Strage DDR problem [7:9043]
Hi all, I am getting a strange problem with DDR connection from a 801 to 803. Both routers are running IOS Ver. 12.1. If 801 orginates the call 803 answers the call and the call gets disconnected in less than aminute and in the meantime I cannot ping from 801 to 803 or the otherway. If 803 orginates the 801 answers without any problem and I can ping from 801 to 803 with 100% success. But when I ping from 803 to 801 the max success rate I get is 60% and normal is 40%. (I tried pinging the remote BRI interface, Ethernet Interface and PC in Remote network all with same result). I want to configure these routers to do tranperant bridging and tried bridging configuration also. With bridging config, If I keep the priority of 803 low, 801 learns 803 as root bridge and learns the MAC address of PC's on the network connected to Ethernet port of 803 but 803 doesn't learn any address for 801 network. Also if I reduce the priority of 801, 803 doesn't learns that and both routers claim to be root bridges. Also there is no data traffic between them. I can't figure out the reson for this if anybody have any idea I will be glad to hear it. Regards, Manoj Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9043t=9043 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sopport study material [7:8820]
Hi all, Today I passed switching with a score of 934 after passing ACRC an year ago. Next is support 2.0. I got course meterial for CIT ver 4.0 Is there any difference in the material of these two. Will the CIT material will be enough for support exam or I need any other book for Support exam? regards, Manoj Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=8820t=8820 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
801 ERROR urgent [7:8826]
Hi all, I am getting the following error when I boot up the 801 router. %Error opening tftp://255.255.255.255/network-confg (Socket error) %Error opening tftp://255.255.255.255/cisconet.cfg (Socket error) %Error opening tftp://255.255.255.255/routera-confg (Socket error) %Error opening tftp://255.255.255.255/routera.cfg (Socket error) The output of the 801 boot seqence and config is as given below. Please help. TinyROM version 1.4(1) 19:38 11/07/00 Copyright (c) 1998-2000 by cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. POST OK. 4MB DRAM, 8MB Flash. Accessing flash:c800-y6-mw.121-3.XG2 Booting c800-y6-mw.121-3.XG2 ..., Restricted Rights Legend Use, duplication, or disclosure by the Government is subject to restrictions as set forth in subparagraph (c) of the Commercial Computer Software - Restricted Rights clause at FAR sec. 52.227-19 and subparagraph (c) (1) (ii) of the Rights in Technical Data and Computer Software clause at DFARS sec. 252.227-7013. cisco Systems, Inc. 170 West Tasman Drive San Jose, California 95134-1706 Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) C800 Software (C800-Y6-MW), Version 12.1(3)XG2, EARLY DEPLOYMENT RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) TAC:Home:SW:IOS:Specials for info Copyright (c) 1986-2000 by cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Mon 13-Nov-00 17:27 by detang Image text-base: 0x000EE000, data-base: 0x00654000 Cisco C801 (MPC850) processor (revision 1) with 43464K bytes of virtual memory. Processor board ID JAD05030E7A CPU part number 0x2101 Bridging software. Basic Rate ISDN software, Version 1.1. 1 Ethernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s) 1 ISDN Basic Rate interface(s) 4M bytes of physical memory (DRAM) 8K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory 8M bytes of flash on board (4M from flash card) %Error opening tftp://255.255.255.255/network-confg (Socket error) %Error opening tftp://255.255.255.255/cisconet.cfg (Socket error) %Error opening tftp://255.255.255.255/routera-confg (Socket error) %Error opening tftp://255.255.255.255/routera.cfg (Socket error) Press RETURN to get started! 00:00:21: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Ethernet0, changed state to up 00:00:22: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Ethernet0, changed state to up 00:00:25: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface BRI0, changed state to administratively down 00:00:25: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from memory by console 00:00:26: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface BRI0, changed state to down 00:00:26: %SYS-5-RESTART: System restarted -- Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) C800 Software (C800-Y6-MW), Version 12.1(3)XG2, EARLY DEPLOYMENT RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) TAC:Home:SW:IOS:Specials for info Copyright (c) 1986-2000 by cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Mon 13-Nov-00 17:27 by detang 00:00:26: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Ethernet0, changed state to administratively down 00:00:27: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Ethernet0, changed state to down RouterA#sh run Building configuration... Current configuration: ! version 12.1 service config no service pad service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname RouterA ! boot config flash:nvram enable secret 5 $1$nTbn$GQVW3zqE.sEBllYS0y6Bt0 enable password cisco ! ip subnet-zero ! isdn switch-type basic-net3 ! interface Ethernet0 no ip address shutdown no cdp enable interface BRI0 no ip address shutdown isdn switch-type basic-net3 no cdp enable no ip http server ip classless dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit dialer-list 1 protocol ipx permit bridge 1 protocol dec line con 0 exec-timeout 0 0 stopbits 1 line vty 0 4 password cisco login no rcapi server end Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=8826t=8826 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bridging over DDR [7:6206]
Hi all,
I have client want to connect two Branch offices using DDR and
access a netbios based program form one branch to the server
on the other branch. They got one 801 and 803 with ip only IOS.
