK TIMES 



WASHINGTON -- Two scholars say in a new research paper that despite earlier 
denials, the Census Bureau was deeply involved in the roundup and internment 
of Japanese Americans at the onset of U.S. entry into World War II. 

The academics say the Census Bureau's involvement included identifying 
concentrations of people of Japanese ancestry in geographic units as small 
as city blocks, lending a senior Census Bureau official to work with the War 
Department on the relocation program and a willingness to disclose names and 
address of Japanese Americans. 

While it is common today for the Census Bureau to publish reports that 
detail the number of people of a given race living in an area as small as a 
city block, such information was generally not available in the 1940s. But 
the authors of the paper contend that the Census Bureau provided such 
detailed information as well as age, sex, citizenship and country of birth 
to the War Department, now the Defense Department, on only one group -- 
Japanese Americans. 

In 1941 and '42, the paper says, Census Bureau officials believed that such 
information was valuable to the War Department's effort in rounding up 
Americans of Japanese ancestry. 

The paper, "After Pearl Harbor: The Proper Role of Population Data Systems 
in Time of War," was written by William Seltzer, a statistician and 
demographer at Fordham University, and Margo Anderson, a history professor 
at the University of Wisconsin in Milwaukee whose area of expertise is the 
census. 

Seltzer and Anderson plan to present the paper at the annual meeting of the 
Population Association of America next week in Los Angeles. 

The practices described in the paper did not appear to have violated laws 
governing the census, which prohibit the bureau from disclosing information 
on individuals. But the authors indicated that Census Bureau officials 
appeared to be willing to provide such data. What is not clear is whether 
they were asked to do so. 

"We're by law required to keep confidential information by individuals," the 
paper quotes the director of the Census Bureau, J.C. Capt, as saying at a 
meeting of the Census Advisory Committee in January 1942. But if the defense 
authorities found 200 Japanese Americans missing and they wanted the names 
of the Japanese Americans in that area, Capt said, "I would give them 
further means of checking individuals." 

The Census Bureau often boasted that its conduct in the relocation of 
Japanese Americans had been its finest hour because it resisted pressure to 
provide explicit data to the War and Justice Departments. 

But Census Bureau officials do not dispute the findings of the paper. They 
say, however, that the strengthening of the laws protecting the 
confidentiality of data on individuals and the environment today would make 
a repeat of those abuses unlikely. 

Japanese Americans have long suspected that the Census Bureau played a 
prominent role in the roundup and relocation of 120,000 residents of 
Japanese ancestry to detention camps in the interior. 

"We've always suspected this," said Norman Mineta, a former California 
congressman who was relocated with his family from San Jose to a detention 
camp in Wyoming. "After all, they are the keeper of this kind of 
information." 

On Dec. 9, 1941, two days after the attack on Pearl Harbor, the Census 
Bureau produced a report titled, "Japanese Population of the United States, 
Its Territories and Possessions." The next day it issued a report on the 
Japanese population by citizenship and place of birth in selected cities. 
The next day it published another report, this one on the Japanese 
population by counties in states on the West Coast. All reports were based 
on data from the 1940 census. 

Capt justified the speed with which the bureau produced these reports by 
saying at meeting of the Census Advisory Committee in January 1942: "We 
didn't want to wait for the declaration of war. On Monday morning we put our 
people to work on the Japanese thing." 

The United States declared war on Japan that Monday afternoon. 


http://www.seattlepi.com/national/cens17.shtml 
© 2000 The New York Times. 
All rights reserved. 

[cia-drugs] Full El Al flight took off on 9/11 from JFK to Tel Aviv

[homepulse]

Full El Al flight took off on 9/11 from JFK to Tel Aviv 
By Wayne Madsen 
Online Journal Contributing Writer 
Mar 16, 2010 
http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_5691.shtml 

[cia-drugs] The Growing Movement for Publicly Owned Banks

[homepulse]

March 18, 2010 by YES! Magazine 

The Growing Movement for Publicly Owned Banks 

We the people have given away our sovereign money-creating power to private, 
for-profit lending institutions, which have used it to siphon wealth from 
the productive economy. Some states are moving to take that power back. 
by Ellen Brown 

"Hundreds of job-creating projects are still on hold because Michigan 
businesses and entrepreneurs cannot get bank financing. We can break the 
credit crunch and beat Wall Street at their own game by keeping our money 
right here in Michigan and investing it to retool our economy and create 
jobs." 
--Lansing Mayor Virg Bernero in The Detroit News March 9, 2010 

Full Article: 
http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2010/03/18-7#comment-1455218 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TakeOurMoneyBack/message/300 

[cia-drugs] PJTV: The Power & Danger of Iconography

[homepulse]

PJTV: The Power & Danger of Iconography 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GdtqtfXdR-c 


He's Barack Obama 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kVFdAJRVm94 

;-) 

[cia-drugs] Fwd: Obama surrenders gulf oil to Moscow --- The Russians are coming - to drill [ for oil ] in our own backyard!!

