RE: question about loopback interfaces
Configuring OSPF: OSPF classifies different media into the following three types of networks by default: + Broadcast networks (Ethernet, Token Ring, FDDI) + Nonbroadcast multiaccess networks (SMDS, Frame Relay, X.25) + Point-to-point networks (HDLC, PPP) Configure Your OSPF Network Type You have the choice of configuring your OSPF network type as either broadcast or nonbroadcast multiaccess, regardless of the default media type. Using this feature, you can configure broadcast networks as nonbroadcast multiaccess networks when, for example, you have routers in your network that do not support multicast addressing. You also can configure nonbroadcast multiaccess networks (such as X.25, Frame Relay, and SMDS) as broadcast networks. This feature saves you from having to configure neighbors, as described in the section "Configure OSPF for Nonbroadcast Networks." Can't answer #2, as it's really early and I'm not awake yet, but it seems that the dead timer should be taken into account. On Mon, 27 Nov 2000, Chuck Larrieu wrote: > Yes and no. recall that a DR is elected on a shared broadcast medium, > typically ethernet. ( dumb question - how does this play out in a token ring > environment? My supposition is that it would work out the same, even though > TR is not a broadcast medium ) > > So if you were to change your scenario to the ethernet port going down, then > yes. > > Hhhh... > > Suppose you had: > > - ethernet > | | | > DRBDR DR/other > | | > (---frame relay cloud ---) > > DR ethernet hardware fails. > > Now then, given that the DR hello is roughly 10 seconds by default, will the > BDR be promoted to DR even though there is an alternate route to the > existing DR. Recall that the SPF would most definitely be the ethernet port. > Would there be a footrace among the various router interfaces? Would the > alternate route to the DR be propagated to everyone prior to the BDR > promotion? Without doing a Q&D lab, I would venture a guess that the BDR > would be promoted because even though there is an alternative route to the > DR loopback, hellos go only to adjacent routers, and the DR is no longer > adjacent. > > Any comments? > > Can't answer number 2. As my real world OSPF experience is limited. > > Chuck > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > whitaker > Sent: Monday, November 27, 2000 9:43 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: question about loopback interfaces > > Thanks for the response! I have two more questions: > > If in an OSPF and BGP environment, I think can see the stability with > loopbacks... Correct me if I'm wrong in this theoritical scenario: > Two routers in an OSPF share the highest priority. To break the tie and > determine the DR, OSPF looks at router id, which is the highest interface > address (let's say serial interface) and determines a particular router has > the highest id. It becomes DR. Without a loopback address, if the serial > interface goes down, then the BDR comes online and a new BDR election takes > place. This requires processing power and could slow down the network. > With a loopback interface configured with the highest IP address, then if a > router is the DR and looses its serial interface, it would remain the DR. > Is this correct? > > My second question involves the configuration of the loopback from > real-world experience. What do most of you use - an address from the same > subnet one of the interfaces is on or a seperate address? > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Tony van Ree [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, November 27, 2000 9:28 PM > To: whitaker; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: question about loopback interfaces > > > The notes I have here suggest that using a loopback interface provides a > more stable interface than a physical interface. As the loopback interface > is up as long as the RAM is working the chances of losing this interface are > greatly reduced. > > Both OSPF and BGP use the highest active IP address as the router ID. If a > loopback address is configured they will use the loopback address. > Therefore the loopback address provides more stability. > > It can also make network management and troubleshooting tasks easier. > > Teunis. > On Monday, November 27, 2000 at 08:58:00 PM, whitaker wrote: > > > Could someone explain the importance of using loopback interfaces? I keep > > reading that it is important when using routing protocols to use loopback > > interfaces. A consultant that is writing documentation for me suggested I > > obtain an entire class C network just for loopback addresses. Cisco says > > when configuring BGP that, "We recommend you use a loopback interface to > > guarantee reachability in networ
Re: Catalyst 2901
