Re: Cisco Secure VPN BETA exam
Hi All !
Could anybody pointout thegood site for SNMP.
"J. Wang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 09/10/2000 09:32:17 PM
Please respond to "J. Wang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: Abdul Mateen/Satyam)
Subject: Re: Cisco Secure VPN BETA exam
243 Problems / 180 minutes
Keep the MCNS 2.0 track,
lots fill-blank,
lots drap-drop,
not easy.
On 10 Sep 2000 09:36:15 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("chung") wrote:
>Hello!!
>
>I will take the Cisco Secure VPN BETA exam tomorrow!! Could anyone give
>me some advice? Which topic should I focus?
>
>Thanks a lot!!
>
>Regards,
>Tony
>
>
>**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
>_
>UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PIX and OSPF
But what about the routing updates that needs to be multi casted between the two OSPF routers. "John Kaberna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 09/20/2000 02:57:47 AM Please respond to "John Kaberna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: "Lorenzo Montezemolo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (bcc: Abdul Mateen/Satyam) Subject: Re: PIX and OSPF Don't pass any info from the ISP inside. Use the PIX as your default gateway for outbound traffic and on the PIX point the default to the inside ethernet of your Internet router. On the Internet router point to your ISP. Very standard practice. John Lorenzo Montezemolo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 8q8fjg$t76$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8q8fjg$t76$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > How would this work if NAT were in place? We're thinking about doing > something similar where we have our ISP-managed router passing > default-network information from outside, through the PIX, and to the > inside. Any thoughts? > > Lorenzo > > > > ""Omar Baceski"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > | you can put an explicit neighboring between the routers to avoid using > | multicast. then you need to put a coumple conduits to let ospf passtrough. > | > | > | > | > -Mensaje original- > | > De: Nabil Fares [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > | > Enviado el: Tuesday, September 19, 2000 2:38 PM > | > Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > | > Asunto: PIX and OSPF > | > > | > Greetings, > | > > | > I'm testing PIX515 and I've couple of questions concerning OSPF. I'll > be > | > installing a PIX between 2 7XXX router: > | > > | > Router-C1>--PIX515-->Router-C2 > | > OSPF OSPF > | > > | > > | > Do I've to do anything special on PIX to pass OSPF? Any help is great. > | > > | > > | > thanks, > | > > | > Nabil > | > > | > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to > | > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html > | > _ > | > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > | > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > | > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > | > | **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to > | http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html > | _ > | UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > | FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > | Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > | > > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html > _ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Don't pass any info from the ISP inside. Use the PIX as your default gateway for outbound traffic and on the PIX point the default to the inside ethernet of your Internet router. On the Internet router point to your ISP. Very standard practice. John Lorenzo Montezemolo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 8q8fjg$t76$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8q8fjg$t76$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...> How would this work if NAT were in place? We're thinking about doing> something similar where we have our ISP-managed router passing> default-network information from outside, through the PIX, and to the> inside. Any thoughts?> > Lorenzo> > > > ""Omar Baceski"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...> | you can put an explicit neighboring between the routers to avoid using> | multicast. then you need to put a coumple conduits to let ospf passtrough.> |> |> |> | > -Mensaje original-> | > De: Nabil Fares [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]> | > Enviado el: Tuesday, September 19, 2000 2:38 PM> | > Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> | > Asunto: PIX and OSPF> | >> | > Greetings,> | >> | > I'm testing PIX515 and I've couple of questions concerning OSPF. I'll> be> | > installing a PIX between 2 7XXX router:> | >> | > Router-C1>--PIX515-->Router-C2> | > OSPF OSPF> | >> | >> | > Do I've to do anything special on PIX to pass OSPF? Any help is great.> | >> | >> | > thanks,> | >> | > Nabil> | >> | > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to> | > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html> | > _> | > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html> | > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com> | > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]> |> | **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to> | http://w
RE: Static, Conduit question.
