tcp reset problem [7:70521]
Running a solaris (v8 I think) box with Lotus Notes on it (new build). We are having a problem with the server immediately sending a reset to clients after receiving the syn. Congestion or errors on the segment are non-existent. I don't control the server so I can't see the logs but I'm dealing with the age old network people vs. server people problem. Anybody ever had this issue? Thanks, Scott Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70521t=70521 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BGP issue ??? [7:37730]
I've never tried it with IBGP, but I've used it for EBGP multihop with no problems. -Original Message- From: Ouellette, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 1:39 PM To: 'Scott H.' Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: BGP issue ??? [7:37730] Thought bgp had a gotcha where you couldn't start a neighbor relationship based on a static route. I'm fairly confident that I remember this. It could be for ibgp only, or maybe just for ebgp. You may want to take a look Tim -Original Message- From: Scott H. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 1:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: BGP issue ??? [7:37730] Yes. BGP needs to know how to get to that neighbor and since they are not directly connected or running a common IGP, you need a static route. Stanzin Takpa wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... In the following cisco configuration , Is the static route necessary, either it is ebgp or ibgp? ROUTER-A interface Loopback0 ip address 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.255 ! interface Serial1 ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0 ! router bgp 400 neighbor 1.1.1.1 remote-as 400 neighbor 1.1.1.1 update-source Loopback0 ! ip route 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 10.10.10.2 ROUTER-B interface Loopback0 ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 ! interface Serial1 ip address 10.10.10.2 255.255.255.0 ! router bgp 400 neighbor 2.2.2.2 remote-as 400 neighbor 2.2.2.2 update-source Loopback0 ! ip route 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.255 10.10.10.1 Stanzin Takpa Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37736t=37730 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: EIGRP Summary Question [7:31256]
If for some reason one of the routes fails that is being summarized, the packet will match the summary to null 0 and be dropped. This is a safety mechanism so the router doesn't waste cycles on packets it can't route. Hunt Lee wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... When using EIGRP Summary: On the router that performs the summarization, it's routing table will have entry listed as Null0 for the summary routes And on the downstream routers, their routing table will only have the summaries - no reference to Null 0. However, the following paragraph is what I'm confused about:- By applying the longest match rule, the downstream routers will forward all destination prefixes using the summary address. Eventually, these routers will be forwarded to the router performing the summarization. The summarizing router will match the destination prefixes with their longer matching subnets. If any of the destination prefixes match the summary address only, the summarizing router will forward these packets to the null interface, and they will be discarded. But why / when would the destination prefixes match the summary address only?? Any help will be greatly appreciated. Best Regards, Hunt Lee IP Solution Analyst Cable Wireless Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31264t=31256 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ISDN Stimulators [7:29787]
This actually sounds kinda kinky--I've been spending way too much time in front of a rack. . .6 weeks to go and counting. AlefTec PvtLtd wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi Can some one pls suggest me good ISDN Stimulators which i can use in my labs for BCRAN. I am looking for following features: ISDN BRI and ISDN PRI Thanking u in advance. Merry Christmas Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29792t=29787 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Who said women don't dig routers? [7:29781]
Throw a route filter on it for proctection and your good to go. Kaminski, Shawn G wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... A friend of mine sent this to me. I've never seen it so I thought I would pass it along! If it's already been seen on this list, I apologize for the waste of bandwidth! http://unixsex.com/netadmin/noclust/routergirl.jpg Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29793t=29781 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Redistribution Question [7:28374]
