CCNP and future CCIE lab setup [7:73696]
Like the other person previously... I am trying to build a lab. I am personally starting my Cisco track but I have recieved some routers from my work. I personally have 2-2501, 3-2503, 1-2504, 1-as2511-rj(which I dont know how to use), 1-2611, 1-2612, 1-3640 w/ 8 a/s module: 2ME-2W module: 4-port ISDN Bri module (dont know module name), 2-2912, 1-2950. Can you also give me any suggestions? Larus has mentioned a backbone router but isnt the 3640 sufficient? Overall... is there anything else that i need to improve this other than 3550 switches which are way out of my budget!!!? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73696t=73696 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: 2620xm w/WIC-1DSU-T1 [7:73634]
try http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps233/products_tech_note09186 a00800a3f09.shtml Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Joseph R. Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: donderdag 7 augustus 2003 2:25 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: 2620xm w/WIC-1DSU-T1 [7:73634] Team, For my home lab I'm looking to hook a 2620xm directly to a 1721 through a WIC-1DSU-T1 interface. Can you tell me what type of cable to use. I beleive it is a Cat 5 cable with standard RJ45 ends. What is the pinout? Thank you, JoeT MCSE, CCNP **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73644t=73634 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: Gigabit Ethernet Collisions [7:73555]
Reimer, Fred wrote: Gigastack is Cisco proprietary and not standard Gigabit Ethernet as far as I know. Fred Reimer - CCNA Yes that is correct. In fact you can't configure the gigastack for full duplex, or more correctly shouldn't as I learned the hard way some time ago:( The new 3750 switches have a much better stacking capability. Dave Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338 Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050 NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprietary information which may be legally privileged. It is intended only for the named recipient(s). If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected the email, please notify the author by replying to this message. If you are not the named recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer. -Original Message- From: W. Alan Robertson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 7:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Gigabit Ethernet Collisions [7:73555] Additionally, gigabit need not run full duplex. Specifically, look into the Gigastack modules for switches. They can run full duplex when there are only two switches in the stack, but the moment you add a third switch, it becomes a shared bus, and all interfaces are forced to half-duplex operation. - Original Message - From: David j To: Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 6:11 PM Subject: RE: Gigabit Ethernet Collisions [7:73555] Is it really working at gigabit speed?, there are several interfaces which are able to work at 10/100/1000 speeds Neil Andersen wrote: What would cause show interface for a Gigabit interface to show increasing collisions? My understanding is that Gigabit Ehternet only runs in FULL DUPLEX. Thanks, Neil **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html -- David Madland CCIE# 2016 Sr. Network Engineer Qwest Communications 612-664-3367 Government can do something for the people only in proportion as it can do something to the people. -- Thomas Jefferson Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73609t=73555 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: Cisco 806 ? [7:73613]
Thanks! I just wanted to double check - some hears ago I got burnt in a similar situation, with a 1003 and (no) NTP if I remember correctly. Heiko -- -- PREVINET S.p.A. www.previnet.it -- Heiko Herold [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- +39-041-5907073 ph -- +39-041-5907472 fax -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 8:04 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Cisco 806 ? [7:73613] It does. It is IOS. Just do your CLI thing. Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Herold Heiko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: woensdag 6 augustus 2003 17:21 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: Cisco 806 ? [7:73613] Hi, for some tests I need something cheap to play with, having 2 eth, vpn and (static) nat capability. Could anybody confirm if a 806 with a IP/FW PLUS 3DES image does support IPSEC and NAT at the same time ? From the docs I'd say it does support both but can I have a vpn tunnel, and nat inside the local network, and nat outside the remote (on the other end of the tunnel) network ? The other endpoint would be a pix or a fw-1 although that shouldn't matter. Couldn't find any configrmation of this in the docs :( Thanks Heiko -- -- PREVINET S.p.A. www.previnet.it -- Heiko Herold [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- +39-041-5907073 ph -- +39-041-5907472 fax **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73643t=73613 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: Strange VPN problem [7:73641]
