voice and 802.11b [7:45342]

2002-05-29 Thread Khurrum Shahzad

Can we use voice through Wireless Ethernet Bridge (like cisco Aironet )? Is
is possible to use voice if two cisco router having voice module and FXO/FXS
are placed on two location connected through wireless bridge? I read that
802.11b has a drawback of lack of interoperability with voice devies.

regards

-- 
___
Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com
http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=45342t=45342
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



help required in configuring frame relay traffic shaping [7:44394]

2002-05-17 Thread Khurrum Shahzad

Hello 
Can anybody tell me any mistake or missing configuration for frame relay
traffc shaping?
I connected two cisco 2600 router serial interfaces throug  32 k link. I
configured point to point frame relay subinterface on both interfaces. I
want to use this link on  CIR 16k and peak rate 32k.

My configuration is 

On interface

   frame-ralay traffic shaping

and on subinterface

   frame-relay class cisco

and for map-class

map-class frame-relay cisco
frame-ralay traffic-rate 16000 32000
frame-relay adaptive-shaping becn


and I also tried 

map-class frame-relay cisco
frame-ralay cir 16000
frame-relay bc 2000
frame-relay be 2000
frame-relay adaptive-shaping becn


Problem is that when I run data on line e.g. file transfer, bandwidth uses
always 16k or less although no other data run on ckt and total
available bandwidth is 32 k. The data rate does not reach to peak rate and
if I remove traffic shaping then total 32 k used. Is any missing parameter
or command in above configuration?

regards

Khurrum


-- 
___
Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com
http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=44394t=44394
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



STRANGE PROBLEM in updating EIGRP routes [7:37055]

2002-03-02 Thread Khurrum Shahzad

Dear All
I am facing a strange problem in 1751 routers.
In a simple scenario in which two 1751 are connected with over a channel with
serial port and eigrp is used for routing.

Router 1
s 0/0 ip addr 192.168.10.1
fe 0/0 ip addr 192.168.1.1

Router 2
s 0/0 ip addr 192.168.10.2
fe 0/0 ip addr 192.168.2.1

both router get the routes of remote LAN and any machine  on 192.168.1.0 (R1)
network ping  all machines on other 192.168.2.0 (R2) network. Configurtion on
both routers have been saved.

But the Promlem is that when any one of the router reboot/power cycle then it
do not send its routes to other router but gets the routes of remote router
and also it shows other router as eigrp neighbor.
It means that when R1 reload/power cycle  then after comleting reload it
shows
routes of 192.168.2.0 but R2 remote router does not shows route of
192.168.1.0. Eigrp configuration is present on both routers and both routers
shows other router as their eigrp neighbor.  Both routers shows Eigrp
configuraton in sh run configuration

To solve this problem, eigrp configuration has to be removed from R1 and
reconfigured then it becomes OK.

no router eigrp 100
router eigrp 100
network 192.168.10.0
network 192.168.1.0



Is anybody knows about this problem? Is there any bug in IOS? The router
configuration  is very simple and working perfectly  on other 2500 series
routers.






SHOW VERSION

Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
IOS (tm) C1700 Software (C1700-Y-M), Version 12.2(4)T,  RELEASE SOFTWARE
(fc1)
TAC Support: http://www.cisco.com/tac
Copyright (c) 1986-2001 by cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Fri 28-Sep-01 02:10 by ccai
Image text-base: 0x800080E0, data-base: 0x80738B80

ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.2(1r)XE1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)

ZAM_RT uptime is 3 hours, 3 minutes
System returned to ROM by power-on
System image file is flash:c1700-y-mz.122-4.T.bin

cisco 1751 (MPC860P) processor (revision 0x501) with 24576K/8192K bytes of
memor
y.
Processor board ID JAD05470F8C (3805074441), with hardware revision 4246
M860 processor: part number 5, mask 2
Bridging software.
X.25 software, Version 3.0.0.
1 FastEthernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s)
2 Serial(sync/async) network interface(s)
32K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.
16384K bytes of processor board System flash (Read/Write)

Configuration register is 0x2102



W_R1#sh run
Building configuration...

