CCIE written Q?
Hi, winners! Should i point all right answers in 350-011 or only most correct? Thanks. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE written Q?
Thanks all. I got it yestaday, 83%. Muhammad Sarosh Niazi wrote: > > Hi, > There is no negative marking in the exam, so whehter u know the answer or > not go for the wild guesses. > > Take Care > Sarosh > > >From: Ilya Mazhara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: Ilya Mazhara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: CCIE written Q? > >Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 09:52:37 +0300 > > > >Hi, winners! > > > >Should i point all right answers in 350-011 or only most correct? > > > >Thanks. > > > >_ > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Looking for some logic here......
Ther're no logic. Just remember: FDDI TTRT, Transparent bridge root priority, BGP MED and most routing interface costs are preferable with lower values and others ### are opposite. Charles Henson wrote: > > Is there any logic or rule of thumb that can be used to remember what is > selected by the lowest value and what is selected by the highes value? > IE.STP root bridge designation is based on the LOWEST mac. OSPF DR is > based on the highest priority. Each one has to do with it's own subject > matter I know but I can't seem to get them all separated and on the written > that could encompass several questions. > (written scheduled for this friday)(confidence is not high) > > Charles > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 4003 Catalyst Switch, Unable to connect 10mbps links
set port host in config mode Muhammad Asif Rashid wrote: > > Hi All > > My server and DHCP is connected to a Catalyst 4003 switch. I do not have > any VLAN and I use all default configuration on the switch. When I try = > to > connect any workstation having 10 Mbps ethernet card to the switch, the > clients do not get a DHCP request from the server.=20 > > But the same device when connected to 10/100 3COM hub, which is = > connected > to the same CAT 4003 switch log on and get the DHCP lease.=20 > > I tried changing the duplex and speed config of the respective ports = > but > nothing helped. Why is it that the device gets a connect from a hub but = > not > from the switch. I have tried even putting the DHCP server on another = > port > in other switches or hubs but the problem remained to all devices = > connected > to the CAT 4003 switch. I am attaching the log file to see my config.=20 > > Thanx=20 > > <<4003.log>>=20 > > Muhammad Faheem > Systems Engineer > Afcomp > Hello : (9714)-3933878 / 3027338 > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Good amazon deal
Yes,its true about eratos, but $10 is very good price if u wanna got some technical details. Some pages are better others. I red only this book (and some pdf's) and passed written test. Another cents.. Nabil Fares wrote: > > This is not a good deal at all. Its the 1998 edition, that edition had more > errors than the recent presidential elections. I don't think its worth the > $10. > > My 2 cents. > > Nabil > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Brian > Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2000 1:24 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Good amazon deal > > Amazon has Roosevelt Giles CCIE Study Guide for $10.00 right now, just > goto clearence items, computers, and then search the page for "CCIE". > > Not a bad deal at all > > Brian > > --- > Brian Feeny, CCNP+ATM, CCDP [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Network Administrator > ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881) > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco CIM's
Not so. Too simple. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi, > > did anyone use the Cisco CIM's(LAN, CCIE Lab, ISDN,...). Are they good ? > > Regards, > > Tarry > > -- > Sent through GMX FreeMail - http://www.gmx.net > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cant see CDP neighbor
Hmm, strange thing. All is OK with 12.1.5. Router4#sh cdp int Ethernet0/0 is up, line protocol is up Encapsulation ARPA Sending CDP packets every 60 seconds Holdtime is 180 seconds Serial0/0 is up, line protocol is up Encapsulation FRAME-RELAY Sending CDP packets every 60 seconds Holdtime is 180 seconds Ethernet0/1 is up, line protocol is up Encapsulation ARPA Sending CDP packets every 60 seconds Holdtime is 180 seconds Router4#sh cdp n Capability Codes: R - Router, T - Trans Bridge, B - Source Route Bridge S - Switch, H - Host, I - IGMP, r - Repeater Device IDLocal Intrfce HoldtmeCapability Platform Port ID sw Eth 0/1140 T S 1900 6 sw Eth 0/0140 T S 1900 4 Router3 Ser 0/0140 R2610 Ser 0/2 Frame Encapsulation is cisco. Chuck Larrieu wrote: > > I got to wondering about this. > > I am working on a frame relay troubleshooting lab, and I have a situation in > my lab where I am seeing all my routes as I expect. In other words, I > believe I have solved the frame relay problem. However, in using that pod to > check this CDP issue I find that CDP neighbors are indeed not showing up. I > manually enabled CDP on all interfaces, and also ran CDP run in the root > config menu. The debugs are indicating an encapsulation failure. > > As I said, all my routes are there and I have full ping ability from end to > end. But no CDP. > > Interesting. > > IOS 12.1 something. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > Roberts, Timothy > Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 4:19 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; Roberts, Timothy > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject:RE: Cant see CDP neighbor > > I Should have included in my last email that I already performed the cdp > enable command. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 4:05 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Cant see CDP neighbor > > Robert make sure that you enable cdp on the interface. The command is "CDP > enable". You have to be in config-interface mode. Let me know if this > works?? > > Eric Washington > Banc Of America Securities - Japan > Information Technology / IS > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -Original Message- > From: Roberts, Timothy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 8:48 AM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: Cant see CDP neighbor > > I have two routers connected back to back via two serial cables. I can ping > each one from the other one. The problem is that they do not show up when I > do a show cdp neighbor. I am sure that I am just overlooking something > small. > Thanks > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Port Flapping
http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/473/46.html john hudson wrote: > > Guy`s i have a problem .. > > some of my trunk port`s keep reporting this message. > > port 2/1 joined bridge port 2/1 > port 2/1 left bridge port 2/1 > > any idea`s > > (i think it`s simple,but just don`t know) > > john > > _ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: strange routes advertisement problem
Hmmm.. Looks like somobody inject this routes into IGP and does auto-summary at him exiting router. suaveguru wrote: > > hi all, > I have a question regarding announcement of routes via > BGP. > > Well we are an INTERNET BACKBONE FOR our customers who > are ISPs . > > As a result we have many upstream providers like AT&T > , ABOVENET etc. > > Recently our customers just have this new network > blocks namely 146.222.185.0 /24, 146.222.186.0 /24 and > 146.222.195.0 /24 > > At our side we have confirmed annoucing them > > At our upstream providers we have also confirmed that > they are announcing them > > but when I go to AT&T route server to do a bgp of > these networks they seem to only recognise the > supernet > > as show below > route-server.ip.att.net> sh ip bgp 146.222.185.0 > > BGP routing table entry for 146.222.0.0/16, version > 13292503 > Paths: (18 available, best #14) > Not advertised to any peer > 7018 174 12018, (received & used) > 12.123.29.249 from 12.123.29.249 (12.123.29.249) > Origin IGP, localpref 100, valid, external > Community: 0:5000 > > ... > > AT&T sees the /16 supernet and not the specific that I > am sending you > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. > http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: strange routes advertisement problem
You send several /24 routes, your upstream : - 1st choice: upstream doing atomic agregation - 2nd: upstream insert into IGP->.IGP->BGP with auto-summary thats default->at ATT You see class B net. By the way the ASpath is right? suaveguru wrote: > > thanks , but can you be more precise who does > auto-summmary and injecting routes into IGP my > customer or his customer or my upstream providers > > regards, > > suaveguru > --- Ilya Mazhara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hmmm.. Looks like somobody inject this routes into > > IGP > > and does auto-summary at him exiting router. > > > > suaveguru wrote: > > > > > > hi all, > > > I have a question regarding announcement of routes > > via > > > BGP. > > > > > > Well we are an INTERNET BACKBONE FOR our customers > > who > > > are ISPs . > > > > > > As a result we have many upstream providers like > > AT&T > > > , ABOVENET etc. > > > > > > Recently our customers just have this new network > > > blocks namely 146.222.185.0 /24, 146.222.186.0 /24 > > and > > > 146.222.195.0 /24 > > > > > > At our side we have confirmed annoucing them > > > > > > At our upstream providers we have also confirmed > > that > > > they are announcing them > > > > > > but when I go to AT&T route server to do a bgp of > > > these networks they seem to only recognise the > > > supernet > > > > > > as show below > > > route-server.ip.att.net> sh ip bgp 146.222.185.0 > > > > > > BGP routing table entry for 146.222.0.0/16, > > version > > > 13292503 > > > Paths: (18 available, best #14) > > > Not advertised to any peer > > > 7018 174 12018, (received & used) > > > 12.123.29.249 from 12.123.29.249 > > (12.123.29.249) > > > Origin IGP, localpref 100, valid, external > > > Community: 0:5000 > > > > > > ... > > > > > > AT&T sees the /16 supernet and not the specific > > that I > > > am sending you > > > > > > __ > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. > > > http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ > > > > > > _ > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. > http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