Get the latest version of CRWS (Cisco Router Web Setup) then yo can use Xauth with a nice web front end. The IOS based version is in my opinion - unusable not for end users. Joel. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 07 August 2003 15:31 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Strange VPN problem [7:73641] XAUTH is in my perception for authentication of users, (local) escpecially radius or tacacs. So what we do at the hub site for a static IKE peer is disable XAUTH, so that a spoke router does not get an auth prompt, or the hub does not wait for it. So I think the HUb is waiting for an answer, maybe used to authenticate VPN users only. WHAT DID YOU PUT AT THE SCREEN IKE PROPOSALS? You need Preshareds keys there! 8. The following example shows the various policies used in the IKE policy named CiscoVPNClient-3DES-MD. In this policy, Preshared Keys(XAUTH) for Authentication Mode is being used so that the client will be prompted to supply a username and password at the end of IKE negotiations. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/secursw/ps2276/products_configuration _example09186a008010edf4.shtml#task2_steps Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: suaveguru [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: donderdag 7 augustus 2003 9:40 Aan: Jansen, M Onderwerp: RE: Strange VPN problem [7:73641] thanks for your prompt reply , but I am using easyvpn configuration for cisco 805 router to concentrator 3005 with the cisco 805 as client mode and concentrator as hub . I can't find the line that you indicate for my cisco 805 , could it be easyvpn configuration that i am using? suaveguru --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Guru. Type the no-xauth behind the key-mapping. isakmp key **NEWKEYNEWCUSTO** address x.x.x.x netmask 255.255.255.255 no-xauth no-config-mode Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: suaveguru [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: donderdag 7 augustus 2003 7:08 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: Strange VPN problem [7:73641] hi all, I am trying to setup a easy VPN solution for a cisco 837 to a cisco VPN concentrator 3005 using network extension mode but I keep getting this error msg Aug 7 13:08:16.571: EZVPN(mendelvpn): Pending XAuth Request, Please enter the following command: Aug 7 13:08:16.571: EZVPN: crypto ipsec client ezvpn xauth Any form of input will be appreciated suaveguru __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html === This message has been checked for all known viruses by the Sirocom Virus Scanning Service === === This message has been checked for all known viruses by the Sirocom Virus Scanning Service WWW.SIROCOM.COM === Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73668t=73641 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Cisco 806 ? [7:73613]
Hi, for some tests I need something cheap to play with, having 2 eth, vpn and (static) nat capability. Could anybody confirm if a 806 with a IP/FW PLUS 3DES image does support IPSEC and NAT at the same time ? From the docs I'd say it does support both but can I have a vpn tunnel, and nat inside the local network, and nat outside the remote (on the other end of the tunnel) network ? The other endpoint would be a pix or a fw-1 although that shouldn't matter. Couldn't find any configrmation of this in the docs :( Thanks Heiko -- -- PREVINET S.p.A. www.previnet.it -- Heiko Herold [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- +39-041-5907073 ph -- +39-041-5907472 fax Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73613t=73613 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: mrtg [7:73702]
This is actually quite simple - all you need to do is have all of your individual node .cfg data go to the same file (mrtg.cfg) instead of individual ones. As you go along, the data will simply append to the end of your existing mrtg.cfg file. In my most recent job (aka I am now looking!) I had about 30 routers configured in a single mrtg.cfg file. As a side note, MRTG integrates really well into What's Up Gold, creating a nice clickable map that somewhat resembles HP OpenView's Network Node Manager. Dan Metheny --- John Brandis wrote: Hey All, Still going with my traffic analysis. God a small problem with MRTG. Does any one here know how to integrate the output of multiple nodes through the instance of a single mrtg.cfg file? At the moment, I am using multiple mrtg.cfg. fles and have a hard tme navigating between all the different nodes.. John ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.solution6.com ** **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73706t=73702 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: Access server 2511 Reverse Telnet [7:73656]
