Re: A question on EIGRP traffic [7:3464]
One hint - By default EIGRP will use a MAX of 50% of the CONFIGURED bandwidth of the interface (via Bandw command). You can change this behavior, however. "Curtis Call" cc: Enviado por: Asunto: Re: A question on EIGRP traffic [7:3464] nobody@groups tudy.com 08.05.01 02:34 AM Por favor, responda a "Curtis Call" By default the EIGRP protocol will use a MAXIMUM of 50% of the link bandwidth. In most cases it won't use much bandwidth at all since it will just be hello traffic when the network is stable, but while passing update information this rule stays in effect. At 10:14 AM 5/7/01, you wrote: >I have been told the cisco EIGRP protocol is using by default 50% of the >bandwith of the WAN link. Can anybody give me more detail on this. > > > >_ >Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=4232&t=3464 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IOS upgrade, failure [7:3513]
Maybe booting from TFTP or trying a smaller 11.3 IOS (less features) "John Brandis" cc: Enviado por: Asunto: IOS upgrade, failure [7:3513] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08.05.01 03:04 AM Por favor, responda a "John Brandis" Hey all, I am back on for the day, Have a 2503 router with suspected 4MB flash. I need to upgrade from IOS 10.2 to at least 11.3. Problem is that IOS 11.3 is 5MB. What can I do besides upgrade the flash.?? John Brandis Network Engineer GoWireless Communications 155 George Street Sydney +61 2 9251 5000 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=4233&t=3513 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Latency in Telnet, intervlan routing [7:38187]
Maybe the servers you are telnetting to, are trying to resolve the incoming IP address to a name, and are waiting for the DNS to respond; try to verify that particular UNIX boxes have correct DNS settings. "Mason" cc: Enviado por: Asunto: Re: Latency in Telnet, intervlan routing [7:38187] nobody@groupstudy .com 15/03/2002 06:17 Por favor, responda a "Mason" Ok, so here is the status: Sniffer traces show that the latency occurs when I do telnet (regardless using IP or Netbios name) to three specific Unix servers. If I do telnet to another device on the same subnet, I have no problems. That eliminates any routing issues, correct ? But what the three servers, independent of each others have in common... can't understand that one. ""Mason"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I do Telnet from a client on VLAN1 and I reach the server just > fine. VLAN1 is where the server is also connected to. > I do Telnet from any other VLAN: Telnet takes a long time, then it times > out. > > That tells me it is something in the InterVLAN routing. What would be the > next step to troubleshoot the problem ? I look into the Cat 5000 > configuration but I can't see any relevant changes that caused the problem. > If I use a Sniffer, I noticed a delta time larger for the Telnet. However, I > don't see any brodcast that could such delay. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=38377&t=38187 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco 2501 & dot1q encapsulation ? [7:60699]
Hi thomas; AFAIK Dot1q is only supported in (some) FastEthernet interfaces, and 2501 has only Ethernet, so it isn't supported. "Thomas Muller" Enviado por: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/01/2003 16:21 Por favor, responda a "Thomas Muller" Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Asunto: Cisco 2501 & dot1q encapsulation ? [7:60699] Hi, I've tried to configure dot1q on the LAN interface on my Cisco 2501 running 12.2 (IP Plus) but it doesn't seem to know the encapsulation dot1q command. Does anyone know if the 2500 series supports dot1q ? Thanks, Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- +++ GMX - Mail, Messaging & more http://www.gmx.net +++ NEU: Mit GMX ins Internet. Rund um die Uhr f|r 1 ct/ Min. surfen! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=60748&t=60699 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: virtual labs [7:60700]
