[cifs-protocol] RE: Status: SRX080811600226 ([MS-NRPC] 2.2.1.3.12 Trust Account Details) superceded by SRX081013600536: [MS-NRPC] operation backing store linkages
Thank you again Andrew. I am proceeding with an enumeration of the linkage list, for submission to document development. Regards, Bill Wesse MCSE, MCTS / Escalation Engineer, US-CSS DSC PROTOCOL TEAM 8055 Microsoft Way Charlotte, NC 28273 TEL: +1(980) 776-8200 CELL: +1(704) 661-5438 FAX: +1(704) 665-9606 -Original Message- From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 8:02 AM To: Bill Wesse Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Status: SRX080811600226 ([MS-NRPC] 2.2.1.3.12 Trust Account Details) superceded by SRX081013600536: [MS-NRPC] operation backing store linkages On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 03:38 -0700, Bill Wesse wrote: Thanks Andrew - especially for the corrections. Just to clarify, the document was never meant to be standalone; It is a very useful thing standalone, or alongside the main document, because it is organised differently, and even just that makes it easier to work with (sometimes it is great to have two different ways to approach the info). Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc. ___ cifs-protocol mailing list cifs-protocol@cifs.org https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
[cifs-protocol] RE: Status: SRX080811600226 ([MS-NRPC] 2.2.1.3.12 Trust Account Details) superceded by SRX081013600536: [MS-NRPC] operation backing store linkages
Thanks Andrew - especially for the corrections. Just to clarify, the document was never meant to be standalone; it is basically a set of notes I took during running down parameter storage. I do have more work to do before submitting the contained information as a change proposal for [MS-NRPC]. Of course, I do have more work to do before that, and I will keep you advised as I progress. Regards, Bill Wesse MCSE, MCTS / Escalation Engineer, US-CSS DSC PROTOCOL TEAM 8055 Microsoft Way Charlotte, NC 28273 TEL: +1(980) 776-8200 CELL: +1(704) 661-5438 FAX: +1(704) 665-9606 -Original Message- From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 1:12 AM To: Bill Wesse Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Status: SRX080811600226 ([MS-NRPC] 2.2.1.3.12 Trust Account Details) superceded by SRX081013600536: [MS-NRPC] operation backing store linkages On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 06:40 -0700, Bill Wesse wrote: Good morning Andrew. For your review, I have attached a working document that details usage and Active Directory storage of several select parameters used by [MS-NRPC] operations. The parameter notes in the document are not complete, and several require additional research. Additionally, the document is organized around operation parameters by name, not by operation. This is for the purpose of brevity. I though it would be unproductive to insert comments into sections of the original [MS-NRPC] document as examples - which is what this doc is, example text. I would deeply appreciate your feedback concerning the quality of, and whether or not this is the sort of information you are looking for concerning the backing store information for the [MS-NRPC] operations parameters. This is looking good, and seems quite a reasonable way to approach the problem. A few errors (just because I'm picky :-): 1.1 You give a lot of detail about accountName, except the actual attribute. 1.3 DomainName is not stored in the DC attribute - this is just the first component of the domain name. The example objects are not the most useful thing - if they are just un-annotated LDIF pastes. (I can usually find them by a simple search on my test DC, but probably do help the hypothetical target of a independent developer not performing network analysis). I do look forward to the completed document. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc. ___ cifs-protocol mailing list cifs-protocol@cifs.org https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
[cifs-protocol] RE: Status: SRX080811600226 ([MS-NRPC] 2.2.1.3.12 Trust Account Details) superceded by SRX081013600536: [MS-NRPC] operation backing store linkages
On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 03:38 -0700, Bill Wesse wrote: Thanks Andrew - especially for the corrections. Just to clarify, the document was never meant to be standalone; It is a very useful thing standalone, or alongside the main document, because it is organised differently, and even just that makes it easier to work with (sometimes it is great to have two different ways to approach the info). Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ cifs-protocol mailing list cifs-protocol@cifs.org https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
[cifs-protocol] RE: Status: SRX080811600226 ([MS-NRPC] 2.2.1.3.12 Trust Account Details) superceded by SRX081013600536: [MS-NRPC] operation backing store linkages
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 06:40 -0700, Bill Wesse wrote: Good morning Andrew. For your review, I have attached a working document that details usage and Active Directory storage of several select parameters used by [MS-NRPC] operations. The parameter notes in the document are not complete, and several require additional research. Additionally, the document is organized around operation parameters by name, not by operation. This is for the purpose of brevity. I though it would be unproductive to insert comments into sections of the original [MS-NRPC] document as examples - which is what this doc is, example text. I would deeply appreciate your feedback concerning the quality of, and whether or not this is the sort of information you are looking for concerning the backing store information for the [MS-NRPC] operations parameters. This is looking good, and seems quite a reasonable way to approach the problem. A few errors (just because I'm picky :-): 1.1 You give a lot of detail about accountName, except the actual attribute. 1.3 DomainName is not stored in the DC attribute - this is just the first component of the domain name. The example objects are not the most useful thing - if they are just un-annotated LDIF pastes. (I can usually find them by a simple search on my test DC, but probably do help the hypothetical target of a independent developer not performing network analysis). I do look forward to the completed document. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ cifs-protocol mailing list cifs-protocol@cifs.org https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