The August 2000, Product guide says 2820, 2900XL, and 3900 have ATM option? I don't know about the End-of-Life models, which may make the below statement accurate. May require further investigation. On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Brian wrote: > On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Tony van Ree wrote: > > > I was under the impression you need to go to a 5500 to ATM card capability. > > well, 5xxx yes > > > > > > Teunis > > > > On Monday, November 27, 2000 at 08:42:15 PM, Brian wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Ronald James wrote: > > > > > > > so, let say if I am looking for a switch adding to my existing network, is > > > > it worth to purchase cat2901 instead of an expensive cat5000? Also, does > > > > the cat2901 support slot modules? > > > > > > yes its worth it. > > > > > > Although the 2901 does have "slot modules" its essentailly a fixed > > > configuration...a Supervisor 1, with a WS-X5213A blade. > > > > > > So you can't add a lane module. > > > > > > Brian > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Brian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > > On Sun, 26 Nov 2000, Han Nguyen wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Can someone please tell me how do I know what version of FW and SW on > > > > the > > > > > > Cat2901 will support Cat 5000 IOS (cmd set)? > > > > > > > > > > cat2901's use the same software as a cat5000whatever version you > > > > > are running, is the same version, same code, same commands, as a cat5k. > > > > > > > > > > Console> (enable) sh module > > > > > Mod Module-Name Ports Module-Type Model Serial-Num > > > > Status > > > > > --- --- - - - - -- > > > > - > > > > > 1 2 100BaseTX Supervisor WS-X2900 003605924 ok > > > > > 2 1210/100BaseTX Ethernet WS-X2901 003976417 ok > > > > > > > > > > Mod MAC-Address(es)Hw Fw Sw > > > > > --- -- -- -- - > > > > > > > > > 1 00-60-5c-2c-a6-00 to 00-60-5c-2c-a9-ff 1.82.14.5(9) > > > > > 2 00-60-5c-21-5d-28 to 00-60-5c-21-5d-33 1.01.44.5(9) > > > > > > > > > > Cat2901 is a Supervisor I. Cat 2926T is a Supervisor II. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > Han. > > > > > > > > > > > > _ > > > > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > Brian Feeny, CCNP, CCDP [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Network Administrator > > > > > ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881) > > > > > > > > > > _ > > > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ > > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > Brian Feeny, CCNP, CCDP [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Network Administrator > > > ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881) > > > > > > _ > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > www.tasmail.com > > > > > > --- > Brian Feeny, CCNP, CCDP [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Network Administrator > ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881) > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MAC address in SUN Firewall.
There's a saying in the computer industry: That's just because that's the way it is.. Ok, maybe I made it up. set local-mac-address, to TRUE at the eeprom. HTH, (hope that helps) DDM On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Sim, CT (Chee Tong) wrote: > Hi.. Dear all, > > I have a SUN firewall which got 3 interfaces, but when I do a ifconfig -a on > the sun, I got 3 different IP on 3 interfaces but all the MAC address are > the same. Later on, I went to check on other sun machine which got more > than one NIC, I found all of the NIC within one machine possess the same MAC > address too > > Why? > > Tong > > == > De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en > is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht > onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en > de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. > == > The information contained in this message may be confidential > and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you > receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents > herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. > > > == > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cross-over roll-over and straight-through cables
Hrmmm, I think this is safe as a general rule??? Rollover: console8-7-6-5-4-3-2-1-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8 Crossover:Like devices & uplinks 1&2 -> 3&6 --- 1&2 -> 3&6 Straight through: Unlike devices 1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8 On Sun, 15 Oct 2000, Lists Wizard wrote: > helo, > > What is general rule of thumb for cabling tow networking devices? In other > words: when should I use cross-over, roll-over or straight-through cables to > connect tow networking devices > > Thanks > > Rover > > > _ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco 2511 console server and Sun boxes
I haven't thought this all the way through (there seem to be easier ways to do this) but perhaps try changing the terminal escape sequence or disabling it entirely.. then it might transmit correctly. This is a off-the-top-off-the-head guess... anyone can dispute. On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Tai Ngo wrote: > Hi there, > > Currently I have a Cisco 2511 as a console server connected to some Sun > Solaris boxes. I can telnet to the sun boxes via my Cisco. but can't issue > a break sequence to the Solaris box. On a non Cisco console server, I would > type "shft escape b" to issue a break sequence but that doesn't seem to > work. If I try to hit the Cntl Shft 6 x key, it breaks me out of the Cisco > box. I want to be able to issue the break key to the Sun box. Any ideas on > what I need to change on my router configuration? > > Thanks! > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Network mgmt product..