What are you looking for? Actual online equipment rental or docs with labs? Francisco Sedano Informatica Pronet CCIE student :-) "reddyred" Enviado por: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/01/2003 16:21 Por favor, responda a "reddyred" Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Asunto: virtual labs [7:60700] Has anyone found any cheap, USEFUL virtual labs for the CCNP track. I'm currently an unemployed CCNA and don't have $1,000 bucks for online labs nor equipment Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=60749&t=60700 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco 2501 & dot1q encapsulation ? [7:60699]
I've configured dot1q on 1721s... I think any recent Cisco with FastEthernet will support it. Francisco Sedano Informatica Pronet CCIE Student :-) "The Long and Winding Road" Enviado por: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/01/2003 16:38 Por favor, responda a "The Long and Winding Road" Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Asunto: Re: Cisco 2501 & dot1q encapsulation ? [7:60699] ""Thomas Muller"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi, > > I've tried to configure dot1q on the LAN interface on my Cisco 2501 running > 12.2 (IP Plus) > but it doesn't seem to know the encapsulation dot1q command. > > Does anyone know if the 2500 series supports dot1q ? Nope. The minimum router for dot1q is the 2610/2611 with the appropriate IOS. I believe the min IOS is 12.1 > > Thanks, Thomas > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > +++ GMX - Mail, Messaging & more http://www.gmx.net +++ > NEU: Mit GMX ins Internet. Rund um die Uhr f|r 1 ct/ Min. surfen! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=60751&t=60699 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: QoS Charts [7:60710]
Could you send it to me? I could setup a ftp server open to anybody to
request them (and all docs which we find useful).
Francisco Sedano
Informatica Pronet
CCIE Student :-)
"Howard C. Berkowitz"
Enviado por: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
09/01/2003 17:39
Por favor, responda a "Howard C. Berkowitz"
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Asunto: QoS Charts [7:60710]
>Howard,
>
>We'd all like to see a comprehensive QOS chart.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Kym
They are Word tables in several different papers of mine. Just trying
to paste them into email text results in something unreadable.
Anyone good at
reformatting tables to ASCII, when table cells have multiple lines?
>
>
>
>>From: "Jonathan V Hays"
>>Reply-To: "Jonathan V Hays"
>>To:
>>Subject: RE: Small Minded QOS
>>Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 22:17:53 -0500
>>
>>Howard,
>>
>>I, for one, would be quite interested in such a comparative table.
>>
>>Thanks in advance.
>>
>>Jonathan
>>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
>>Howard C. Berkowitz
>>Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 3:47 PM
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: Re: Small Minded QOS
>>
>>
>>At 7:39 PM + 1/8/03, Jennifer Bellucci wrote:
>>>Hello
>>>
>>>Can someone tell me where I can find every single QOS formula for all
>>>the QOS techniques in one document, prefer it if it was one page.
>>>Please do not send me the link to QOS on cco.
>>
>>Could you clarify what you mean by "formula"? When I hear that, I
>>think of the derivation of the algorithms, and, certainly for things
>>like RED and WFQ, these were published in scientific papers of many
>>pages and equations. Indeed, if you go into the literature, you'll
>>find that what we may call things are actually approximations ("true"
>>WFQ is a theoretical abstraction; what we call WFQ is more like
>>Self-Clocked WFQ).
>>
>>Now, if you are thinking of a comparative table of what the various
>>IOS QOS mechanisms do, that's something I might be able to dig up. .
>>.