[homepulse]

- Forwarded Message - 
From: "Les Lemke"  
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 
Subject: Obama surrenders gulf oil to Moscow --- The Russians are coming - to 
drill [ for oil ] in our own backyard!! 



In case someone hasn't figured it out yet, Obama is an enemy of The People of 
these United States! 



EDITORIAL: 

Obama surrenders gulf oil to Moscow 

The Russians are coming - to drill in our own backyard 

By THE WASHINGTON TIMES 

The Obama administration is poised to ban offshore oil drilling on the outer 
continental shelf until 2012 or beyond. Meanwhile, Russia is making a bold 
strategic leap to begin drilling for oil in the Gulf of Mexico . While the 
United States attempts to shift gears to alternative fuels to battle the 
purported evils of carbon emissions, Russia will erect oil derricks off the 
Cuban coast. 

Offshore oil production makes economic sense. It creates jobs and helps fulfill 
America's vast energy needs. It contributes to the gross domestic product and 
does not increase the trade deficit. Higher oil supply helps keep a lid on 
rising prices, and greater American production gives the United States more 
influence over the global market. 

Drilling is also wildly popular with the public. A Pew Research Center poll 
from February showed 63 percent support for offshore drilling for oil and 
natural gas. Americans understand the fundamental points: The oil is there, and 
we need it. If we don't drill it out, we have to buy it from other countries. 
Last year, the U.S. government even helped Brazil underwrite offshore drilling 
in the Tupi oil field near Rio de Janeiro. The current price of oil makes 
drilling economically feasible, so why not let the private sector go ahead and 
get our oil? 

The Obama administration, however, views energy policy through green eyeshades. 
Every aspect of its approach to energy is subordinated to radical environmental 
concerns. This unprecedented lack of balance is placing offshore oil resources 
off-limits. The O Force would prefer the country shift its energy production to 
alternative sources, such as nuclear, solar and wind power. In theory, there's 
nothing wrong with that, in the long run, assuming technology can catch up to 
demand. But we have not yet reached the green utopia, we won't get there 
anytime soon, and America needs more oil now. 

Russia more sensibly views energy primarily as a strategic resource. Energy is 
critical to Russia's economy, as fuel and as a source of profit through export. 
Russia also has used energy as a coercive diplomatic tool, shutting off natural 
gas piped to Eastern Europe in the middle of winter to make a point about how 
dependent the countries are that do business with the Russians. 

Now Russia is using oil exploration to establish a new presence in the Western 
Hemisphere. It recently concluded four contracts securing oil-exploration 
rights in Cuba's economic zone in the Gulf of Mexico. A Russian-Cuban joint 
partnership will exploit oil found in the deep waters of the Gulf. 

Cuba has rights to the area in which drilling will be conducted under an 
agreement the Carter administration recognized. From Russia's perspective, this 
is another way to gain leverage inside what traditionally has been America's 
sphere of influence. It may not be as dramatic as the Soviet Union attempting 
to use Cuba as a missile platform, but in the energy wars, the message is the 
same. Russia is projecting power into the Western Hemisphere while the United 
States retreats . The world will not tolerate a superpower that acts like a 
sidekick much longer. 

Source: 
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/18/obama-surrenders-gulf-oil-to-moscow/
 

comments: 
http://washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/18/obama-surrenders-gulf-oil-to-moscow/comments/
 

[cia-drugs] USMC

[homepulse]

A U.S. Marine squad was marching north of Fallujah when 
they came upon an Iraqi terrorist who was badly injured 
and unconscious. On the opposite side of the road was an 
American Marine in a similar but less serious state. 
The Marine was conscious and alert and as first aid was 
given to both men, the squad leader asked the injured 
Marine what had happened. 

The Marine reported, "I was heavily armed and moving 
north along the highway here, and coming south was a 
heavily armed insurgent. We saw each other and both took 
cover in the ditches along the road. I yelled to him 
that Saddam Hussein was a miserable, lowlife scum bag 
who got what he deserved. And he yelled back that Barack 
Obama is a lying, good-for-nothing, left wing Commie who 
isn't even an American. 

So I said that Osama Bin Laden dresses and acts like a 
frigid, mean-spirited lesbian! He retaliated by yelling, 
"Oh yeah? Well, so does Nancy Pelosi!" 

"And, there we were, in the middle of the road, shaking 
hands, when a truck hit us." 





