Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX
Right on Jim ""Jim McDowell"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 000701c0af62$7288d600$376b84d1@dude">news:000701c0af62$7288d600$376b84d1@dude... > This archaic line of thought has been around for ages...in every conceivable > organization, since Ally Oop was a fetus...for example, "I had to walk five > miles to school every day when I was a kid", or "The old corps was better". > > Some people are lucky enough to find an employer who will hire a no-nothing > and train them into a qualified network administrator. Others aren't...they > have to work for certifications and then get employed in the networking > field. For most, having a certification just means they are trying to be > better (better job, advancement, change careers, etc)what can be wrong > with that? In the long run it is always your skill, dedication, > perseverance, knowledge, attitude, etc., etc. that get you ahead, not the > perceived value of your certification. > > > - Original Message - > From: "Mike Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2001 3:51 PM > Subject: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX > > > > I will probably get yelled at for this one but... > > > > I am a CCNA, CCDA, CCNP, and yes going after the CCIE. > > So up front I am not against certs. > > > > I am becoming aware of more and more people becoming > > Cisco certified and not know enough to go and actually > > do the work. Our company has and is interviewing for > > network folks, I have the opportunity to interview > > these people to verify technical experience. I have > > had CCNA, CCNP, and yes even CCIE written folks who > > could not tell me what they 'should' acutally know. > > > > > > This scares me because I am also working hard toward > > my certs and the CCIE. But it has been proven and is > > showing up more that these people are becoming "paper" > > Cisco folks, as in the paper MCSE. > > > > I know and hope the CCIE LAB and title will remain as > > difficult if not more so in the future. I for one do > > not want to spend a year of my life gaining the CCIE > > title to be one among thousands who also have it. > > > > That is my insite and hope Cisco will > > try to make it more difficult to obtain the CCNP/DP > > and not become another MCSE program. > > > > > > > > __ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. > > http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ > > > > _ > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Guys, Help me urgently
Shahid, Check out Caslow. "Shahid Muhammad Shafi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Dear forum > I am setting up a lab for frame relay switching using > the secenario such that I have one 7000 router acting > as fr switch and three routers such as one is acting > as Hub and two are acting as spokes. The interface > serial1/1 of 7000 is connected to the hub so i have > two routes statement there > > like > > frame-relay route 100 interface serial1/0 100 > frame-relay route 200 interface serial1/2 200 > > on interface serial1/0 > frame-relay route 100 interface serial1/1 100 > > on interface serial1/2 > frame-relay route 200 interface serial1/1 200 > > i am getting only three actives and not one. > > Checked all the cabling, still not working > > Kindly help me out > > Regards > Shahid > > > > = > Shahid Muhammad Shafi > MSc Telecommunications Candidate > University of Colorado Boulder > BSEE(GIKI),MCSE+I,CNA,CCNA,CCNP > > Please help feed hungry people worldwide http://www.hungersite.com/ > A small thing each of us can do to help others less fortunate than ourselves > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. > http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FW: xmodem to flash card
-Original Message- From: Feigenbaum, Jerrold Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 3:38 PM To: 'Roberts, Timothy' Subject: RE: xmodem to flash card Tim, you need to xmodem to slot0:(pcmcia flash card) rather then bootflash:(internal flash) If you are going to infact xmodem and don't want to wait around for hours for the xmodem download at 9600 baud then at the command prompt type xmodem -cs 38400 and also set your terminal program to the same 38400 speed. Another way to do it is if you have a gig port on the boxB (one your wanting to add the flash to) and a gig port on another boxA set them both in the same vlan and then attach a laptop to the switch port of boxA and put it in the same vlan and network. Connect the two gig ports via fiber. Then you can ping the BoxB from your laptop to check connectivity.. Once you have connectivity you can do Copy tftp flash... When it asks you Bootflash:? type in slot0 that will point to your external pcmcia flash card. Hope this helps Tim. Jerrold -Original Message- From: Roberts, Timothy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 2:41 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: xmodem to flash card Is it possible to transfer an ios image via xmodem to a flash card? I do not see available commands within xmodem that will allow that. I can transfer to internal flash. I need to transfer to flash card due to a lack of internal flash. Thanks _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: LSA type-5 suppression across OSPF area boundaries?? [7:12235]