IGRP will automatically summarize the route to the classful boundary since it has no connections to that network. If you look at the route table in Chuck's last message, you will see a classful route to the 10.0.0.0 network. Hunt Lee wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Ok - on Router C (the redistribution router - I changed the network statement from network 192.168.1.18 0.0.0.0 area 0 to network 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 and everything works straight away :) However, the more puzzling thing is that without any Ip route and Summary-address from Router C (to summarize the OPSF routes before redistributing them into IGRP), how come Router D can still see the routes from OSPF? I thought that it shouldn't be able to see any OSPF routes as they are from /28 subnets. - apart from the Router A since it is /24. Help!!! Hunt Chuck Larrieu wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Like Stefan Dozier, I too recreated this on my pod, and I am unable to duplicate your problem. I was wrong - IGRP will see the 192.168.1.0/24 subnet come in. As you can see from my Router D table, all the routes are there. I am able to ping from all routers to al other routers. I10.0.0.0/8 [100/8976] via 192.168.2.49, 00:00:44, Serial1 I192.168.1.0/24 [100/8726] via 192.168.2.49, 00:00:44, Serial1 192.168.2.0/28 is subnetted, 1 subnets C 192.168.2.48 is directly connected, Serial1 R5# router D The only other thing that comes to mind, seeing as you have a number of different IOS versions on your various routers, and the way you are doing your network statements, is a bug I heard about on the CCIE list a while back - something about redistribution problems when using the 0.0.0.0 mask in the OSPF process when assigning interfaces. I did a bit of searching, but I am unable to locate any further information. Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hunt Lee Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 11:35 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Redistribution Question [7:28374] I need some help on a Redistribution question: I have setup 4 routers: Router A - Router B - Router C - Router D A, B C are running OSPF, and C D are running IGRP - I'm trying to redistribute between OSPF IGRP routes: A is connected to B with 10.1.1.100 / 24 - Serial 0 B is connected to A with 10.1.1.1 / 24 - Serial 0 B is connected to C with 192.168.1.17 /28 - Serial 1 C is connected to B with 192.168.1.18 / 28 - Serial 0 C is connected to D with 192.168.2.49 / 28 - Serial 1 D is connected to C with 192.168.2.50 / 28 - Serial 0 However, I could only ping from D to A ( vice versa), but I couldn't ping from B to D, or D to B N.B: D to C (and vice versa) is fine as they are directly connected Any help will be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance, Hunt Lee Below are the configs for the routers: Router A version 11.0 service udp-small-servers service tcp-small-servers ! hostname RouterA ! ! no ip domain-lookup ! interface Ethernet0 no ip address shutdown ! interface Serial0 no ip address no fair-queue clockrate 64000 ! interface Serial1 ip address 10.1.1.100 255.255.255.0 clockrate 64000 ! router ospf 100 network 10.1.1.100 0.0.0.0 area 1 ! ip host RouterB 10.1.1.1 ip host RouterC 192.168.1.18 ip host RouterD 192.168.2.50 ! line con 0 line aux 0 transport input all line vty 0 4 login ! end Router B version 11.0 service udp-small-servers service tcp-small-servers ! hostname RouterB ! no ip domain-lookup ! interface Ethernet0 no ip address shutdown ! interface Serial0 ip address 192.168.1.17 255.255.255.240 no fair-queue ! interface Serial1 ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 ! router ospf 100 network 192.168.1.17 0.0.0.0 area 0 network 10.1.1.1 0.0.0.0 area 1 ! ip host RouterA 10.1.1.100 ip host RouterC 192.168.1.18 ip host RouterD 192.168.2.50 ! line con 0 line aux 0 transport input all line vty 0 4 login ! end Router C version 12.0 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname RouterC ! ! ip subnet-zero no ip domain-lookup ip host RouterA 10.1.1.100 ip host RouterB 192.168.1.17 ip host RouterD 192.168.2.50 ! interface Ethernet0 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast shutdown ! interface Serial0 ip address 192.168.1.18 255.255.255.240 no ip directed-broadcast no ip mroute-cache no fair-queue clockrate 64000 ! interface Serial1 ip
Re: how to change the serial port IP of remote end [7:28665]
You need some sort of console connection to the remote router, be it direct connect or dial-up through the aux. port. If you try to do it over the primary circuit, you will lose your connection as soon as you hit enter. Rajneesh Yadav wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi all, I want to change serial IP of my both the router one is placed in UK.so my question is,can i change it remotely and how its possible.please if anyboby can help me out. Regards Rajneesh Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=28670t=28665 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Question of OSPF Over DDR [7:28666]
