Is IGRP actually supported by other vendors? [7:43994]
Nokia might support it, but I have been (fairly reliably) told that Cisco will *not* be supporting IGRP as of one of the newest IOS releases. I can't find the announcement on CCO (if there is one), so take with a grain of salt, but a Cisco instructor was quite adamant about this last week. JMcL - Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 13/05/2002 04:44 pm - "nrf" Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 13/05/2002 01:42 pm Please respond to "nrf" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Is IGRP actually supported by other vendors? [7:43994] Is this part of a business decision process?: Just found this while surfing around. "As a network device, the Nokia IP330 supports a comprehensive suite of IP-routing functions and protocols, including RIPv1/RIPv2, IGRP, OSPF and BGP4 for unicast traffic..." http://www.nokia.com/securitysolutions/platforms/330.html Every piece of literature I've ever read has stated without fail that IGRP is proprietary to Cisco. Yet here's Nokia brazenly claiming that they in fact support IGRP. What's up with that? Unfortunately I don't have an Ipso box lying around that I can actually experiment with. Can anyone confirm whether this is true and whether it provides complete interoperability with Cisco? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43999&t=43994 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is IGRP actually supported by other vendors? [7:43994]
Comments inline... --- "Howard C. Berkowitz" wrote: > I don't know the specifics of the Nokia case. Cisco > has, however, > both supplied router blades running IOS on an OEM > basis to vendors > including Cabletron, and licensed a software port to > DEC (IOS on DEC > hardware -- Brouter 500) And the blade for the Synoptics 3000 chassis... __ Do You Yahoo!? LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience http://launch.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43997&t=43994 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PIX 501 and interface secondary IP [7:43986]
Hello! You have got a router and a private IP address space between the router and the PIX. This is because the PAT address and the static outside adrress must not be the same in the PIX (, and the PAT address must not be in the global address space too). I red int the PIX OS 6.2ED documentation, that now the NAT and PAT is bidirectional. I don't know does it mean exactly, but you should look it, maybe it'll help you. Best regards, Tamas Horvath network engineer Tel.: +36 22/515-452, Fax: +36 22/327-532 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: From: Andy Barkl Reply-To: Andy Barkl To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PIX 501 and interface secondary IP [7:43986] Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 02:46:44 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" I am trying to configure my new PIX 501 with a static IP address for translation to inside email and web servers. When I use the one static address assigned by the ISP, I can no longer use the PAT for outbound access. How can I configure the PIX to support inbound translation as well as outbound translation using one external static IP? Is there a method to assign a secondary address (static) on the external interface and then set the interface for DHCP as well? Your help is greatly appreciated. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43998&t=43986 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is IGRP actually supported by other vendors? [7:43994]
At 11:42 PM -0400 5/12/02, nrf wrote: >Just found this while surfing around. > >"As a network device, the Nokia IP330 supports a comprehensive suite of >IP-routing functions and protocols, including RIPv1/RIPv2, IGRP, OSPF and >BGP4 for unicast traffic..." >http://www.nokia.com/securitysolutions/platforms/330.html > >Every piece of literature I've ever read has stated without fail that IGRP >is proprietary to Cisco. Yet here's Nokia brazenly claiming that they in >fact support IGRP. What's up with that? Unfortunately I don't have an Ipso >box lying around that I can actually experiment with. Can anyone confirm >whether this is true and whether it provides complete interoperability with >Cisco? I don't know the specifics of the Nokia case. Cisco has, however, both supplied router blades running IOS on an OEM basis to vendors including Cabletron, and licensed a software port to DEC (IOS on DEC hardware -- Brouter 500) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43996&t=43994 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco & HP Procurve? [7:43995]
Anyone have any experience with a Cisco core (6500/4006) and HP Procurves 10/100 switches in the closets? Is there anything special required if we want to run 802.1Q VLANs to the HPs? Thanks!! Jeffrey Reed Classic Networking, Inc. Cell 717-805-5536 Office 717-737-8586 FAX 717-737-0290 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43995&t=43995 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is IGRP actually supported by other vendors? [7:43994]
Just found this while surfing around. "As a network device, the Nokia IP330 supports a comprehensive suite of IP-routing functions and protocols, including RIPv1/RIPv2, IGRP, OSPF and BGP4 for unicast traffic..." http://www.nokia.com/securitysolutions/platforms/330.html Every piece of literature I've ever read has stated without fail that IGRP is proprietary to Cisco. Yet here's Nokia brazenly claiming that they in fact support IGRP. What's up with that? Unfortunately I don't have an Ipso box lying around that I can actually experiment with. Can anyone confirm whether this is true and whether it provides complete interoperability with Cisco? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43994&t=43994 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE- I WILL BE [7:43969]
exactly, what Michael says..