--- related: 




Cafferty : 
Pelosi Beyond Sleazy for Plan to Deem ObamaCare Passed! 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I5mHhzK5MvE 
Nancy Pelosi Is A Horrible Woman! Jack Cafferty 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gc9fsPTyqe8 

Pelosi: 
we have to pass the health care bill so that you can find out what is in it 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KoE1R-xH5To 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jiDXqLS2-Eg 
http://www.breitbart.tv/nancy-pelosi-we-need-to-pass-health-care-bill-to-find-out-whats-in-it/
 
http://reason.com/blog/2010/03/09/nancy-pelosi-on-health-care-we 

-- 
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/The-impudent-tyranny-of-Harry-Reid-8665439-79935422.html
 
http://www.factcheck.org/2010/01/medicare-board-unrepealable/ 

Steve King Calls For Revolution In The Streets Of Washington To Stop Health 
Care Bill 
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/03/steve-king-calls-for-revolution-in-the-streets-of-washington-to-stop-health-care-bill.php
 

[cia-drugs] FW: [PEPIS] Fwd: CFR Regulatory Plan A Smokescreen

[Kris Millegan]

-- Forwarded Message
> From: Tony Gosling 
> Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 01:30:58 +
> To: , 
> Subject: [PEPIS] Fwd: CFR Regulatory Plan A Smokescreen
> 

> +44 (0)7786 952037
> http://tonygosling.blip.tv/
> http://www.thisweek.org.uk/
> http://www.911forum.org.uk/
> "Capitalism is institutionalised bribery."
> _
> www.abolishwar.org.uk 
> www.elementary.org.uk 
> www.public-interest.co.uk 
> www.radio4all.net/index.php/series/Bristol+Broadband+Co-operative
> 
> http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
> "The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the
> possessor from the community" Carl Jung
> https://217.72.179.7/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
> 

-- End of Forwarded Message

[cia-drugs] The Military KNOWS Israel pulled off 911 ?

[homepulse]

Fwd: MUST WATCH: The Military KNOWS Israel pulled off 911 ? 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/WhoDid911/message/3449 

[cia-drugs] Power in south

[michael1]

Many in the US might be so shocked at level of inside control that they
think unstoppable.  The real solution will come from the outside.  The
Third World.  To many this is hard to believe.  This is why I posted about
the opera in Mexico.

Another sign all over the net is the expensive decision to get broadband
to as many citizens as possible in the US and in the UK.  Why?

Because we are falling more and more behind in invention.  Less and less
percent of patents and on and on.

So the broadband decision shows the level of desperation.

Michael

Re: [cia-drugs] Power in south

[homepulse]

dear Michael, 

this might interest you?: 

National Broadband Plan 
http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/MediaCog/message/712 

also, if you feel like it, please elaborate on the 'South Power' factor. 

;-) 

- Original Message - 
From: micha...@midcoast.com 
To: cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 5:51:37 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific 
Subject: [cia-drugs] Power in south 

Many in the US might be so shocked at level of inside control that they 
think unstoppable. The real solution will come from the outside. The 
Third World. To many this is hard to believe. This is why I posted about 
the opera in Mexico. 

Another sign all over the net is the expensive decision to get broadband 
to as many citizens as possible in the US and in the UK. Why? 

Because we are falling more and more behind in invention. Less and less 
percent of patents and on and on. 

So the broadband decision shows the level of desperation. 

Michael 


 

Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ 

Please let us stay on topic and be civil. 

OM 
Yahoo! Groups Links 

[cia-drugs] Re: US shipping powerful bunker buster bombs to Diego Garcia for coming attack on Iran

[muckblit]

Time frame? In the 1970's a friend of mine was platoon
leader in SF camp and they had to run an officer's
Harley up the flagpole at night since he had been
using them for slave labor at his house.

That was a golden era. I can't quite conceptualize in
as clear terms what we need to relate to in some
concrete way. Matthew McDaniel rode a horse from
Oregon to DC and NYC to draw attention to the plight
of the largest tribe in SE Asia, parallel to the
plight of all rural and urban and to some extent
middle class people who are all dis-enfranchised
by utopian propaganda of all sapping empire.

-Bob

--- In cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com, micha...@... wrote:
>
> Thanks…!
> Today in Mexico that opera goes on and on and makes a storm.
> Protesters around the President chant: "You are the drug runner, President."
> 
> Not so here.  Here we have no-course changing art.  As a group we are too
> afraid and/or the situation has not become dire enough.
> 
> I am beginning to see why Mr. Roberts was a success.  We have all played
> Mr. Roberts at one point or another.  I remember mine.  I locked our
> platoon sergeant in his 2nd floor squad room.  All hell broke loose and
> there was a company formation with the top screaming at us.  They would
> `catch this guy', whoever did it.   I spoke up in formation and said, "I
> locked him up." The top dismissed the formation except me.  When the CO
> gave out the article 15, (a light wrist slap), he had trouble keeping a
> straight face.  I was known from then on as "Lockup Donovan" or just
> "Lockup".  But now I see that it probably, as in the play, inspired others
> to do the same.
> 
> We don't dare toss off the captain's potted palm here.
> Lol.
> m
> 
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: micha...@...
> > To: cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 10:54:36 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
> > Subject: Re: [cia-drugs] US shipping powerful bunker buster bombs to Diego
> > Garcia for coming attack on Iran
> >
> > "There" the play is the thing...
> > http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8563528.stm
> > "Here" we are still learning to play Mr. Roberts...
> >
> > ruxpert response:
> >
> > Correction:
> > we, "Here" fully practiced on our TVs, Already know how to play such,
> > right "Here" as we see you & me play precisely such, Mr. Roberts! ;-)
> >
> > La Société du spectacle - Society of the Spectacle
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia-drugs/message/48973
> >
> >
> >
>

