Re: [CinCV] OpenGL

2011-09-26 Thread David Armstrong
I have recompiled with the --enable-opengl option and now have 
X11-OpenGL driver option back.

Have selected the driver and seems OK with a few tests.

David


On 25/09/11 21:30, Einar Rünkaru wrote:

On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 1:37 AM, David Armstrongbod...@netspace.net.au  wrote:

I have mesa-dev installed - v7.10.2

checking config.log associated with installation, there is no mention of the
string libGl (case insensitive search)
there is an entry: OPENGL_LIBS=''


This means that OpenGL is not enabled


As an aside, I notice that 2.1.5 is mentioned numerously in the log.


This is irrelevant.

There is a bug in configure scripts.

Results of quick tests:

'./configure' - does not enable OpenGl

'./configure --enable-opengl' - enables openGL

'./configure --enable-mmx' - enables OpenGL

I didn test more, but I think enabling something make autodetection of
OpenGL work.

Einar

___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra



___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra


Re: [CinCV] OpenGL

2011-09-26 Thread Johannes Sixt
Am 25.09.2011 22:34, schrieb E Chalaron:
 there we go with --enable-mmx:

Sorry, that's not what I asked for. Please read again:

 I have OpenSuse 11.4 64bit and also use --disable-mmx --enable-opengl,
 but OpenGL is detected correctly. I have the proprietary Nvidia drivers
 installed. It would be helpful to see the section in config.log about
 OpenGL.

(And please don't top-post.)

-- Hannes

___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra


Re: [CinCV] OpenGL

2011-09-25 Thread Einar Rünkaru
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 1:37 AM, David Armstrong bod...@netspace.net.au wrote:
 I have mesa-dev installed - v7.10.2

 checking config.log associated with installation, there is no mention of the
 string libGl (case insensitive search)
 there is an entry: OPENGL_LIBS=''

This means that OpenGL is not enabled

 As an aside, I notice that 2.1.5 is mentioned numerously in the log.

This is irrelevant.

There is a bug in configure scripts.

Results of quick tests:

'./configure' - does not enable OpenGl

'./configure --enable-opengl' - enables openGL

'./configure --enable-mmx' - enables OpenGL

I didn test more, but I think enabling something make autodetection of
OpenGL work.

Einar

___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra


Re: [CinCV] OpenGL

2011-09-25 Thread E Chalaron


To report on that : --enable-mmx leads to a make error, so for me there 
is no other option than --disable-mmx --enable-opengl other opengl is 
not detected at all.

Open suse 11.3 11.4 and 64 bits
cheers
E


'./configure --enable-mmx' - enables OpenGL


___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra


Re: [CinCV] OpenGL

2011-09-25 Thread Johannes Sixt
Am 25.09.2011 21:48, schrieb E Chalaron:
 
 To report on that : --enable-mmx leads to a make error, so for me there
 is no other option than --disable-mmx --enable-opengl other opengl is
 not detected at all.
 Open suse 11.3 11.4 and 64 bits

I have OpenSuse 11.4 64bit and also use --disable-mmx --enable-opengl,
but OpenGL is detected correctly. I have the proprietary Nvidia drivers
installed. It would be helpful to see the section in config.log about
OpenGL.

-- Hannes

___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra


Re: [CinCV] OpenGL

2011-09-25 Thread E Chalaron

there we go with --enable-mmx:


/bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --tag=CC   --mode=link gcc 
-D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -g 
-O2   -o libmpeg2enc.la  conform.lo mpeg2enc.lo putseq.lo putpic.lo 
puthdr.lo putmpg.lo putvlc.lo putbits.lo predict.lo readpic.lo 
writepic.lo transfrm.lo fdctref.lo idct.lo quantize.lo ratectl.lo 
stats.lo motion.lo cpu_accel.lo fdct_mmx.lo fdctdata.lo idct_mmx.lo 
idctdata.lo quant_mmx.lo quantize_x86.lo predict_mmx.lo predcomp_mmxe.lo 
predcomp_mmx.lo  -lm -ldl -lpthread
libtool: link: ar cru .libs/libmpeg2enc.a .libs/conform.o 
.libs/mpeg2enc.o .libs/putseq.o .libs/putpic.o .libs/puthdr.o 
.libs/putmpg.o .libs/putvlc.o .libs/putbits.o .libs/predict.o 
.libs/readpic.o .libs/writepic.o .libs/transfrm.o .libs/fdctref.o 
.libs/idct.o .libs/quantize.o .libs/ratectl.o .libs/stats.o 
.libs/motion.o .libs/cpu_accel.o .libs/fdct_mmx.o .libs/fdctdata.o 
.libs/idct_mmx.o .libs/idctdata.o .libs/quant_mmx.o .libs/quantize_x86.o 
.libs/predict_mmx.o .libs/predcomp_mmxe.o .libs/predcomp_mmx.o