Like this mornings database issue with oracle not being
accessible in two of 36 buildings...the users and the
server admin swore it was a network issue...turns out the
oracle processes caused a server utilization of 100%. Most labs
wont teach that issue..Just as Michael says..
Larry Letterman
Cisco Systems
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Michael L. Williams
Sent: Sunday, May 12, 2002 6:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: CCIE- I WILL BE [7:43969]
"Larry Letterman" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> A 40 router lab is nice, but its not the same as troubleshooting a
> production network with 20,000 + users at multiple sites.
Here here and to add to that. "... a production network with
20,000+ users at multiple sites..." running a variety of multiprotocol,
quirky, sometimes custom-written (read: homemade) applications that are
trying to do whatever on the network coupled with devices from whatever
manufacturers that don't play nice ("oh, you need this device in it's own
VLAN because broadcast traffic makes it crash"), etc, etc
Mike W.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43993&t=43969
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCNP Study Guide [7:43932]
What about the Sybex version, do you think that has enough information to pass the exam by itself? I'm just curious cuz i only have 3 weeks and 5 days before exam time and I don't have much time to study between then, so I wanna know what resource i should use hehe. Thanks Jarred Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43992&t=43932 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE- I WILL BE [7:43969]
"Larry Letterman" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> A 40 router lab is nice, but its not the same as troubleshooting a
> production network with 20,000 + users at multiple sites.
Here here and to add to that. "... a production network with
20,000+ users at multiple sites..." running a variety of multiprotocol,
quirky, sometimes custom-written (read: homemade) applications that are
trying to do whatever on the network coupled with devices from whatever
manufacturers that don't play nice ("oh, you need this device in it's own
VLAN because broadcast traffic makes it crash"), etc, etc
Mike W.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43991&t=43969
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE- I WILL BE [7:43969]
If the network is well designed and implemented, you should not have to be analyzing and troubleshooting very much. In Fact you should have 99.90 uptime if its as well done as implied below As Kevin says, the real experience comes from finding and repairing networks that are less than desirable, and making them better. A 40 router lab is nice, but its not the same as troubleshooting a production network with 20,000 + users at multiple sites. Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kevin Cullimore Sent: Sunday, May 12, 2002 3:13 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE- I WILL BE [7:43969] Please don't discount the value of analyzing & troubleshooting poorly-designed networks. The learning opportunities are almost unimaginably vast. OTH, it probably takes sustained exposure to both for an adequate understanding of how all this stuff is supposed to function/interact. > Lucky for me, I have a well-designed network to analyze and troubleshoot, > and I have a 40 router lab to build whatever I want to, to my heart’s > content. > > > Karl Thrasher Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43990&t=43969 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE- I WILL BE [7:43969]
Very good point. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43989&t=43969 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Self Test Software [7:43987]
I looked deeper, and they do not have any DA/DP tests. Would still be curious to know how they are on the stuff they do have though. ""Steve Ringley"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I have not seen a discussion of Self Test Software here. They are the "authorized" practice test provider for Cisco. Has anyone used their materials? I am considering options for the CCDA and CCDP tests - both of which have changed recently. Thanks! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43988&t=43987 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Self Test Software [7:43987]
I have not seen a discussion of Self Test Software here. They are the "authorized" practice test provider for Cisco. Has anyone used their materials? I am considering options for the CCDA and CCDP tests - both of which have changed recently. Thanks! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43987&t=43987 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PIX 501 and interface secondary IP [7:43986]
I am trying to configure my new PIX 501 with a static IP address for translation to inside email and web servers. When I use the one static address assigned by the ISP, I can no longer use the PAT for outbound access. How can I configure the PIX to support inbound translation as well as outbound translation using one external static IP? Is there a method to assign a secondary address (static) on the external interface and then set the interface for DHCP as well? Your help is greatly appreciated. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43986&t=43986 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Difference "spantree root" vs spantree priority" [7:43978]
