Re: trial copy of ciscoworks
Try http://www.cisco.com/kobayashi/sw-center/netmgmt/cww/cwwindows.html Jeff - Original Message - From: swapnil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Paul Borghese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Cisco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2000 12:04 AM Subject: Re: trial copy of ciscoworks > I didn't find there. do you have any links > > - Original Message - > From: Paul Borghese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Cisco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, July 24, 2000 2:54 AM > Subject: Re: trial copy of ciscoworks > > > > have you tried cisco.com? > > - Original Message - > > From: "swapnil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "cgs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2000 11:28 AM > > Subject: trial copy of ciscoworks > > > > > > > from where can I get trial copy of ciscoworks for winnt. > > > > > > swapnil > > > > > > ___ > > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > ___ > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ___ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 29xx switch
Rayza, It would seem strange that you are having collisions on FastEthernet0/7 yet it is set to Full Duplex. Did you change the duplex settings and not clear the counters ? Do you have a problem that you are troubleshooting or is this just a test :-) Jeff Humphreys - Original Message - From: rayza manesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, July 28, 2000 8:36 AM Subject: 29xx switch > Group, > > How would you interpret / translate these entries and if you see any trace > of error how would you troubleshoot it? > > Thank you for responding > > > 2924c#show controllers ethernet-controller > > Transmit FastEthernet0/5 Receive > 538094835 Bytes 3906491772 Bytes >3624591 Unicast frames5028897 Unicast frames > 281400 Multicast frames0 Multicast frames >1185752 Broadcast frames25235 Broadcast frames > 0 Discarded frames2 No bandwidth frames > 0 Too old frames 0 No buffers frames > 109875 Deferred frames 4 No dest, unicast > 80754 1 collision frames 0 No dest, multicast > 82613 2 collision frames 0 No dest, broadcast > 29839 3 collision frames 0 Alignment errors > 14630 4 collision frames 0 FCS errors > 64619 5 collision frames 187 Collision fragments > 92952 6 collision frames > 34412 7 collision frames 1560598 Undersize frames > 5250 8 collision frames564263 Minimum size frames >333 9 collision frames 1281283 65 to 127 byte frames > 8 10 collision frames487990 128 to 255 byte frames > 0 11 collision frames155193 256 to 511 byte frames > 0 12 collision frames352075 512 to 1023 byte frames > 0 13 collision frames 2213332 1024 to 1518 byte frames > 0 14 collision frames 0 Oversize frames > 0 15 collision frames > 0 Excessive collisions > 0 Late collisions > *** > > 2924c#sh controller switch > > Switch registers: > > Device Type : 0x00030073 > Congestion Threshold : 0x91C0 > Peak Total Allocation: 0x0224 > Total Allocation : 0x > Peak Total Bandwidth : 0x09D8 > Total Bandwidth : 0x > Total Bandwidth Limit: 0x0A29 > Lower Bandwidth Limit: 0x003F > Switch Mode : 0x0014 > > Cumulative garbage collection collected 0x6E7C buffers. > > > ** > FastEthernet0/7 is up, line protocol is up > Hardware is Fast Ethernet, address is 0050.2ae1.e047 (bia 0050.2ae1.e047) > Description: Firewall > MTU 1500 bytes, BW 10 Kbit, DLY 100 usec, rely 255/255, load 1/255 > Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set, keepalive not set > Full-duplex, 100Mb/s, 100BaseTX/FX > ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00 > Last input never, output 00:00:01, output hang never > Last clearing of "show interface" counters never > Queueing strategy: fifo > Output queue 0/40, 0 drops; input queue 0/75, 0 drops > 5 minute input rate 243000 bits/sec, 33 packets/sec > 5 minute output rate 26000 bits/sec, 33 packets/sec > 4936116 packets input, 3850732772 bytes, 0 no buffer > Received 3659 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles > 4404 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 10 ignored, 0 abort > 0 watchdog, 0 multicast > 0 input packets with dribble condition detected > 5880690 packets output, 945033918 bytes, 0 underruns > 0 output errors, 3286 collisions, 3 interface resets > 0 babbles, 0 late collision, 7548 deferred > 0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier > 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out > > > > > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com > > ___ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: where do live
Jim, Don't come to St. Louis, Mo. It's hot and humid in the summer, cold in snowy in the winter, and it floods in the Spring. However, for $3500 per month you could get a mansion with a pool. I'm talking a 3000 - 3500 sq ft house and we even have basements :-) Jeff Humphreys - Original Message - From: Jim Bond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2000 9:02 PM Subject: where do live > Hello, > > I'm so tired of working 60-70 hours a week; I'm so > tried of paying $3,500 mortgage per month for a 1,300 > sqf home; I'm so tired of driving on that crowed > highway (if you consider 5MPH is high). I'm thinking > moving out of silicon valley bay area. > > Where, in US, can I find a place that is not cold in > winter, not hot in summer, no too much snow, no too > much rain, IT job market not too bad? I know it's > difficult to find such a place, but close? > > Thanks in advance. > > > Jim > > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Kick off your party with Yahoo! Invites. > http://invites.yahoo.com/ > > ___ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 802.3 frame and full-duplex
Stephen, First, SD is the last octet of the preamble. You get 7 octets of 0x55 and the final octet is 0xD5 which is signaling the start of the Data Link frame, hence SD. On the switch question, if port A,B, and C are sending packets to port D I think that the output queue on D would accumulate the packets if the offered load is greater than the link's capacity. However, the queue is not infinite and eventually you will have to start dropping packets. Jeff Humphreys - Original Message - From: Stephen Ede <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2000 7:28 PM Subject: 802.3 frame and full-duplex > I have 2 questions to submit here... > > 1) If there are several nodes attached to a 10/100 switch, and all NICs are > in full duplex mode, this means that CSMA/CD is not in effect, loopback is > turned off, and any station can transmit and receive concurrently. But what > happens when 2 or 3 of these stations want to transmit to one particular > station concurrently? Is the traffic buffered in the switch? Or is CSMA/CD > still in effect, even in full duplex mode, where they will sense the wire > and wait if busy? > > 2) In the diagram below of an 802.3 frame, what does the "SD" potion > signify? > > | Preamble | SD | Dest. Add. | Source Add. | Length | DSAP | SSAP | Control > | Data | FCS | > > Thank you in advance. > > ___ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Switches !!!
