OT: Linksys vs. Cisco [7:41829]
I always thought of Linksys as Toy Home (SOHO) solutions. Lately I have been seeing post of people using Linksys' VPN solution. What is the different between Linksys VPN Solution (BEFVP41) and Cisco's 1751 VPN router. I am working on a project and if Cost is the only difference I will go with the cheaper solution. Now I am not talking about connecting up major sites with thousands of users, what we are talking about is a corprate setup with 7-15 Servers and approx. 100 users accessing the network (not all at the same time). Is the different price, packets per second (PPS), or are we just comfortable with the vendor (CISCO)... Just would like to see what other people think of these routers. Rico Ortiz Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41829t=41829 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How do you get that? [7:41832]
Good question, curious of the answer myself. I opened up some telcom books I have on the shelf and the give 8k to overhead but what overhead? is this signalling, framing? Rico -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kelly Cobean Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 12:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: How do you get that? [7:41832] All, I was wondering if any of you have a good link to a site that explains how the bandwidth is derived for T-1/T-3 circuits. What I'm looking for specifically is how we come to 1.544 Mb/s for a T-1 that is 24x64K channels which = 1536K, and what happens to the other 8K, and the same calculation for a T-3. Descriptions of Robbed-bit signaling, etc., too. Thanks much for your help. Kelly Cobean, CCNP, CCSA, ACSA, MCSE, MCP+I Network Engineer GRC International, Inc., an ATT company Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41847t=41832 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco VPN Client PIX [7:40670]
might not be the same as your problem but I had a Citrix client do the same. took 2 months to troubleshoot the damn thing. Found out is was a power thing. Good luck and good hunting... Rico -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 11:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco VPN Client PIX [7:40670] I am using Cisco VPN Client to connect with my Office PIX 515 firwall over IPSEC 3DES encryption. My connection is droping automatically. It is not because of idle time out or maximum time out. it happens on radomly. If some one has any information on it. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40677t=40670 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]
My understanding is Vint Cerf, was the creator of the TCP/IP protocols. Not sure but was he not commissioned by DOD/BBN during the ARPAnet days.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Steven A. Ridder Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 2:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657] I am a technical reviewer for a book, and someone wrote that TCP/IP was written by the Depertment of Defense. I am confident that ARPAnet was commissiond by the DoD in the 60's to BBN, and maybe TCP/IP was derived from these early protocls, but to say the the DoD, or BBN or anyone other than the Internet community wrote TCP and IP would be incorrect, right? I seem to remember that IP was used in ArpaNet, but not TCP. I thought TCP was written in various universities. I could even look up the couple (who used to work at Cisco) who wrote it. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. Get in my head: http://sar.dynu.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40632t=39657 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco 2600 with IPSEC to wins2000 environment [7:39798]
Mcgraw-hill has a pretty good book called Cisco interworking w/Win NT W2k. It has a good section on Cisco, 2000 IPsec.. Rico -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Darren Sargent Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 1:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Cisco 2600 with IPSEC to wins2000 environment [7:39798] You may want to poke around here - http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios113ed/113t/113t_ 3/ipsec.htm Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40647t=39798 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]
When I was in the Marines (about 10 yrs ago) the used Banyard Vines for there networks. I believe EDS has been hired to upgrade there current network to an IP setup.. Rico -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Priscilla Oppenheimer Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 2:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657] And I've heard that the US side in Desert Storm used Banyan for their networking systems, not TCP/IP!? Priscilla At 12:05 PM 3/28/02, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote: Thats what the DoD taught in their DataCommunications Schools. Sorry Dom. Absolutely, positively wrong, though. That's an urban legend that has been disavowed by every early developer I can think of, including the DARPA people. It developed out of pure DARPA sponsored research in networking. I'm hard-pressed to think of any nuclear command control communications system, before the mid-80's or so, that used TCP/IP, and at one time I knew pretty much every system that was deployed. Among the ones I can talk about, they were circuit-switched or radio. Some of the circuit-switched networks were computer controlled, including AUTODIN I and a variety of intelligent networks. Without detailed research, I'd tend to say the first military TCP/IP applications were in tactical, not strategic, nets. Actually, the first demonstration that packet switched networks were resilient to massive attack came from the Iraqi air defense system in Desert Storm. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chuck Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 9:00 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657] the real reason being.? wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Sorry, the be resilient to Global Thermal Nuclear attacks is a myth. Dom Stocqueler William Gragido To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657] Sent by: nobody@groups tudy.com 27/03/2002 20:17 Please respond to William Gragido The DoD adopted TCP/IP as its native protocol for communications in 1983. DARPA lead the charge for a communications system that would be resilient to Global Thermal Nuclear attacks (therein allowing for continued, uninterrupted comm), and would allow for common connectivity of multi-vendor solutions. This of course did yield 'ARPA NET' which, by a decision of the DCA (Defense Communications Agency), in 1983 was split in two yielding a smaller version of 'ARPA NET' and 'MILNET'. The evolution of the modern internet can followed done the line from 'ARPA NET' and as we all know by virtue of adding new networks to the mix, 'ARPA NET' was de-regulated in 1991 ushering the age of the modern internet. Hope that helps, Will Gragido -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael Williams Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 1:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657] It's kinda fuzzy. I myself just got through doing a tech review of a book covering this topic as well as have written my own materials for training, etc covering this topic. IMHO, DoD is credited with creating the internet even though at the time it wasn't called the internet and didn't use the same protocols we do now. Although the DoD started the whole mess, from what I've read DoD commisioned ARPANET to research this. I'm sure that peoples are various universities and colleges were in on the actual deveopment evidenced by the fact that in 1971 there were 15 nodes (with a total of 23 hosts), namely UCLA, SRI, UCSB, U of Utah, BBN, MIT, RAND, SDC, Harvard, Lincoln Lab, Stanford, UIU(C), CWRU, CMU, and NASA/Ames. Note most of those listed are colleges/universities. I've read some about BBN, however it seems to me their main role was to supply the first computers (Honeywell 516 mini computers with 12K of memory) that acted as Information Message Processors (IMPs) (routers?). However, I would humbly suggest that Howard B. or Priscilla O. throw their 2 cents in here. Also, since your doing a technical edit, be careful of the words you choose as well. For example you use the word written over and over above, but I don't think the conversation is really about which programmers actually wrote the code it's more about who either spearheaded or caused the evolution of the *standards* we call TCP/IP in which case I don't think crediting the DoD is incorrect. My 2 cents =) Mike W. Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at:
aironet pc card using Linux [7:40654]
Ok, bit off topic. I have a Aironet 340 using Linux. everything seems to be working but I am unable to get an IP address from the AP. Using an Linksys AP. SSID is shows good, recieving and transmitting packets. it must be something simple anyone has any ideas.. TIA.. Rico Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40654t=40654 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Anybody use Port Security on Switch in real world? [7:40137]
I use it on one of my sites at a military installation lin NY. It more a pain than its worth. everytime theres an add move or change you have to break the link and resecure the connection. Its not a hard task just something more to do when you have a full plate. Rico -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rich Chang Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 3:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Anybody use Port Security on Switch in real world? [7:39457] I work at a government agency with a real need for Port Security. I would like to konw if anyone has tried to use the Port Security command on thier Switches, thereby preventing unauthorized access to ports on the Switches, in a Real World environment. We work in a Technical enevironment where a lot of people tinker and play with thier computers, switching NICS, and also use HUBs. Anyone have any real world experience in this matter? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40137t=40137 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco Aironet [7:38382]
Brian, We (USCG) have done this in the NY harbor, we used the 350 with an omni antenna. one very important thing to remember when using wireless, CLEAR line of sight. We would lose network connectivity every time another boat got in the way. but for the most part it worked quite nicely.. Rico -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brian Zeitz Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 9:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco Aironet [7:38382] I found a document to do a Cisco AIR-AP34xE2C external antenna modification. This modification is to put a high power antenna on a Cisco Aironet. Well, what I wanted to do, is to use this to broadcast the contents of my server to my neighborhood. Kinda like a community Intranet. I live in a metro area, and I am wondering if anyone in this group has every tried anything like this. I also found modifications to bump up the power of the signal on the Aironet. I am just courious if anyone has tried this, and im wordering if anyone has setup plans/Parts for doing something like this. I have found antennas that claim they will go at least = mile or more. I hope this is relavant to this study group, thanks. PS. Could we please have a way to put some people on ignore. Some of the post here I am finding are less then helpful, and filling up my mailbox with political stuff, instead of helpful information. If not, I can make a rule in outlook 2002 to search for certain peoples usernames and thow them in the garbage. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=38577t=38382 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: WiFi [7:38543]
I believe as long as SSID mode are the same as the bridge it should work. I have a linksys card connected to a AP340..Rico -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ndabarasa Michel Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 9:08 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: WiFi [7:38543] hello list, i am a kind not expert in wireless technology. up to now i was able to make two cisco-aironet or two speedlan bridges talk between them. but i have been told that all WiFi compliant devices can talk and now i want to try to make cisco bridge talk to a 'linksys' PC card on a notebook. because they dont have the same terminology i don't know where to start from. i have now installed the PC card in the laptop and the cisco bridge is already in activity in our network. i just want to know what configs i can use on my linksys PC card to make it talk with the cisco box. /'^ ^'\ ((o)-(o)) |oOOO--(_)--OOOo--|-|- | Ndabarasa Michel... | | CCNA,CCAI.. | | National University of Rwanda.. | | Computing Centre... | | voice.. | | office (+250)530666 | | cell (+250)08425269..| | .oooO | | ( )Oooo. | |---\ (--- ( )---|-| \_) ) /|-| (_/ -- FREE! The Best in Rwanda Email Address @mail.rw Reserve your name right now at http://mail.rw Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=38579t=38543 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: detect routers and switches [7:36873]