IIRC, set spantree root is a macro is a macro, and it's a combination of commands, one of which is to make the priority a liitle over 8k. Not only does it change the priority, but does some other calculations as well. I think the 5 is for the number of hops in diameter the netwotk is. If I'm wrong, there are people on this list smarter than me who will correct me. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. Get in my head: http://sar.dynu.com ""JohnZ"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi group, I am try to figure out what is the difference between the > following two commands: > > set spantree root 5 > set spantree priority 0 5 > > Do both of them provide the same results: set vlan 5 as the root bridge. > > Thanks. > JZ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43985&t=43978 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Certification Digest V2 #2071 (Vacation) [7:43984]
I will be on vacation from 5-7-02 to 5-22-02. Any matter regarding network management please forward to Bob Taylor @ 213-979-0032. Thanks. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43984&t=43984 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE- I WILL BE [7:43969]
Please don't discount the value of analyzing & troubleshooting poorly-designed networks. The learning opportunities are almost unimaginably vast. OTH, it probably takes sustained exposure to both for an adequate understanding of how all this stuff is supposed to function/interact. > Lucky for me, I have a well-designed network to analyze and troubleshoot, > and I have a 40 router lab to build whatever I want to, to my heart’s > content. > > > Karl Thrasher Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43983&t=43969 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BGP Multihoming Policy [7:43962]
At 2:50 PM -0400 5/12/02, Chuck wrote: > > >Idle curiousity - in cases like AS 2, if the buying ISP already has an AS >number, do they get to keep the one acquired in the purchase? Or does ARIN >require that to be relinquished? Probably not, meaning that worlCom must >have about a dozen AS numbers, but you never can tell. You've more or less hit the key rule in address space or ASN transfers. If there is a change of ownership of the organization to which these were assigned, the identifiers go to the new owner. An organization cannot sell IP space or ASNs to a third party. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43982&t=43962 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BGP Multihoming Policy [7:43962]
My (admittedly limited/shallow) understanding is that if you buy a corporate entity, you are also buying their AS number, which dovetails well with the limited resources the regional registries have available to track & respond to commercial misdoings. It might be more instructive to note that AS1 was originally BBN, which only makes sense, since they are at least partially to blame for all of this fuss over data connectivity in the first place. - Original Message - From: "Chuck" To: Sent: Sunday, May 12, 2002 2:50 PM Subject: Re: BGP Multihoming Policy [7:43962] > ""Howard C. Berkowitz"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > At 12:30 AM -0400 5/12/02, Erwin wrote: > > >Suppose we are the ISP having 3 different AS connected to users for > > >multihoming. If it is requested that the users prefer a particular path, > say > > >from AS1, instead of from AS2 or AS3. What is the best way to apply the > > >configuration? Is it using BGP path selection process criteria, then we > > >apply weight or Local Preference, or we use the policy for controlling > > >inbound traffic by configuring MED or AS PATH? > > > > > >Thanks in advance > > > > I'd need to know a lot more about what problem you are trying to > > solve. Are AS1-3 all internal to you, or are some of them your > > upstreams? It's highly unlikely that an ISP could get three > > registered AS, but you could use private ASNs. > > In case anyone is interested, AS-1 is registered to Genuity ( formerly > GTE ), AS-2 is registered to ACES Research out of Phoenix AZ, whcih in turn > was sold to RMI Net of Denver a couple of years ago, and AS-3 is registered > to MIT. For some reason I kinda doubt this person is connected through all > three of these. So he is probably using these numbers for simplicity sake. > ( I would hope ) > > Idle curiousity - in cases like AS 2, if the buying ISP already has an AS > number, do they get to keep the one acquired in the purchase? Or does ARIN > require that to be relinquished? Probably not, meaning that worlCom must > have about a dozen AS numbers, but you never can tell. > > > > > Do the users have ASNs of their own? Do any multihome to other > > providers? Is their address space provider-assigned? If so, by you > > or another ISP? > > > > Why do you want different paths? Traffic management? Controlling the > > exit to your upstreams? > > -- > > "What Problem are you trying to solve?" > > ***send Cisco questions to the list, so all can benefit -- not > > directly to me*** > > > > > > Howard C. Berkowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Chief Technology Officer, GettLab/Gett Communications > http://www.gettlabs.com > > Technical Director, CertificationZone.com http://www.certificationzone.com > > "retired" Certified Cisco Systems Instructor (CID) #93005 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43981&t=43962 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE communication and services [7:43714]