[cia-drugs] Re: Mexicans Kill US Consulate Staff

[muckblit]

A journalist killed in Oaxaca, southern Mexico, too, last week.
40 journalists killed since 2000, about the same as in the US.

http://www.google.com/search?q=mexico+journalist+killed

-Bob

--- In cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com, smac...@... wrote:
>
>
> Mexicans Kill US Consulate Staff
>
> Comment: If the war on drugs did not exist, you would not be reading
this article!
>
> WASHINGTON â€" Suspected drug cartel “hit teams”
gunned down an American consular employee and her husband in a Mexican
border city and killed a co-worker’s Mexican husband in a
separate attack, a US official said Sunday.
>
>
> KILLED: ARTHUR REDELFS, 34, WAS KILLED ALONG WITH HIS WIFE LESLEY
ENRIQUEZ, WHO WORKED AT THE U.S. CONSULATE. THEIR ONE-YEAR-OLD BABY WAS
UNHARME D
>
> The victims â€" two Americans and a Mexican â€" came under
fire in separate locations as they were driving Saturday through Ciudad
Juarez after earlier attending the same social event, the official said,
speaking on condition of anonymity.
>
> The killings marked an ominous turn in the drug violence wracking
northern Mexico, and prompted the State Department to announce that
Americans working at six US consulates in the border area could send
their families away.
>
> President Barack Obama said he was “deeply saddened and
outraged by the news of the brutal murders,” said National
Security Council spokesman Mike Hammer.
>
> The victims came under fire in separate locations after attending the
same social event earlier in the day, the US official said, speaking on
condition of anonymity.
>
> “Suspected drug cartel hit teams fired on locally employed
staff, Consulate General Juarez, in their privately owned
vehicles,” the official said.
>
> “The attacks resulted in three fatalities â€" two American
citizens and one Mexican citizen,” he said.
>
> The victims included a US woman employed by the consulate’s
American citizens services section who was with her American husband and
infant daughter when they came under fire, the official said.
>
> The infant, who was in the back seat, survived the attack unharmed,
but the woman and her husband were killed, he said.
>
> In the second attack, a Mexican employee of the consulate was
following her husband and two children in a separate car, when her
husband’s vehicle came under fire, killing him and wounding the
two children, the official said.
>
> “Both families had attended the same social event earlier in
the afternoon off-post away from the consulate,” the US official
said. “It has not been determined if the victims were
specifically targeted.”
>
> Shortly after the killings were disclosed by the White House, the
State Department issued a travel warning for Mexico.
>
> It said Americans working in consulates in the northern cities of
Tijuana, Nogales, Ciudad Juarez, Nuevo Laredo, Monterrey and Matamoros
were authorized to send family members home until April 12 because of
security concerns.
>
> The departure authorization only affect relatives of US government
personnel in those cities, the statement said.
>
> The travel warning said that due to the “recent violent
attacks,” US citizens were urged to “delay unnecessary
travel to parts of Durango, Coahuila and Chihuahua states.”
>
> “While millions of US citizens safely visit Mexico each year
… violence in the country has increased,” the State
Department said.
>
> “Drug cartels and associated criminal elements have retaliated
violently against individuals who speak out against them or whom they
otherwise view as a threat to their organizations,” it read.
>
> The State Department travel warning was issued “coupled with
the increase of violence in that northern area,” said Department
spokesman Fred Lash.
>
> “It’s not an ordered departure, it’s up to them
if they want to come out or not,” said Lash told AFP.
>
> Ciudad Juarez, population 1.3 million, is a major hub for smuggling
illegal drugs into the United States. It is directly across the border
from El Paso, Texas.
>
> More than 2,600 people were murdered in Ciudad Juarez in 2009 in
drug-related violence.
>
> The war between rival drug cartels to control major border crossing
points, as well as the government’s attempt to crackdown on the
cartels, has killed more than 15,000 people across Mexico over the last
three years, according to government figures.
>
> The State Department warning said that some of the recent clashes
“have resembled small-unit combat, with cartels employing
automatic weapons and grenades.”
>
> “Large firefights have taken place in towns and cities across
Mexico, but occur mostly in northern Mexico,” the statement read.
“During some of these incidents, US citizens have been trapped
and temporarily prevented from leaving the area.”
>
> More than 60 people were killed over the weekend in Mexico, including
38 in the southern state of Guerrero, Mexican officials said.
>
>
>
>
> http://www.darkgovernment.com/news/mexicans-kill-us-consul

[cia-drugs] WACLA Visibilty Action = Banner Preparation, etc ...

