回复: Creating Multiple Interfaces on an Ethernet Port
Hi, In fact,you can add several subinterface on a physical fastethernet port of a router with these subinterface encapsulated ISL or Dot1q,and give each subinterface a IP address.Many NIC can support 802.1q or ISL,so you can devide the physical NIC to several virtual NIC encapsulated ISL or 802.1q,and give each of them ip address,the defauft gateway ip of the router's subinterface. Johnny Sun -Original Message- ·¢¼þÈË: Kenneth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ÐÂÎÅ×é: groupstudy.cisco ÊÕ¼þÈË: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ÈÕÆÚ: 2001Äê2ÔÂ22ÈÕ 10:29 Ö÷Ìâ: Re: Creating Multiple Interfaces on an Ethernet Port >Oh yeah. Nobody said it's a layer 3 issue. It's obviously an IOS issue since >it doesn't make sense why it can't be configured that way. NT servers can >have one NIC with multiple IP addresses. > >Yonkerbonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... >> You can add IPX addresses to it, so it doesn't seem to >> be an issue of layer 3 addresses. I think it just a >> matter of Cisco IOS supporting it. >> >> Michael >> >> --- Kenneth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > try adding an ip address to it. >> > >> > "Tim Lovelace" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in >> > message >> > >> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... >> > > This seems to be incorrect. I tried this on a >> > router I had spare and below >> > > are hte results. It may be a newer feature, I am >> > to lazy to look on CCO. >> > > >> > > Tim >> > > >> > > >> > > Router2#sh ver >> > > Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software >> > > IOS (tm) C2600 Software (C2600-I-M), Version >> > 12.0(15), RELEASE SOFTWARE >> > > (fc1) >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Router2#config t >> > > Enter configuration commands, one per line. End >> > with CNTL/Z. >> > > Router2(config)#int e0/0 >> > > Router2(config-if)#int e0/0.1 >> > > Router2(config-subif)# >> > > 00:01:29: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Ethernet0/0, >> > changed state to up >> > > Router2(config-subif)#^Z >> > > Router2#sh run >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > interface Ethernet0/0 >> > > ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.128 >> > > no ip directed-broadcast >> > > ! >> > > interface Ethernet0/0.1 >> > > no ip directed-broadcast >> > > ! >> > > >> > > -Original Message- >> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >> > > Brian >> > > Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 9:29 PM >> > > To: Chris Wornell >> > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > Subject: Re: Creating Multiple Interfaces on an >> > Ethernet Port >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > the only way you can create sub interfaces on >> > ethernet is to use dot1q or >> > > ISL encapsulation on a FastEthernet interface >> > (VLANs) >> > > >> > > brian >> > > >> > > >> > > On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Chris Wornell wrote: >> > > >> > > > Hello, >> > > > >> > > > I've found out you can't create multiple >> > interfaces on an ethernet port >> > > > apparently. I was wondering why this is >> > exactly? I know you can >> > > accomplish >> > > > the same on serial lines using pvc's but it >> > seems odd you can't do it on >> > > > ethernet. I know there are ethernet only >> > networks and the ip secondary >> > > > command doesn't seem right compared to creating >> > a new interface. >> > > > >> > > > Chris Wornell >> > > > Technical Support >> > > > MM Internet http://mminternet.com >> > > > 888-654-4971 >> > > > CCNA, CCDA, CSE >> > > > >> > > > _ >> > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >> > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations >> > to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > > >> > > >> > > --- >> > > I'm
Re: 4 Ethernet Int