By design, hellos and lsa's are surpressed. Do a search on CCO for a demand circuit for further info.. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aaron ZHAO) wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... hi, all I have a question about OSPF over DDR. The lab scenario is: 1. RTA and RTB connect with each other using back-to-back connection with serial PPP connection, and use the asynchronous interface as the backup interface. 2. And on each router there is a ethernet interface as a stub network. All the networks run ospf and belong to 3 areas respectively. PPP and its backup links are all in the area 0. 3. I have use the broadcast key word in the rout map, and correctly define the dialer-list with ip permit. Question: When the primary PPP link is down, the DDR works correctly. But there is not hello packet can be find on the DDR. When I show the interface asynchronous 1 under the ospf, I find that: no hellos (passive interface). What is mean? Why? can not explain it. Can you help me? Thanks a lot. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=28669t=28666 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE R/S written Topic?!?? [7:26674]
Per Bjorklund wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hello! I4m about to take the written exam, but one question. Since there is no appel talk and LANE in the lab and very simpel ISDN does the same apply to the written exam? /regards Per Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=26679t=26674 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE R/S written Topic?!?? [7:26674]
Check out this link: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/certifications/rsblueprint.html This should tell you everything you want to know. Scott Hoover wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Per Bjorklund wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hello! I4m about to take the written exam, but one question. Since there is no appel talk and LANE in the lab and very simpel ISDN does the same apply to the written exam? /regards Per Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=26680t=26674 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Lab procedures [7:26002]
How can they be better? People taking the one day are taking the same exact test as the ones who had the two day. One day people just skip the time consuming basic stuff. DAve Diaz wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Rubbish, the IP addressing, IPX addressing is already done, names are done, passwords are done, you jump right into complex configuration and you better be qucik becasue at the moment cisco want to see how fast you are rather than how good you are, for me the two day ccie's are far better accomplished engineers as demonstarted by the program, From: Brad Ellis Reply-To: Brad Ellis To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE Lab procedures [7:26002] Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 16:48:54 -0500 You will find out all of that information when you go to take your test. Answering your questions IS in direct violation of the NDA! Any information that has not been made publically available by Cisco, is considered NDA. You can email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you have any other questions for information not published on Cisco's website. thanks, -Brad Ellis CCIE#5796 (RS / Security) Network Learning Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] CCIE Labs, racks, and classes: http://www.ccbootcamp.com/quicklinks.html James wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hello, I am curious to as how the CCIE lab experience is like. I am aware as this question does not violate NDA as I am not asking specific questions on the lab. For the one day lab, what do the candidate have to do when starting ? Load config files on various routers or config from scratch or ??? I don't seem to be able to find out how it goes so anyone with experience taking the lab, any comments on your experience is greatly appreciated. Thanks James __ Do You Yahoo!? Find a job, post your resume. http://careers.yahoo.com _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=26103t=26002 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT-Survey--anybody use AAA to authenticate backup links? [7:21916]
Does anybody use AAA to authenticate ISDN backup links? Thanks! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21916t=21916 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PPP password [7:19837]
no service password-encryption Andy Barkl wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I need to display the PPP password on my ISDN link. In the enable mode can I turn off some type of encryption to then display the encrypted password? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19839t=19837 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 'It's not the US they want to destroy. It's our arrogance' [7:19665]
