RE: Three 24 Gbps Switching Engines at 18 Mpps (Layer2)!?! [7:54863]

2002-10-04 Thread Jarvis Steven C A1C 18 CS/SCBT

i think they're two different processes. the PPS is the direct amount of
calculations it can do and the GBPS would be the bandwidth. so if you had
18Mpps and 24GBPS, and you tried to switch 18M packets all of MTU (1500)
it would be 1800 * 1500 = 270 or 27GBPS so you exceed the
bandwidth that the sup card could handle, so with the higher bandwidth the
SUP can handle the same amount of packets but of larger sizes.
this is how i see it and i hope it's correct. if not please let me know.
steve

-Original Message-
From: Newell Ryan D SrA 18 CS/SCBT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10/4/02 7:17 AM
Subject: Three 24 Gbps Switching Engines at 18 Mpps (Layer2)!?! [7:54833]

What does this mean. I was looking at table 21-112. The difference
between
supervisor engine I and supervisor engine II is that the I has 24 Gbps
switching engine and the
II has three 24 Gbps. Yet the pps remains the same(18Mpps). Is there a
direct correlation between the switching fabric and the switching
throughput. If there is reading online that would be great.
Here is the link I was referring to. 

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/pcat/ca4000.htm

Ryan Newell




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=54863t=54863
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Cabling techniques between 4006 2550 [7:51411]

2002-08-14 Thread Jarvis Steven C A1C 18 CS/SCBT

The only GBIC that doesn't care whether or not you use MM or SM is the LX/LH
GBIC. There are two other types that might benifit your situation. The SX
GBIC is cheaper and is only compatabile w/ MM. I have seen instances where
I've caught link off of SM but only from a 3 meter patch cord. The distance
limitation of SX GBIC's is relevant to what micron core you have and the
modal frequencies of the fiber. The range of 62.5 micron and 160 MHz/km
frequency is 722 ft (220 m) and 50.0 micron and 500 MHz/km freq is 1804 ft
(550 m). Also there is the ZX model which is the nicest, it uses SM and can
shoot up to 62.1 miles (100 km). Depending on the size of the building I
would recommend using the SX cards. In most cases everything across the
board is cheaper, and (although I'm unsure of your situation) there doesn't
seem to be the need for the greater distance features of the other cards.
Hope this helps.

Steve Jarvis 

-Original Message-
From: Chuck's Long Road [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 8:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cabling techniques between 4006  2550 [7:51411]


2950 switches?

all Cisco GBIC's ( and in fact all GBIC's in general ) are SC connectors.
there are such thing as SC-ST patch cables, in case your contractor
terminates the fiber as ST.

Multimode fiber has a distance limitation of 1800 feet or so. You can use LX
GBIC's in conjunction with mode conditioning patch cables at both ends over
multimode fiber, and extend that distance quite a bit.

Or you can go with single mode.  I am not certain, but I think I read
someplace that single mode fiber on short runs requires an attenuation patch
cable at both ends

The GBIC's don't care much what kind of fiber you use, but you do need to be
aware of the gotcha's

I don't have the Cisco link hand, but a search on GBIC and distance
should get you to a couple of good guides on CCO.

HTH

--
coming soon:

www.chuckslongroad.info
John Brandis  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Hi All,

 Am building a new network and have some questions to answer, before I get
 cabling quotes. I have placed an order for a Cat 4006 at my core, and some
 20 2550 switch's at my distribution layer. Running a pretty simple
network.

 MY question is:

 1). To run between the 3 floors in my building, what type of fibre would
be
 best used


 2). What type of termination points of the fibre,, are required, so i can
 cnonnect to the 4006 and 2550 respectively.

 Thanks all for your answers last night about the VPN. I got it going after
 some pre-shared key spelling mistakes, and a bug in the VPN concentrator
 software was found.

 John
 Sydney, Australia


 **

 visit http://www.solution6.com
 visit http://www.eccountancy.com - everything for accountants.

 UK Customers - http://www.solution6.co.uk

 *
 This email message (and attachments) may contain information that is
 confidential to Solution 6. If you are not the intended recipient you
cannot
 use, distribute or copy the message or attachments.  In such a case,
please
 notify the sender by return email immediately and erase all copies of the
 message and attachments.  Opinions, conclusions and other information in
 this message and attachments that do not relate to the official business
of
 Solution 6 are neither given nor endorsed by it.
 *




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=51424t=51411
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]