Help with upgrading 1601 s/w [7:27433]
Hi group, I need some advice on upgrading my 1601, Read from Flash(RFF) router. It's now running IOS 11.1 on a 4Mb flash card. I have bought a new 16Mb flash card and loaded IOS 12.1 (size about 10Mb) on my laptop. Can I swap out the old flash card and insert the new 16Mb and do 'copy tftp flash'? I have checked with some document in CCO which disallow flash card removal for RFF 1600 routers. Will configuring the config-register help? Any advice?? Thanks. David Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27433&t=27433 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help with upgrading 1601 s/w [7:27433]
Thanks MADMAN and [EMAIL PROTECTED] Finally found the procedures here.. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/130/upgrade_index.shtml -Original Message- From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 10:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Help with upgrading 1601 s/w [7:27433] You can pull the flash card from the 1600 but this will crash the router. I haven't done so in quite some time but I think you can pull your old flash and install the new flash and it should boot up off the frist file on the flash card. You can always add the "boot system flash x" to CYA. dave "Ng, Kim Seng David (David)" wrote: > > Hi group, > > I need some advice on upgrading my 1601, Read from Flash(RFF) > router. It's now running IOS 11.1 on a 4Mb flash card. I have bought a > new 16Mb flash card and loaded IOS 12.1 (size about 10Mb) on my laptop. > Can I swap out the old flash card and insert the new 16Mb and do 'copy > tftp flash'? I have checked with some document in CCO which disallow > flash card removal for RFF 1600 routers. Will configuring the > config-register help? Any advice?? > > Thanks. > David -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27466&t=27433 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: isdn problem [7:27975]
>From your config, I assume you ping from router 2 to 1 since you only have dialer map at BRI0 of router 2. I think you are missing this in the interface config of BRI0 at router 2 ppp pap sent-username ... password . Hope this helps... -Original Message- From: sudhakar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 7:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: isdn problem [7:27975] >Dear Sir i connected router1 and router2 by BRI0 isdn line, but it showing conection fails., not pinging , So plese give me solution on this. > waoting for u r replay router1 router1#sh run Building configuration... Current configuration: ! version 12.0 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname router1 ! ! username router2 password 0 router2 ip subnet-zero isdn switch-type basic-net3 ! ! ! ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 198.168.0.8 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast no ip route-cache ! interface Serial0 description BLR-PUN LINK bandwidth 64 ip address 172.16.127.4 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast no ip route-cache shutdown no fair-queue ! interface BRI0 ip address 172.16.130.2 255.255.255.0 ip directed-broadcast encapsulation ppp dialer idle-timeout 500 dialer-group 1 isdn switch-type basic-net3 no peer default ip address no fair-queue ppp authentication pap router rip redistribute static network 172.16.0.0 ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.16.130.1 ! ! line con 0 transport input none line vty 0 4 ! end Router2 router2#sh run Building configuration... Current configuration: ! version 12.0 service timestamps debug datetime msec service timestamps log datetime msec no service password-encryption ! hostname router2 ! enable password 12#$ ! username mcd password 0 12#$ username router1 password 0 router1 ip subnet-zero isdn switch-type basic-net3 ! ! ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 172.16.4.3 255.255.255.0 ip directed-broadcast no ip route-cache ! interface Serial0 bandwidth 64 ip address 172.16.129.1 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast ! interface BRI0 bandwidth 64 ip address 172.16.130.1 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast encapsulation ppp dialer idle-timeout 99 dialer map ip 172.16.130.2 broadcast 2648970 dialer hold-queue 25 dialer load-threshold 1 either dialer-group 1 isdn switch-type basic-net3 no peer default ip address ppp authentication pap ! router rip network 172.16.0.0 ! ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.16.4.1 ip route 172.16.126.0 255.255.255.0 172.16.4.1 ip route 172.16.130.0 255.255.255.0 172.16.130.2 ! dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit ! line con 0 password 123 transport input none line vty 0 4 password 123 login ! end Debugg file router2#debug is router2#debug isdn eve router2#debug isdn events ISDN events debugging is on router2#p *Apr 19 04:52:15.118: ISDN BR0: TX -> RRp sapi = 0 tei = 94 nr = 10 *Apr 19 04:52:15.158: ISDN BR0: RX INFOc sapi = 0 tei = 94 ns = 6 nr = 10 i = 0x080115050402889018018370088032363438393730 *Apr 19 04:52:15.884: SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x15 *Apr 19 04:52:15.884: Bearer Capability i = 0x8890 *Apr 19 04:52:15.888: Channel ID i = 0x83 *Apr 19 04:52:15.888: Called Party Number i = 0x80, '2648970' *Apr 19 04:52:15.944: ISDN BR0: RX RRr sapi = 0 tei = 94 nr = 11 *Apr 19 04:52:16.130: ISDN BR0: received HOST_INFORMATION call_id 0x8193 *Apr 19 04:52:16.694: ISDN Event: dsl 0 call_id 0x8193 B channel assigned by swi tch 0 ISDN BR0: RX RRr sapi = 0 tei = 94 nr = 12 *Apr 19 04:52:16.765: ISDN BR0: received HOST_CONNECT call_id 0x8193 *Apr 19 04:52:16.765: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0:1, changed state to up *Apr 19 04:52:16.789: %ISDN-6-CONNECT: Interface BRI0:1 is now connected to 2648 970 *Apr 19 04:52:16.793: BR0:1 PPP: Treating connection as a callout *Apr 19 04:52:16.797: BR0:1 PPP: Phase is ESTABLISHING, Active Open *Apr 19 04:52:16.797: BR0:1 LCP: O CONFREQ [Closed] id 139 len 10 *Apr 19 04:52:16.801: BR0:1 LCP:MagicNumber 0x0184C7B3 (0x05060184C7B3) *Apr 19 04:52:16.801: ISDN BR0: Event: Connected to 2648970 on B1 at 64 Kb/s *Apr 19 04:52:16.805: ISDN BR0: TX -> INFOc sapi = 0 tei = 94 ns = 7 nr = 12 i = 0x0801150F *Apr 19 04:52:16.809: CONNECT_ACK pd = 8 callref = 0x15 *Apr 19 04:52:16.813: ISDN BR0: RX RRr sapi = 0 tei = 94 nr = 13 *Apr 19 04:52:16.840: ISDN BR0: received HOST_FACILITY_INVOKE call_id 0x8193 Facility i = 0x91A1130202410B020122300AA1053003020101820100 *Apr 19 04:52:16.844: - ETSI Supplementary Service, Invoke, AOC-D Charging Uni ts: 1 *Apr 19 04:52:16.848: BRI0:1: AOC-D Recorded Units = 1 *Apr 19 04:52:16.852: BR0:1 LCP: I CONFREQ [REQsent] id 123 len 14 *Apr 19 04:52:16.852: BR0:1 LCP:AuthProto PAP (0x0304C023) *Apr 19 04:52:16.856: BR0:1 LCP:MagicNumber 0x0393D0A3 (0x05060393D0A3) *Apr 19 04:52:16.856: BR0:1 LCP: O CONFNAK [REQsent] id 123 len 9 *Apr 19 04:52:16.860: BR0:1 LCP:AuthProto CHAP (0x0305C
Dialer keyword in Snapshot Server cmd [7:28557]
Hi group, What function does the 'dialer' keyword in the 'snapshot server' command has?? For eg, snapshot server 5 dialer As I understand, this keyword is required for snapshot clients to allow them to dial to servers as only clients dials to servers (Am I right?). What function it has then for servers since they never dial to clients? The Cisco CD says this about the keyword: snapshot server active-time [dialer] dialer = (Optional) Allows the client router to dial up the remote router in the absence of regular traffic. Thanks David Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28557&t=28557 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Dialer keyword in Snapshot Server cmd [7:28557]
Nick, I managed to do some experiment with my home lab. When I ignored the dialer keyword at the server side, the server end will not treat the routing updates (ie. sending of routing updates) as interesting. As a result, the idle timeout (default 120sec) will count down till zero. Hence, the server will disconnect the ISDN call after 120sec even if the snapshot active timer is not yet due. However, if the keyword is present, every time an update is sent, the idle time-out is reset back to 120sec and the ISDN link is kept up until the snapshot timer expires. >From my observation, I think you can ignore the keyword if you are applying the snapshot on serial interfaces or any interfaces which doesn't dial out. Purely my guess. Thanks David -Original Message- From: Shah Nick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 3:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Dialer keyword in Snapshot Server cmd [7:28557] This keyword is applied on both server & client, but it works on Clients only. It is used in conjuntion with dialer map snapshot command, which directs the string to dial etc. >From what I understand its just one of the Cisco things, whereby you also have to put in the dialer keyword (as in Snapshot server 5 dialer) on the server end, but without the matching dialer map snapshot command (and also due to server keyword) it never dials out and its also not meant to dial out. hth Nick Shah Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28576&t=28557 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FW: Frame relay problems [7:28569]