Hi, Use "Cisco 3620" plus two "NM-2FE2W" module,so you get 4 fastethernet ports and 4 wan interface card slots. But in fact I often use Cisco 3662 for its performance.For Cisco 3662 has 225MHz CPU,while 3640 100MHz and 3620 80MHz. Johnny Sun -Original Message- ·¢¼þÈË: Michael Snyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ÐÂÎÅ×é: groupstudy.cisco ÊÕ¼þÈË: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ÈÕÆÚ: 2001Äê2ÔÂ22ÈÕ 23:27 Ö÷Ìâ: Re: 4 Ethernet Int >Shoot this one down. > >2621, both FE's trunked and channeled to a 3524. Four Vlans on the 3524. >Done. > > >Assuming the you can trunk and etherchannel at 2621. > > > > >"Jason Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... >> nope FE modules are not supported by the 2600 range... >> >> go ahead try it. >> >> It is to do with the architecture of the router. >> >> Regards, >> >> Jason Baker >> Network Engineer >> MCSE, CCNA >> >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Michael Snyder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 11:45 AM >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: Re: 4 Ethernet Int >> >> >> How about a 2621 with two FE WIC's? >> >> >> >> ""Avila, James"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >> 32CC5B62AF0BD2119E4C00A0C9663E224378C7@MAIL">news:32CC5B62AF0BD2119E4C00A0C9663E224378C7@MAIL... >> > New to the cisco world. >> > >> > Does anyone know what the smallest Cisco router I can place 4 routable >> fast >> > ethernet interfaces might be? >> > >> > TIA >> > >> > >> > _ >> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >> >> >> _ >> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> _ >> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > >_ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
回复: "Router on a stick"
Hi Thomas, It's OK.Use subinterface and ISL encapsulation. Johnny Sun -Original Message- ·¢¼þÈË: Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ÐÂÎÅ×é: groupstudy.cisco ÊÕ¼þÈË: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ÈÕÆÚ: 2001Äê2ÔÂ23ÈÕ 11:03 Ö÷Ìâ: "Router on a stick" >Hi Group - I am trying to setup the lab to practice setting vlan with the >"router on a stick" method. Do you think I can do it with the 2621 router >and Cat 3500 series switch (instead of 2900)??? Thanks in advance! > > >_ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
re: Acess list (only for me)
Hi Jeongwoo, Just change the access-list like this: access-list 101 permit tcp host 192.168.1.52 any eq telnet regards. Johnny Sun -Original Message- ·¢¼þÈË: jeongwoo park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ÐÂÎÅ×é: groupstudy.cisco ÊÕ¼þÈË: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ÈÕÆÚ: 2001Äê3ÔÂ1ÈÕ 16:47 Ö÷Ìâ: Acess list (only for me) >Hi all >I am playing with 3620 router that has an ethernet. >There are several hosts hanging off the ethernet. >I want nobody but myself to telnet to this router. >So, I made access list as following; > >access-list 101 permit tcp host 192.168.1.52 eq telnet any >! >ip access-group 101 in > >192.168.1.52 is my ip address > >I couldn't telnet in. >What am I missing? > >Thanks in adv. > > > >-- >jeongwoo > > >_ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
re: Acess list (only for me)
Check your configration of the router,if you have not give the router a password for telnet in,the router would not let you telnet in.The router should have been configed as: line vty 0 4 password cisco login Johnny Sun -Original Message- ·¢¼þÈË: jeongwoo park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ÐÂÎÅ×é: groupstudy.cisco ÊÕ¼þÈË: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ÈÕÆÚ: 2001Äê3ÔÂ2ÈÕ 9:53 Ö÷Ìâ: Re: Acess list (only for me) >didn't work >anyway thanks for your reply. >J > >""Johnny Sun"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >000601bf73a6$f70f3e80$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:000601bf73a6$f70f3e80$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... >> Hi Jeongwoo, >> >> Just change the access-list like this: >> access-list 101 permit tcp host 192.168.1.52 any eq telnet >> >> regards. >> >> Johnny Sun >> >> >> -Original Message- >> ·¢¼þÈË: jeongwoo park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> ÐÂÎÅ×é: groupstudy.cisco >> ÊÕ¼þÈË: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> ÈÕÆÚ: 2001Äê3ÔÂ1ÈÕ 16:47 >> Ö÷Ìâ: Acess list (only for me) >> >> >> >Hi all >> >I am playing with 3620 router that has an ethernet. >> >There are several hosts hanging off the ethernet. >> >I want nobody but myself to telnet to this router. >> >So, I made access list as following; >> > >> >access-list 101 permit tcp host 192.168.1.52 eq telnet any >> >! >> >ip access-group 101 in >> > >> >192.168.1.52 is my ip address >> > >> >I couldn't telnet in. >> >What am I missing? >> > >> >Thanks in adv. >> > >> > >> > >> >-- >> >jeongwoo >> > >> > >> >_ >> >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >> >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> _ >> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > >_ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
re: 2 ISP's