OK how about telnet, 3rd party SNMP software.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of ashish Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 6:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: detect routers and switches [7:36873] well, that's not my problem. I have to find a general way to find whether a remote IP box is a router or a switch. That IP box can be of any vendor. and that remote box can be located across multiple networks. - Original Message - From: Larry Letterman To: Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 3:07 PM Subject: RE: detect routers and switches [7:36873] if its cisco gear, do a show cdp neighbor detail and it should show you whats on the other end... Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of ashish Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 2:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: detect routers and switches [7:36873] Hi, this question is bit vauge.But thought you guys will surely be able to help me out :-) is there any way to tell programmatically , whether a remote box is a router or a switch. Thanks, Ashish Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=36913t=36873 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2000 professional [7:24175]
Whats it NOT doing... Rico -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of jimmy halbert Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 7:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 2000 professional [7:24175] I am trying to get hyperminal to work wih 2000 Professionalno such luck _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=24200t=24175 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New York Study Group [7:23580]
I too would like to as well.. Rico -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of ALFREDO TORRES Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 6:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: New York Study Group [7:23580] I would be interested in being part of the cisco study group. - Original Message - From: Philip Jache To: Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 8:24 PM Subject: RE: New York Study Group [7:23580] We could start one. Philip Jache Sports Illustrated 135 West 50th Street New York, NY 10020 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=24204t=23580 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: smartforce training [7:21933]
Its provided for CG members. Its a CBT. If you like CBTs then its good. If I actually like the notes and other stuff that is provided with Smartforce. Rico -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jennifer Cribbs Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 6:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: smartforce training [7:21933] That is exactly what everyone else is telling me that has replied. Thanks for the reply. Jenn 10/3/2001 3:10:13 PM, Lynn Melson wrote: My company provides it to all employees. Actually I much prefer a book. The CBT just doesn't have the depth of information you will need. Good Luck - Original Message - From: Jennifer Cribbs Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 4:54 PM Subject: smartforce training [7:21933] Hello, I would like some feedback on smartforce training. Is anyone familiar with this? I am thinking about purchasing this curriculum and want to know if it is a waste of money or if it is something truely beneficial in obtaining your certification? Thanks, Jenn Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=22132t=21933 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco Aironet vs Lucent ORiNOCO [7:20954]
We {USCG} use the 350s to provide connectivities to the Boats in the NY
harbor. Its a great solution if your standing still but watch out if you
rock..
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Allen May
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cisco Aironet vs Lucent ORiNOCO [7:20954]
rofl...my badI thought it said Arrowpoint...not Aironet. *slap self*
- Original Message -
From: Murphy, Brian J SITI-ISET-31
To: 'Allen May' ;
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:43 AM
Subject: RE: Cisco Aironet vs Lucent ORiNOCO [7:20954]
Iassumes he means driver support...
This is the list from linux 2.4.10
[*] Wireless LAN (non-hamradio) x x
STRIP (Metricom starmode radio IP) (NEW)x x
ATT WaveLAN DEC RoamAbout DS support (NEW) x x
Aironet Arlan 655 IC2200 DS support (NEW) x x
Aironet 4500/4800 series adapters (NEW) x x
Cisco/Aironet 34X/35X/4500/4800 ISA and PCI cards (NEW)
-Original Message-
From: Allen May [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 5:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cisco Aironet vs Lucent ORiNOCO [7:20954]
It works via IP addresses...so yes.
- Original Message -
From: Steiven Poh-(Jaring MailBox)
To:
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 9:03 AM
Subject: Re: Cisco Aironet vs Lucent ORiNOCO [7:20954]
Is both work with Linux OS?
Steiven
- Original Message -
From: netman
To:
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 8:21 PM
Subject: Re: Cisco Aironet vs Lucent ORiNOCO [7:20954]
I don't know about the Lucent stuff, but I installed some Cisco
Aironet
340
series equipment last summer (99), and I have not had one trouble call
at
all. These are used constantly for classes and haven't had one probem.
In
fact I almost forgot we had them installed. You can't beat that :-)
Donman
- Original Message -
From: Steiven Poh-(Jaring MailBox)
To:
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 9:25 PM
Subject: Cisco Aironet vs Lucent ORiNOCO [7:20954]
Hello Folks,
Any one got idea about above comparison?