Pardon my french, but this is horseshit. We are constantly helping the less fortunate countries of the world. Get off your high horse and analyze the crazy bastards that did this. . .they did not attack military sites that could defend themselves. They went after innocent people who were trying to make better lives for themselves and their families. Children are dead. Wives did not see their husbands come home from work last night. CNN is showing a story with a young woman looking for her fiancee in the rubble of the WTC. The people that did this are brainwashed by their leaders to believe the US is responsible for the horrible lives they lead. The US must suffer in the name of alahanalyze that. The only thing these people did was awake the sleeping giant the same way Japan did with Pearl Harbor. An example will be made. We will give them their wish. They will soon be with Alah. wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Reeta Sinha 'It's not the US they want to destroy. It's our arrogance' During winters when I was little, the boys on my block played a game called King of the Hill. After storms, snowplows clearing the streets would leave behind huge hills of dense, packed snow hills 15 to 20 feet high. The game was simple. The one who reached the top of the hill and kept everyone else off it was the King of the Hill. Boys would scramble up the hill, shoving and pushing each other, sometimes sending a playmate tumbling to the ground. It was a rough game and usually it was the bully who made it to the top. The biggest, loudest, meanest kid on the block became the King of the Hill. The others -- smaller and weaker -- tumbled down quickly or were thrown off by the King, if they got close to the top of the hill. Standing a safe distance away, I would watch the boys who were knocked off the hill over and over again. They never looked defeated. With their chins set, they would get up from the ground, brush the snow off their clothes and, after grabbing handfuls of snow, climb up the hill again, determined to topple the King. What they lacked in bulk and height, they made up for with creativity (icy snow shoved inside a shirt pretty much paralyzes any bully). Inevitably, the bully's arrogance was his downfall. Confident that he, the King, was the biggest, the strongest, the best and so certain that the others were puny and dumb, the bully usually didn't see the boy sneaking up behind him. The one who, with one shove, sent the former King sliding headfirst down the hill. The smaller boys didn't really care who was the King of the Hill. That snowy kingdom would be gone come spring. It was the bully's attitude, his assumption that he deserved to be King that made the boys so determined. Without treaties or negotiation, they would band together and attack the King, just to see him take a fall. Bullies, kings, dictators, meanies don't seem to get it, do they? The more they push, the more they shove, the more they flex their muscles, the more determined it makes those they ridicule and bully. The world has seen this human drama played out time and time again throughout history, sometimes by individuals, sometimes with entire peoples with uprisings. In fact and fiction, those who are pushed frequently and far enough, always push back. It happened again on September 11, 2001. When terrorists crashed passenger planes into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon building in the US, someone, some group of people, was pushing back. The message seems pretty clear: the wealthy, powerful king had to be knocked off the hill. Perhaps this is not the time to criticize a country that has suffered such great loss of life. But, as I have listened to news reports and watched the horrific images for the past several hours, the most recent showing a second plane aiming directly for the World Trade Center, crashing through a tower as onlookers scream, I can't help but wonder. What would drive some people to take such extreme measures? Why would anyone go to these lengths to hurt the United States? I can come up with only one answer. It's not us they hate. It's not the US they want to destroy. It's our arrogance. 'America under attack.' That's how the media is describing it. Unaware of the morning's events, I listened to cryptic voicemail messages about my home office in Chicago being shut down due to the 'crisis' and my father asking me to call. I had left my California hotel room for a conference session without listening to the news hours earlier. Confused by the messages, I turned on the television immediately. The caption on my muted television screen alarmed me. Were we being invaded? Had the government been overthrown? But it isn't the US these terrorists want. They don't want our land, our buildings, our wealth, our leaders or our people. I think they are just sick and tired of being pushed around. As I write this, I don't
Re: For FR Grus.... [7:16635]