>rd
>
>_
>STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
>http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
>.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=60753&t=60710
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Subnet question [7:60711]
Surely there are a lot of solutions; which I'd do is: Define a different VLAN for each floor. Connect the catalysts in each floor with trunk interfaces (802.1q) Connect a Fast or Giga ethernet interface from a router to one of the switches. You must setup that interface (both on the router an on the switch side) as DOT1Q. On the router you can do it with the following config: -- Note: VLAN 101 - Floor 1 VLAN 102 - Floor 2 VLAN 103 - Floor 3 interface fastethernet 0/0 (for example) full-duplex (Duplex full?) speed 100 no ip address interface fastethernet 0/0.101 encap dot1q 101 ip address 10.100.1.254 255.255.255.0 interface fastethernet 0/0.102 encap dot1q 102 ip address 10.100.2.254 255.255.255.0 interface fastethernet 0/0.103 encap dot1q 103 ip address 10.100.3.254 255.255.255.0 If you tell us which switches are you using (cat or IOS based) I can put you a config for that; assuming they are IOS, it is more or less: --- Switch on floor 1: interface FastEthernet0/1 switchport access vlan 101 switchport mode access duplex full speed 100 interface FastEthernet0/2 switchport access vlan 101 switchport mode access duplex full speed 100 ... ! Trunk to floor 2 interface FastEthernet0/10 switchport mode trunk duplex full speed 100 .. Switch on floor 2: interface FastEthernet0/1 switchport access vlan 102 switchport mode access duplex full speed 100 interface FastEthernet0/2 switchport access vlan 102 switchport mode access duplex full speed 100 ... ! Trunk to floor 1 interface FastEthernet0/10 switchport mode trunk duplex full speed 100 ! Trunk to floor 3 interface FastEthernet0/11 switchport mode trunk duplex full speed 100 Francisco Sedano Informatica Pronet CCIE Student :-) "Tamhankar, Nitin" Enviado por: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/01/2003 17:40 Por favor, responda a "Tamhankar, Nitin" Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Asunto: Subnet question [7:60711] This might be a very elementary question for some of you guys but I would appreciate the answer. If an office which has 3 different floors and has Cisco routers and catalyst switches and windows environment. We need to configure it in such a way that each floor is on its own subnet for example floor1 100.10.1.0 floor2 100.10.2.0 floor3 100.10.3.0 Also if a computer which has IP address in subnet 100.10.1.0 is moved from floor 1 to floor 2, it should not communicate with the network unless its IP address is changed to one in 100.10.2.0 subnet. How it can be accomplished? Thank you Nitin [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=60754&t=60711 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco 2501 & dot1q encapsulation ? [7:60699]
Good to know, thanks!! "Sam Sneed" Enviado por: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/01/2003 22:25 Por favor, responda a "Sam Sneed" Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Asunto: Re: Cisco 2501 & dot1q encapsulation ? [7:60699] This is not true. ISL is onlly supported on FastEthernet. Dot1Q cna be run on a 2610 with 10BT ethernet. ""Francisco Sedano/Inf-Pronet"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi thomas; > > AFAIK Dot1q is only supported in (some) FastEthernet interfaces, and 2501 > has only Ethernet, so it isn't supported. > > > > > > > "Thomas Muller" > Enviado por: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 09/01/2003 16:21 > Por favor, responda a "Thomas Muller" > > Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > cc: > Asunto: Cisco 2501 & dot1q encapsulation ? [7:60699] > > Hi, > > I've tried to configure dot1q on the LAN interface on my Cisco 2501 > running > 12.2 (IP Plus) > but it doesn't seem to know the encapsulation dot1q command. > > Does anyone know if the 2500 series supports dot1q ? > > Thanks, Thomas > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > +++ GMX - Mail, Messaging & more http://www.gmx.net +++ > NEU: Mit GMX ins Internet. Rund um die Uhr f|r 1 ct/ Min. surfen! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=60765&t=60699 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: show trunk on 2924m-XL [7:60741]
Maybe "Show interface status"... ELX_SW_1#sh int status PortName Status Vlan Duplex Speed Type Fa0/1 connectedtrunkhalf100 10/100BaseTX Fa0/2 notconnect 99 auto auto 10/100BaseTX Fa0/3 connected100 full100 10/100BaseTX Fa0/4 connected100 full100 10/100BaseTX Fa0/5 Router a Madridconnected100 full100 10/100BaseTX "Phil Wallisch" Enviado por: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/01/2003 21:36 Por favor, responda a "Phil Wallisch" Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Asunto: show trunk on 2924m-XL [7:60741] Does anyone know how to do the equivilant of a "show trunk" on an IOS based switch? I've been having to do a "show run" to see if the port was trunking. Help STOP SPAM: Try the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=60760&t=60741 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco 2501 & dot1q encapsulation ? [7:60699]