ar: .libs/fdct_mmx.o: No such file or directory
make[2]: *** [libmpeg2enc.la] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/edouard/Desktop/CinelerraCV/mpeg2enc'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/edouard/Desktop/CinelerraCV'
make: *** [all] Error 2


On 09/26/2011 09:02 AM, Johannes Sixt wrote:

Am 25.09.2011 21:48, schrieb E Chalaron:

To report on that : --enable-mmx leads to a make error, so for me there
is no other option than --disable-mmx --enable-opengl other opengl is
not detected at all.
Open suse 11.3 11.4 and 64 bits

I have OpenSuse 11.4 64bit and also use --disable-mmx --enable-opengl,
but OpenGL is detected correctly. I have the proprietary Nvidia drivers
installed. It would be helpful to see the section in config.log about
OpenGL.

-- Hannes

___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra



___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra


Re: [CinCV] OpenGL

2011-09-23 Thread Einar Rünkaru
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 12:33 PM, David Armstrong
bod...@netspace.net.au wrote:
 I have version 1.4 (from glxinfo)

 Maybe it is because I compiled v2.2 when v2.1.5 already installed from ppa
 binary installation?
 Happy to remove both and start again.


No, what is installed before does not matter.

Have you installed mesa-dev (eg appropriate OpenGL dev packages)?

Does configure find libGl? At the end of configure output there is
summary - what it says about OpenGL?

Einar

___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra


Re: [CinCV] OpenGL

2011-09-23 Thread David Armstrong

I have mesa-dev installed - v7.10.2

checking config.log associated with installation, there is no mention of 
the string libGl (case insensitive search)

there is an entry: OPENGL_LIBS=''

As an aside, I notice that 2.1.5 is mentioned numerously in the log.



On 23/09/11 22:49, Einar Rünkaru wrote:

On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 12:33 PM, David Armstrong
bod...@netspace.net.au  wrote:

I have version 1.4 (from glxinfo)

Maybe it is because I compiled v2.2 when v2.1.5 already installed from ppa
binary installation?
Happy to remove both and start again.


No, what is installed before does not matter.

Have you installed mesa-dev (eg appropriate OpenGL dev packages)?

Does configure find libGl? At the end of configure output there is
summary - what it says about OpenGL?

Einar

___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra



___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra


Re: [CinCV] OpenGL (was 2.2 testing so far)

2011-09-22 Thread Einar Rünkaru
Hi.

On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Raffaella Traniello
raffaella.tranie...@g-raffa.eu wrote:
 Ciao!

 Issue is no X11-OpenGL video driver option in preferences set-up drop
 down box.

 If you followed instructions for Grandma, then you didn't use the
 --enable-opengl configure option so - from what I understand of the manual
 - OpenGL is not enabled and you don't get the OpenGL option in the video
 driver dropdown menu.

 This is not confirmed by my experience:
 I never use the --enable-opengl configure option either but I get the
 X11-OpenGL video driver option in the drop down menu (configure ended with
 OpenGL enabled).

 Do any of you know what is the expected behaviour with OpenGL?

'--enable-opengl' is not needed.

OpenGL is detected automatically if configure finds appropriate
headers and libGL.so.1. On some systems configure fails to find libGL.

Starting from version 2.1.5 cinelerra checks glx server version and if
it is lower than 1.3 does not show OpenGL option in video driver
dropdown.