You can disable inverse arp on each interface on the spokes and then clear the cache. That should prevent the spokes from seeing the unused dlci's, but will require a static map of dlci to ip for each dlci you want to use. Cisco Lover wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Oopss Sorry guys...I donto know where it lost in b/w..Any way..I have write it here again. Thanks for the kind replies.. For eg, our FR switch is setup for Full mesh,But out network is setup as Hub Spoke environment.In that case there must be some unused DLCI's on spoke routers which we would still be seeing as active on these routers although they would be of no use offcourse for this envioronmetnt. Is there any way If we can get rid of these DLCIS on the spokes.i.e to disable them or USE any method which block them to be appearing on spoek routers.(without touching FR switch) I know Must be confusing for majority here ..But .. I AM SURE I WILL GET THE SOLUTION HERE AS WELL. Thanks. From: Cisco Lover Reply-To: Cisco Lover To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: For FR Grus [7:16635] Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 07:06:08 -0400 Hi Guys.. Come with some New Queston.. For eg, our FR switch is setup for Full mesh,But out network is setup as Hub Spoke FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16656t=16635 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: For FR Grus.... [7:16635]
You might be right, I would have to test in it a lab. Can anybody give confirmation on this? -Original Message- From: McCallum, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 9:44 AM To: Scott Hoover; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: For FR Grus [7:16635] Doesn't disabling inverse arp only take effect on a router reboot? -Original Message- From: Scott Hoover [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 August 2001 15:43 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: For FR Grus [7:16635] You can disable inverse arp on each interface on the spokes and then clear the cache. That should prevent the spokes from seeing the unused dlci's, but will require a static map of dlci to ip for each dlci you want to use. Cisco Lover wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Oopss Sorry guys...I donto know where it lost in b/w..Any way..I have write it here again. Thanks for the kind replies.. For eg, our FR switch is setup for Full mesh,But out network is setup as Hub Spoke environment.In that case there must be some unused DLCI's on spoke routers which we would still be seeing as active on these routers although they would be of no use offcourse for this envioronmetnt. Is there any way If we can get rid of these DLCIS on the spokes.i.e to disable them or USE any method which block them to be appearing on spoek routers.(without touching FR switch) I know Must be confusing for majority here ..But .. I AM SURE I WILL GET THE SOLUTION HERE AS WELL. Thanks. From: Cisco Lover Reply-To: Cisco Lover To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: For FR Grus [7:16635] Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 07:06:08 -0400 Hi Guys.. Come with some New Queston.. For eg, our FR switch is setup for Full mesh,But out network is setup as Hub Spoke FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16665t=16635 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: For FR Grus.... [7:16635]
Could you elaborate on the mapping of 0.0.0.0 to a DLCI? How does it come about? Thanks, Scott Chuck Larrieu wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... it used to be that you could do a clear frame-relay-inarp to accomplish this. however, since the advent of 12.x, I believe the only sure way is to reload. BTW, watch out for the mapping of 0.0.0.0 to your DLCI's! ;- Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 8:10 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: For FR Grus [7:16635] Doesn't disabling inverse arp only take effect on a router reboot? -Original Message- From: Scott Hoover [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 August 2001 15:43 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: For FR Grus [7:16635] You can disable inverse arp on each interface on the spokes and then clear the cache. That should prevent the spokes from seeing the unused dlci's, but will require a static map of dlci to ip for each dlci you want to use. Cisco Lover wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Oopss Sorry guys...I donto know where it lost in b/w..Any way..I have write it here again. Thanks for the kind replies.. For eg, our FR switch is setup for Full mesh,But out network is setup as Hub Spoke environment.In that case there must be some unused DLCI's on spoke routers which we would still be seeing as active on these routers although they would be of no use offcourse for this envioronmetnt. Is there any way If we can get rid of these DLCIS on the spokes.i.e to disable them or USE any method which block them to be appearing on spoek routers.(without touching FR switch) I know Must be confusing for majority here ..But .. I AM SURE I WILL GET THE SOLUTION HERE AS WELL. Thanks. From: Cisco Lover Reply-To: Cisco Lover To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: For FR Grus [7:16635] Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 07:06:08 -0400 Hi Guys.. Come with some New Queston.. For eg, our FR switch is setup for Full mesh,But out network is setup as Hub Spoke FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16672t=16635 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: For FR Grus.... [7:16635]
