RE: Which Router for BGP4 ??
I think the new 265x with 128 Mbytes is a good choice. -Mensaje original- De: suaveguru [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Enviado el: viernes, 09 de febrero de 2001 9:05 Para: John Neiberger; Robert Nelson-Cox; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asunto: Re: Which Router for BGP4 ?? Is 64mb enough? regards, suaveguru --- John Neiberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > why not a 3640? I've got BGP running on a 3640 and > the router barely knows > that it's turned on most of the time. The processor > usage is very low and > I've had zero problems so far. I do have 128 MB of > DRAM, though. That is > necessary. > > > >From: "John Gesualdi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >Reply-To: "John Gesualdi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >Subject: Which Router for BGP4 ?? > > >Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 10:40:18 + > > > > > > I need to run BGP4 with my ISP. Which > router would you recommend I > > >purchase? Should I go with a 3620,3640 or a > 2650,2651? Thanks. > > > > None of the above, unless you want to filter just > about everything that's > > > useful. You'll need about 128Meg for the full > table IIRC. > > > > > > Why do you *need* to run BGP4? > > > > Rob./ > > > > > > > >-- > > > > > > > > >John A. Gesualdi,CCNP, CCDP > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >The Providence Journal Company > > >Phone (401)277-8133 > > >Pager (401)785-6938 > > > > > > > > >_ > > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations > to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > _ > > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at > http://www.hotmail.com. > > > > _ > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > ___ > Send a cool gift with your E-Card > http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/ > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dialer problems
Hi there, I have a problem with my dialer: 00:17:57: BR1/1 DDR: has 2 ongoing call(s), maximum allowed call(s) 2 = on pool 5, exceeded max 00:17:58: BRI1/1: wait for isdn carrier timeout, call id=3D0x803D 00:17:58: BR1/1 DDR: Attempting to dial 884400507 00:18:04: BRI1/1: wait for isdn carrier timeout, call id=3D0x803E interface BRI1/1 no ip address encapsulation ppp load-interval 30 dialer pool-member 5 priority 90 max-link 2 isdn switch-type basic-net3 ppp authentication chap callin interface Dialer1 ip address 192.168.20.2 255.255.255.0 encapsulation ppp no ip route-cache no ip mroute-cache load-interval 30 dialer pool 5 dialer remote-name pppSERVER dialer idle-timeout 18000 dialer enable-timeout 2 dialer string 884401044 dialer string 884401000 dialer string 884400507 dialer hold-queue 100 dialer load-threshold 1 outbound dialer max-call 6 dialer-group 1 ppp authentication chap callin ppp multilink Any ideas? Should I use a "dialer wait-for-carrier"?? Thanks in advance. Javier Castillo Alc=EDbar - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Alhambra Systems, S.A. - www.alhsys.com c/Albasanz 14, 28037 Madrid Tel.: +34 91 787 23 00 Fax.: +34 91 787 23 01 _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Dialer problems
Hi, I have 5 channels connected: BR1/0:1 Sync PPP- Bundle: Di1 BR1/0:2 Sync PPP- Bundle: Di1 BR1/1:1 Sync PPP- Bundle: Di1 <- bri1/1:2 is not connected BR1/3:1 Sync PPP- Bundle: Di1 BR1/3:2 Sync PPP- Bundle: Di1 The Bri1/1:2 is not connected, but the router says > 00:17:57: BR1/1 DDR: has 2 ongoing call(s), maximum allowed call(s) 2 = > on > pool 5, exceeded max > 00:17:58: BRI1/1: wait for isdn carrier timeout, call id=3D0x803D > 00:17:58: BR1/1 DDR: Attempting to dial 884400507 > 00:18:04: BRI1/1: wait for isdn carrier timeout, call id=3D0x803E > regards. -Mensaje original- De: Tony van Ree [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Enviado el: lunes, 19 de marzo de 2001 22:28 Para: Javier Castillo Alcibar; Cisco Mailing List (E-mail) Asunto: Re: Dialer problems Hi, How many 'B' channels do you have to dial out on. More than two on a BRI. I don't think so. I would assume then your third call is waiting for a spare channel. You might need more than one BRI. Just some thoughts, Teunis, Hobart, Tasmania Australia On Monday, March 19, 2001 at 06:28:21 PM, Javier Castillo Alcibar wrote: > Hi there, > > I have a problem with my dialer: > > 00:17:57: BR1/1 DDR: has 2 ongoing