Einar

___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra


Re: [CinCV] OpenGL (was 2.2 testing so far)

2011-09-21 Thread E Chalaron



This is not confirmed by my experience:
I never use the --enable-opengl configure option either but I get 
the X11-OpenGL video driver option in the drop down menu (configure 
ended with OpenGL enabled).


Same for me here. If I dont specify --enable-opengl I still get the 
X11-OpenGL option even if the config specifies clearly that opengl is off.


E

___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra


Re: [CinCV] opengl libraries missing in Fedora 12, x86-64

2010-01-31 Thread Johannes Sixt
On Sonntag, 31. Januar 2010, Scott C. Frase wrote:
 I see that the libGL.so.1 in that directory has the appropriate OpenGL
 hooks:
 [sfr...@ogre usr]$ strings -a /usr/lib64/nvidia/libGL.so.1 | grep
 glDeleteShader glDeleteShader
 [sfr...@ogre usr]$ strings -a /usr/lib64/nvidia/libGL.so.1 | grep
 glUseProgram glUseProgram
 glUseProgramObjectARB

 I've tried manually pointing configure.in to the /usr/lib64/nvidia
 directory: AC_CHECK_LIB([GL], [glUseProgram],
  [OPENGL_LIBS=-lGL; libGL=yes],
 # On SUSE/OpenSUSE, NVidia places the OpenGL 2.0 capable library in
 /usr/X11R6/lib # but it doesn't place a libGL.so there, so the linker won't
 pick it up # we have to use the explicit libGL.so.1 path.
  save_LIBS=$LIBS
  for l in /usr/lib64/nvidia /usr/X11R6/lib
 /usr/X11R6/lib64; do LIBS=$l/libGL.so.1
  AC_MSG_CHECKING(for glUseProgram in $l/libGL.so.1)
  AC_TRY_LINK([],[extern int glUseProgram();
 glUseProgram();], [OPENGL_LIBS=$l/libGL.so.1; libGL=yes],[libGL=no])
 AC_MSG_RESULT([$libGL])
  test $libGL = yes  break
  done
  LIBS=$save_LIBS

 But still I get OpenGL missing when I run configure.

Analyze config.log. It should tell you what configure did exactly and why it 
was not successful.

-- Hannes

___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra


Re: [CinCV] opengl libraries missing in Fedora 12, x86-64

2010-01-31 Thread Scott C. Frase

Hannes,
I did a search on some different things in config.log (error, gl, GL, 
OpenGL,etc), but don't see any errors related to opengl that are jumping out at 
me.


I'm sorry to bother you, but can you take a look?
http://content.serveftp.net/content/config.log

scott

___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra


Re: [CinCV] opengl libraries missing in Fedora 12, x86-64

2010-01-31 Thread Edouard Chalaron
Scott
I had the same problem on Suse 11.2
Reason : try a force openGL and you may end up with the same error on libx264 I 
had, e.g. different versions of libx264 devel, make sure to have the most 
recent one.
It may lead you back to your error you had a couple of weeks ago.
Cheers
E

 I did a search on some different things in config.log
 (error, gl, GL, OpenGL,etc), but don't see any errors
 related to opengl that are jumping out at me.
 
 I'm sorry to bother you, but can you take a look?
 http://content.serveftp.net/content/config.log
 
 scott
 
 ___
 Cinelerra mailing list
 Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
 https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra



___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra


Re: [CinCV] opengl libraries missing in Fedora 12, x86-64

2010-01-31 Thread Johannes Sixt
On Sonntag, 31. Januar 2010, Scott C. Frase wrote:
 Hannes,
 I did a search on some different things in config.log (error, gl, GL,
 OpenGL,etc), but don't see any errors related to opengl that are jumping
 out at me.

 I'm sorry to bother you, but can you take a look?
 http://content.serveftp.net/content/config.log

Looks like you need pass --enable-opengl to configure. For some reason it's 
not on by default.