HP Openview is pretty modular, you may just want the Network Node Manager (NNM). If you can get that piece, it'd reduce the cost, significantly. At least, last I checked... On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, Tim Begley wrote: > If you have less than 50 hosts to monitor investigate CiscoWorks for Windows > - it ships with What's up Gold too. > Cost me about $3500 Aussie Dollars 9 months ago - about USD $1750 at the > moment :-( > > > -Original Message- > From: Dinesh B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, 2 November 2000 8:34 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Network mgmt product.. > > > Hi .. > > I am looking out for a good network mgmt tool for my company, which has > Cisco products, high end sun servers and also NT servers. I know there are > many of them like HPOV, Unicenter etc..I am looking at the price of the > product too, where I can fit my budget. Which one would you suggest will > be best to implement and can work in a heterogeneous environment? > > Any comments or links to evaluate the products would be great. > > Thanks > Dinesh. > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > >From homework help to love advice, Yahoo! Experts has your answer. > http://experts.yahoo.com/ > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VPN & NAT
SORRY, It won't happen again!! ever!! On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, Chuck Larrieu wrote: > one more reason to read my posts first - the link I sent is fine. can go in > as either guest or registered. info looks to be about the same. here it is > again. > > http://www.cisco.com/tac/newsflash/vpn2.html > > > Chuck > > > "Greg Reaume" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:8tt4o9$cic$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > This link doesn't work. Mind reposting a checked one? :) > > > > Thx. > > > > "Duane Morgan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I don't know who was trying to configure this, but this link might help: > > > > http://www.cisco.com/tac/newflash/vpn2.html > > > > _ > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > _ > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VPN & NAT
No, he's right, I typed it in as the link was up in a browser on a different computer, thus copy/paste wasn't an option. I was missing the "s" in newsflash.. Of course, CHUCK's works though... So, it was checked, but I guess my zeal to help was worthless.. : ) Oh well, Later On Fri, 3 Nov 2000, Jason Baker wrote: > it does work :) > > Regards, > > Jason Baker > Network Engineer > > > > -Original Message- > From: Greg Reaume [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, November 03, 2000 12:32 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: VPN & NAT > > > This link doesn't work. Mind reposting a checked one? :) > > Thx. > > "Duane Morgan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I don't know who was trying to configure this, but this link might help: > > http://www.cisco.com/tac/newflash/vpn2.html > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Logging
You want Tacacs or Radius. Unless you're asking about "capturing each command" I'm not sure this would help with that if even possible. DDM On Fri, 3 Nov 2000, Study Cisco wrote: > Hi All, > > I am trying to log login and logout activity on my > routers for security point of viewcan any one help > me how i can log these activities.. > > thanks in adv. > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > >From homework help to love advice, Yahoo! Experts has your answer. > http://experts.yahoo.com/ > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Get Paid To Read Email!
Agreed: One last Survivor joke, time to kick this guy off the island!! _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Flapping and Dampening
Would someone be so kind as to explain these too terms, in english? While I'd honor references to where I can get definitions, instead of just uses in context. I'd greatly appreciate a translation into laymen's terms of these two definitions. Thank you. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Flapping and Dampening: Resolved
Thanks to all who answered... I guess I was thinking it was more "technical" and looking for ways to apply it. I suppose it's more theoretical and my understanding was sufficient and there wasn't 'more to it', even though there is a (config-router)#bgp dampening option, I guess that's the extent of it, as far as that is concerned, half-life's not inclusive.. ok, i'll shut up now My Halabi book is on back-order *groan* On Thu, 16 Nov 2000, Duane Morgan wrote: > Would someone be so kind as to explain these too terms, in english? > > While I'd honor references to where I can get definitions, instead of just > uses in context. I'd greatly appreciate a translation into laymen's terms > of these two definitions. > > Thank you. > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE R&S lab prep
