RE: ccie exam fee
Taken from http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/625/ccie/ccie_program/whatsnew.html Price Changes for Exams After a rigorous evaluation of our current cost structure, we find it necessary to increase our CCIE Lab exam fee to reflect our current cost of doing business. The present $1,000 US lab fee has been in effect since the CCIE organization was first launched in 1993. Effective on April 1, 2001, we will begin charging customers $1,250 US per lab attempt, (plus any applicable local taxes). The exam fee for the Prometric exams will also increase to $300 US effective March 15, 2001. This applies to all qualification and recertification exams. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of brain Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 4:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ccie exam fee hello=20 i have heard rumors of increase in the ccie qualification exam fee to = 300 $. is it true. also would there be any increase in the near future = in the passing marks of ccie qualification exam (routing and switching) = has anyone heard anything about it? thanx umer _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: tftpserver on redhat 7.0
There is a problem with RH7, with tftp-server-0.17-5.i386.rpm. I had to downgrade to tftp-server-0.16-5.i386.rpm and it worked. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Frank Kim Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 9:24 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: tftpserver on redhat 7.0 Hi folks, Anyone able to get tftpserver to run on redhat 7.0? I was able to to run it in 6.x. And I would hate to have a tftpserver running on a windows box because most of the work I'm doing is through remote. And no, I would not downgrade my redhat box to 6.2. Thanks for any help. -Frank _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 56K vs 64K
Here is a link to a White Paper on T-1 basics. It covers with moderate detail what you are wanting. http://www.ttc.com/downloads/white_papers/t1_tn.pdf There are many other White Papers on the page I found the this one on that might be of interest to everyone. http://www.ttc.com/technical_resources/white_papers/index.html -Scott Brenner CCNP/CCDP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Christopher Larson Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 5:47 AM To: 'Howard C. Berkowitz'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: 56K vs 64K Could you post a link or somewhere to get this info. I have been looking and cannot find anything. I remember covering this in BCRAN and would like to go through it again. Having to do with the serial lines and the sampling rate, bit robbing etc. SF/ESF AMI/B8ZS etc. If you have a link to this info I would love to read it over again. -Original Message- From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 1:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 56K vs 64K High-level view: Remember there are multiple levels in the "T1" world. I'm carefully avoiding "layer" If anyone starts trying to force this into OSI layering, I will start to mutter, "This is a .44 magnum, the most powerful handgun in the world. I can't remember if I've fired 5 or 6 rounds. Feeling lucky, punk?" :-) The lowest level is the electrical/optical signal format Next, you have bit stream encoding (AMI, B8ZS, etc.) Next, you have framing (SF, ESF) And with voice services, you have call control (CCS, CAS, etc.) Bruce Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote, On a T1 line what is the difference between 56K and 64K. If I am correct I believe that 56K uses bit stuffing to stuff the 8th bit of every timeslot with a 1 to fulfill the ones density requirement. However, this would not be necessary with B8ZS line coding, right because B8ZS will not allow 8 consecutive zeroes anyway. You're right about B8ZS, but 56K (and, for that matter, 48K) was introduced at a time when AMI was extremely common. Now if that is true, why would you use 56K on a B8ZS coded T1 circuit and if those timeslots are cross-connected to a 64K line or vice versa, wont that cause errors because the two clock rates are expecting different things in the 8th bit. I would appreciate any comments at all on this subject. But the DS0 sees a 64 KBPS stream and doesn't inherently expect any meaning in any particular bit. Bit meaning does come up at a higher level when used for telco signaling, as with CAS and CCS. I didn't even _think_ of the acronym CCIE while writing the body of this message. No ciscos were scaled, finned, or fried in its preparation. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Bookpool LLC
It's weird how peoples experiences differ... I have ordered 22 books from them since 1/99 and have never had a problem. The books always showed up on time, and in perfect condition. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jerry Langfield Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 2:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bookpool LLC I'd say caveat emptor Buyer be really aware what you are getting. I found Bookpool to be terrible for customer service and pricing. The misrepresent what they are selling. Use anyone but them. JL ""John Huston"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 8vcivf$c05$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8vcivf$c05$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... What's everyone's opinion about the subject? Recently I have noticed that their prices are not as competitive, their customer service is almost non-existent and they do not fully disclose or misrepresent things. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