-- Hannes

___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra


Re: [CinCV] opengl libraries missing in Fedora 12, x86-64

2010-01-31 Thread Scott C. Frase




Scott
I had the same problem on Suse 11.2
Reason : try a force openGL and you may end up with the same error on libx264 I 
had, e.g. different versions of libx264 devel, make sure to have the most 
recent one.
It may lead you back to your error you had a couple of weeks ago.
Cheers
E


Eduoard/Hannes,
Forcing --enable-opengl did the trick.  I was able to configure Cinelerra 
successfully.


thanks for the help!
scott

___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra


Re: [CinCV] opengl slow

2008-04-27 Thread Bernd Porr

Hi!

Sorry. That doesn't excite me very much.

Let's start with something much simpler: I want to watch plain HDV in 
realtime in the composer window. I actually don't need any fancy effects 
for the video. Just plain transitions for a very simple editing job.


kdenlive does the job perfectly. I can view and edit HDV without any 
probs. Also avidemux does it. Why is cinerella so slow?


/Bernd

Johannes Sixt wrote:

On Friday 25 April 2008 02:37, Scott C. Frase wrote:

Adam (or anyone who knows),
How can I tell if Cinelerra is using hardware shading?


Load a jpeg (640x480 will do) with 5 seconds duration
attach a Rotate effect
Set it to 0 degrees at the 0 seconds mark and
180 degrees at the 5 seconds.
In the compositor, scrub between the two ends.

With hardware shading (i.e. the OpenGL driver) I get a *very* noticable 
improvement in the frame rate.


-- Hannes

___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra


--
www:http://www.berndporr.me.uk/
http://www.linux-usb-daq.co.uk/
Mobile: +44 (0)7840 340069
Work:   +44 (0)141 330 5237
University of Glasgow
Department of Electronics  Electrical Engineering
Room 519, Rankine Building, Oakfield Avenue,
Glasgow, G12 8LT

___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra


Re: [CinCV] opengl slow

2008-04-24 Thread Scott C. Frase
On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 22:51 +0200, Johannes Sixt wrote:
 Yes, you should be ok. But look into configure.in: There is some 
 special-casing for [Open]SUSE, which I added so that the Nvidia
libGL.so.1 is 
 picked up. Maybe you need something similar? [But quite frankly, your
listing 
 above suggests that this is not the case - you really should be OK.
Shrug.]
 
 -- Hannes

Hannes, 
I sent this on Monday, but it didn't seem to get to the mailing list.  

I'm running Fedora 7 64-bit, so I'll take your word for it.  Thanks for
the confirmation.  

Adam (or anyone who knows),
How can I tell if Cinelerra is using hardware shading?

scott


___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra


Re: [CinCV] opengl slow

2008-04-21 Thread Johannes Sixt
On Monday 21 April 2008 03:00, Scott C. Frase wrote:
  Most likely you are linking against MESA's libGL.so. Check to whom the
  libGL.so that cinelerra links in. For example, on my system I have this:
 
  $ ldd /usr/local/bin/cinelerra | grep libGL.so
  libGL.so.1 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1 (0xb6de2000)
  $ rpm -qf /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1
  x11-video-nvidia-1.0.8762-1

 Hi Hannes,
 I may or may not have the problem you specify.  I see that libGL.so.1 on
 my system is the mesa driver:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ldd /usr/local/bin/cinelerra  | grep libGL.so
 libGL.so.1 = /usr/lib64/libGL.so.1 (0x00308ce0)
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -qf /usr/lib64/libGL.so.1
 mesa-libGL-6.5.2-13.fc7

 I do have the NVidia drivers installed (169.12) for my BFG 8800GT. When
 I look for the NVidia drivers in rpm, search comes up empty:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -qa | grep nvidia
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]#

 I compiled cinelerra from source with the OpenGL option, configure
 recognized OpenGL and the build went fine.  It looks like the libGL.so.1
 symbolically links to the NVidia library, libGL.so.169.12.