Hi, I want to say,without your own AS and use BGP,you cant do the load balancing with only one router.One router only permit one interface with "ip nat outside",this is the problem.I've do the load balancing to two isp using one pix and two 3620 router,in which two 3620 do the job of nat.You can use "default-network" plus dynamic routing or link the two 3620 and config policy routing on them. Regards. Johnny Sun -Original Message- ·¢¼þÈË: Vincxe Fortunato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ÐÂÎÅ×é: groupstudy.cisco ÊÕ¼þÈË: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ÈÕÆÚ: 2001Äê3ÔÂ3ÈÕ 2:40 Ö÷Ìâ: Re: 2 ISP's >Terminating 2 ISP links on the same router will not require BGP. Just use >floating static default routes and load balance out the two links. If you >own your own AS (public AS), then use BGP for advertisement only. > >Vince > > >Oleh Hrynchuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... >> Larry Lamb wrote: >> > >> > Well what type of router are you looking to deploy? This will >significantly >> > influence your decision on what type of routing/connectivity that you'll >> > use. Full BGP tables can chew up a lot of memory. Looking a the >Mae-East >> > Looking Glass at Digex, they're using almost 30MB. That's going to >require >> > a router with 64MB more like 128MB of memory. >> >> second is true. >> 64 Mb isn't enough already since several months ago. >> >> > A lot of this type of >> > configuration will be covered in Internet Routing Architectures by >Halabi. >> > It's a Cisco Press title. >> >> >> Generally, I would want to say that answer for the question needs real >knowledge >> about several internetworking area. >> What about propagating of [sub]networks? Whom and what? >> What about negotiating with both ISP about policy routing and other staff? >> (I have some experience with working in a ISP as system engineer and can >say >> that it isn't so easy) >> >> >> So, resume is (IMHO): theoretically it is possible of course. >> But in practice let's say, it is not easy so far... >> >> >> >> CHEERS, ;-) >> >> OLEH >> >> >> > >> > "Atul Kumar Udupi" wrote in message <97o0uf$pmu$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... >> > >can u give me some more info please >> > > >> > > >> > >"Larry Lamb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >> > >97o0hs$p33$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:97o0hs$p33$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... >> > >> Yep, you can do a lot of different things with routing as well >depending >> > >on >> > >> the memory available, etc. Full BGP from both, full BGP from one >with a >> > >> floating static route, etc. >> > >> >> > >> "Atul Kumar Udupi" wrote in message <97nsnb$gr8$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... >> > >> >Greetings, >> > >> >Hello All I would like to know , Is there any way to terminate >2 >> > >ISP's >> > >> >on a same cisco router and use them as a redundant link. >> > >> > >> >> _ >> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > >_ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
re: Secondary IP addressing
Use extended ping. -Original Message- ·¢¼þÈË: Santosh Koshy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ÐÂÎÅ×é: groupstudy.cisco ÊÕ¼þÈË: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ÈÕÆÚ: 2001Äê3ÔÂ3ÈÕ 7:30 Ö÷Ìâ: Re: Secondary IP addressing >How are they connected ? > > >""Roberts, Timothy"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... >> >> >> I am setting up secondary IPs on two of my serial interfaces. I can ping >> both IPs on ROUTER B from the other ROUTER A. The problem is that I >cannot >> ping the secondary IP on ROUTER A from ROUTER B. What would cause this? >> >> Router A >> int serial 0 >> ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 >> ip address 128.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 secondary >> >> >> Router B >> int serial 0 >> ip address 10.1.1.2 255.255.255.0 >> ip address 128.1.1.2 255.255.255.0 secondary >> >> _ >> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > >_ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
re: CCNP Certification
CCNP Foundation 165 minutres,about 105 question,divided into three part,each pass score 692. Johnny Sun, CCNP -Original Message- ·¢¼þÈË: Igor Glavanic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ÐÂÎÅ×é: groupstudy.cisco ÊÕ¼þÈË: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ÈÕÆÚ: 2001Äê3ÔÂ5ÈÕ 13:42 Ö÷Ìâ: Re: CCNP Certification >Pass scores are between 690 and 710. >You will get between 63 and 65 questions. >Time allowed is 75 minutes as much as I remember. > > > > >_ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
re: IOS version 13.xxx ?? and a Rant...