Sorry, I was thinking RSM and typed RSP but I don't see much of a difference in there functionality. I agree with Howard's description of the RSP and RSM. We pretty much just took a 7500 RSP and modified it to interface to the Catalyst bus. Jeff Humphreys - Original Message - From: Howard C. Berkowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 14, 2000 7:32 PM Subject: RE: Switches !!! > >I have to say that I'm a little confused my self! > >RSP "Route Switch Processor" is used by the 7500's > >RSM "Route Switch Module" can be used by Cat5500 for example. > >We have currently 7 5500's with RSM's, and I tell you it is doing all of the > >routing for us to include VLANs. Lot's of then. > >What I am trying to say here is that I can Route between VLAN's just fine > >with an RSM. I think that someone missed typed RSP with RSM. > >Paulo > > > Nahhh... > > The guts of a RSM and RSP are the same. The RSM connects to a Cat5000 > bus and can have its own WAN interface. The RSP connects to a CBus > in a 7x00. There are also faster RSPs available than RSMs. > > ___ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Using Queing over the Internet
Greetings, I am actually working with a company that will be offering a product with an SLA over the internet. One caveat is that you can not be more than one ISP away from the company on either end. They will be using GRE tunnels to the ingress router, then they will create MPLS Traffic Engineering Tunnels (TE) to transverse their network to the egress router and finally GRE tunnels to far end customers site. They have built a nationwide fiber optic network to support this product and it should be interesting to see if businesses choose to pay a premium for the SLA. Thanks, Jeff - Original Message - From: Erick B. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Chuck Larrieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 18, 2000 9:12 AM Subject: RE: Using Queing over the Internet > > Chuck, > > My understanding/knowledge of QoS and the like is the > same as yours. I'm not a QoS, MPLS, Traffic > Engineering Guru but I was just explaining the basic > issues with what he was asking for. I've read the QoS > book (the skinny one with the blue cover) and the book > basically has same conclusion. I'm not sure of all the > details of MPLS VPNs but that is what people are > talking about on other lists when it comes to VPNs and > QoS stuff. It's going to be awhile before QoS, etc is > really effective across the 'net end-to-end (if ever). > > > --- Chuck Larrieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Erik, I've been trying to finish up the QoS book > > I've been working on for a > > couple of weeks. Is your understanding of QoS > > across the internet along the > > lines of mine? I.e. while many ISP's will offer > > some form of service level > > agreements ( SLA's ), they will also tell you flat > > out that the SLA is good > > only on the particular ISP network. Traffic too and > > from the ISP network > > falls outside of the SLA. And in fact the internet > > itself is generally > > unreliable in terms of QoS, and it will be many > > years before RSVP and other > > QoS services will be available end to end across the > > net. > > > > In the case you mention below, using MLPS VPN's, > > what are some of the > > caveats? How would you go about setting up such a > > thing if your traffic is > > going through three or four different ISP's? > > > > Chuck > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > > Erick B. > > Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2000 7:10 PM > > To: Chuck Larrieu; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: Using Queing over the Internet > > > > > > I think he was asking how queuing works over the > > Internet in a VPN. This would fall under QoS and to > > acheive QoS then it has to be set up properly across > > all points from end to end. You may want to look at > > MPLS VPNs since MPLS uses traffic shaping/QoS. > > > > Basically, you can have queuing on router A and > > traffic going through it will be properly > > queued/priortized, etc and then this traffic reaches > > router B, C, etc and they have to have similar rules > > for queueing/prioritzation else that router/device > > will forward the traffic normally. If you're using > > one > > of the newer QoS/Traffic Engineering protocols on > > your > > network then it may be different depending on a > > number > > of things. Note, I'm no guru when it comes to > > QoS/TE/MPLS, etc. > > > > --- Chuck Larrieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > If I understand the question correctly, the answer > > > is that queueing is > > > defined on the physical interface, not the logical > > > or tunnel interface. > > > > > > Priority queueing can allow you some refinement > > > based on an access list. > > > or other things ) > > > > > > Custom queueing works with protocol and interface > > > traffic, and allows for > > > some granular control of amount of traffic. > > > > > > There are things to be aware of with any form of > > > queueing that you may use. > > > There is a good discussion on queueing at: > > > > > > > > > http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/qos_ > > > c/qcprt2/qcdconmg.htm > > > most definitely watch the wrap > > > > > > Chuck > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2000 6:10 AM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Using Queing over the Internet > > > > > > > > > Can you setup a VPN queing between two sites? > > > > > > __ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! > > Messenger. > > http://im.yahoo.com/ > > > > ___ > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > __
