Re: no lmi - dlci inactive - telco says my problem? [7:44709]
I would recommend connecting a loopback plug or cable to the DSU and see if the interface comes up up (looped) if it does you equipment is okay. If not the telco has a problem. beth shriver wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hello friends, I am having a little problem getting a new long distance frame relay circuit going and getting the ol its your equipment answer from telco and not sure if this is the case or not. I have checked cables and tsu/router config and all seems ok . when the telco loops my csu/tsu it causes my interface to bounce but interface then stays in interface UP protocol DOWN state. Telco is saying they see no LMI from my equipment. In the past when i seen no LMI it always turned out to be something on the telco side. I dont do frame relays much so i am kind of at the mercy of tech who is turning this circuit up so can someone give me some pointers on what i can look for to make sure it is not in my equipment ? or how i can tell if it is a telco issue with circuit? any replies would be greatly appreciated! fast replies appreciated even more!!! :) __ Do You Yahoo!? LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience http://launch.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=44929t=44709 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: written exam passed [7:33460]
I sure did not get the same test you did. I used the boson tests to verify verify my knowledge before takign the written exam. I was scoring 85%-95% first time taking them and only got an 81 on the written today. For me there were probably 5 questions that were quite similar and only 2 that were identical. Dont think you can memorize the Boson software and pass the written exam. At least not the one I took. Gobble Degook wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... lots of people ask the same thing already test 1,2,3 has 200Q,200Q,400Q respectively. so totally 800Q. gobble --- JimYam wrote: Gobble, May I know which Boson 800Q you are refering to? I believe they have Boson 1, 2 and 3. Thanks in advance. Jim - Original Message - From: gobble degook Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 12:54 PM Subject: written exam passed [7:33460] Hi, I passed written this morning with 90, mixed feelings. Cisco should really change exam content, honestly speaking, only 5 questions I have never seen before. maybe cisco should sue boson, even the ospf area number on the diagram is the same. on the other side , I think I am lucky becos I am still under the old content. My suggestion: if they still have this old content, just do boson 800 questions, then you can pass easily. My preparation: after CCDP, read jeff doyle once, ospf sections are excellent. out of patience before I start to read caslow and halabi. did boson 800Q, ccprep 200Q. make sure you understand each question and knowledge required behind. Can anybody advise me whether I violate NDA by saying these things. it is definitely not my intention to do that. Gobble ccnp/dp, mcse, cne, sun csacna. [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Find, Connect, Date! http://personals.yahoo.ca Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=36541t=33460 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Different type of intervlan routing problem... [7:35595]
A problem I have come across on the 3500XL switches and dot1q trunking is when the XL switch expected the packets on the native VLAN to be untagged and the device on the other end of the trunk expects the packets to be tagged. This prevents communication through the trunk on the native VLAN. The way to get around this is to set the native VLAN to a VLAN that does not exist anywhere on your network such as VLAN 999. This way all packets going through the trunk are tagged and you will be able to route on vlan 24 again. Sean Knox wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi all, I'm having a problem with intervlan routing on a 3500XL. Port FastEthernet0/17 is an access link and the host, part of VLAN23, is working fine and can traverse the network. FastEthernet 0/18 is a 802.1q trunk link connected to a 802.1q aware host (a special network device my company makes). Vlan24 is defined as the native vlan for this link on both sides (the switch and 802.1q host). Connected to the 3500XL's FastEthernet 0/1 is a router with subifs defined with IP addresses and appropriate 802.1q VLAN tags for each vlan. VLAN23, our access link, is routed fine throughout the network. However, I can't ping the 802.1q host on VLAN24 from the connected router or elsewhere. The 802.1q device has its default gateway set to the corresponding router subinterface. What am I missing? Below are the relevant parts of the 3500XL config and router config. Thanks in advance! Sean Relevant parts of show running-config on 3500XL: interface FastEthernet0/1 duplex full speed 100 switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport mode trunk interface FastEthernet0/17 duplex full speed 100 switchport access vlan 23 spanning-tree portfast interface FastEthernet0/18 duplex half speed 100 switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport trunk native vlan 24 switchport mode trunk spanning-tree portfast interface VLAN1 