[homepulse]

video: 
WACLA Visibilty Action = Banner Preparation and DVD - - sticker, stamp and 
stuff! 
http://911blogger.com/node/22972 

[cia-drugs] “The Reason For This Cover-Up Goes Right To The White House”

[homepulse]

“The Reason For This Cover-Up Goes Right To The White House” 
George Washington Blog || March 18, 2010 
http://www.prisonplanet.com/the-reason-for-this-cover-up-goes-right-to-the-white-house.html
 

video: 
Investigate 9/11, just not too deeply 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ViQksBPxs1w 


Chairs of Both the 9/11 Commission and the Joint Intelligence Inquiry into 9/11 
Said That Government Minders Obstructed the 9/11 
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2010/03/government-minders-obstructed-911.html 

[cia-drugs] Ore. lawsuit claims Boy Scouts sex abuse coverup

[smartnews]

Ore. lawsuit claims Boy Scouts sex abuse  coverup  

Mar 19, 2010 By WILLIAM McCALL
PORTLAND, Ore. (AP) - The Boy Scouts  of America has long kept an extensive 
archive of secret documents that chronicle  the sexual abuse of young boys 
by Scout leaders over the years.

The  "perversion files," a nickname the Boy Scouts are said to have used 
for the  documents, have rarely been seen by the public, but that could all 
change in the  coming weeks in an Oregon courtroom.

The lawyer for a man who was  molested in the 1980s by a Scout leader has 
obtained about 1,000 Boy Scouts sex  files and is expected to release some of 
them at a trial that began Wednesday.  The lawyer says the files show how 
the Boy Scouts have covered up abuse for  decades.

The trial is significant because the files could offer a rare  window into 
how the Boy Scouts have responded to sex abuse by Scout leaders. The  only 
other time the documents are believed to have been presented at a trial was  
in the 1980s in Virginia.
At the start of the Oregon trial, attorney Kelly  Clark recited the Boy 
Scout oath and the promise to obey Scout law to be  "trustworthy." Then he 
presented six boxes of documents that he said will show  "how the Boy Scouts of 
America broke that oath." He held up file folder after  file folder he said 
contained reports of abuse from around the country, telling  the jury the 
efforts to keep them secret may have actually set back efforts to  prevent 
child abuse nationally.

Clark is seeking $14 million in  damages on behalf of a 37-year-old man who 
was sexually molested in the early  1980s in Portland by an assistant 
Scoutmaster, Timur Dykes. Clark said the  victim suffered mental health 
problems, 
bad grades in school, drug use, anxiety,  difficulty maintaining 
relationships and lost several jobs over the years  because of the abuse. Dykes 
was 
convicted three times between 1983 and 1994  
of sexually abusing boys, most of them Scouts

The lawsuit also  named the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 
because the Mormons acted  as a charter organization, or sponsor, for the local 
Boy Scouts troop that  included the victim. But the church has settled its 
portion of the case. 
_http://apnews.myway.com/article/20100319/D9EHLRE00.html_ 
(http://apnews.myway.com/article/20100319/D9EHLRE00.html)   

[cia-drugs] Re: Power in south

[muckblit]

The level of political, intellectual discourse by the common people
in Latin America and Africa leaves us behind. They are not afraid
of the old CIA puppet dictators. No African nation wants AFRICOM.
People mob farm foreclosure auctions in Latin America and either
shut them down or buy the farmer's land cheap for him. Then it
surprised me to hear that the same paradigm was practiced here
during the Dust Bowl and Great Depression.

I thought we were still being beat up by importing smart people
from India and Pakistan. Paks have taken Brighton Beach from
the Russians. Why do we need broadband if we can just let all
the B-1B foreigners replace us at a third the cost? Can't we all
just be morons? Being middle class has so many obligations,
including an orderly thought process so as not to spam the
internet.