I think with ur configuration u have enabled only Inbound. The same neexds to be enabled for Outbound as wel with NAT and Global configuration pair and Outbound (Optional). Try these and give us the feedback [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 08/11/2000 03:08:22 AM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:(bcc: Abdul Mateen/Satyam) Subject: RE: Static, Conduit question. Hi, I suppose these aren't the real addresses and the real addresses are valid ones what actualy you did hear is allowed every one to reach those addresses, but you need to disable the nat with NAT 0 command or if these are the real addresses to use static nat statments. I hope it helps.. GIL CCNA,CCDA -Original Message- From: Richard Tran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2000 7:37 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PIX: Static, Conduit question. We have an ip address(a.b.c.d) registered with an internet domain name. This domain is served both as our email and website domain. We have one internal web(192.168.1.222) and one internal mail server(192.168.1.223). I have a question about the pix configuration below. static (inside,outside) a.b.c.d 192.168.1.222 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0 static (inside,outside) a.b.c.d 192.168.1.223 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0 conduit permit tcp host a.b.c.d eq www any conduit permit tcp host a.b.c.d eq smtp any Is this the right configuration for the pix to redirect the appropriate traffic to the internal servers? Any response is greatly appreciated. ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] This email was scanned using ESPG @ PubliCom Haifa. ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PIX Upgrade from 4.4(1) to 5.1(2)
Hi ! Pls install the syslog server and see error for any translations. If there r error then u need to reconfigure the new commands. Rgrsd "Ronnie John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 08/31/2000 12:44:46 AM Please respond to "Ronnie John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:(bcc: Abdul Mateen/Satyam) Subject: PIX Upgrade from 4.4(1) to 5.1(2) Hello, I was just curious if any body have any problems when upgrading the pix software from Ver. 4.4(1) to 5.1(2). When I performed the above upgrade traffic would no longer flow through the pix. I could ping it from inside but I could not surf out. Also from outside I could not surf into my website. Any suggestions, thoughts, comments would be appreciated. Thanks Ronnie John ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BGP4 implementation
Hi Elmer ! Just u need to configure the community filtering at RouterA as RouterA # neighbourremote-as xxx RouterA # neighbour send-community RouterA # neighbour route-map abcd out route-map abcd 100 match ip set community no-export These set of commands will tell the RTB not to export the routes learned frm ur AS to its other external peers. I hope this will cmet ur configuration. Pls update me if u find better alternate solution. Regrds "Deloso, Elmer G." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 09/05/2000 06:45:08 PM Please respond to "Deloso, Elmer G." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc:(bcc: Abdul Mateen/Satyam) Subject: BGP4 implementation Hi, group. I need some help on filtering BGP4. The scenario is this: my routerA is set up with a T1 to routerB via static classB address. However, RouterB is also connected to other clouds running BGP4. I do want users in RouterB cloud to get to my network, but I don't want the other clouds that connect to RouterB to get into my network. The simple questions are: is it just a matter of RouterA using ACL to allow only RouterB? Is it telling the NetAdmin of RouterB to modify his route-redistribution config so no routes outside of RouterB's cloud gets sent to my RouterA? Are there any other issues or configurations I'm better off implementing? Thanks as always to all kind responses. Elmer Title: BGP4 implementation Hi, group. I need some help on filtering BGP4. The scenario is this: my routerA is set up with a T1 to routerB via static classB address. However, RouterB is also connected to other clouds running BGP4. I do want users in RouterB cloud to get to my network, but I don't want the other clouds that connect to RouterB to get into my network. The simple questions are: is it just a matter of RouterA using ACL to allow only RouterB? Is it telling the NetAdmin of RouterB to modify his route-redistribution config so no routes outside of RouterB's cloud gets sent to my RouterA? Are there any other issues or configurations I'm better off implementing? Thanks as always to all kind responses. Elmer
Re: alarm lights on tsu puzzle
Basic testing approach shud be as follows 1. U need to test the 64k physical pairs (2/4 pairs ) are working fine . this can be achieved by testing the line impedance using multimeter. If you bert meter it will be ideal to test the line 2. If the line is ok, then check the configurations and check the alarms. If possible change the modem pairs. Jerry Deer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 05/19/2000 01:31:48 AM Please respond to Jerry Deer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc:(bcc: Abdul Mateen/Satyam) Subject: alarm lights on tsu puzzle I have a 64k point to point ckt running from point A to Point B with Adtran tsu on each end connected to the telco's dmarc with a straight through cable. I have alarm lights on both tsu's. both are properly configured as our other tsu's are. here is the puzzling part the telco says they can test good to THEIR dmarc at both points A and B but cannot see our tsu's on either side. I have tested both of the straight through cables that go from the telco dmarc to the tsu and both are good. any suggestions would be greatly appreciated! thanks, JD ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How to enable the telnet on NT Box
Hi Few weeks back, i saw the mail discussing about the same .Could anyone pls give me the linked URL . Rgds ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