Current configuration : 652 bytes
!
version 12.2
service timestamps debug uptime
service timestamps log uptime
no service password-encryption
!
hostname W_R1
!
enable secret 5 $1$WXuj$iGaxxfubhqEi9uX5YzKKK1
!
memory-size iomem 25
ip subnet-zero
!
!
!
!
interface FastEthernet0/0
 ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
 speed auto
!
interface Serial0/0
 ip address 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface Serial0/1
 no ip address
 shutdown
!
router eigrp 100
 network 192.168.1.0
 network 192.168.10.0
 auto-summary
 no eigrp log-neighbor-changes
!
ip classless
no ip http server
!
!
line con 0
line aux 0
line vty 0 4
 exec-timeout 0 0
 password cisco
 login
!
no scheduler allocate
end

W_R1#




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37055t=37055
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: DIAL Backup of Wireless VLAN [7:20058]

2001-09-16 Thread Khurrum Shahzad

To which net I configure as my interesting packet because both net of my
remote site LAN is also on sub interfaces of my Central site Fast Ethernet
Interface. I can't define route to a net which is also on my directly
connected interface.




Don't look for an interface going down, instead configure a floating
default
route as your interesting packet.
  Dave

Khurrum Shahzad wrote:

  Hi all
  I want help regarding my scenario which is as follows.
  I have one central and tow remote sites. Both two  remote sites are
connected
  with central through Wireless Ethernet Bridge (high speed).
  At Central site Ethernet cable from both Wireless Bridge are connected to
  switch and  Cisco 2620 is used for routing between 3 different VLAN ( two
for
  remote and one for central).
  So at central site I have 3 sub interface on Fast Ethernet each having IP
  address of separate net.

  I also require Sync Dial Backup for each  remote site. So I placed one 1601
  and Sync dialup modem on each remote site and  dialup modems at central
  connected with sync port of 2620.

  But I can't understand how to configure online (automatic) backup because
if
  any of wireless link will break or down, Ethernet ports  will not down and
  dialer will not initiate.

  Also for manual backup, if I manually dial to central site from any remote
  site then after connected to central, I have same IP net on both site of
  link,
  it means Ethernet port of 1601 and fast Ethernet port of 2620 have Ethernet
  IP
  from same net.

  Can anybody guide me how I run my main links on Wireless Ethernet Bridge
and
  backup link on dialup with routers?

  Network diagram of my setup is at

  http://www.geocities.com/khurrums/

  Regards
  Khurrum




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=20100t=20058
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DIAL Backup of Wireless VLAN [7:20058]

2001-09-15 Thread Khurrum Shahzad

Hi all
I want help regarding my scenario which is as follows.
I have one central and tow remote sites. Both two  remote sites are connected
with central through Wireless Ethernet Bridge (high speed).
At Central site Ethernet cable from both Wireless Bridge are connected to
switch and  Cisco 2620 is used for routing between 3 different VLAN ( two for
remote and one for central).

So at central site I have 3 sub interface on Fast Ethernet each having IP
address of separate net.

I also require Sync Dial Backup for each  remote site. So I placed one 1601
and Sync dialup modem on each remote site and  dialup modems at central
connected with sync port of 2620.

But I can't understand how to configure online (automatic) backup because if
any of wireless link will break or down, Ethernet ports  will not down and
dialer will not initiate.

Also for manual backup, if I manually dial to central site from any remote
site then after connected to central, I have same IP net on both site of
link,
it means Ethernet port of 1601 and fast Ethernet port of 2620 have Ethernet
IP
from same net.

Can anybody guide me how I run my main links on Wireless Ethernet Bridge and
backup link on dialup with routers?

Network diagram of my setup is at

http://www.geocities.com/khurrums/


Regards
Khurrum




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=20058t=20058
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re:strange problem in voice [7:9093]

2001-06-23 Thread Khurrum Shahzad

Use command  no supervisory  on voice ports at FXS router.

Hi,
i configured voice on two routers, on one router i ?hav a phone set
attached with Fxs and on the other router Pbx is connected with fxo. I can
recieve
and make calls from both ends, but i m having this problem that the phone
keeps on ringing even when i  onhook the phone.