The DDR is configured with IP and the routers are getting
connected over ISDN. Now the netbios program is the problem.
I thought of two options a) use IP tunnel and b) Transperant Bridging.
I was looking in the Cisco Cd for the info and got the explanation
and sample config on transperant bridging. But one point of defining
interesting traffic I couldn't grasp. The info from the CD is as given
below
access list access-list-no {permit|deny}type-code[mask]
(Permits packets according to ethernet type code)
The corresponding line in sample config was
access-list permit 0x0800 0xFFF8
Can anyone please explain type-code and mask in the command
and the values in the sample config.
Hope the background info doesn't bother you.
Thanks in advance
Manoj
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=6206t=6206
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX
Hi all, I am really getting fed up with this discussion of paper certification. I read one mail saying that while interviewing some one, the candidate said that he wanted to become a network engineer for better pay. Is the this guy became a network engineer for serving the company and people? Everybody here is trying to make more money for them self and their family to have a better life by getting better qualified and knowledgeable. The certification and study groups and all are only the means for that. First accept this truth. About being paper certified, I am an engineer with more than 8 years experience in networking field, but unfortunately I am working with a company who is not dealing with routers or cisco equipment's. I have experience in modems, muxes, ISDN equipment's, and supports wide area networks. Now are anyone of you, who is talking about paper certification ready to give me a job even at the entry level to work on cisco routers if I present myself as of now without certifications? I did tried and I didn't even got an interview call. Now I have some certification and some experience, at least I am getting some interviews. What I feel is that the certifications shows that the guy knows how this stuff works and some idea of how to make it work. It doesn't mean that he knows in and out of anything. Then it also shows that he is willing to learn and he can pick up things fast. Don't think that since you have 10 years experience and the other guy doesn't means the other guy doesn't worth anything. He may be able to do things which you can't and he may know things that you don't know. Try to share the knowledge and help him. Without giving a chance, how anyone going to learn? Sorry if I hurt anybody's feelings but it doesn't feel write to blame guy's like me for not having experience. We are trying to get experience and we selected the path to get there through certification. Since we got certification we don't claim that we are better than a guy with experience. We just want to show that we can learn if you give us a chance. regards, Manoj. EA Louie wrote: some of the certs are like getting a "paper diploma" (which is what I got... heheheh) So, if they are going to take the risk and study for the cert on the hopes that they can get a job using the cert as leverage, more power to them! By virtue of the testing mechanism, the CCNA/CCNP/CCDA/CCDP will be attainable by studying. I work with one now, who has both a CCNP and CCDP, but couldn't reload an erased flash on a 2600 series router... go figure. I was very tempted to ask, "What are those certs really for?", but I just smiled and helped him reload the flash from a tftp server using rommon. (By the way, the variables in rommon on a 2600 are case sensitive :-) When I first started working in industry after earning my degree, my boss put me together with a technician who had no degree, but tons of experience. The tech rolled his eyes when he met me and said, "Great...I gotta train ANOTHER engineer". What he didn't count on was that I'd learn how to do his job, not to his skill level (he had 10+ years in the industry), but good enough so that he'd trust me to do the work if he wasn't around. I kind of feel like him, now... a non-certified "packet jockey" that has to train these certified, "paper trained", network "engineers". I interviewed a guy the other day and asked him, "Why do you want to get Cisco certified?". He said, because he wanted to be a network engineer and learn how to read/interpret Cisco configurations. When I asked him "Why do you want to be a network engineer?", his reason was pretty weak (but I'd guess he'd have said "the money" if I pressed him). The havoc I could wreak on these guys with policy routing, access-groups, NAT, and route maps... heheheheh...evil grin - Original Message - From: Mike Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2001 3:51 PM Subject: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX I will probably get yelled at for this one but... I am a CCNA, CCDA, CCNP, and yes going after the CCIE. So up front I am not against certs. I am becoming aware of more and more people becoming Cisco certified and not know enough to go and actually do the work. Our company has and is interviewing for network folks, I have the opportunity to interview these people to verify technical experience. I have had CCNA, CCNP, and yes even CCIE written folks who could not tell me what they 'should' acutally know. This scares me because I am also working hard toward my certs and the CCIE. But it has been proven and is showing up more that these people are becoming "paper" Cisco folks, as in the paper MCSE. I know and hope the CCIE LAB and title will remain as difficult if not more so in the future. I for one do not want to spend a year of my life gaining the CCIE title to be one among thousands who also have
