--- Patricia Johnson-Holm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 12:38:26 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Patgricia Johnson-Holm
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: THE MASONIC FOUNDING OF THE UNITED
> OF AMERICA
> To: Tim cWhite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>
>
> There is no doubt about the founding of the
> Washington et al, goes back to the Masonic take over
> of our country. And here is the next part about
> that, that you need to know.
>
> First, the original Constitution was replaced as of
> July 9th 1789 by Washington etc. Look back to the
> original foundation papers.
>
> See for yourself the concepts expressed by the
> Declaration of Independence do not match what was
> put into the 1789 constitution.
>
> Next, look up the actual leaders of our country
> going back to before 1776. Why are they not
> acknowledged for their contribution? They are not
> acknowledged because what they contributed was not
> what the so called 'masonic' group wanted to agree
> with.
>
> Then think about why the name Liberty came about.
> The Liberty Bell(s), the Statue of Liberty go back
> to the naming of the this country. Why is it being
> written out of history?
>
> Also don't forget the importance of the Jesuits
> being disbanded in 1775, then reinstituted right
> after the money for the Louisana Purchase was paid
> out.
>
> All of this adds together to form a pattern of what
> was really transpiring, not just what the current
> top masons want you to believe. Anytime secracy is
> mandatory to stay in 'power' this indicates
> something is very WRONG. The first goal of the
> masons goes way back to the Stuarts. These goals are
> what the general public are told is supposed to be
> true about all of the 'masonic order.' Of course it
> is becoming common knowledge that the old goals are
> by no means the same as the current top masonic
> (jesuit) goals.
>
> Of course the everyday person did not want
> Revolutionary War with England. It was only with the
> 5% of the population mostly the ones fighting
> England in other ways, such as the Battle of Caledon
> (1746 Bonnie Prince Charlie and so on) that the
> Independence from England was demanded.
>
> With England so strung out trying to take over every
> area that the House of Stuart had established as
> mutual economic benefit. This made it possible for
> the new country Liberty, to 'win.'
>
> Supposedly, the French paid for the Revolution. But
> think of it this way, IF that were true why do we
> NOT speak FRENCH right now? Of course the answer is
> that the funds did NOT come from the good graces of
> King Louis.
>
> Why was the year 1789 chosen to take over Liberty?
> Was it because 'Bonnie Prince Charlie' Charles
> Edward Stuart ended up dead in 1788? Why was the
> French Rovolution in 1789? It looks to be for much
> the same reason. Are you aware that the House of
> Stuart was Royalty over France and several other
> countries? Yes, it is this connection that starts to
> make sense out of why things happened as they
> actually did. Not just according to the version some
> of the history books try to tell you. See for
> yourself the little details (and sometimes not so
> little details) reveal the TRUTH.
>
> So now you see why the evil side knew that the Date
> July 9th was very important not only in 1789, but
> also the response to it in 1947.
>
> Of course there is much more, but it is best to
> research these points for yourself.
>
> Patricia Johnson-Holm
>
>
>
> Tim White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Masonic Founding of The United States of America
>
>
> Written by Administrator
> Friday, 19 November 2004
> by Alexander S. Holub
>
> The next time you hear from some fundamentalist
> Christian talking about how the United States of
> America was founded by a group of church-going
> Christians, as the fundamentalists claim they are,
> think about this:
>
> The revolution against England was NOT a popular
> idea.
> Most people in The Colonies were quite happy with
> the
> way things were going. The people who were concerned
> about the taxes were those who would have to pay the
> majority of the taxes: the wealthy, the factories,
> and
> the shop owners. The majority of people in this
> country worked either for themselves or for someone
> else. The Boston Tea Party, you will recall,
> occurred
> because of the tax on tea. The fact of the matter is
> that most of the people in The Colonies didn't drink
> tea. It was mainly the wealthy who retained that
> habit. It was, though, symbolic for the continued
> taxing to pay for the British nobility's excesses.
> Fundamentalist Christians have this mistaken idea
> that
> when The Declaration of Independence was signed,
> everyone stood in line to sign it. Actually, it took
> over 5 years for everyone to sign it. That was well
> after the Revolutionary War was won. Part of the
> problem was transportation the other part was that
> many of the signers weren't sure that breaking away
> fr