Regards,
Dar



-- 

___
Make PC-to-Phone calls with Net2Phone.
Sign-up today at: http://www.net2phone.com/cgi-bin/link.cgi?121




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9646t=9093
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: frame-relay route question [7:8217]

2001-06-13 Thread Khurrum Shahzad

I already configured frame relay ietf encapsulation and lmi disable ( no
keep alives).
In my configuration frame relay cloud get data from s1 with dlci 26 and
gives data on s1 with dlci 27. But in order to this configuration words i
have to configure 2 additional route ( 26 on s1 and 17 on s0 which is not
required for my configuraion). In absence of these route configuratio do not
work.

It means that cisco route configuration can't work if dlci's do not match
and not inverse of each other. All other frame-relay switches ( like
memotec, motrolla ) can works with one way route ad in absence of inverse
dlci route.







Hi John,


When you set up your frame relay network you have to be sure to give 
your
interface a dlci and tell it where to go...like you have below...s0 use 
dlci
16 to the frame cloud which uses dlci 26 to get to s1.  But then you 
have to
tell s1 that it needs to use dlci 26 to get back to the frame cloud 
which
uses dlci 16 to get back to s0.  What you have is serial 1 send down 
dlci 27
to the frame cloud and forward down s0 on dlci 17.  If you do an show 
frame
pvc on the routers attached on s1 and s0 you will see that one has dlci 
16
assigned and the other has dlci 27 assigned.  But the frame is trying 
to
send data to them on dlci 26 and dlci 17 which they dont know about.

so you just need to make sure that your dlci's match and that are an 
inverse
of each other.


Here is the output from my current lab:


c4500#sh frame route
Input Intf  Input Dlci  Output Intf Output Dlci Status
Serial1 102 Serial3 201 active
Serial2 103 Serial3 301 active
Serial3 201 Serial1 102 active
Serial3 301 Serial2 103 active


good luck,

Don






-Original Message-
From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 1:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: frame-relay route question [7:8217]


If you are connecting to a non-Cisco device you need to set the frame
relay encapsulation type to ietf and the LMI type to ANSI.  The 
defaults
are cisco encapsulation type and cisco LMI, neither of which will that
device understand.  Try that change and let's see if that resolves the
issue.  If not, please let us know.

HTH,
John

 Khurrum Shahzad  6/12/01 12:13:49 PM 
When connecting cisco router ( as frame-relay switch) with frame relay
device, I configured frame relay route as

Serial 0Dlci in  16to   Serial 1 Dlci out 26
Serial 1Dlci in  27to   Serial 0 Dlci out 17
( require only these 2 routes)

But show frame-relay pvc shows both route status inactive and both
route
does not work.

When I give additional two route ( not required ) 

Serial 1Dlci in  26to   Serial 1 Dlci out 16
Serial 0Dlci in  17to   Serial 0 Dlci out 27

then both route status become active and configuration works.

Is it necessary that dlci path must be completed?Because sometime it is
not
required to complete path of dlci.

Can anybody give me guidence on this topic ?




-- 

___
Get your free email from http://mymail.iname.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=8319t=8217
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Frame Relay Network [7:8381]

2001-06-13 Thread Khurrum Shahzad

I want some help regarding connecting cisco routers across a frame relay
based TDMA  ( Time Division Multiple Access ) Network. In TDMA network,
main site (hub) is connected to different remote site having remote unit
(each site has differet DLCI). At main site there are two different path, one
for transmission (Tx) and other for Receive (Rx). So at main site a Frame
Relay switch is used to switch data from TX and RX path to DTE device ( e.g
Cisco router). Currently a main cisco router is connected to switch port and
differnt remote router connected to remote terminal (star topology).
The configuration used is at main site subinterfaces are reated for each
remote site and set specific interface dlci for each subinterface).

Configuration at main router

interface s0 
encapsulation frame-relay 
no keep-alive ( as TDMA has lmi disabled)
no ip address

interface s 0.1
ip addr 192.168.21.1 255.255.255.0
frame-relay interface-dlci 17

interface s 0.2
ip addr 192.168.22.1 255.255.255.0
frame-relay interface-dlci 18

and so on as depend on number of remote sites.

