Re: Thanks to GetCert.com. I'm now CCNP and CCDP. [7:31679]

2002-01-11 Thread George Murphy CCNP, MCSE

Congratulations Kevin Keep on Striving!... Those exams seem squirlly 
and unrealistic which makes a bear to pass!.

Kevin King wrote:

>Hello,
>
>  I passed 640-025 the day before yesterday, and now I'm both CCNP and CCDP.
>Thanks to GetCert.com. The practical exams I bought from www.GetCert.com is
>very
>useful.
>  
>
>Best regards,
>
>Kevin King  
>2002-1-12




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31707&t=31679
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: OT: What good is this stuff, anyway? [7:31705]

2002-01-11 Thread George Murphy CCNP, MCSE

Good Stuff!, Sounds like my shop Chuck. We have similar real world 
scenarios that end up just like that...ya know...enterasys, 
lucent...etc... kinda gets one inspired!

Chuck Larrieu wrote:

>I had the extreme good fortune of sitting in a meeting today with a
>customer. The project has moved out of the sales phase ( a year in the
>making ) and into the project phase. In attendance were the customer's top
>IT networking staff and my employer's project team.
>
>This ended up being a four hour meeting, completely dominated by Customer IT
>Director and my employer's Mr. CCIE
>
>One of the high points? the customer had sent Mr. CCIE an L3 switch
>configuration the previous day. Mr. CCIE was to offer comment on the design.
>Mr. CCIE said "from what I see here, I'll bet you have a routing loop. I'll
>bet that if you do a traceroute from that switch to this particular network
>it will go nowhere." The customer said "you're on", telnetted into the
>switch, performed the trace, and sure enough, the * * * * * * appeared after
>three hops. You shoulda seen this guy's face!
>
>this was but a small part of a fascinating dialogue between the customer and
>Mr. CCIE.
>
>Oh, it did not hurt that Mr. CCIE had fifteen years technology experience,
>and ten years in networking.
>
>Anyway, back to the books. I'm jazzed about learning the dirty little BS
>things again!
>
>Chuck




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31706&t=31705
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: DS3 requirments [7:31914]

2002-01-14 Thread George Murphy CCNP, MCSE

Richard, it really kind of depends on what kind of traffic etc will be 
going through. If a big corporate site with a 1000 plus users were using 
a DS3 fo internet and this corp had remote sites that were spokes. I 
would say go with a 7000 series of some sort. A nice modular 3600 series 
with a HHSI card and an Adtran CSU would get you there as well but is 
probably better for a smaller situation just my two cents but you 
may check Cisco's site for example designs to. Hope this helps

Richard Tufaro wrote:

>Hey guys...is there a quick rundown of the best hardware software, that
>would be good for a DS3 connection?




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31925&t=31914
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: SNMP Read-only Access [7:31926]

2002-01-14 Thread George Murphy CCNP, MCSE

Jose, we are using read-only at our shop for monitoring and performance 
reports of WAN links. It gives enough info to be useful and by not 
setting the management software to read-write, it saves a lot of uh-ohs. 
Read-write (in my opinion) should be for special utilities..

Quezada, Jose L wrote:

>Hello all,
>   I have some doubts regarding SNMP. What exactly does SNMP read-only
>give you? I believe it has to do with the MIB's, but considering Catalyst
>5000 switches, what can you do with SNMP read-only and what requires
>read-write. 
>
>   Also, if I want to only monitor the network from a NMS, is SNMP
>read-only sufficient or do I also have to enable some traps. Can I have SNMP
>read-only without any traps being enabled?
>
>Any help would be appreciated.
>
>Thanks.
>
>Joe Quezada




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31955&t=31926
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: CVPN and login scripts [7:32013]

2002-01-15 Thread George Murphy CCNP, MCSE

When I was dealing with this situation before, if the PC was configured 
to be a network client of the (i.e domain login, email etc.) I would 
usually take care of its self. For the times that it would not, I made a 
special .bat file that they would click once connected to map drives 
using ye old trusy "net use" command.

NetEng wrote:

>Anyone know of a utlilty that can check against a vpn connection? I dont
>users that VPN in (3005) to run our corporate login script. Any ideas are
>appreciated. Thanks




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32033&t=32013
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]