I've tried just now in my 4000 and it doesn't work, NP-E.. It seems it's time for a router change :-) Francisco Sedano Informatica Pronet. "Marc Thach Xuan Ky" Enviado por: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/01/2003 00:12 Por favor, responda a "Marc Thach Xuan Ky" Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Asunto: Re: Cisco 2501 & dot1q encapsulation ? [7:60699] I've just configured dot1q on a 4500 with NP6E and IOS 12.2, I haven't tested whether its working. rgds Marc Francisco Sedano/Inf-Pronet wrote: > > 4000? Could you expand on it? Which model/IOS? I have a plain 4000 with > 12.1(11) and it doesn't support it.. > > "cebuano" > Enviado por: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 09/01/2003 22:04 > Por favor, responda a "cebuano" > > Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > cc: > Asunto: RE: Cisco 2501 & dot1q encapsulation ? [7:60699] > > This is possible with certain models of the 2600 series, and the > cheapest router to support this with 10Mb Ethernet is the 4000 series. > HTH. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > Larry Letterman > Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 12:32 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Cisco 2501 & dot1q encapsulation ? [7:60699] > > I dont believe so either, since they only support a 10BT > ethernet connection... > > Larry Letterman > Network Engineer > San Jose Transport > Cisco Systems Inc. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > > John Neiberger > > Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 7:43 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Cisco 2501 & dot1q encapsulation ? [7:60699] > > > > > > I don't believe that any of the 2500 series routers support trunking > of > > any variety. If I'm wrong someone will surely correct me. > > > > John > > > > >>> "Thomas Muller" 1/9/03 8:21:59 AM >>> > > Hi, > > > > I've tried to configure dot1q on the LAN interface on my Cisco 2501 > > running > > 12.2 (IP Plus) > > but it doesn't seem to know the encapsulation dot1q command. > > > > Does anyone know if the 2500 series supports dot1q ? > > > > Thanks, Thomas > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -- > > +++ GMX - Mail, Messaging & more http://www.gmx.net +++ > > NEU: Mit GMX ins Internet. Rund um die Uhr f|r 1 ct/ Min. surfen! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=60771&t=60699 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NAT [7:60784]
Hello! And there are some issues with several protocols, as Marc points out. In FTP, for example, possibly the new packet will be larger than original one. (IP Addresses are codified in the data payload as text). So, it's possible the router has to fragment the packet. And that's not a simple header rewrite. Francisco Sedano Informatica Pronet. "Marc Thach Xuan Ky" cc: Enviado por: Asunto: Re: NAT [7:60784] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/01/2003 12:08 Por favor, responda a "Marc Thach Xuan Ky" Dwayne, it's most likely that any NAT implementation would overwrite the header data that it wishes to change, rather than rewrites the header in its entirety. Of course the end result would look the same when you view the packet, however you can recalculate the checksum from the old and new IP addresses without reading the entire packet, so that's a gain for not using the full header creation code. Note though that some protocols which don't pass well through NAT are handled by an ALG (Application Level Gateway), and these modules will rewrite the IP data. Now if I were coding an ALG I'd certainly create the entire header for scratch, and I might need to do the same with the data. Think of an FTP ALG for example. Here the length of the data may be changed, in particular it may grow. The buffer that is currently allocated for the packet may not have room to grow, so in that case, you'd need to copy the data into a larger buffer probably as you parse and alter the data. rgds Marc Dwayne Saunders wrote: > > Hi all, > Was just wondering if any one could put me on to a good link in > regards NAT and packet headers, simply what I am trying to find out is the > packet header total rewritten or just the ip address part of the header and > checksum, Or is a new header written to envelope the original header. > > Or does each application do it differently. > > Any help would be great. > > Regards > > D'Wayne Saunders Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=60803&t=60784 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco 2501 & dot1q encapsulation ? [7:60699]