Cofiguration at remote sites

interface s 0
encapsulation frame-relay
no keep-alive
no ip address

interface s0.1
ip addr 192.168.21.2 255.255.255.0
frame-relay interface-dlci 17

and same at all remote site routers.

How can I replace frame relay switch by using two serial port of Cisco
router and route data from both TX and Rx path to LAN ethernet port?
I want to eliminate switch and want to take same work with cisco router.

My understanding is that cisco router works as frame relay switch by
receiving data of a specific dlci from a serial port and swich to different
serial port with a differnt or same dlci. Can Cisco router transmit and
receive data of same dlci at different serial ports and route these data to
LAN ethernet interface?



-- 

___
Get your free email from http://mymail.iname.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=8381t=8381
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: frame-relay route question [7:8217]

2001-06-13 Thread Khurrum Shahzad

The device with which I am connecting cisco has lmi disabled.



I am a little curiius why you'd want to do no keepalive and disable lmi 
on
a frame ckt, I mean lmi is how the circuit does a sanity check to check
status.

Brian Sonic Whalen
Success = Preparation + Opportunity


On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Khurrum Shahzad wrote:

 I already configured frame relay ietf encapsulation and lmi disable ( 
no
 keep alives).
 In my configuration frame relay cloud get data from s1 with dlci 26 
and
 gives data on s1 with dlci 27. But in order to this configuration 
words i
 have to configure 2 additional route ( 26 on s1 and 17 on s0 which is 
not
 required for my configuraion). In absence of these route configuratio 
do not
 work.

 It means that cisco route configuration can't work if dlci's do not 
match
 and not inverse of each other. All other frame-relay switches ( like
 memotec, motrolla ) can works with one way route ad in absence of 
inverse
 dlci route.





 
 
 Hi John,


 When you set up your frame relay network you have to be sure to give
 your
 interface a dlci and tell it where to go...like you have below...s0 
use
 dlci
 16 to the frame cloud which uses dlci 26 to get to s1.  But then you
 have to
 tell s1 that it needs to use dlci 26 to get back to the frame cloud
 which
 uses dlci 16 to get back to s0.  What you have is serial 1 send down
 dlci 27
 to the frame cloud and forward down s0 on dlci 17.  If you do an show
 frame
 pvc on the routers attached on s1 and s0 you will see that one has 
dlci
 16
 assigned and the other has dlci 27 assigned.  But the frame is trying
 to
 send data to them on dlci 26 and dlci 17 which they dont know about.

 so you just need to make sure that your dlci's match and that are an
 inverse
 of each other.


 Here is the output from my current lab:


 c4500#sh frame route
 Input Intf  Input Dlci  Output Intf Output Dlci 
Status
 Serial1 102 Serial3 201 
active
 Serial2 103 Serial3 301 
active
 Serial3 201 Serial1 102 
active
 Serial3 301 Serial2 103 
active


 good luck,

 Don






 -Original Message-
 From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 1:02 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: frame-relay route question [7:8217]


 If you are connecting to a non-Cisco device you need to set the frame
 relay encapsulation type to ietf and the LMI type to ANSI.  The
 defaults
 are cisco encapsulation type and cisco LMI, neither of which will 
that
 device understand.  Try that change and let's see if that resolves 
the
 issue.  If not, please let us know.

 HTH,
 John

  Khurrum Shahzad  6/12/01 12:13:49 PM 
 When connecting cisco router ( as frame-relay switch) with frame 
relay
 device, I configured frame relay route as

 Serial 0Dlci in  16to   Serial 1 Dlci out 26
 Serial 1Dlci in  27to   Serial 0 Dlci out 17
 ( require only these 2 routes)

 But show frame-relay pvc shows both route status inactive and both
 route
 does not work.

 When I give additional two route ( not required )

 Serial 1Dlci in  26to   Serial 1 Dlci out 16
 Serial 0Dlci in  17to   Serial 0 Dlci out 27

 then both route status become active and configuration works.

 Is it necessary that dlci path must be completed?Because sometime it 
is
 not
 required to complete path of dlci.

 Can anybody give me guidence on this topic ?





-- 

___
Get your free email from http://mymail.iname.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=8388t=8217
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: frame-relay route question [7:8217]

2001-06-13 Thread Khurrum Shahzad

The device with which I am connecting cisco has lmi disabled.