-Bob

--- In cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com, micha...@... wrote:
>
> Many in the US might be so shocked at level of inside control that
they
> think unstoppable.  The real solution will come from the outside.  The
> Third World.  To many this is hard to believe.  This is why I posted
about
> the opera in Mexico.
>
> Another sign all over the net is the expensive decision to get
broadband
> to as many citizens as possible in the US and in the UK.  Why?
>
> Because we are falling more and more behind in invention.  Less and
less
> percent of patents and on and on.
>
> So the broadband decision shows the level of desperation.
>
> Michael
>

Re: [cia-drugs] Re: Power in south

[homepulse]

hear hear! 
albeit experience has demonstrated you not reciprocating communication / direct 
question. 
That is of course your prerogative, and I love ya just the same, 
but such seems to go counter to your below expressed position? 
My Friend ;-) 

- Original Message - 
From: "muckblit"  
To: cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 11:11:22 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific 
Subject: [cia-drugs] Re: Power in south 

The level of political, intellectual discourse by the common people 
in Latin America and Africa leaves us behind. They are not afraid 
of the old CIA puppet dictators. No African nation wants AFRICOM. 
People mob farm foreclosure auctions in Latin America and either 
shut them down or buy the farmer's land cheap for him. Then it 
surprised me to hear that the same paradigm was practiced here 
during the Dust Bowl and Great Depression. 

I thought we were still being beat up by importing smart people 
from India and Pakistan. Paks have taken Brighton Beach from 
the Russians. Why do we need broadband if we can just let all 
the B-1B foreigners replace us at a third the cost? Can't we all 
just be morons? Being middle class has so many obligations, 
including an orderly thought process so as not to spam the 
internet. 

-Bob 

--- In cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com, micha...@... wrote: 
> 
> Many in the US might be so shocked at level of inside control that 
they 
> think unstoppable. The real solution will come from the outside. The 
> Third World. To many this is hard to believe. This is why I posted 
about 
> the opera in Mexico. 
> 
> Another sign all over the net is the expensive decision to get 
broadband 
> to as many citizens as possible in the US and in the UK. Why? 
> 
> Because we are falling more and more behind in invention. Less and 
less 
> percent of patents and on and on. 
> 
> So the broadband decision shows the level of desperation. 
> 
> Michael 
> 




 

Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ 

Please let us stay on topic and be civil. 

OM 
Yahoo! Groups Links 

[cia-drugs] al-CIA-duh al Qaeda alqaeda al-CIAduh CENQUAL

[muckblit]

alqaeda al-CIAduh al-CIA-duh al Qaeda CENQUAL

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/18/AR201003\
1805464.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/18/AR201003\
1805464_pf.html

Dismantling of Saudi-CIA Web site illustrates need  for clearer cyberwar
policies

By Ellen Nakashima
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, March 19, 2010; A01




By early 2008, top U.S. military officials had become convinced that 
extremists planning attacks on American forces in Iraq were making use 
of a Web site set up by the Saudi government and the CIA to uncover 
terrorist plots in the kingdom.

"We knew we were going to be forced to shut this thing down," recalled 
one former civilian official, describing tense internal discussions in 
which military commanders argued that the site was putting Americans at 
risk. "CIA resented that," the former official said.

Elite U.S. military computer specialists, over the objections of the 
CIA, mounted a cyberattack that dismantled the online forum. Although 
some Saudi officials had been informed in advance about the Pentagon's 
plan, several key princes were "absolutely furious" at the loss of an 
intelligence-gathering tool, according to another former U.S. official.

Four former senior U.S. officials, speaking on the condition of 
anonymity to discuss classified operations, said the creation and 
shutting down of the site illustrate the need for clearer policies 
governing cyberwar. The use of computers to gather intelligence or to 
disrupt the enemy presents complex questions: When is a cyberattack 
outside the theater of war allowed? Is taking out an extremist Web site
a  covert operation or a traditional military activity? Should Congress
be  informed?

"The point of the story is it hasn't been sorted out yet in a way that 
all the persons involved in cyber-operations have a clear understanding 
of doctrine, legal authorities and policy, and a clear understanding of 
the distinction between what is considered intelligence activity and 
wartime [Defense Department] authority," said one former senior national
security official.

CIA spokeswoman Marie Harf said, "It's sheer lunacy to suggest that any 
part of our government would do anything to facilitate the movement of 
foreign fighters to Iraq."

The Pentagon, the Justice Department 
 and the
National Security Agency, whose  director oversaw the operation to take
down the site, declined to  comment for this story, as did officials at
the Saudi Embassy in  Washington.
Precedent before policy

The absence of clear guidelines for cyberwarfare is not new. The George 
W. Bush  
administration was compelled in its final years to refine  doctrine as
it executed operations. "Cyber was moving so fast that we  were always
in danger of building up precedent before we built up  policy," said
former CIA director Michael V. Hayden, without confirming  or denying
the existence of the site or its dismantling.

Lawyers at the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel 
 are
struggling to define the legal  rules of the road for cyberwarriors,
according to current and former  officials.