I need first to pass the written exam before shceduling any lab exams..anyone can advise for the C&S written exam...is it difficut I know that any exam is 50% general knowledge and 50% specialization...has anyone done it before to tell me what to read and which books to study ""CiscoB"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Cool, I didnt know the ISP Dial qualification exam applied to the C&S lab > exam. I'll have to schedule the C&S lab exam then. Anyone else taking it? > > thanks, > -Brad Ellis > CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security) > Network Learning Inc > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > www.optsys.net (Cisco hardware) > > ""nrf"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Allright. Sean Knox has pretty much nailed it on the head. But let me try > > one more time. > > > > To become a R/S CCIE you must > > #1) pass the R/S written > > #2) pass the R/S lab > > > > To become a Security CCIE you must > > #1)pass the Security written > > #2) pass the Security lab > > > > To become a C/S CCIE you must > > #1)Pass one of 8 possible C/S writtens - or - have passed either the old > > ISPDial or WAN-switching CCIE writtens back when they were still available > > (so if you have never done this, then unless you have a time machine, you > > cannot do it now) > > #2)Pass the C/S lab. > > > > > > Bottom line - the labs are absolutely NOT the same for all three, believe > > me. I've tried all 3 labs, and they are significantly different. There > are > > some base-level similarities, but beyond that they are quite divergent. If > > you don't believe me, read their descriptions: > > > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/certifications/services.html#4 > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/certifications/routing.html#4 > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/certifications/security.html#4 > > > > > > > > > > ""Sean Knox"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > The lab is not the same for all three. As nrf has repeatedly tried to > tell > > > you, they are three SEPARATE tracks. To achieve the R/S CCIE, you need > to > > > pass the R/S written and the R/S CCIE Lab. To get your C/S CCIE, even if > > you > > > already have, say, you R/S CCIE *completed*, you still need to complete > > the > > > C/S written then take the C/S lab. > > > > > > Sean > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 5:07 AM > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: Re: CCIE communication and services [7:43714] > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry, I guess that wasn't very clear. Suppose you attain an > > > > R/S CCIE and > > > > now wish to go for security or C/S. As the lab is the same > > > > for all three, is > > > > it necessary to keep retaking the lab or will the written be enough? I > > > > assume you probably do have to take the lab again, however > > > > since it is the > > > > same test you have already passed,it just seems redundant. > > > > > > > > nrf wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Uh, what? I don't understand your question. If you're saying > > > > > that you're > > > > > thinking that you can just keep getting more than one C/S CCIE > > > > > by taking > > > > > that lab over and over again (but by passing different C/S > > > > > writtens), then > > > > > the answer is absolutely not. Contrary to what many people > > > > > believe, there > > > > > are no different 'flavors' of the C/S. There is only 1 C/S > > > > > CCIE, and you're > > > > > either a C/S CCIE or you're not. And really, this makes > > > > > perfect sense, > > > > > since there is only one unified C/S lab which every C/S > > > > > candidate takes, no > > > > > matter which written he/she passed. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ""Jason Owens"" wrote in message > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > > > Based on your post above, as the lab is the same general > > > > > knowledge, would > > > > > > you need to keep taking it, providing you have passed it > > > > > once, to get more > > > > > > than one CCIE? Or would the various written exams suffice? > > > > > Just curious. > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43971&t=43714 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Committed Access Rate [7:43757]