I am a little curiius why you'd want to do no keepalive and disable lmi 
on
a frame ckt, I mean lmi is how the circuit does a sanity check to check
status.

Brian Sonic Whalen
Success = Preparation + Opportunity


On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Khurrum Shahzad wrote:

 I already configured frame relay ietf encapsulation and lmi disable ( 
no
 keep alives).
 In my configuration frame relay cloud get data from s1 with dlci 26 
and
 gives data on s1 with dlci 27. But in order to this configuration 
words i
 have to configure 2 additional route ( 26 on s1 and 17 on s0 which is 
not
 required for my configuraion). In absence of these route configuratio 
do not
 work.

 It means that cisco route configuration can't work if dlci's do not 
match
 and not inverse of each other. All other frame-relay switches ( like
 memotec, motrolla ) can works with one way route ad in absence of 
inverse
 dlci route.





 
 
 Hi John,


 When you set up your frame relay network you have to be sure to give
 your
 interface a dlci and tell it where to go...like you have below...s0 
use
 dlci
 16 to the frame cloud which uses dlci 26 to get to s1.  But then you
 have to
 tell s1 that it needs to use dlci 26 to get back to the frame cloud
 which
 uses dlci 16 to get back to s0.  What you have is serial 1 send down
 dlci 27
 to the frame cloud and forward down s0 on dlci 17.  If you do an show
 frame
 pvc on the routers attached on s1 and s0 you will see that one has 
dlci
 16
 assigned and the other has dlci 27 assigned.  But the frame is trying
 to
 send data to them on dlci 26 and dlci 17 which they dont know about.

 so you just need to make sure that your dlci's match and that are an
 inverse
 of each other.


 Here is the output from my current lab:


 c4500#sh frame route
 Input Intf  Input Dlci  Output Intf Output Dlci 
Status
 Serial1 102 Serial3 201 
active
 Serial2 103 Serial3 301 
active
 Serial3 201 Serial1 102 
active
 Serial3 301 Serial2 103 
active


 good luck,

 Don






 -Original Message-
 From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 1:02 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: frame-relay route question [7:8217]


 If you are connecting to a non-Cisco device you need to set the frame
 relay encapsulation type to ietf and the LMI type to ANSI.  The
 defaults
 are cisco encapsulation type and cisco LMI, neither of which will 
that
 device understand.  Try that change and let's see if that resolves 
the
 issue.  If not, please let us know.

 HTH,
 John

  Khurrum Shahzad  6/12/01 12:13:49 PM 
 When connecting cisco router ( as frame-relay switch) with frame 
relay
 device, I configured frame relay route as

 Serial 0Dlci in  16to   Serial 1 Dlci out 26
 Serial 1Dlci in  27to   Serial 0 Dlci out 17
 ( require only these 2 routes)

 But show frame-relay pvc shows both route status inactive and both
 route
 does not work.

 When I give additional two route ( not required )

 Serial 1Dlci in  26to   Serial 1 Dlci out 16
 Serial 0Dlci in  17to   Serial 0 Dlci out 27

 then both route status become active and configuration works.

 Is it necessary that dlci path must be completed?Because sometime it 
is
 not
 required to complete path of dlci.

 Can anybody give me guidence on this topic ?





-- 

___
Get your free email from http://mymail.iname.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=8392t=8217
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



frame-relay route question [7:8217]

2001-06-12 Thread Khurrum Shahzad

When connecting cisco router ( as frame-relay switch) with frame relay
device, I configured frame relay route as

Serial 0Dlci in  16to   Serial 1 Dlci out 26
Serial 1Dlci in  27to   Serial 0 Dlci out 17
( require only these 2 routes)

But show frame-relay pvc shows both route status inactive and both route
does not work.

When I give additional two route ( not required ) 

Serial 1Dlci in  26to   Serial 1 Dlci out 16
Serial 0Dlci in  17to   Serial 0 Dlci out 27

then both route status become active and configuration works.

Is it necessary that dlci path must be completed?Because sometime it is not
required to complete path of dlci.

Can anybody give me guidence on this topic ?




