RE: IS-IS on BSCI 640-901 [7:56727]

2002-11-04 Thread Ersin Abacioglu
I just passed the exam yesterday.  I used the Routing TCP/IP book by Jeff
Doyle for a comprehensive understanding of IS-IS.  However, these links
should be enough for the test:

http://www.ciscopress.com/catalog/ccnp.asp?news=true

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/732/Tech/routing/isis.shtml

Good luck,

Ersin


-Original Message-
From: James Gosnold [mailto:nobody@;groupstudy.com] 
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 8:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: IS-IS on BSCI 640-901 [7:56727]

Dear all,

I'm planning to sit the exam in the next few weeks. The major change to the
old 640-503 exam according to Cisco (who should know these things) is the
introduction of a module on IS-IS.

I have purchased 3 books all geared towards the old exam (Sybex, Cisco press
and Examcram), none of which include much info on IS-IS and at the moment
there only appears to one book currently in print that is specifically for
BSCI 640-901.

Any recommendations on how I should tackle this problem? Cisco provide a
link with some configuration info on IS-IS, do you think it sufficient to
read this well or should I be looking elsewhere for further info?

Kind regards, James.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56854&t=56727
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: How can I Fill out our unused bandwidth with dummy traffic [7:54021]

2002-09-24 Thread Ersin Abacioglu

Use Wan Killer from SolarWinds 2001 Engineers Edition.  This is available at
www.solarwinds.net


Ersin


-Original Message-
From: shojaee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 2:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: How can I Fill out our unused bandwidth with dummy traffic
[7:53970]

Dear sirs,

I'm a member of technical staff in an ISP site. We have cable connection to
the internet with 512k bandwidth.
I require to do the following:
1- Measure our maximum connection speed to internet.
2- Fill out our unused bandwidth with dummy traffic.
How can i do these? thanks for your prompt attention.

With best regards
Hassan Shojaie




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54021&t=54021
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: CiscoWorks2000 and snmp problems [7:54865]

2002-10-04 Thread Ersin Abacioglu

I had a similar problem but with our cat 5500's.  The CPU would spike to 95%
utilization every couple of minutes.  Before I get into what we did, try
going under Resource Manager Essentials => Administration => Change Polling
options => choose the 7000 series routers and try to manipulate some of the
polling options.  

If this doesn't work.  See if this is caused by Device Fault Manager.  Go to
Server Configuration => Administration => Stop Process => shutdown DFM
Server and DFM Broker and see if that resolved anything.  

If all else fails, reopen the case with Cisco.  Hopefully you will get a
more experienced tech this time.  

Ersin

 -Original Message-
From:   bi.s [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Friday, October 04, 2002 9:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:CiscoWorks2000 and snmp problems [7:54865]

hi,

i am interested if there is someone using cw2k and has c7200 vxr with 
npe-400.
do you have problems with snmp on the routers? on other routers?
it looks like there is a problem with snmp causing high cpu on routers 
and bringing the network down.

has someone this problems? how did you solve them?
ios upgrading doesnt help and the cisco case was closed without a fix.

is  snmp-server view cutdown an option 
(http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/477/SNMP/ipsnmphighcpu.shtml).

any experiences with that?

thanks
-bis




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54870&t=54865
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]