4000? Could you expand on it? Which model/IOS? I have a plain 4000 with 12.1(11) and it doesn't support it.. "cebuano" Enviado por: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/01/2003 22:04 Por favor, responda a "cebuano" Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Asunto: RE: Cisco 2501 & dot1q encapsulation ? [7:60699] This is possible with certain models of the 2600 series, and the cheapest router to support this with 10Mb Ethernet is the 4000 series. HTH. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Larry Letterman Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 12:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Cisco 2501 & dot1q encapsulation ? [7:60699] I dont believe so either, since they only support a 10BT ethernet connection... Larry Letterman Network Engineer San Jose Transport Cisco Systems Inc. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > John Neiberger > Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 7:43 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Cisco 2501 & dot1q encapsulation ? [7:60699] > > > I don't believe that any of the 2500 series routers support trunking of > any variety. If I'm wrong someone will surely correct me. > > John > > >>> "Thomas Muller" 1/9/03 8:21:59 AM >>> > Hi, > > I've tried to configure dot1q on the LAN interface on my Cisco 2501 > running > 12.2 (IP Plus) > but it doesn't seem to know the encapsulation dot1q command. > > Does anyone know if the 2500 series supports dot1q ? > > Thanks, Thomas > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > +++ GMX - Mail, Messaging & more http://www.gmx.net +++ > NEU: Mit GMX ins Internet. Rund um die Uhr f|r 1 ct/ Min. surfen! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=60762&t=60699 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: disappearing default rip update [7:60937]
Are you still receiving it? (debug ip rip...)? And are you sure you aren't receiving any other default route via other -better admin distance- routing protocol? What do you see in a debug ip routing? "Vicuna, Mark" Enviado por: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 13/01/2003 09:13 Por favor, responda a "Vicuna, Mark" Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Asunto: disappearing default rip update [7:60937] Hi All, Has anyone experience something similar to - the rip default not being shown in the route table and the rip database that is being sent by the upstream router? (Upstream router being a tier 2 provider). I have other routers hanging off the provider edge router that are receiving the default route. Been working on this for a few hours now with the lvl3 guys but we are both stumped. Both of us agreed to log a call with cisco. But just wondering if anyone else has seen this happen before? It's a weird one.. most likely code specific. No bugs showing for my customer's affected router.. ios version being used by the provider is ios specific to their vpn network. Cheers, Mark. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=60978&t=60937 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: More odd router occurances [7:61244]
Maybe that message is coming from the Boot, which is older it two of the routers. I see it ocassionally, but it doesn't harm, since as soon as correct IOS loads, later on the boot process, the sentence will be understood. What I don't understand is the reason of the reloading... What can you see in Show ver regarding last boot? "The Long and Winding Road" Enviado por: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 17/01/2003 05:45 Por favor, responda a "The Long and Winding Road" Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Asunto: More odd router occurances [7:61244] It's getting to where I actually wish troubleshooting would come back to the lab ;-> had two routers go into endless reload tonight when I turned a few on to get some more practice. after going through the password recovery procedure for both, it appears that the two routers in question did not like the command "ip pim sparse-dense-mode" on the token ring interfaces. Which is interesting, because two other routers have that same configuration, and came up just fine. also - does anyone know what the command "ip kerberos source-interface any" does? I am unable to locate it in either the 12.1 or the 12.2 documentation. every time I reload any of my routers I get the error message % Invalid input detected at '^' marker. pointing to the kerberos line. I have issued "no" commands, but upon reload the damn thing is back in there. The IOS versions I am running are 56des just venting. -- TANSTAAFL "there ain't no such thing as a free lunch" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=61255&t=61244 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
R/S Study group in Spain [7:61945]
Hello friends! I currently have CCNP certification and looking forward to get CCIE in the next months. I'd love to create a study group in Madrid, Spain. Or, at least in Spain : -). I have a lab, with Cat5k, several 2500, MC3810, etc, accesible via telnet. Anybody here interested? Best regards, Francisco Sedano. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=61945&t=61945 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
