MISSED THE WRITTEN BY 3 POINTS [7:29249]
I JUST MISSED THE WRITTEN TEST BY A WHOLE 3 POINTS.WHAT BOTHERS ME THE MOST IS THAT IT WAS SO EASY...WELL I GUESS IT WAS DECENT FOR ONLY STUDYING FOR THREE DAYS...I WILL GET IT NEXT TIME CAUSE I DONT FEEL LIKE MAKING ANOTHER $300 DONATION. P. NEIL BORNE CCNP, CCDA, AND C-VOICE _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=29249&t=29249 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCIE written [7:32733]
Has the test changed since the first of the year?? _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32733&t=32733 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Rogue Wireless LANs [7:47287]
The problem that I am coming accross is that some of my customers take the wireless gear outta the box and plug it in and when they figure that work with factory defaults they leave it alonethen all of a sudden someone pulls up in the front yard and starts snooping around. One thing you can do is WEP and depending on the vendor try some filtering by mac, ssid, or protocol... You will have do some serious lockdown measures when its a internal user as opposed to outside users... But like the last email stated if things get bad use netstumbler but be careful from the last I heard it works with only some wireless cards... >From: "Patrick Donlon" >Reply-To: "Patrick Donlon" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Rogue Wireless LANs [7:47287] >Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 11:48:48 -0400 > >I've just found a wireless LAN set up by someone in the building, I found >it >by chance when I was checking something with a colleague from another dept. >The WLAN has zero security which is not a surprise and lets the user into >the main LAN in the site with a DHCP address served up too! Does anyone >have >any tips on preventing users and dept's who don't think about security from >plugging whatever they like into the network, > >Cheers > >Pat > > > >-- > >email me on : [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=47373&t=47287 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468]
The better, but more costly choice is the concentrator, you have a lot less issues to worry about than w/ IOS.Either pay now or pay for it later P. Neil Borne, CCDA,CCNP and C-voice Systems Integrator III >From: "Hyde, Lori" >Reply-To: "Hyde, Lori" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468] >Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 08:42:52 -0400 > >I've used both the IOS and the concentrator solutions. I have found the >concentrator solution to be more expensive, but absolutely rock solid. The >IOS solution is less expensive, but there are many bugs even with the >latest >versions. Lots of headaches here. My recommendation: if you have the bucks, >go with the concentrator. By far the better choice from a maintenance and >reliablity aspect. >Lori > >-Original Message- >From: Bob Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 6:46 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468] > > >Hi, > >I'm looking for comments about various Cisco VPN options allowing access >from a home workstation.. >As far as I know my options are: > >1) Cisco PIX accessed by VPN Client 1.1 >2) Cisco 3000 (or 5000) Concentrator accessed by VPN client 3.1 >3) Cisco IPsec IOS access by VPN Client 1.1 > >It would seem that option 3 is the most cost effective (assuming you >already >have the hardware, you just need to purchase the correct IOS).. >Anyone with hints/info/caveats? >Appreciate any feedback from people actually using the IOS and the VPN >client... > >Thanks _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=20540&t=20468 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468]
I am curoius to see what happens when CISCO comes out with the next Unified client later on P. Neil Borne, CCDA,CCNP and C-voice Systems Integrator III >From: "Andras Bellak" >Reply-To: "Andras Bellak" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468] >Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 10:15:56 -0400 > >One thing to be aware of - the VPN client doesn't (at least didn't last >time I looked) support Windows 2000. It also has (once again, possibly >should be "had") big issues with some ISPs, especially aol and netzero. > >I have to agree with the other folks, the concentrator (we have 3 >vpn-3030 systems deployed around the world) is rock solid - I've only >ever had one hang. The cisco VPN hardware solution is a great fit for >home offices connecting to the concetrator, and the 806 router also >works very well. > >I've used the client to pix, and while it works fine, it's a real >p.i.t.a. > >Andras > >-Original Message- >From: Neil Borne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 6:33 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468] > > >The better, but more costly choice is the concentrator, you have a lot >less >issues to worry about than w/ IOS.Either pay now or pay for it later > >P. Neil Borne, CCDA,CCNP and C-voice >Systems Integrator III > > > > > >From: "Hyde, Lori" > >Reply-To: "Hyde, Lori" > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: RE: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468] > >Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 08:42:52 -0400 > > > >I've used both the IOS and the concentrator solutions. I have found the > >concentrator solution to be more expensive, but absolutely rock solid. >The > >IOS solution is less expensive, but there are many bugs even with the > >latest > >versions. Lots of headaches here. My recommendation: if you have the >bucks, > >go with the concentrator. By far the better choice from a maintenance >and > >reliablity aspect. > >Lori > > > >-Original Message- > >From: Bob Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 6:46 PM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468] > > > > > >Hi, > > > >I'm looking for comments about various Cisco VPN options allowing >access > >from a home workstation.. > >As far as I know my options are: > > > >1) Cisco PIX accessed by VPN Client 1.1 > >2) Cisco 3000 (or 5000) Concentrator accessed by VPN client 3.1 > >3) Cisco IPsec IOS access by VPN Client 1.1 > > > >It would seem that option 3 is the most cost effective (assuming you > >already > >have the hardware, you just need to purchase the correct IOS).. > >Anyone with hints/info/caveats? > >Appreciate any feedback from people actually using the IOS and the VPN > >client... > > > >Thanks >_ >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at >http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=20554&t=20468 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
LANE Information [7:50420]
Does anyone know where I get can get some "straight forward" LANE information? Thanks, P. Neil Borne, CCDA,CCNP,C-voice and CWNA Systems Integrator III _ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=50420&t=50420 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