Once you solve R1-R4 problem, that should solve R1-R3. On R4, remove the subi/f 0.1. Just work using the physical interface s0 and turn on inverse arp like what you have for R3. Also add a map from R4 to R3. That may help. Thanks David -Original Message- From: McHugh Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 2:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Frame relay problems [7:28569] Does anyone know why I am seeing active pvc's on this hub and spoke frame relay config and only getting half succesfull pings. I had to delete the dlci and interfaces and then reload the router because I changed the interface type from point to multi. Or really just create a new sub interface. See below what I am getting: Thanks This is a spoke router: r4#sh frame map Serial0 (up): ip 0.0.0.0 dlci 401(0x191,0x6410) broadcast, CISCO, status defined, active Serial0.1 (up): point-to-point dlci, dlci 401(0x191,0x6410), broadcast status defined, active r4#ping 172.16.1.1 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 172.16.1.1, timeout is 2 seconds: !.!.! Success rate is 60 percent (3/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 68/68/68 ms r4# This is a hub: r1#sh frame map Serial0.3 (up): ip 172.16.1.3 dlci 103(0x67,0x1870), dynamic, broadcast,, status defined, active Serial0.3 (up): ip 172.16.1.2 dlci 102(0x66,0x1860), dynamic, broadcast,, status defined, active Serial0.2 (up): point-to-point dlci, dlci 104(0x68,0x1880), broadcast status defined, active r1#ping 172.16.1.2 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 172.16.1.2, timeout is 2 seconds: !.!.! Success rate is 60 percent (3/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 68/68/68 ms r1# And then from r3 which is a spoke router using a physical interface with map statments I cannot connect to the other spoke routers at all. r3#sh frame map Serial0 (up): ip 172.16.1.5 dlci 301(0x12D,0x48D0), static, CISCO, status defined, active Serial0 (up): ip 172.16.1.1 dlci 301(0x12D,0x48D0), dynamic, broadcast,, status defined, active Serial0 (up): ip 172.16.1.2 dlci 301(0x12D,0x48D0), static, CISCO, status defined, active r3#ping 172.16.1.2 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 172.16.1.2, timeout is 2 seconds: . Success rate is 0 percent (0/5) r3# Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28577&t=28569 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bootstrap protocol in Multicast [7:65243]
Hi group, In Bootstrap protocol, does the PIM router selects the RP with the higest or lowest IP address (assuming everything else is the same) from the RP-set list obtained in the RP-discovery message?? I was reading Jeff Doyle's "Routing TCP/IP Vol 2" and pages 491 (first bullet point) and 564 (last second para) seems to contradict. I have done some testing and it seems to be the lower IP address. Auto-RP seems to be the opposite. Appreciate any response. Thanks David Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=65243&t=65243 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Simulating a 64K link in lab [7:25061]
Hi group, I am new to this group. Wondering whether someone could help.. I have two routers (2621 and 1601) tied back-to-back using V.35 serial. Can I simulate a 64K link with this config if I execute "bandwidth 64000" at the interface prompt?? What I understand is that this command is used in eigrp to limit eigrp traffic to 50% of what ever b/w one specified. Does this physically limit the link to a speed of 64K too?? Thank you in advance ksng Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=25061&t=25061 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can frame-relay multipoint sub-interfaces support inverse arp?? [7:26362]
Hi, I was a bit confused after reading the Ciscopress CCNP Support book and Caslow's ccie book. Can frame-relay multipoint sub-interfaces support inverse arp DLCI mappings?? Ciscopress Support book seem to say no (not directly though) but Caslow's book says yes. Thanks in advance... David Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26362&t=26362 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