ip address 10.6.200.2 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast no ip route-cache ! ip default-gateway 10.6.200.1 Switch#show vlan VLAN Name StatusPorts - --- 1default activeFa0/2, Fa0/3, Fa0/4, Fa0/5, Fa0/6, Fa0/7, Fa0/8, Fa0/9, Fa0/10, Fa0/11, Fa0/12, Fa0/13, Fa0/14, Fa0/15, Fa0/16, Fa0/19, Fa0/20, Fa0/21, Fa0/22, Fa0/23, Fa0/24, Fa0/25, Fa0/26, Fa0/27, Fa0/28, Fa0/29, Fa0/30, Fa0/31, Fa0/32, Fa0/33, Fa0/34, Fa0/35, Fa0/36, Fa0/37, Fa0/38, Fa0/39, Fa0/40, Fa0/41, Fa0/42, Fa0/43, Fa0/44, Fa0/45, Fa0/46, Fa0/47, Fa0/48, Gi0/1, Gi0/2 24 VLAN0024 active VLAN Type SAID MTU Parent RingNo BridgeNo Stp BrdgMode Trans1 Trans2 - -- - -- -- -- -- 1enet 11 1500 - - ---1002 1003 24 enet 100024 1500 - - ---0 0 Router8510#show run interface FastEthernet1/0/4 description Core8500 to 3500XL ip address 10.6.200.2 255.255.255.0 duplex full speed 100 interface FastEthernet1/0/4.23 encapsulation dot1Q 23 ip address 10.6.23.1 255.255.255.0 interface FastEthernet1/0/4.24 encapsulation dot1Q 24 ip address 10.6.24.1 255.255.255.0 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35926t=35595 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Errors on Ethernet Ports on 6500?!?!?! [7:32853]
That is a common problem with 3Com NICs you can try upgrading the dirvers witch sometimes helps but hardsetting speed and duplex to 100/full on both sides is you best bet. Bill Carter wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I have been seeing a lot of problems with 3COM NIC's If the switch is forced 100/full and the NIC is auto we get a lot of errors, if NIC is forced 100/Full errors go away. If Switch and 3Com NIC left to auto switch will come up 100/full and NIC 100/half. You have to make sure the NIC is also forced. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael Williams Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 1:41 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Errors on Ethernet Ports on 6500?!?!?! [7:32853] This is wild stuff, so I thought I'd run it by GroupStudy to see if anyone had seen this before or knew what caused it. We're currently migrating connections from a 5513+RSM to a new 6509+Sup2/MSFC2. There were three ethernet connections, that upon being moved from the 5500 to the 6500, starting showing input errors and CRC errors. When these connections were moved, the port on the 6500 was configured identically to the same port on the 5500 as far as speed, duplex, VLAN assignment, and spanning tree settings. These same devices (same patch cables and all) created no errors on the 5500 whatsoever. Here's the kicker: When we went back and changed the port speed/duplex to auto on the 6500, it negociated the same speed/duplex settings we had forced, but now there were no more errors. (i.e. a server set for 100-Full, that was plugged into a switchport on the 5500 forced to 100-Full was fine, but plugged into a port on the 6500 forced to 100-Full caused errors, and plugged into the exact same 6500 port set for auto speed/duplex had no errors.) Any ideas on why letting the switch detect settings caused no errors while forcing it to those same settings causes errors? Thanks, Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33731t=32853 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mirroring 2 ports on 2 different VLANs through 1 SPAN port [7:33575]
You can not monitor two Vlans with one port. As a general rule you can not monitor two vlans with one sniffer the port your sniffer is connected to must be in the same vlan you are watching (no multi vlan ports allowed). It is possible to monitor both vlans at the same time with one sniffer by mirroring to one port for Vlan 10 and mirroring to a second port for Vlan 20 and then connecting a hub to these two ports and sniffing the hub. However, This is not recommended. You need to be aware that this will bridge the two Vlans and basically defeats the purpose of the Vlan. As for the multi Vlan port. This will assign a port to more than one Vlan. So for example a server could talk to devises on both Vlan 10 and Vlan 20. The multi vlan comand will also prevent the use of a trunk on the XL series switches. As a general rule you are better off to do vlan routing to get to your server rather than to connect the server to a multi vlan port. Jerry Lu wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hello everyone, I got into a situation here: Hareware: Cisco Catalyst 2900XL ISO: 12.0(5.1)XP Say interface FE 0/1 is assigned to Vlan 10, and interface FE 0/2 is assigned to Vlan 20. Is it possible to make interface FE 0/3 as a SPAN port whcih monitors both FE 0/1 and FE 0/2 ? I need to attach a sniffer onto FE 0/3 and analyst the traffic so FE 0/3 could not be a trunk port (the sniffer doesn't understand VLAN taggings). I know under normal circumstance this setup is not allowed (can't monitor 2 vlan traffic through 1 port). But is there a work around? BTW, what's the meaning of the interface commands switchport multi vlan? If I run this command on an interface, will this interface become a trunk port or an access port? I can't seem to find out the detailed explanation on this command from Cisco's website. Thanks for your help! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33575t=33575 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
