Re: [CinCVS] Playback performance
Both are 29.97.On 9/6/06, Graham Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 19:59 -0500, Matt Pfingsten wrote:> On 6/30/06, Valentina Messeri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> try to use x11 instead of x11-xv in preference>playback>video > driver>> Sorry for the late response. That didn't do it. I am scrolling through> some footage and sub-clipping and I notice that when I move one frame> a time, only every 3rd or 4th frame actually updates the Viewer's > display. I'm wondering if this is the source of my playback woes, in> that its simply not updating the Viewer or Compositor display often> enough rather than struggling to play the footage.> > Any ideas?Project frame rate set wrong perhaps. Check your asset frame rate too.Graham>> --> Matt Pfingsten> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > www.GotWookiee.com___Cinelerra mailing listCinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra-- Matt Pfingsten [EMAIL PROTECTED]www.GotWookiee.com
Re: [CinCVS] Playback performance
On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 19:59 -0500, Matt Pfingsten wrote: > On 6/30/06, Valentina Messeri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > try to use x11 instead of x11-xv in preference>playback>video > driver > > Sorry for the late response. That didn't do it. I am scrolling through > some footage and sub-clipping and I notice that when I move one frame > a time, only every 3rd or 4th frame actually updates the Viewer's > display. I'm wondering if this is the source of my playback woes, in > that its simply not updating the Viewer or Compositor display often > enough rather than struggling to play the footage. > > Any ideas? Project frame rate set wrong perhaps. Check your asset frame rate too. Graham > > -- > Matt Pfingsten > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > www.GotWookiee.com ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
Re: [CinCVS] Playback performance
On 6/30/06, Valentina Messeri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: try to use x11 instead of x11-xv in preference>playback>video driverSorry for the late response. That didn't do it. I am scrolling through some footage and sub-clipping and I notice that when I move one frame a time, only every 3rd or 4th frame actually updates the Viewer's display. I'm wondering if this is the source of my playback woes, in that its simply not updating the Viewer or Compositor display often enough rather than struggling to play the footage. Any ideas?-- Matt Pfingsten[EMAIL PROTECTED]www.GotWookiee.com
[CinCVS] How this last merge occured
Hi all, For those interested, I have drawn up the process of how the 2.1 merge occurred: http://cvs.cinelerra.org/~pmdumuid/2.0_to_2.1_notes/20_21merge.png http://cvs.cinelerra.org/~pmdumuid/2.0_to_2.1_notes/20_21merge.fig The Magenta line shows connections where commits came from the SVN, the red lines show commits as a result of the merge, and the black lines are simple mergers. Here are the steps taken: 1. Determine which patch from 2.0CV had made it into 2.1, ( see http://cvs.cinelerra.org/~pmdumuid/2.0_to_2.1_notes/patch_yesno ) 2. Apply these patches onto the 2.0 base code, (SECTION "2.0CV into 2.1") 3. Another branch "2.0 to 2.1" then was developed containing incremental patches that would arrive at 2.1. 4. Patches made in the "2.0 to 2.1" branch where then pulled into "2.1CV plan" branch using the git merge tool. 5. Due to some git-issues, the "2.1CV plan" branch required an isolation from it's mergers, so a new branch, "2.1CV plan w/out merge" was created. 6. Patches were then collated, and ordered in a better manner and a new branch, "2.1CV reordered" is formed. 7. At multiple points along "2.1CV reordered", the changes are committed to the SVN. At this stage, the relationships between the figure branch names and the git branches are: "2.1 to 2.1 patch"http://.../~j6t/.../cinelerra2.git "2.1CV plan" http://.../~j6t/.../cinelerra2.git#svn-plan "2.1CV plan w/out merge" http://.../~j6t/.../cinelerra2.git#svn-plan-linear "2.1CV reordered" http://.../~j6t/.../cinelerra2.git#svn-planj6t Regards, Pierre ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
Re: [CinCVS] Cinelerra v2.1 has been Released
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 08:29:41AM +0200, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote: > Le 06.09.2006 00:59:49, Nicolas a écrit : > >On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 11:31:10PM +0200, Johannes Sixt wrote: > >> On Sunday 27 August 2006 20:18, Johannes Sixt wrote: > >> > We've completed the merge. Expect a substantial number of svn > >commits soon. > >> > > > > >I get an error during the compilation process (the message were > >written > >in French, I translated them) : > > > >Entering directory « /usr/src/cinelerra/rev_865/hvirtual/po » > >make cinelerra.pot-update > >make[3]: entering directory « /usr/src/cinelerra/rev_865/hvirtual/po » > >make[3]: *** No rule to build the target « > >../plugins/1080to480/1080to480.C », needed for « > >cinelerra.pot-update ». Stop. > > > Edit POTFILES.in and replace the following line: > plugins/1080to480/1080to480.C > > with: > plugins/1080to540/1080to540.C > > (maybe there are other mismatches in POTFILES.in) > > Regards > > Jean-Luc Hello, I fetched the latest revision (868). I compiled it with the open-gl configure option. It compiled fine, but it's not quite useable for the moment. It crashes several times (with errors I've never seen before), and I've noticed several bugs. Anyway, I'll continue to fetch and compile the latest revision, to keep an eye on the merge progress! ;-) Nicolas, Paris. ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
