RE: NM-1E2W Module
For a complete list of every module and it's requirements, you can find out at http://www.cisco.com/go/modules Every module is listed under 'solution finder' and it contains hardware & software requirements for each module. -Original Message- From: Kevin Wigle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 11:55 AM To: Evan Francen; 'Warrick FitzGerald'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: NM-1E2W Module well I've been having a running commentary with Cisco for the last few days about what is and what isn't supported on 2600s.. If all you need is an additional ethernet then the NM-1E= would do it. There is also a 4 port ethernet - NM-4E= (but pricey) Kevin Wigle - Original Message - From: "Evan Francen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Warrick FitzGerald'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 10:14 AM Subject: RE: NM-1E2W Module > The 2600 series routers do not support the NM-1E2W module. You can check > the supported modules at > http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/pcat/2600.htm. > > HTH, > Evan > > -Original Message- > From: Warrick FitzGerald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 9:03 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: NM-1E2W Module > > > Hi, > > I have a 2600 cisco router and would like to purchase another ethernet > interface for the unit. I can find plety of NM-1E2W modules for sale, but > the description next to the item always says that it is for a 3600 router, > can anyone tell me if this module will work in a 2600 and if so how would I > have figured this out myself ? > > Thanks > Warrick FitzGerald > LiveTechnology International Inc. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FREE Book: "SAFEguarding the E-Business Network"
http://www.cisco.com/offer/pixfamily/V591-1008Z
RE: How to Multiplex 3 T1s [7:4625]
Take a look at this config and see if it work for you: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/131/7.html -Original Message- From: Al Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 8:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: How to Multiplex 3 T1s [7:4625] Colleagues, I am currently trying to multiplex / bind 3 parallel T1 clear channel circuits. The circuits will be terminating on a 7206 router on an 8 port multi channel T1 card. My question is how do I bind the 3 T1s together to get the total aggregate bandwidth of 3 T1s. I have only found info on Inverse multiplexing for ATM which is not what I am trying to achieve. what I have is strictly 3 Point to Point T1 circuits using PPP. Albert Smith Lucent Technologies System Engineer, CCNP MCSE FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=4667&t=4625 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: cisco 3660 [7:9026]
I had a similar problem, and tac concluded that it was a bad motherboard. After it got replaced, the router has been running great. -Original Message- From: cisco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 3:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: cisco 3660 [7:9026] hi, i have a cisco 3660 router which have problem that it is rebooting again agian but saying that failing all rommon startup test. how can i breack that router . thanx kaushalender Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9039&t=9026 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E&M port to PBX, busy tone [7:9949]
Under the voice-port configuration, change the wait-wink timing with the timing wait-wink command. What is probably happening, is that the router isn't waiting long enough for a response to come back from the PBX. This will give the PBX time to respond to the routers reqest for an open DS0. My config looks something like this: voice-port 1/0:0 timing wait-wink 5000 HTH -Original Message- From: Shoaib Waqar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 7:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: E&M port to PBX, busy tone [7:9949] I have a problem scenario as: I am having a Cisco 3662 router, having 2 port E&M VIC. I have configured the E&M port with the required parameters from PBX, like type 5, signal immediate and operation 2 wire. I also have created a pots dial peer for this E&M port which is connected to the PBX. The PBX make is Alcatel and the code configured on PBX to seize the E&M on router is hash symbol and 76. But when i dial this, i get the busy tone, i should get the tone from router. So can anyone help me?? Shoaib __ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9954&t=9949 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
free Cisco Career Certifications T-shirt
If you're Cisco-certified, go to the URL listed here, fill out a short survey, and tell Cisco what you think about its career certification program. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/jts_survey.html
RE: t1/e1
Title: RE: t1/e1 I believe that the part number is WIC-1DSU-T1. But try this link and look under useful tools, you will find a solution finder that will list the modules and their requirements. http://www.cisco.com/go/module Jon Wagner CCNA -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2000 10:41 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: t1/e1 Hey everyone, I've been looking for a part # but can't seem to find it.. So in the 2600 series, there is a wic avail. that is t1 w/ csu/dsu built in. This allows you simply to make a rj-45 t1 cross-over cable and connect them. Also pretty nice, is they use slarp to config themselves.. Well, I can't seem to find an E1 version of this card. URL's and documentation would be excellent response. Thanks everyone Larry Averitt Design Validation CCNA ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 4006 Power Supplies [7:41257]
I believe that this link will explain everything about the Catalyst 4006 power system. It looks like you need at least 2 power supplies at minimum. We have been running a 4006 for 2 years with 2 power supplies. So far we haven't had any problems with them. http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat4000/rel6_3/config/ad min.htm#xtocid1085919 -Original Message- From: x [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 8:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 4006 Power Supplies [7:41257] Jeff, We just bought a Cisco 4006 switch. Our reseller and our Cisco rep both told us we need two power supplies to run it and one for redundancy. They both went on to say the power supply is the first thing to go. They sold me on it so I got all three power supplies. I got the switch a few weeks ago and I threw in the two 10/100 blades and the extra power supply. I unplugged one power supply and it still seemed fine. I decide to unplug another and leave only one running just to see if it would die. It ran for 30 minutes until I decided to plug it back in, keep in mind I didn't have anything attached at the time. I am guessing if you really wanted to you could get away with one, but when your spending that much(think it was around $14k to $15k) an extra $600 or so to protect your investment is no big deal. I also like the fact that if two powersupplies die it will still probably run and I can take my time replacing them. A good night's sleep is worth $600 to me. --- Jeffrey Reed wrote: > Im trying to understand power redundancy in the > Cisco 4006 switch. Reading > through the online information, Cisco seems to imply > you must have at least > two power supplies up and running at all times. The > 3rd power supply > provides redundancy. Other vendors allow you to run > at least a partially > populated chassis on one power supply. If I have a > 4006 with SUPII and one > 48-port blade, do I really need three power > supplies? Anyone have experience > with 4006s and power supplies? > > Thanks!! > > Jeffrey Reed > Classic Networking, Inc. > Cell 717-805-5536 > Office 717-737-8586 > FAX 717-737-0290 [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41290&t=41257 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: cpu utilization of catalyst switches [7:21544]
30% seems about right. For the true CPU info check out the following links: For the Catalyst 4000 series: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/82.html For the Catalyst 2900XL/3500XL series: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/19.html -Original Message- From: Burgin Kozak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 3:00 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: cpu utilization of catalyst switches [7:21544] Hi. What is the acceptable cpu utilaziton value of catalyst 4000 series switches? I have a 4006 and cpu utilazition is about %30 is it ok? is this value acceptable? thanks regards Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=21555&t=21544 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CPU Utilization on Cat3548XL - a mystery.. [7:57494]
It is normal to have that rate of utilization. This article explains it all. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps607/products_tech_note0918 6a0080094e78.shtml -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:simonkc@;netsol.co.in] Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 8:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CPU Utilization on Cat3548XL - a mystery.. [7:57494] I have an out-of-the-box Catalyst3548XL switch .There are no user connections nor trunk connections on the switch...just a plain switch with a power chord But the CPU utilization shows a consistent 50%. Can anybody explain??? Thanks in advance, Simon Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57503&t=57494 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