I agree with the last post. We did this similar simulation in a lab setup for pre-production implementation on our network. NSSA area works great.Keeps LSA type 7's in the NSSA and then if you want you can translate type 7's to type 5 LSA's at the ABR to area 0.0.0.0 Good reference is John T. Moy's OSPF Anatomy of an Internet Routing Protocol and Cisco Press Routing TCP/IP Volume I.John's book gives you the industry standard view of OSPF and the Cisco Press book will give you Cisco specific issues as well. Check out Chapter 9 page 482 in the Cisco book. Hope this helps! Jerrold -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Allen Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 8:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: LSA type-5 suppression across OSPF area boundaries?? [7:12218] What about making the area between the ASBR and ABR a not so stubby area (NSSA). If these are Cisco routers you could then use the summary-address command on the ASBR to summarize the external routes. The ABR will then convert the type 7 NSSA LSAs to type 5 LSAs. What do you think wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > hi all, > > have a problem that has been nagging at me for a good long time now... > > say you have a pair of ABRs sitting at an OSPF area boundary, and an ASBR is > originating Type-5 LSAs from inside the non-backbone area. Is there an easy > way to suppress the propagation of the type-5s outside the area? I would > have a range statement on the ABRs to advertise the area aggregate, I just > want to suppress the more specifics. > > I have tried using 'distribute-list out ' which would do it for > me, but for some reason IOS won't allow this with OSPF: > > router(config)#router os 1 > router(config-router)#distribute-list 1 out FastEthernet 0/0 > % Interface not allowed with OUT for OSPF > router(config-router)# > > I suppose that allowing this could potentially screw up routing if done > without some care, but JunOS lets you do exactly this sort of thing - you > can produce some wacky policies, but at least you have the option ;-) > > btw - I know I could prolly do this with multiple OSPF instances and > redistribute between them, but I *really* don't want to get into this level > of complexity. > > thanks in advance - this one has been driving me mad > > Andy Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12235&t=12235 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: LSA type-5 suppression across OSPF area boundaries?? [7:12236]
Setting up the ASBR in an NSSA area will work. We connected a Nortel CVX to two Extreme Networks Layer 3 switches acting as the ABR'S then off to two more layer 2 switches then to two Cisco 7200 routers in a lab. We were able to keep the LSA type 7's in the NSSA area. It works just fine. With the Extreme L3 boxes we could use the translate option to translate LSA type 7 to LSA type 5 through the ABR's. Jerrold -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Neiberger Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 5:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: LSA type-5 suppression across OSPF area boundaries?? [7:12212] Could you accomplish this by making the area containing the ASBR a stubby area? IIRC, you can put an ASBR inside a stubby area but the Type-5 LSAs will not leave the area. I'm not sure about that, but I'd swear I read that somewhere recently. Okay, I just checked this in Giles, 2nd edition. According to him, the above is true. But who knows if it works in the real world. Good luck! John >>> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" 7/12/01 1:58:11 PM >>> hi all, have a problem that has been nagging at me for a good long time now... say you have a pair of ABRs sitting at an OSPF area boundary, and an ASBR is originating Type-5 LSAs from inside the non-backbone area. Is there an easy way to suppress the propagation of the type-5s outside the area? I would have a range statement on the ABRs to advertise the area aggregate, I just want to suppress the more specifics. I have tried using 'distribute-list out ' which would do it for me, but for some reason IOS won't allow this with OSPF: router(config)#router os 1 router(config-router)#distribute-list 1 out FastEthernet 0/0 % Interface not allowed with OUT for OSPF router(config-router)# I suppose that allowing this could potentially screw up routing if done without some care, but JunOS lets you do exactly this sort of thing - you can produce some wacky policies, but at least you have the option ;-) btw - I know I could prolly do this with multiple OSPF instances and redistribute between them, but I *really* don't want to get into this level of complexity. thanks in advance - this one has been driving me mad Andy Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12236&t=12236 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: help, catalyst 5500 console connectivity. [7:16523]
use a straight thru cable...Depends on the sup eng. as to what cable you use. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Anand Ghody Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 8:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: help, catalyst 5500 console connectivity. [7:16523] I just bought a catalyst 5505 from ebay and I am having trouble with the console port. I am using one of the console cables that I use with some other cisco routers. My hyperterminal terminal setting are 9600-8-none-1, no flow control. the switch when booted goes through its diagnostics and boots fine. everything looks good except I can not connect to it to configure it. Do the cataylst use a pinout different than that of a router. Any one got any ideas? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=17086&t=16523 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