Marc Russell? more info, please? I'd search the website archives, but for some reason, it's not coming up in my browser for a few days now. On Fri, 17 Nov 2000, Kevin Wigle wrote: > Which is why from what I have heard/read (and visiting the web site) that > you should bite the bullet and buy the lab scenarios from Marc Russell. > > They have been argued as the best lab prep material for the very reason that > they do get into the "large" scenarios. > > I haven't bought them yet but I will be in the early new year. > > Kevin Wigle > > - Original Message - > From: "Belt, Louie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "'Rodgers Moore '" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, 16 November, 2000 22:06 > Subject: RE: CCIE R&S lab prep > > > > The book's a farce for true CCIE lab prep. It is not in any way enough > > prep for the lab. It segment's everything into small portions, and gives > > you step by step intructions it never puts it all together (totally unlike > > the lab). Additionally, there is no bridging, DLSW+, voice, firewall > > feature sets,... > > > > It is woefully inadequate for use in CCIE prep. If you use this book as > > your main "lab prep" you will be in utter shock the day you step into the > > lab. > > > > Louie > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Rodgers Moore > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 11/16/00 7:15 PM > > Subject: Re: CCIE R&S lab prep > > > > I think that the most telling statement you've made is that Cisco knows > > about the book, and hence the lab proctors do too. So logically, this > > book > > alone will not be enough to pass the lab. > > > > Rodgers Moore > > > > "Chuck Church" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > 149867F27C65D411977900508B10457A3627@ntserver">news:149867F27C65D411977900508B10457A3627@ntserver... > > > All, > > > > > > I was talking to a Cisco SE Tuesday and he mentioned that the > > All-In-One > > > Cisco CCIE Lab Study Guide by Stephen Hutnik and Michael Satterlee was > > the > > > book to use. Apparently many internal Cisco people in RTP use this > > book > > for > > > preparation. I've ordered it, and am currently using the Doyle and > > Halabi > > > books as well. Has anyone used this all in one guide to prepare? Was > > it > > > useful? Also, I found out for sure there will be a small amount of > > voice > > on > > > the test - FXS/FXO on a couple of routers. Any idea on where to start > > or > > > what to read? Maybe some CCO URLs? > > > > > > TIA, > > > > > > Chuck Church > > > R&S Lab - Jan 12/13 RTP (AKA D-Day) > > > CCNP, CCDP, MCNE, MCSE > > > Sr. Network Engineer > > > Magnacom Technologies > > > 140 N. Rt. 303 > > > Valley Cottage, NY 10989 > > > 845-267-4000 x218 > > > > > > _ > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > _ > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE R&S lab prep
Nevermind. found it. cciebootcamp.com or ccbootcamp.com On Fri, 17 Nov 2000, Duane Morgan wrote: > Marc Russell? more info, please? > > I'd search the website archives, but for some reason, it's not coming up > in my browser for a few days now. > > On Fri, 17 Nov 2000, Kevin Wigle wrote: > > > Which is why from what I have heard/read (and visiting the web site) that > > you should bite the bullet and buy the lab scenarios from Marc Russell. > > > > They have been argued as the best lab prep material for the very reason that > > they do get into the "large" scenarios. > > > > I haven't bought them yet but I will be in the early new year. > > > > Kevin Wigle > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Belt, Louie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "'Rodgers Moore '" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, 16 November, 2000 22:06 > > Subject: RE: CCIE R&S lab prep > > > > > > > The book's a farce for true CCIE lab prep. It is not in any way enough > > > prep for the lab. It segment's everything into small portions, and gives > > > you step by step intructions it never puts it all together (totally unlike > > > the lab). Additionally, there is no bridging, DLSW+, voice, firewall > > > feature sets,... > > > > > > It is woefully inadequate for use in CCIE prep. If you use this book as > > > your main "lab prep" you will be in utter shock the day you step into the > > > lab. > > > > > > Louie > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Rodgers Moore > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: 11/16/00 7:15 PM > > > Subject: Re: CCIE R&S lab prep > > > > > > I think that the most telling statement you've made is that Cisco knows > > > about the book, and hence the lab proctors do too. So logically, this > > > book > > > alone will not be enough to pass the lab. > > > > > > Rodgers Moore > > > > > > "Chuck Church" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > > 149867F27C65D411977900508B10457A3627@ntserver">news:149867F27C65D411977900508B10457A3627@ntserver... > > > > All, > > > > > > > > I was talking to a Cisco SE Tuesday and he mentioned that the > > > All-In-One > > > > Cisco CCIE Lab Study Guide by Stephen Hutnik and Michael Satterlee was > > > the > > > > book to use. Apparently many internal Cisco people in RTP use this > > > book > > > for > > > > preparation. I've ordered it, and am currently using the Doyle and > > > Halabi > > > > books as well. Has anyone used this all in one guide to prepare? Was > > > it > > > > useful? Also, I found out for sure there will be a small amount of > > > voice > > > on > > > > the test - FXS/FXO on a couple of routers. Any idea on where to start > > > or > > > > what to read? Maybe some CCO URLs? > > > > > > > > TIA, > > > > > > > > Chuck Church > > > > R&S Lab - Jan 12/13 RTP (AKA D-Day) > > > > CCNP, CCDP, MCNE, MCSE > > > > Sr. Network Engineer > > > > Magnacom Technologies > > > > 140 N. Rt. 303 > > > > Valley Cottage, NY 10989 > > > > 845-267-4000 x218 > > > > > > > > _ > > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > _ > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > _ > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