Gene, I agree with the other posters here, that a 0 CIR will not cut it for voice... Not because the voice won't go across the link, but because every packet is marked DE and can be dropped in the frame cloud. As far as FRTS, that's pointless unless you actually get a CIR above 0.. When you say the DSCP is getting marked at 6, are you sure it's marking the DSCP as 6 or the backward-compatible 3 bits for IP Precedence at 6? It would make sense that it would mark the 3 IP precedence bits at 6 (which is very high, 7 being the highest) Nortel ITG cards deal with IP Precedence, not the full 6-bits of DSCP. Just wanting to make sure about this CAR isn't going to help you accomplish anything. LLQ is fine, but there are some things to consider. If you're not doing any other fancy queueing, then you may want to look into IP RTP Priority. It's a much simpler way to setup priority for voice traffic without alot of hassle. Just apply fair-queue to the interface, then use the 'ip rtp priority' command to give the voice traffic priority... (assuming your voice traffic is using RTP) Mike W. "Gene Volpe" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I have a customer who needs to prioritze his voice over his frame relay > network. They have a PBX on each LAN and a switch that is setting the DSCP > bit in all the traffic coming from the PBX to a value of 6. > > I think it would be easy enough to just set up priority queueing with a > match on the DSCP field, but the customer is pushing for CAR. Anyone have > any feelings on the subject and if so, how would I configure the CAR, as far > as the bps rates go? The circuit has a CIR of 0 (I know, I know!!) and a > burst of a full T. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43980&t=43757 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Difference "spantree root" vs spantree p [7:43978]
set spantree root automatically lowers the priority, changes the diameter and sets another command that forgets me Priority only changes the spanning tree priroity for that switch and that vlan Cheers Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43979&t=43978 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Difference "spantree root" vs spantree priority" [7:43978]
Hi group, I am try to figure out what is the difference between the following two commands: set spantree root 5 set spantree priority 0 5 Do both of them provide the same results: set vlan 5 as the root bridge. Thanks. JZ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43978&t=43978 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BGP Multihoming Policy [7:43962]
""Howard C. Berkowitz"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > At 12:30 AM -0400 5/12/02, Erwin wrote: > >Suppose we are the ISP having 3 different AS connected to users for > >multihoming. If it is requested that the users prefer a particular path, say > >from AS1, instead of from AS2 or AS3. What is the best way to apply the > >configuration? Is it using BGP path selection process criteria, then we > >apply weight or Local Preference, or we use the policy for controlling > >inbound traffic by configuring MED or AS PATH? > > > >Thanks in advance > > I'd need to know a lot more about what problem you are trying to > solve. Are AS1-3 all internal to you, or are some of them your > upstreams? It's highly unlikely that an ISP could get three > registered AS, but you could use private ASNs. In case anyone is interested, AS-1 is registered to Genuity ( formerly GTE ), AS-2 is registered to ACES Research out of Phoenix AZ, whcih in turn was sold to RMI Net of Denver a couple of years ago, and AS-3 is registered to MIT. For some reason I kinda doubt this person is connected through all three of these. So he is probably using these numbers for simplicity sake. ( I would hope ) Idle curiousity - in cases like AS 2, if the buying ISP already has an AS number, do they get to keep the one acquired in the purchase? Or does ARIN require that to be relinquished? Probably not, meaning that worlCom must have about a dozen AS numbers, but you never can tell. > > Do the users have ASNs of their own? Do any multihome to other > providers? Is their address space provider-assigned? If so, by you > or another ISP? > > Why do you want different paths? Traffic management? Controlling the > exit to your upstreams? > -- > "What Problem are you trying to solve?" > ***send Cisco questions to the list, so all can benefit -- not > directly to me*** > > Howard C. Berkowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Chief Technology Officer, GettLab/Gett Communications http://www.gettlabs.com > Technical Director, CertificationZone.com http://www.certificationzone.com > "retired" Certified Cisco Systems Instructor (CID) #93005 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43977&t=43962 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BGP Multihoming Policy [7:43962]
You'll probably need to use as prepends to control traffic in both directions from the ISP side... To control user's OUTBOUND traffic patterns: On the BGP connections to these users, for any of the less preferred routes (from AS2 and AS3), you want to setup a route-map to match those less preferred AS's and then do an as prepend to increase the ASPATH length, and thus make them less favorable from the user's perspective. This is cause the user's OUTBOUND traffic to prefer links through any AS that doesn't have the ASPATH increased. You could also use MEDs to accomplish the task, but you need to make sure that the user has his equipment configured to accept them. The as prepends can't really be ignored by the user's routers. To control user's INBOUND traffic patterns: --- On the BGP connections to less prefered AS's (AS2,AS3), you need to have a route-map on your outbound route announcements. This route-map needs to match any routes for your users and set an as prepend on these routes before announcing them. You might have to do more than one prepend to get the results you want, depending on how your provider connections are setup. But again, this step will increase the ASPATH length on user routes announced to the less prefered AS's. Hope this helps. Rob Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43976&t=43962 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ios question? [7:43882]