The Saudi-CIA Web site was set up several years ago as a "honey pot," an
online forum covertly monitored by intelligence agencies to identify 
attackers and gain information, according to three of the former 
officials. The site was a boon to Saudi intelligence operatives, who 
were able to round up some extremists before they could strike, the 
former officials said.

At the time, however, dozens of Saudi jihadists were entering Iraq each 
month to carry out attacks. U.S. military officials grew concerned that 
the site "was being used to pass operational information" among 
extremists, one former official said. The threat was so serious, former 
officials said, that Gen. Ray Odierno, the top U.S. military commander 
in Iraq, requested that the site be shut down.

The operation was debated by a task force on cyber-operations made up of
representatives from the Defense and Justice departments, the CIA, the 
Office of the Director of National Intelligence, and the National
Security Council
 . Lt. Gen.
Keith B. Alexander,  who directs the National Security Agency, made a
presentation.

The CIA argued that dismantling the site would lead to a significant 
loss of intelligence. The NSA countered that taking it down was a 
legitimate operation in defense of U.S. troops. Although one Pentagon 
official asserted that the military did not have the authority to 
conduct such operations, the top military commanders made a persuasive 
case that extremists were using the site to plan attacks.

The task force debated whether to go forward and, if so, under what 
authority. If the operation was d

[cia-drugs] Re: al-CIA-duh al Qaeda alqaeda al-CIAduh CENQUAL

[muckblit]

alqaeda CENQUAL al-CIAduh al-CIA-duh al Qaeda

http://www.google.com/search?q=seymour+hersh+qaeda
http://www.google.com/search?q=rashid+khalidi+qaeda+cia


--- In cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com, "muckblit"  wrote:
>
> alqaeda al-CIAduh al-CIA-duh al Qaeda CENQUAL
>
>
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/18/AR201003\
\
> 1805464.html
>
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/18/AR201003\
\
> 1805464_pf.html
>
> Dismantling of Saudi-CIA Web site illustrates need  for clearer
cyberwar
> policies
>
> By Ellen Nakashima
> Washington Post Staff Writer
> Friday, March 19, 2010; A01
>
>
>
>
> By early 2008, top U.S. military officials had become convinced that
> extremists planning attacks on American forces in Iraq were making use
> of a Web site set up by the Saudi government and the CIA to uncover
> terrorist plots in the kingdom.
>
> "We knew we were going to be forced to shut this thing down," recalled
> one former civilian official, describing tense internal discussions in
> which military commanders argued that the site was putting Americans
at
> risk. "CIA resented that," the former official said.
>
> Elite U.S. military computer specialists, over the objections of the
> CIA, mounted a cyberattack that dismantled the online forum. Although
> some Saudi officials had been informed in advance about the Pentagon's
> plan, several key princes were "absolutely furious" at the loss of an
> intelligence-gathering tool, according to another former U.S.
official.
>
> Four former senior U.S. officials, speaking on the condition of
> anonymity to discuss classified operations, said the creation and
> shutting down of the site illustrate the need for clearer policies
> governing cyberwar. The use of computers to gather intelligence or to
> disrupt the enemy presents complex questions: When is a cyberattack
> outside the theater of war allowed? Is taking out an extremist Web
site
> a  covert operation or a traditional military activity? Should
Congress
> be  informed?
>
> "The point of the story is it hasn't been sorted out yet in a way that
> all the persons involved in cyber-operations have a clear
understanding
> of doctrine, legal authorities and policy, and a clear understanding
of
> the distinction between what is considered intelligence activity and
> wartime [Defense Department] authority," said one former senior
national
> security official.
>
> CIA spokeswoman Marie Harf said, "It's sheer lunacy to suggest that
any
> part of our government would do anything to facilitate the movement of
> foreign fighters to Iraq."
>
> The Pentagon, the Justice Department
>  and
the
> National Security Agency, whose  director oversaw the operation to
take
> down the site, declined to  comment for this story, as did officials
at
> the Saudi Embassy in  Washington.
> Precedent before policy
>
> The absence of clear guidelines for cyberwarfare is not new. The
George
> W. Bush  
> administration was compelled in its final years to refine  doctrine as
> it executed operations. "Cyber was moving so fast that we  were always
> in danger of building up precedent before we built up  policy," said
> former CIA director Michael V. Hayden, without confirming  or denying
> the existence of the site or its dismantling.
>
> Lawyers at the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel
>  are
> struggling to define the legal  rules of the road for cyberwarriors,
> according to current and former  officials.
>
> The Saudi-CIA Web site was set up several years ago as a "honey pot,"
an
> online forum covertly monitored by intelligence agencies to identify
> attackers and gain information, according to three of the former
> officials. The site was a boon to Saudi intelligence operatives, who
> were able to round up some extremists before they could strike, the
> former officials said.
>
> At the time, however, dozens of Saudi jihadists were entering Iraq
each
> month to carry out attacks. U.S. military officials grew concerned
that
> the site "was being used to pass operational information" among
> extremists, one former official said. The threat was so serious,
former
> officials said, that Gen. Ray Odierno, the top U.S. military commander
> in Iraq, requested that the site be shut down.
>
> The operation was debated by a task force on cyber-operations made up
of
> representatives from the Defense and Justice departments, the CIA, the
> Office of the Director of National Intelligence, and the National
> Security Council
>  . Lt. Gen.
> Keith B. Alexander,  who directs the National Security Agency, made a
> presentation.
>
> The CIA argued that dismantling the site would lead to a significant
> loss of intelligence. The NSA countered that taking it down was a
> legitimate oper