When I do my first lab of BGP, I use cisco 2500 with version 11.2. Ask for your money back! Johnny Sun >Sounds like your instructor didn't know BGP either. What a shame. You could >ask for your money back... > >BTW, I like "cop run start" much better than "write mem." It's more >intuitive. Not. &;-) > >Priscilla > >At 12:39 PM 3/19/01, Buri, Heather H wrote: >>Well, it may be like Z said earlier and that is...my instructor did not know >>what he was talking about. I thought 12.1 was still the most recent version >>but then again, I have not been on CCO recently upgrading my IOS's either. >>And...been too busy the past couple of days trying to get caught up from >>being gone for a week from work. I will check it out tonight. :-) >> >>Heather Buri >>CSC Technology Services - Houston >> >>Phone: (713)-961-8592 >>Fax:(713)-961-8249 >>Mobile: >>Alpha Page: >> >>Mailing:1360 Post Oak Blvd >> Suite 500 >> Houston, TX 77056 >> >> >> >>-Original Message- >>From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 12:08 PM >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: Re: IOS version 13.xxx ?? and a Rant... >> >> >>Wow, 13 already? That's pretty surprising since 12.1 isn't GD yet and >>12.2 isn't even out yet. >> >> >>> "Buri, Heather H" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3/19/01 10:41:14 AM >>> >>Hi Everyone. >> >>Well, I finished my BSCN course through Global Knowledge last week. I >>have >>to say I was kind of disappointed. I really was wanting to spend some >>good >>time on BGP and OSPF but we had to rush through it because we wasted a >>whole >>day going over RIP??? I thought this was supposed to be an advanced >>class! >>My opinion is the only refresher we should have been given on RIP is: >> >>Router Rip >> >>Anyways, the instructor said they started making the labs easier >>because too >>many people complained about them being too difficult??? :::sigh::: >> >>Oh well. Thank God for this list and I guess I will be saving myself >>$2000 >>on the CIT course now. >> >>I will be taking my exam on April 5. I wanted to study BGP and Policy >>Based >>routing some more. >> >>My instructor did mention Cisco was up to IOS release 13 already. This >>was >>news to me. He said it had been out for some time. My question is, >>has >>anyone been using it yet? My instructor did say that they finally did >>away >>with my favorite command... write mem. A sad, sad day! Well, I knew >>it was >>coming. I don't suppose "c r s" will work at the command line?? :-) >> >>Heather Buri >>CSC Technology Services - Houston >> >>Phone: (713)-961-8592 >>Fax:(713)-961-8249 >>Mobile: >>Alpha Page: >> >>Mailing:1360 Post Oak Blvd >> Suite 500 >> Houston, TX 77056 > > > > >Priscilla Oppenheimer >http://www.priscilla.com > >_ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