Do you have no exec under your line 1 16? -Original Message- From: Wallis Short [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 5:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Access server 2511 Reverse Telnet [7:73656] HI All I was wondering if any of you guys have come across reverse telnet problems with the 2511 access server? Basically I have 8 devices connected and when I reverse telnet to them all is OK, but on when I try and connect to a 2900 XL switch I get this : Termserver#telnet 192.168.1.1 2006 Trying 192.168.1.1, 2006 ..Open And thats it, nothing else. No command prompt or anything comes up on the screen I have configured telnet connections as exactly the same as all my other devices, I have IOS 12.0(5.2). Any ideas ?? Cheers Wallis **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73666t=73656 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
VPN Conncetion from Windows Client to nt domain [7:73720]
Dear all We have a cisco vpn concentrator 3000 series for vpn connection. What we want to do is to establish a vpn conncetion from a windows client(W2k or WinXP Pro) to the concentrator and then log on to our domain and then get the shares connected to the pc. I created a vpn connection and it works proberbly. Only the log on to the domain will not work. It should go like this way that the user is logged on to the pc and then if it is needed establish the vpn connection and get also logged on to the domain and get the shares connected to the pc. How can I do this ? Thanks a lot Kai Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73720t=73720 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: Multicasting [7:72403]
It seems nobody has really answered this. To begin with, I agree that you do not need IGMP on the tunnels, only on Ethernet ports where there are possible receivers of the mcast traffic. In addition, it is not necessary that your SP runs mcast on his router since you are using GRE tunnels. PIM-DM uses SPTs so the moment it starts receiving (S,G) traffic from a mcast source it will send out the traffic to all interfaces on its outgoing interface list. For PIM-DM that is all interfaces that have multicast enabled and have a PIM-DM neighbour or a mcast receiver. So the first thing you need to do is check if you can see your PIM-DM neighbour at the other end of the SP cloud with the show ip pim neighbor command. Please keep us posted on how this progresses. Kind regards George Murage -Original Message- From: Doan Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 11:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Multicasting [7:72403] If you're using PIM Dense-Sparse mode you will need to designate an RP router because the DR needs to know where to send the (*,G) to join and the source DR needs to register the SA messages to the RP. What you can do for this case is R1-SP1---SP2-R2 make either R1 or R2 the RP. Assign a static RP-to-group mapping to the router that is not the RP to point to the one that is assigned the RP. If you're using static RP mapping then all you need on your tunnel interface is PIM-SM. **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73719t=72403 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
WIC-1T Serial WAN [7:73752]
Team, Are WIC-1T interfaces to be used between locations only useful when hooked up to an external CSU/DSU? If so what technology is the local loop? Thank you, JoeT MCSE, CCNP Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73752t=73752 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: udld [7:73730]
All the time. It is our standard to run udld in agressive mode. Jim -Original Message- From: Lopez, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 10:00 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: udld [7:73730] Anyone out there make it a common practice to implement UDLD on Cat 6509 GigE uplinks? TIA, Robert LEGAL NOTICE Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this E-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately. **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73750t=73730 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: 7206 T1 Interface Cards [7:73739]
Thanks much, I thought you could. I couldn't check the Cisco site until just a few minutes ago (interesting firewall issues)appreciate the responses M.C. van den Bovenkamp To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 7206 T1 Interface Cards [7:73739] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] .com 08/08/2003 01:04 PM Please respond to M.C. van den Bovenkamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quick question, does anyone know off the top of their head if you can hot swap cards in a 7206? Has anyone done it? Yes and yes. Regards, Marco. **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73749t=73739 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Can block DHCP traffic at layer 2 switch? [7:73489]
Dear All, We have configured DHCP server at the CORE switch and this will assign the ip address to the client located at edge switch. PC---edge switch-GE uplink---CORE---DHCP server (The network is pure Layer 2 network) But we are afraid that some end users will place their own DHCP server at the edge switch so it will interrupt the normal ip address assignment. Any method to block the unauthorized DCHP server? TIA. Lo Ching Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73489t=73489 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: VPN Conncetion from Windows Client to nt domain [7:73720]