Check out this link http://cisco.com/warp/public/620/1.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43973&t=43882 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCIE Study Partner WANTED [7:43972]
Team, I am looking for a partner to share study material, ideas and equipment to prep for the CCIE LAB. I live in New York City. If you are interested email me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] JB Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43972&t=43972 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can "WS-X4604-GWY" voice gateway perform routing between VLANs? [7:43970]
Hi, I am setting up a catalyst 4006. I am using the Voice gateway - WS-X4604-GWY to perform routing between the VLANs I have created on the switch itself. The switch is using a Sup II engine, the voice gateway is at the 5 fifth slot. The voice gateway has an internal gigabit port linking to the switch backplane, I am trying to use this gigabitethernet port to create subinterface, however, it doesn't seem to work. Can the WS-X4604-GWY support VLAN routing? I can't find the sample configuration on the cisco website? Can anyone help. Append is the config Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) C4GWY Software (C4GWY-IO3SX3-M), Version 12.1(5)YF4, EARLY DEPLOYMENT RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) TAC Support: http://www.cisco.com/tac Copyright (c) 1986-2002 by cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Fri 22-Feb-02 11:20 by eaarmas Image text-base: 0x80020088, data-base: 0x80BCD564 ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.1(5r)YF1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) ROM: C4GWY Software (C4GWY-IO3SX3-M), Version 12.1(5)YF4, EARLY DEPLOYMENT RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) S4006_voicegw uptime is 16 hours, 25 minutes System returned to ROM by power-on System image file is "flash:c4gwy-io3sx3-mz.121-5.YF4.bin" cisco x4604 (MPC8260) processor (revision 0x108) with 49152K/16384K bytes of memory. Processor board ID JAB0446050V (873643296) Channelized E1, Version 1.0. Bridging software. X.25 software, Version 3.0.0. --More-- Primary Rate ISDN software, Version 1.1. 1 Virtual Ethernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s) 1 FastEthernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s) 1 Gigabit Ethernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s) 1 Serial network interface(s) 2 Channelized E1/PRI port(s) 24 Voice resource(s) 256K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory. 31744K bytes of processor board System flash (Read/Write) Configuration register is 0x2102 S4006_voicegw#exit ASTAR-S4006-01> (enable) sho mod Mod Slot Ports Module-Type Model Sub Status --- - - --- --- 1 12 1000BaseX Supervisor WS-X4013no ok 2 248Inline Power Module WS-X4148-RJ45V no ok 3 348Inline Power Module WS-X4148-RJ45V no ok 4 448Inline Power Module WS-X4148-RJ45V no ok 5 51 Voice Gateway WS-X4604-GWYno ok Mod Module-Name Serial-Num --- 1JAE061502JN 2JAE061207GK 3JAE061207PR 4JAE061300FU 5JAB0446050V Mod MAC-Address(es)Hw Fw Sw --- -- -- -- - 1 00-09-43-1e-20-00 to 00-09-43-1e-23-ff 3.25.4(1) 7.1(2) 2 00-08-a3-a2-fe-00 to 00-08-a3-a2-fe-2f 1.6 3 00-08-a3-a3-0a-60 to 00-08-a3-a3-0a-8f 1.6 4 00-08-a3-a2-fd-d0 to 00-08-a3-a2-fd-ff 1.6 5 00-02-4b-bc-dc-92 1.8 12.1(5)YF4, --More-- ASTAR-S4006-01> (enable) ASTAR_C4006_C01> (enable) sho run This command shows non-default configurations only. Use 'show config all' to show both default and non-default configurations. .. ... ... ... ... .. begin ! # * NON-DEFAULT CONFIGURATION * ! ! #time: Fri May 10 2002, 03:36:08 ! #version 7.1(2) ! ! #system web interface version(s) ! --More-- #test ! ! #vtp set vtp domain a set vlan 1 name default type ethernet mtu 1500 said 11 state active set vlan 100 name user192_v type ethernet mtu 1500 said 100100 state active set vlan 200 name server223_v type ethernet mtu 1500 said 100200 state active set vlan 300 name voice196_v type ethernet mtu 1500 said 100300 state active set vlan 401 name etpl204_v type ethernet mtu 1500 said 100401 state active --More-- set vlan 1002 name fddi-default type fddi mtu 1500 said 101002 state active set vlan 1004 name fddinet-default type fddinet mtu 1500 said 101004 state active stp ieee set vlan 1005 name trnet-default type trbrf mtu 1500 said 101005 state active stp ibm set vlan 1003 name token-ring-default type trcrf mtu 1500 said 101003 state active mode srb aremaxhop 7 stemaxhop 7 backupcrf off ! #ip set interface sc0 200 10.178.223.253/255.255.255.0 10.178.223.255 set interface sl0 down set interface me1 down set ip route 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 10.178.223.1 ! #dns set ip dns server 10.178.223.11 primary ! #spantree #backbonefast set spantree backbonefast enable #vlan set spantree priority 10 100 set spantree priority 10 200 set spantree priority 10 300 set spantree priority 10 401 --More-- ! #syslog set logging level cops 2 default ! #set boot command set boot config-reg