Re: [CinCVS] Trimming and insertion things
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 12:02:00AM +0200, Bernhard Fr?hmesser wrote: > Hello, > > I have played around with trimming and editing existing tracks, but all > these didn??t do the right. > > Following situation: > > I have two video tracks with clips on both tracks, now i added a third > video track where i want to insert another clip nearly at the beginning > of the videotrack, but when i insert the clip only the audio tracks move > to the right (exactly the ammount of the cliplength i have inserted). > But the videoclips in videotrack 1 and 2 stay at the same position, how > can i make sure that if i insert a clip into track 3 that all the other > tracks (video and audio with all effects etc...) move to the right > automatically when i insert a new clip to video 3 ? > > Thanks for hints/tips, > > BF. What about : - setting the in and out points at the beginning and at the end of the material loaded on video 3 - arming the tracks 1 and 2 - pasting silence (shift+space) That should work. Nicolas, Paris. ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
[CinCVS] Trimming and insertion things
Hello, I have played around with trimming and editing existing tracks, but all these didn´t do the right. Following situation: I have two video tracks with clips on both tracks, now i added a third video track where i want to insert another clip nearly at the beginning of the videotrack, but when i insert the clip only the audio tracks move to the right (exactly the ammount of the cliplength i have inserted). But the videoclips in videotrack 1 and 2 stay at the same position, how can i make sure that if i insert a clip into track 3 that all the other tracks (video and audio with all effects etc...) move to the right automatically when i insert a new clip to video 3 ? Thanks for hints/tips, BF. ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
[CinCVS] [Bug 289] Segfault each time I want to upload movies to work on
http://bugs.cinelerra.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-06 15:59 --- I've just shared the output of "strace -f cinelerra" at the following address : http://delachaux.free.fr/Thibaut/Forums/cinelerra_bug Hope this will help ! --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
Re: [CinCVS] anyone compared this with cinelerra?
On Wed, 06 Sep 2006 14:00:12 +0200 "Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think we cannot have any advice of such a software only with > screenshots. > The most important is the engine: what can we do with it. Even in > termes of productivity. I haven't used it, but based on what they say on their website it seems very impressive. It uses mplayer/mencoder as engine, thus can load and save almost every known format. ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
Re: [CinCVS] anyone compared this with cinelerra?
Le 06.09.2006 13:30:13, Miha Kitič a écrit : I gave a quick look to Lives as the screenshots seemed to be very promising. The program started, however I was unable to import any video file. Whenever I tried, the program simply crashed. I think we cannot have any advice of such a software only with screenshots. The most important is the engine: what can we do with it. Even in termes of productivity. Regards Jean-Luc pgp0yOrVbyLhh.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [CinCVS] anyone compared this with cinelerra?
My understand of Lives is that it is/was intended to "VJ'ing", live mixing of video. Not sure how it would go with movie editing.On 9/6/06, Miha Kitič <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:I gave a quick look to Lives as the screenshots seemed to be very promising. The program started, however I was unable to import anyvideo file. Whenever I tried, the program simply crashed.They say that Debian based Ubuntu version is still in testing stage.But at the moment Lives is just not very useful for me. Nevertheless, the first impression of this softwareis promissing and it may be useful tool in the future.But I would still put my bet on Cinelerra, especiallywhen it comes to serious video editing. All the best!MihaOn pon, 2006-09-04 at 11:52 +0300, Dimitrios wrote:> anyone compared this with cinelerra?>> http://lives.sourceforge.net/index.php?do=features >> ___> Cinelerra mailing list> Cinelerra@skolelinux.no> https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra>___Cinelerra mailing listCinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra-- Mark Stavar Swan Dancer ProductionsEmail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Mobile: 0410 638 671http://www.the-writers-retreat.com/
Re: [CinCVS] anyone compared this with cinelerra?
I gave a quick look to Lives as the screenshots seemed to be very promising. The program started, however I was unable to import any video file. Whenever I tried, the program simply crashed. They say that Debian based Ubuntu version is still in testing stage. But at the moment Lives is just not very useful for me. Nevertheless, the first impression of this software is promissing and it may be useful tool in the future. But I would still put my bet on Cinelerra, especially when it comes to serious video editing. All the best! Miha On pon, 2006-09-04 at 11:52 +0300, Dimitrios wrote: > anyone compared this with cinelerra? > > http://lives.sourceforge.net/index.php?do=features > > ___ > Cinelerra mailing list > Cinelerra@skolelinux.no > https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra > ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