Rgds,
Steiven
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21204t=20954
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Aironet 350 authenication using RADIUS [7:20974]
we are using the cisco radius server its extremely simple to setup. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of dovelet Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 6:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Aironet 350 authenication using RADIUS [7:20974] Hi all, Our company just wants to implement wireless LAN and we will go for Cisco Aironet 350. In authenication, the Cisco guy told us that we need to use their ACS RADIUS server. My question is: can I use another RADIUS server for it? What is the requirement? Can anyone suggest a RADIUS server to me? Thanks a lot. Dovelet Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21205t=20974 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TCP/IP question [7:17343]
there was a question regarding 127.0.0.1. I understand that the actual
TCP/IP software actually uses this address for self testing.
when ping localhost {or computer {netbios} name} the actual ip address of
127.0.0.1 shows up on the screen.
In doing some research one book explains that 127.0.0.1 is not useable but
the rest of the addresses in the 127 network can be used.
I went to my trusty 2500 and try to plug in 127.12.12.25 and the router
would not allow me config the interface with that address.
Is entire 127 network off limits or just 127.0.0.1. is this a cisco thing.
any explaination is appreicated..
Thank You..
Rico Ortiz,
Regional Systems Manager,
Electronic Support Detachment New York
United States Coast Guard
[GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had
a name of winmail.dat]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=17343t=17343
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: hyperterminal for linux [7:17115]
if you are trying to access the router through the console port. You can use the linux console. Rico -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: hyperterminal for linux [7:17115] is there a hyperterminal version for linux? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=17127t=17115 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How is the job market for CCNPs and/or CCIEs in NYC/NJ [7:16359]
Not sure, we lucent just laying off about 3/4 of its work force NJ has been hit hard. In NYC there are always jobs, but must be willing to travel.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of George Zhang Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 1:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT: How is the job market for CCNPs and/or CCIEs in NYC/NJ [7:16344] Hi All, I am very curious about the current job market in New York City/New Jersey area for CCNP, CCIE type of people because I am in the process of moving to northern New Jersey. If you are in that area, from that area or know about that area, please kindly provide your answer/comments. Your inputs will be greatly appreciated. Q1. How hard/easy is it for someone with CCNP and/or CCIE with several years of experience to find a decent job in that area? Let assume this candidate has fair amount of hands-on experience and can configure a six router lab with frame relay, OSPF, EIGRP, RIP, redistribution, IPX RIP, IPX EIGRP, VLAN, etc in one hour or so. Q2. What companies in that area are currently hiring? Q3. What companies in that area are currently frozen? I know the answer to this question might be a long list. Q4. Which employer do you recommend? Q5. Which employer you don't recommend? Q6. Which reputable headhunters/search firms are specialized in placing network professionals in that area? Q7. Which headhunters/search firms you recommend? Q8. Which headhunters/search firms you don't recommend? Q9. Do employers still work with headhunters/search firms nowadays? It is said that employers don't work with headhunters/search firms now because of cost and availability of qualified candidates. I think that many people in this group might be interest in the answers to these questions as well. So your comments/input will be greatly appreciated. Thank you for all your help in advance. George Zhang Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16359t=16359 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MAC Address: [7:9547]
These are broadcast.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tan Chee Leong Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 1:51 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: MAC Address: [7:9547] Hi, In a small LAN with two routers I found the following MAC addresses appearing. 00:00:00:00:00:01 ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff Most of the time I see it coming from the routers. Is there a special meaning to this? Pardon me for my weak networking knowledge. Cheers, Chee Leong Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9583t=9547 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Wan technology [7:9475]
diversity is key. know them all and don't pigeon hole your self. Rico -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ronnie Poon Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 1:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Wan technology [7:9475] Dear all, Which vendor's WAN technology is more valuable in the market. Nortel passport , juniper or Cisco. Thanks Ronnie Poon Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9585t=9475 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Two DSL circuits for Fault Tolerance [7:9200]
Not sure where in the thread I am getting this. Not sure of the make up of your network. but 2 nics is a good way of going. Some sort of address translation must be done either by NAT or proxy. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Steven V. Snead Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 12:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Two DSL circuits for Fault Tolerance [7:9200] Load balancing would be nice but my real goal would be to have Fault tolerance on my NT 4.0 box. Fault tolerance between the two DSL connections, such that if one DSL fails, it will switch over to the other DSL, so that the exchange server still receive mail. My thought was to use two DNS servers the primary pointing to one IP and the secondary pointing to another IP from the other DSL circuit. I'm a little lost on how that can be set up on the server end. Two NIC cards ? I guess I need hardware but would like to do it without NAT. I can't believe this is something that can't be done and hopefully without BGP because working with the ISP seems impossible for this to happen. Thanks, Steven V. Snead, MCSE, MCP+I, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9253t=9200 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