-- 

___
Get your free email from http://mymail.iname.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=8217t=8217
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



With TDMA Network [7:8044]

2001-06-11 Thread Khurrum Shahzad

Hi all

I want some help regarding connecting cisco routers across a frame relay
based TDMA  ( Time Division Multiple Access ) Network. In TDMA network, main
site (hub) is connected to different remote site having remote unit (each
site has differet DLCI). At main site there are two different path, one for
transmission (Tx) and other for Receive (Rx). So at main site a Frame Relay
switch is used to switch data from TX and RX path to DTE device ( e.g Cisco
router). Currently a main cisco router is connected to switch port and
differnt remote router connected to remote terminal (star topology). The
configuration used is at main site subinterfaces are created for each remote
site and set specific interface dlci for each subinterface).

Configuration at main router

interface s0 
encapsulation frame-relay 
no keep-alive ( as TDMA has lmi disabled)
no ip address

interface s 0.1
ip addr 192.168.21.1 255.255.255.0
frame-relay interface-dlci 17

interface s 0.2
ip addr 192.168.22.1 255.255.255.0
frame-relay interface-dlci 18

and so on as depend on number of remote site

Cofiguration at remote sites

interface s 0
encapsulation frame-relay
no keep-alive
no ip address

interface s0.1
ip addr 192.168.21.2 255.255.255.0
frame-relay interface-dlci 17

and same at all remote site routers.

How can I replace frame relay switch by using two serial port of Cisco
router and route data from both TX and Rx path to LAN ethernet port?
I want to eliminate switch and want same work with cisco router.

My understanding is that cisco router works as frame relay switch by
receiving data of a specific dlci from a serial port and swich to different
serial port with a differnt or same dlci. Can Cisco router transmit and
receive data of same dlci at different serial ports and route these data to
LAN ethernet interface?


Waiting for help.

Thanks 

Khurrum


-- 

___
Get your free email from http://mymail.iname.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=8044t=8044
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Problem with Console Port

2000-08-29 Thread Khurrum Shahzad




Hi all ,

I am facing a problem with my 2501 router. It 
was working fine, but forthe lasttwoweeks  I am not able to 
connect to the console port of therouter. It shows nothing on the screen 
when I try to connect and pressenter. When I checked the Signal level of the 
console port on my Break Outbox, it showed me the continuous LOW status of 
TxD signal. When I reboot therouter, it shows me the startup messages and 
finally after showing all thosemessages it hangs and TAKES NO INPUT 
from the HYPER TERMINAL.
Ihave also tried many terminal Software like 
Telix, Teraterm but response of the router remains the same.
There is no problem in Console Cable as cable is 
working fine on other  Routers.
The router has no prior configurations (as 
I did an ERASE STARTUPCONFIGURATION before), so I am not able to connect via 
TELNET or AUX port. Before doing ERASE STARTUP 
CONFIGURATION, I was connecting  to reouter with AUX Port and did my 
configuration but after erase NVRAM, AUX was shut and router becomes 
useless.
Is there any way out???Can I replace 
NVRAM of this router with any other NVRAM having configuration and then connect 
with the router with AUX port or via TELNET?
Is NVRAM Of 2501 router replaceable?

Please help me if anybody has the 
solution.

Khurrum


Problem with Console Port

2000-08-19 Thread Khurrum Shahzad

Hi ,

 I am facing a problem with my  2501 router. It was working fine, but for
the last few days I am not able to connect to the console port of the
router. It shows nothing on the screen when I try to connect and press
enter. When I checked the Signal level of the console port on my Break Out
box, it showed me the continuous LOW status of TxD signal. When I reboot the
router, it shows me the startup messages and finally after showing all those
messages it  hangs and TAKES NO INPUT from the HYPER TERMINAL. I have also
tried many terminal Software like Telix, Teraterm.

The router has no prior configurations (as I did an ERASE STARTUP
CONFIGURATION before), so I am not able to connect via TELNET or AUX port.

Is there any way out???

Can I replace NVRAM of this router with any other NVRAM having configuration
and then connect with the router with AUX port or via TELNET?
Is NVRAM Of 2501 router replaceable?

Khurrum






___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]