Re: Motels in NC - Any?? [7:60632]
Use Hotwire to do a search in the Raleigh/Durham area. I saved alot on my hotel when I took the exam. Logan, Harold wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Wingate inn is pretty much the preferred hotel. Costs around 70-80 per night, but it's easily worth it. Their contact info is in the email that cisco sounds out with their preferred hotels. -Original Message- From: Cisco Nuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 2:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT:Motels in NC - Any?? [7:60632] Hello,Does any one of any reasonably priced motels near the Cisco CCIE Lab exam area in NC?Thank you.Sincerely,CN -- -- Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=60645t=60632 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: STILL Off Topic - VOTE [7:56758]
Priscilla, I agree that if the new computerized systems actually work it will be a triumph. Unfortunately, I'm too pessimistic about it. We all know what happens to end users when an application is changed, or even an OS, confusion reigns supreme. I think it's going to be a massive boondoggle on election day. The segment of the population that votes the most is also the segment that is going to be the most confused by the mere introduction of a computer into the process. I think as time goes on computerized voting will be the way it's done almost everywhere, but for now, I'm dreading the lawsuits after election day. This brings us to your points regarding these systems and what we actually know about them. I thought I remember reading somewhere that after the 2000 election MIT and Stanford did a study regarding new methods of voting and found that the computerized system wasn't a secure as everyone thought it would be. I'm not sure if that's correct, but I think I remember reading that. Not knowing the process of how these systems work also makes me wonder how secret your ballot is. If a record is kept of each person voting, how hard would it be to keep track of who they voted for? I agree with you that not enough has been made known about them. Which brings us to the final problem. What happens when the voters complain the network is slow. :-) Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message news:200211050315.DAA24012;groupstudy.com... Yes, indeed, VOTE. But, shall we take odds on the number of problems that will occur? :-) Many states are using new computerized systems. If these actually work in most cases, it will be a huge triumph for Information Technology. Back in 2000 I tried to get a discussion going about what an awful job IT did in letting states linger with 1970s punch-card technology. There were some general lessons to be learned there about the need to get rid of legacy technologies, etc.. But people thought I wanted to start a political discussion and refused to have a best practices discussion. I was bummed. ;-) But that's OK. It wasn't really Cisco-focused. But what do we know about these new computerized touch-screen systems? I heard that they were paperless. So is the data going to be transmited to a server somewhere? Are the devices connected via wireless or wired? Is there a Cisco switch? A router? How does the data get to the state authorities? How was the new system tested? What are the security issues, not to mention the reliability issues? Does it scare anyone else that we don't know anything about these systems? Shouldn't something about them be published? Did they go through a code reivew by experts in programming and security? Accoring to this article, Theresa LePore, the Queen of Chad, Supervisor of Elections in Palm Beach County, Florida, signed an agreement with Sequoia Voting Systems, the makers of Florida's new system, to protect their trade secrets, which effectively prohibits any party contesting an election from examining the machine or its programming. Scary. http://www.commondreams.org/views02/0805-07.htm Then again, maybe everything will go smoothly. If it does, it's a great credit to the programmers and network administrators who made it work and troubleshooted problems that happened in real-time. ___ Priscilla Oppenheimer www.troubleshootingnetworks.com www.priscilla.com The Long and Winding Road wrote: For those United States residents, Tuesday is election day. No politics here. No flames here. You have a right and a privilege that is rare in today's world. Please take the appropriate amount of time to get to your polling place and exercise the right that many have fought and died for. Your vote DOES count. -- www.chuckslongroad.info Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=56895t=56758 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Off Topic - of general interest [7:56500]
To me, it would be corporate welfare if the government subsidized the actual investment into the telecom industry. If private investment is encouraged to head that way because of the tax code or deregulation the so be it. It's not Washington's money first. IMHO Jim Tim Metz wrote in message news:200210300736.HAA14144;groupstudy.com... Chuck, didn't this strike you as corporate welfare? Tim The Long and Winding Road wrote in message news:200210300050.AAA32516;groupstudy.com... saw this one come through today. Personally, I agree with the premise. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;3953254;5700831;g?http://207.27.3.33/2/ watch the wrap -- www.chuckslongroad.info Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=56530t=56500 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dual CCIE and Recertification [7:54799]
I know if you have one CCIE and pass a second one it counts as recertifiying, however does this mean you would have to recertify both in the future by taking the written for each one, For example, Security and Rs? Jim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=54799t=54799 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: rate limit plz help [7:47133]
Actually, x is in bits and y and z are in bytes. wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... When you use - rate-limit input x y z conform-action transmit , x is in bytes and y and z are in bits HTH Dom. kaushalender Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 21/06/2002 14:07 Please respond to kaushalender To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:rate limit plz help [7:47133] hi group, I have a customer who has take 64 up link and burstable 128 downlink .Problem is that i give sh int command it is showing 5 minute input rate 148000 bits/sec, 218 packets/sec 5 minute output rate 62000 bits/sec, 36 packets/sec But i have configure following on serial interface Serial0/2 mtu 2048 bandwidth 512 ip address 216.252.243.1 255.255.255.252 ip access-group 107 in ip access-group 107 out no ip proxy-arp ip wccp web-cache redirect out ip wccp web-cache redirect in rate-limit input 64000 71680 71680 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop rate-limit output 64000 131072 131072 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop encapsulation ppp can some body help me to tell .why this is happening when i have configured 64 kbps on uplick of customer which input traffic for my router is showing 148kbps and out traffic 62 kbps why in traffic is exceeding Thanx in advance kaushalender Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47145t=47133 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: major BCMSN(504) question who passed it?
I passed this test yesterday. Just as the previous post said it's mainly a conceptual test. Know your MLS, VTP, STP, and VLAN stuff. You'll do fine. Jim ""Favio T"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I went to brainbuzz.com and printed out there cramsession sheet (640-504) when I looked at it, it said that I have to know Catalyst 3000 switches BUT I have the BCMSN Cisco press book by Karen WEbb and Catalyst start at 4000 not one word on 3000 switches should I tell brainbuzz to buzz off or what ? thanks for your help can't wait to pass this test any tips on study material thanks a million [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