CCIE- I WILL BE [7:43969]
Hello, I feel like writing tonight, so this text you see… My name is Karl, and I took the CCIE written beta exam a week or so ago and would like to comment on it, and my career goals, in general. This information may be beneficial to some and may be useless to others. Comments and criticisms are welcome. I took the beta appox. 3 days before the beta period ended. I was kicking off my study for the written exam with the first of about 20 books I wanted to read before attempting to take the 300 dollar written, when I discovered to my jubilation that there was a 50 dollar beta to be had. I decided to take the beta for a cheap peek at what I was in for. I fully expected to be annihilated by the questions; consumed and spitten back into my seat - devastated by the complexity and depth of the subject matter for which I was expected to be expertly versed in. BUT, I found, instead of being submersed in dismay, that I was actually treading water. Hope breeds desire. No, I didn’t pass the exam, but that was not my intention. I merely wanted to have a look-see. I wanted to, and did, compose a more personalized blueprint of the exam than what was offered to me on Cisco’s website. (Actually, the blueprint on the website is a pretty good representation of what I was subjected to during the beta (for those looking for exam info.)) Like a few others have said here, I’m no longer intimidated by the exam. So, by now you may be wondering about my experience, and if I’m a bookworm, or if I'm a lab rat... Yes, I have experience. Yes, I’m a bookworm. And, yes, you guessed it; I’m a lab rat. I work in the USPSNOC at WorldCom. My group manages a network of over 36,000 routers (think about it, how many post offices are there?). We provide physical layer up to network, and in some instances, higher level services. So I troubleshoot ds0 up to optical carrier levels, data link, and obviously network. I’m a first level engineer but I think if the times were better I’d be higher up the food chain. Face it. No one is moving. If you are comfortable, you aren’t going to take the risk with another job right now (inside or outside). That’s my problem. No one is moving. I'm stuck. But I’ll be damned if I’m letting this time go by without busting my ass to position myself to move on up. I’ll be ready for better times. Granted, being a 1st level engineer with a CCIE cert is a little scary but I think for those of us who have the gumption to go on, get it on, and grab it, we should. Even though I think with abreviated study concentrating on my weaknesses I could pass the written more quickly, I’m taking the full year to cover everything I originally intended to cover. Why? Because as a CCIE, I’ll need it. I’m not a paper bitch. And I will prove it in about a 1.5 years. Lucky for me, I have a well-designed network to analyze and troubleshoot, and I have a 40 router lab to build whatever I want to, to my heart’s content. Although it may sound like I’m bragging or being cocky, I’m only boasting to all that soon, I’ll be prepared to reap the benefits of a more “network engineer friendly” market. I don’t f*ck around…. Karl Thrasher Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43969&t=43969 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Let the flamin' begin....dumbass beginner ques [7:43759]
I don't think it was misinformation Brian. Not sure whether it's all IOS's, but all the ones I have on my routers take both commands although the clockrate method is a hidden one. Not important in the least, just thought I'd mention it. Gaz ""Brian Umbarger"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Whoopsies.forgot the space > > The command is: > > Router (config-if)# clock rate 56000 > > Sorry about the misinformation!! > > -Brian Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43968&t=43759 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNP604-503 ( Routing Exam) [7:43895]
It all dependsWell..do you feel that you master all the topics and materials..if it is..then stop reading...if not continue with other books... There are numerous books written for CCNP Routing..If you want I can give you a list..I have a list of 10 to 20 books... Your question is like "Everyone, I have read this, is this enough?" It depends on how much your understanding and how much you absorbed...what is your networking background, your hands-on experience...etc.. So I hope you know the answers.. Good Luck for the exam... ""rtiwari"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > HI , > I HAVE TODD LAMMLE'S CCNP ROUTING GUIDE. I HAVE STUDIED THAT. IS IT > SUFFICENT OR I HAVE TO READ THE CISCO PRESS BSCN BOOK ALSO. > PLEASE REPLY. > -RAVI > > Tim Potier wrote: > > > Buy the Cisco Press BSCN book... it has more information than you will > need, > > but worth the price. BUT, since you are taking the exam next week, I doubt > > you have time to read the entire book... so I would go to CCO and look at > > the exam outline, and cram from online resources. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43967&t=43895 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