[cia-drugs] Aluminum Mercury Thimerosol

[muckblit]

80% of students in one school acquire ADHD in one year? How?! Aluminum.
http://www.youtube.com/v/CXWBxxVk_h0



http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/03/20/david-ayou\
b-interview-february-2010.aspx

New Warning About Everyday Poison Linked to Alzheimer's,  ADHD, and
Autism  Posted by
Dr.  Mercola

|  March 20 2010Dr. Ayoub was, as many of you are, very
concerned about mercury  (thimerosal) in vaccines for a number of years,
and attended a number of  autism conferences that featured physicians
who were highlighting the  dangers of mercury.
However, a few personal encounters heightened his interest in another 
toxic metal frequently used in vaccines, namely aluminum.

Parents of autistic children kept pointing out the fact that their 
children's heavy metal toxicity profiles showed high amounts of 
aluminum, and they wanted to know what that meant.

Secondly, a well respected nutritionist who deals with industrial 
aluminum toxicity showed him toxicity profiles of middle school children
who had ADHD. In his estimate, 90 percent of the children in one 
particular school had developed ADHD during the course of a single year,
and their toxicity profiles showed massive amounts of aluminum.

In addition, he did a pilot study with Dr. Usman, who treats autism 
with biomedicine, and when he evaluated the aluminum burden of these 
autistic children, he found that high percentage of them also had very 
high aluminum burdens.

All of these events led him to look deeper into the aluminum issue, 
which we discuss at length in this interview.
Why is Aluminum Used in Vaccines?
Mercury (thimerosal) exposure has declined significantly since it was 
eliminated from the single-dose vials of most childhood vaccines, yet 
autism rates have continued to skyrocket. This has led many to assume 
that mercury isn't a problem, and anyone questioning the safety of 
vaccines is considered to be a hysterical wingnut.

However, while mercury use has decreased, the use of aluminum  additives
has increased!

Aluminum, like any other adjuvant, is added to the vaccine in order  to
boost the host's immune response to the antigen. The antigen is what
your body responds to and makes antibodies against (the virus being 
injected). By boosting your body's immune response, the vaccine 
manufacturer can use a smaller amount of antigen, which makes production
less expensive.

Interestingly enough, according to Dr. Ayoub, even our modern medical 
literature admits that how this happens exactly is still a mystery. And 
it's not a consistent finding. He mentions a couple of studies on
the  more recent HPV vaccine, which found that the aluminum adjuvant had
no  effect at all on the immune response…

So, although aluminum is frequently added to vaccines for this 
particular purpose, no one knows with any degree of confidence that it 
actually makes a more effective vaccine.
Is Aluminum a Heavy Metal?
Aluminum is by many considered to be a heavy metal. However, based on 
the Periodic Table, it's just shy of a heavy metal. So it's
called a  "light metal."

But regardless of its precise classification, aluminum is in the  metal
grouping, and it's a common compound.

You will find aluminum in the earth's crust, and in air, soil and 
water. However, although aluminum is a common, "natural"
substance, it's  important to realize that it has absolutely no
biological role  inside your body.

In fact, we already know that aluminum  is a poison
 .
Which Vaccines Contain Aluminum?
Many vaccines contain aluminum, including:

* Hepatitis A
* Hepatitis B
* DTaP (diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis)
* Hib vaccine
* Pneumococcal vaccine
* Gardasil (HPV vaccine)

This is NOT an all-inclusive list, however. Your best bet is to read 
through the package insert of each vaccine in question.

You can find a comprehensive list  of approved vaccines on the FDA's
website, with links to each package  insert
 .

The amount of aluminum in each vaccine will vary. However, according  to
Dr. Ayoub, it's important to realize that the toxicity is not 
entirely dependent on dose, but also on how it's distributed in your
body.

For example, a small dose released rapidly from the injection site  into
your body can cause a rapid rise in blood aluminum levels. So a  small
dose released quickly may be much more toxic than a large dose  that
ends up staying longer in the tissue at the injection site.

The variables of personal differences and differences in how the 
injection is given are too numerous to count, and they may play a role 
in how toxic a shot ends up being once inject