Re: 1600's - Using to make a Frame Switch [7:4643]

2001-05-16 Thread Michel Lavondes

On Wed, 16 May 2001, Circusnuts wrote:

 It shouldn't be any different than a 4 port router.  I'm not sure what is
 supported in the 1600 IOS, but here is a basic template of the Telco Cloud
 config.

Only difference would be needing to switch to/from a tunnel between the
routers, or over IP addresses directly if FR switching supports that (I
know X25 switching does, can't remember whether FR does). There's an
example using tunneling in the 11.3 FR configuration guide.

 interface Serial0
  no ip address
  encapsulation frame-relay
  frame-relay lmi-type ansi
  frame-relay intf-type dce
  frame-relay route 102 interface Serial1 201
  frame-relay route 103 interface Serial2 301
  frame-relay route 105 interface Serial3 501
 !
 interface Serial1
  no ip address
  encapsulation frame-relay
  frame-relay lmi-type ansi
  frame-relay intf-type dce
  frame-relay route 201 interface Serial0 102
 
 Phil
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Gary Hughes
 Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 11:52 PM
 Subject: 1600's - Using to make a Frame Switch [7:4643]
 
  Anybody know the config's to make a 4 port Frame-Switch from 2 1600's
 (both
  with 2 serial ports)

-- 
Someone approached me and asked me to teach a javascript course. I was
about to decline, saying that my complete ignorance of the subject made
me unsuitable, then I thought again, that maybe it doesn't, as driving
people away from it is a desirable outcome. --Me




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=4663t=4643
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: hi [7:4536]

2001-05-16 Thread Michel Lavondes

On Tue, 15 May 2001, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:

 Perhaps bringing it into perspective, is dCEF a collective? Is Seven 
 of Nine the future of the VIP?

Or an acceptable loss ratio? 77.7% of all packets/cells make it through?

-- 
Someone approached me and asked me to teach a javascript course. I was
about to decline, saying that my complete ignorance of the subject made
me unsuitable, then I thought again, that maybe it doesn't, as driving
people away from it is a desirable outcome. --Me




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=4680t=4536
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Route Poisoning and Poison Reverse?? [7:4666]

2001-05-16 Thread Michel Lavondes

On Wed, 16 May 2001, Aki Christopoulos wrote:

 I understand that both (Route Poisoning and Poison reverse) are used with
 Distance Vector Routing Protocols, but I am not able to get a clear
 definition
 of Route Poisoning..
 
 What is the difference between the two??

Never heard route poisoning myself, but I would assume it means the same
as poison reverse. Did you see both used in the same document, or by the
same author?

-- 
Someone approached me and asked me to teach a javascript course. I was
about to decline, saying that my complete ignorance of the subject made
me unsuitable, then I thought again, that maybe it doesn't, as driving
people away from it is a desirable outcome. --Me




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=4692t=4666
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]