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] lib64]# ll *GL*
 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root   19 2008-04-20 20:44 libGLcore.so.1 -
 libGLcore.so.169.12
 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 11223112 2008-04-20 20:44 libGLcore.so.169.12
 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  655 2008-04-20 20:44 libGL.la
 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root   10 2008-04-20 20:44 libGL.so - libGL.so.1
 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root   15 2008-04-20 20:44 libGL.so.1 -
 libGL.so.169.12
 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root   837224 2008-04-20 20:44 libGL.so.169.12
 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root   11 2007-10-25 23:09 libGLU.so -
 libGLU.so.1
 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root   20 2007-10-25 21:47 libGLU.so.1 -
 libGLU.so.1.3.060502
 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root   450840 2007-04-10 16:36 libGLU.so.1.3.060502

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] lib64]# rpm -qf /usr/lib64/libGL.so.169.12
 file /usr/lib64/libGL.so.169.12 is not owned by any package

 In this case, even though rpm -qf output reports linking to mesa,
 shouldn't I be OK cause libGL.so.1 symlinks to the NVidia library?

Yes, you should be ok. But look into configure.in: There is some 
special-casing for [Open]SUSE, which I added so that the Nvidia libGL.so.1 is 
picked up. Maybe you need something similar? [But quite frankly, your listing 
above suggests that this is not the case - you really should be OK. Shrug.]

-- Hannes

___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra


Re: [CinCV] opengl slow

2008-04-17 Thread Burkhard Plaum

Hi,

Bernd Porr schrieb:

Hi all,

I've got the problem that the openGL driver is slower (5fps) than the XV 
driver (10fps). I've got an nvidia card with opengl 2.0 support and was 
actually expecting that it's getting faster and not slower with openGL. 
I've got a force 7300GS and then nvidia drivers installed. Any ideas why 
it is so slow?


If you process in YUV and display with OpenGL, you have an additional YUV-RGB
conversion, which is done in software I assume.

For rendering YUV video, xv is always faster I think.

Burkhard

___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra


Re: [CinCV] opengl slow

2008-04-17 Thread Bernd Porr

Hi,

thanks for the quick reply. That's a shame. I was hoping to get my HD 
footage a bit smoother by getting a more powerful graphics card with 
openGL 2.0 :-(


/Bernd

Burkhard Plaum wrote:

Hi,

Bernd Porr schrieb:

Hi all,

I've got the problem that the openGL driver is slower (5fps) than the 
XV driver (10fps). I've got an nvidia card with opengl 2.0 support and 
was actually expecting that it's getting faster and not slower with 
openGL. I've got a force 7300GS and then nvidia drivers installed. Any 
ideas why it is so slow?


If you process in YUV and display with OpenGL, you have an additional 
YUV-RGB

conversion, which is done in software I assume.

For rendering YUV video, xv is always faster I think.

Burkhard

___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra


--
www:http://www.berndporr.me.uk/
http://www.linux-usb-daq.co.uk/
Mobile: +44 (0)7840 340069
Work:   +44 (0)141 330 5237
University of Glasgow
Department of Electronics  Electrical Engineering
Room 519, Rankine Building, Oakfield Avenue,
Glasgow, G12 8LT

___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra


Re: [CinCV] opengl slow

2008-04-17 Thread Richard Spindler
2008/4/17, Burkhard Plaum [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
  If you process in YUV and display with OpenGL, you have an additional
 YUV-RGB
  conversion, which is done in software I assume.

This really depends on how it is implemented in cinelerra and what
capabilities the hardware provides. It is perfectly possible to do the
yuv-rgb conversion in OpenGL.

For some newer ATI drivers, XV is implemented by using a texture in
the backend, for example.

  For rendering YUV video, xv is always faster I think.

-Richard

-- 
Don't contribute to the Y10K problem!

___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra


Re: [CinCV] opengl slow

2008-04-17 Thread Johannes Sixt
On Thursday 17 April 2008 01:12, Bernd Porr wrote:
 I've got the problem that the openGL driver is slower (5fps) than the XV
 driver (10fps). I've got an nvidia card with opengl 2.0 support and was
 actually expecting that it's getting faster and not slower with openGL.
 I've got a force 7300GS and then nvidia drivers installed. Any ideas why
 it is so slow?

Most likely you are linking against MESA's libGL.so. Check to whom the 
libGL.so that cinelerra links in. For example, on my system I have this:

$ ldd /usr/local/bin/cinelerra | grep libGL.so
libGL.so.1 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1 (0xb6de2000)
$ rpm -qf /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1
x11-video-nvidia-1.0.8762-1

-- Hannes

___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra