Lab reccomendation for CCNP
All, I've seen this before but can't find the link. Can someone point me to a URL(s) that gives recommendation for CCNP home lab equipment? Or give your recommendation. Thx _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BSCN book
You can go to bestbookbuys.com which is kind of a pricewatch.com for books. It seems like the book is so new that they are going for retail at most book stores. However, you can get coupon codes for $10.00 off at Barnes&Nobles. That's what I did - it paid for shipping. ""Jeff Duchin"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 8u1st3$nmj$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8u1st3$nmj$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Do you guys know where I can get this for lower than the retail price? If I > go through my work I get a discount but it takes too damn long... I'm taking > a trip next week and want it sooner. Any suggestions? > > Cheers, > Jeff > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cisco load director
It seems that your loadbalancing from the inside is not working. You will have to verify that it's working on your internal network first before even trying from the Internet. From the failure to telnet from the inside, that seems to be the case. Anyway, I think your problem might be in the case where you only have 1 interface configured. The way I did it was to bridge the traffic between 2 interfaces so that all traffic from the web servers will have to go through the LD otherwise it can't keep track of what's going on. It's possible in you configuration, the server got the requests but respond directly to the requester and bypassing the LD. My $.02 Henry Ngo ""Pushkar Shirolkar"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 8p99lr$dd$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8p99lr$dd$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > yes the conduits have been setup .. > > regds > Pushkar > > "andy lennon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 8p97lc$net$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8p97lc$net$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > you are going from an outside to an inside on the pix, do you have conuits > > on the pix setup? > > > > > > ""Pushkar Shirolkar"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > 8p97ca$mco$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8p97ca$mco$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > hi friends, > > > i have a strange prob. i have a cisco load director 416 ... and have a > > very > > > simple config. i have a firewall whose one interface is to the internet > > and > > > one to the internal n/w ... as usual .. nothing diff. . and inside > on > > > the n/w i have one load director and 2 web servers which i want to load > > > balance ... > > > > > > i have natted the virtual IP in the firewall to a public IP .. and > opened > > > port 80 for incoming hits now this virtual IP is bound to the 2 web > > > servers ... > > > > > > but the prob is that i donot get any inbound connections from outside .. > > > also when i tried to telnet to port 80 of the virtual IP from inside > also > > .. > > > i'm unable to do so ... > > > > > > also i have connected only one ethernet cable from the first ethernet > > > interface on the LAN .. do i have to connect another cable from the > second > > > interface even though they are in the same n/w ?? > > > > > > please can anyone help out ... this is ans SOS situation .. > > > the config file is below .. please take a look ... > > > > > > Pushkar > > > --- > > > : Saved > > > : LocalDirector 416 Version 3.1.4 > > > syslog output 20.3 > > > no syslog console > > > enable password 4d9b64f9ab66474af34252545443b8 encrypted > > > hostname web_ld > > > no shutdown ethernet 0 > > > no shutdown ethernet 1 > > > shutdown ethernet 2 > > > interface ethernet 0 auto > > > interface ethernet 1 auto > > > interface ethernet 2 auto > > > mtu 0 1500 > > > mtu 1 1500 > > > mtu 2 1500 > > > multiring all > > > no secure 0 > > > no secure 1 > > > no secure 2 > > > no ping-allow 0 > > > no ping-allow 1 > > > no ping-allow 2 > > > ip address 172.16.0.254 255.255.255.0 > > > no rip passive > > > rip version 1 > > > failover ip address 0.0.0.0 > > > no failover > > > password cisco > > > snmp-server enable traps > > > no snmp-server contact > > > no snmp-server location > > > virtual 172.16.0.253:80:0:tcp is > > > virtual 172.16.0.253:443:0:tcp is > > > real 172.16.0.4:80:0:tcp is > > > real 172.16.0.10:80:0:tcp is > > > name 172.16.0.4 web1 > > > name 172.16.0.10 web2 > > > name 172.16.0.253 domain > > > bind 172.16.0.253:80:0:tcp 172.16.0.4:80:0:tcp > > > bind 172.16.0.253:80:0:tcp 172.16.0.10:80:0:tcp > > > : end > > > > > > > > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html > > > _ > > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to > > http://www.group
Re: Off Topic---Cisco Local Director 416
You can use the "backup" command. The following example is directly out of Cisco Doc virtual 10.10.10.10 real 1.1.1.2 real 1.1.1.3 bind 10.10.10.10 1.1.1.2 1.1.1.3 real 1.1.1.4 backup 1.1.1.2 1.1.1.4 backup 1.1.1.3 1.1.1.4 In the above example, the virtual server 10.10.10.10 has 2 real servers 1.1.1.2 & 3. The real 1.1.1.4 is defined as the backup for the real server. You can also have it backup the virtual server. Try it and see what works best for you. Henry ""Stuart Laubstein"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I am trying to use a Cisco 416 so that the 2 NT servers can use 1 ip > address--I hope to have the Cisco 416 monitor the two and if one goes down > to use the other one. Is there some way to set the load sharing features so > that this will happen--ie maybe set one to 100% and the other as backup, I > do not want them both to be running and sharing the load if possible. The NT > boxes are to be scanning mail and not running any other applications. > > thanks for any idea's > > stuart > _ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > > Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at > http://profiles.msn.com. > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html > _ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MSFC
Is it possible that you erase your flash too and the router is booting up from the mini IOS in ROM? Try to sho flash and see if it has an IOS. If not restore or copy from tftp. ""Jeff Duchin"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 8pm351$ne2$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8pm351$ne2$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hello all. Quick question... I cleared my running-config and then foolishly > gave my start-up config the boot as well. I can still access the msfc, but > it shows: > > Router(boot)# > > I tried to change the hostname and it's still showing this. Also, I tried to > go ahead and configure from global ip routing and no dice! I can't configure > any routing period. Any clue as to how to fix this? > > Cheers, > Jeff > > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html > _ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ( Sh Int serial ) I/p & O/P rate Explanation
Your summation would be correct only if the inbound and outbound peaks took place at the exact moment in time. Rarely such is the case. Henry "NRS Hariharan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi all, >I have a doubt.Iam having a 64 kbps RF leased link to my ISP .When > using the " show interface serial 0" command, in the output we get the Last 5 > minute Input & Output rate. During peak utilisation sometimes I/p rate is > about 63Kbps and O/p is about 5 to 10 Kbps. , or vice versa. >To my knowledge the sum of both i/p and o/p should give the bandwidth , > isn't it?, but how come it is high ie . 63+5 = 68 Kbps > > I will be glad if any of u can clarify my doubt. > > > hari > > > Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1 > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html > _ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