call(s), maximum allowed call(s) 2 = > on > pool 5, exceeded max > 00:17:58: BRI1/1: wait for isdn carrier timeout, call id=3D0x803D > 00:17:58: BR1/1 DDR: Attempting to dial 884400507 > 00:18:04: BRI1/1: wait for isdn carrier timeout, call id=3D0x803E > > interface BRI1/1 > no ip address > encapsulation ppp > load-interval 30 > dialer pool-member 5 priority 90 max-link 2 > isdn switch-type basic-net3 > ppp authentication chap callin > > interface Dialer1 > ip address 192.168.20.2 255.255.255.0 > encapsulation ppp > no ip route-cache > no ip mroute-cache > load-interval 30 > dialer pool 5 > dialer remote-name pppSERVER > dialer idle-timeout 18000 > dialer enable-timeout 2 > dialer string 884401044 > dialer string 884401000 > dialer string 884400507 > dialer hold-queue 100 > dialer load-threshold 1 outbound > dialer max-call 6 > dialer-group 1 > ppp authentication chap callin > ppp multilink > > > Any ideas? Should I use a "dialer wait-for-carrier"?? > > Thanks in advance. > > > Javier Castillo Alc=EDbar - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Alhambra Systems, S.A. - www.alhsys.com > c/Albasanz 14, 28037 Madrid > Tel.: +34 91 787 23 00 > Fax.: +34 91 787 23 01 > > > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- www.tasmail.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problem with my BRI interface
Hi all, you know what these messages mean?? 13w4d: ISDN BR3/1: Incoming call id =3D 0x1DDE 13w4d: ISDN BR3/1: received HOST_INCOMING_CALL call_id 0x1DDE 13w4d: ISDN BR3/1: Incoming call rejected due to screening. 13w4d: ISDN BR3/1: received HOST_DISCONNECT_ACK call_id 0x1DDE 13w4d: ISDN BR3/1: Error: Unexpected Disconnect_Ack - call id 0x1DDE937192228 A remote router can not connect to my router, and I see these messages when I debug isdn events Any ideas? Javier Castillo Alc=EDbar - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Alhambra Systems, S.A. - www.alhsys.com c/Albasanz 14, 28037 Madrid Tel.: +34 91 787 23 00 Fax.: +34 91 787 23 01 _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problem with Dialers+BRI
Hello, I have a strange problem with my DDR config: albufera-int#sh users Line User Host(s) Idle Location *130 vty 0idle 00:00:00 190.191.0.1 BR1/0:1 Sync PPP- Bundle: Di1 BR1/0:2 Sync PPP- Bundle: Di1 BR1/1:1 Sync PPP- Bundle: Di1 notice that BRI1/1:2 is not connected because: albufera-int#debug dialer events Dial on demand events debugging is on albufera-int#term monitor albufera-int# 4d23h: BR1/1 DDR: has 2 ongoing call(s), maximum allowed call(s) 2 on = pool 5, exceeded max! but only bri1/1:1 is connected =BF?=BF? any ideas why the router believes that bri1/1.2 is connected too? Cheers. Javier Castillo Alc=EDbar - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Alhambra Systems, S.A. - www.alhsys.com c/Albasanz 14, 28037 Madrid Tel.: +34 913041800 Fax.: +34 913273131 _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help with FTP + NAT
Hello, I am trying to configure NAT for FTP service, but I don't know how. I have a router with 192.168.251.14 in the outside interface, and = 10.0.0.1 in the inside interface. I want that the incoming ftp connections from = the outsise(internet) to be translated to my internal server: 10.0.0.2 ---FTP->(192.168.251.14) ROUTER(10.0.0.1) ---FTP XLATED-->SERVER(10.0.0.2) Any ideas? Cheers. Javier Castillo Alc=EDbar - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Alhambra Systems, S.A. - www.alhsys.com c/Albasanz 14, 28037 Madrid Tel.: +34 913041800 Fax.: +34 913273131 _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ISDN problems
Hi all !!, I have a dialer with two dialer string defined: int dial 1 dialer string 914401000 dialer string 914400507 ... The question is, what these messages mean?? 6d02h: ISDN BR1/1: TX -> SETUP pd =3D 8 callref =3D 0x5D 6d02h: Bearer Capability i =3D 0x8890 6d02h: Channel ID i =3D 0x83 6d02h: Calling Party Number i =3D 0x80, '914401000', = Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown =20 6d02h: Called Party Number i =3D 0x80, '914400507', = Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown the router tries to call 914401000 but finally calls to 914400507 ?? Thanks in advance. Javier. Javier Castillo Alc=EDbar - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Alhambra Systems, S.A. - www.alhsys.com c/Albasanz 14, 28037 Madrid Tel.: +34 91 787 23 00 Fax.: +34 91 787 23 01 _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