There are a few things that you can try on the concentrator, like checking all the settings in the group that the client/user is a member of. But the most likely suspect is the settings on the PC. The network connection settings must have Client for Microsoft Networks enabled and I would also recommend NetBIOS over TCP/IP in the advanced settings. If you can ping the devices on the LAN, then you will require NetBIOS to browse properly. This is a simple solution to a possibly complicated scenario, but try it out anyway. Regards, Steve Wilson CCNP Network Engineer -Original Message- From: Kai Bovermann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 08 August 2003 13:05 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: VPN Conncetion from Windows Client to nt domain [7:73720] Dear all We have a cisco vpn concentrator 3000 series for vpn connection. What we want to do is to establish a vpn conncetion from a windows client(W2k or WinXP Pro) to the concentrator and then log on to our domain and then get the shares connected to the pc. I created a vpn connection and it works proberbly. Only the log on to the domain will not work. It should go like this way that the user is logged on to the pc and then if it is needed establish the vpn connection and get also logged on to the domain and get the shares connected to the pc. How can I do this ? Thanks a lot Kai **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73726t=73720 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: cisco back to back cable [7:71992]
One more possible issue. Recently I installed a back-to-back cable in my lab. On the DCE end I verified the cable: sh controllers s 0 - It showed DCE. I then configured the interface; config t int s0 clock rate 130 ip address no shut end The router returned an error message that seemed to indicate that it thought there wasn't a DCE cable on that interface. Now interface s1 was configured for a DCE cable and it worked just fine. OK, reload the router. no change Power off the router Now it works. IOS ver 11.3 on a 2514. -Original Message- From: LINSEN Jurgen (BMB) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 2:37 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: cisco back to back cable [7:71992] Sure you're using a cross cable? -Original Message- From: KW S [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 6:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: cisco back to back cable [7:71992] Dear All I have a 2501 and 2505 and I am trying to set up a homelab..These 2 routers come with a cable which is a DB60(DTE) and the other end is a DB60(DCE).This is wat that is label on the cable. Anyway, I try to connect this cable to the serial interface of the 2 routers...and both the routers are showing serial is down and line protocol is down. I guess I have used the wrong cable...or maybe I have missed out something. Please comment.. Regards, kws DISCLAIMER This e-mail and any attachment thereto may contain information which is confidential and/or protected by intellectual property rights and are intended for the sole use of the recipient(s) named above. Any use of the information contained herein (including, but not limited to, total or partial reproduction, communication or distribution in any form) by other persons than the designated recipient(s) is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender either by telephone or by e-mail and delete the material from any computer. Thank you for your cooperation. For further information about Proximus mobile phone services please see our website at http://www.proximus.be or refer to any Proximus agent. **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73731t=71992 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: BGP and QOS Beta exams [7:73599]
Peter, Yes, you will have to begin chasing VUE and Cisco. For example, I did BGP Beta on May 30th 2003 and I got a letter about my passing from Prometric around 20th June 2003. After a few days, it also appeared in my Tracking System. The same with BSCI Beta 643-801. It could have something to do with your postal address. So, check with VUE, then they should guide concerning how to approach Cisco ... because my experience shows that Cisco asks for a copy of the result of a given exam, and this comes from Prometric/VUE. Good Luck! You must be a very patient person:-) And this is also the reason I do not like Beta exams now. Mwalie CCDP Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73637t=73599 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: How to study..Self or Classes [7:73624]
Hello, Knowledgenet courses are okay, but I feel they are by far expensive. You can use the money to get equipment. The material at knowledgenet (for the Cisco courses like BSCI) is exactly what is in the Cisco course book that costs $60.00. The reason I like knowledgenet is that being interactive, I can study even when tired at night, just when reading a book is nearly impossible. I think I have come to like knowledgenet; fortunately, I have not been paying for the courses. Good Luck! Mwalie CCDP Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73639t=73624 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