From CCO: clear frame-relay-inarp To clear dynamically created Frame Relay maps, which are created by the use of Inverse ARP, use the clear frame-relay-inarp EXEC command. clear frame-relay-inarp Syntax Description This command has no arguments or keywords. Command Mode EXEC Example The following example clears dynamically created Frame Relay maps: clear frame-relay-inarp Related Commands frame-relay inverse-arp show frame-relay map I don't have access right now to test it, but I'm pretty sure I've done this before without rebooting. -Original Message- From: McCallum, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 9:44 AM To: Scott Hoover; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: For FR Grus [7:16635] Doesn't disabling inverse arp only take effect on a router reboot? -Original Message- From: Scott Hoover [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 August 2001 15:43 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: For FR Grus [7:16635] You can disable inverse arp on each interface on the spokes and then clear the cache. That should prevent the spokes from seeing the unused dlci's, but will require a static map of dlci to ip for each dlci you want to use. Cisco Lover wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Oopss Sorry guys...I donto know where it lost in b/w..Any way..I have write it here again. Thanks for the kind replies.. For eg, our FR switch is setup for Full mesh,But out network is setup as Hub Spoke environment.In that case there must be some unused DLCI's on spoke routers which we would still be seeing as active on these routers although they would be of no use offcourse for this envioronmetnt. Is there any way If we can get rid of these DLCIS on the spokes.i.e to disable them or USE any method which block them to be appearing on spoek routers.(without touching FR switch) I know Must be confusing for majority here ..But .. I AM SURE I WILL GET THE SOLUTION HERE AS WELL. Thanks. From: Cisco Lover Reply-To: Cisco Lover To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: For FR Grus [7:16635] Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 07:06:08 -0400 Hi Guys.. Come with some New Queston.. For eg, our FR switch is setup for Full mesh,But out network is setup as Hub Spoke FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16703t=16635 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FRAME-Relay Hub and Spoke Question [7:16221]
a). yes b). the route statement on the switch should point out the interface on the switch (connected to the hub), this statement has nothing to do with the hub interface (or sub-interfaces). Ray Smith wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Guys, Correct me if I am wrong but in a Frame-Relay lab scenaio that I am doing. I have 3 routers representing spokes, 1 4000 series configured as a switch, and 1 representing the Hub/HQ router. I am planning on using sub-interfaces on the HUB and physical interfaces for the spoke routers. My question are:- a). Don't I only need 1 physical cable from router HUB to the Switch? b). In the frame-relay route statement on the switch, would I map the routes to the sub-interfaces as opposed to the single physical interface (S0) on the Hub router? Thanks _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16222t=16221 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: very urgent [7:8306]
Remove backup statements for primary and add a floating static pointed out BRI (or dialer) with an adminstrative distance higher than your IGP. Don't forget to redistribute these routes into your IGP. Sudhakar Reddy Kanchi wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... senorio Leased Line with ISDN backup. 1)we have two branch offices named as X and Y. 2)we have configured leased line as primary and isdn back up between two branch offices,everything is ok and it is working fine. 3)we have given backup delay as 5 seconds(backup delay 5 60) so that when leased line goes dowm ISDN should activate after 5 seconds. 4)when leased line activate isdn will remain up till 180 seconds.(after 180 seconds isdn will goes down). REQUIREMENT ISDN should activate immediately after the leased line goes down.so that the end users at those branch offices cannot face any problems. 5)but problem is that when leased line goes down isdn is activating after 60 seconds(eventhough we have given backup delay as 5 seconds) by that time all applications are shutting down and the users at those brach offices are facing problems. so what could be the problem.we need isdn should activate immediately after leasedline goes down that means with in 5 seconds. ITS VERY URGENT THANKS IN ADVANCE P.NAVEEN. _ Chat with your friends as soon as they come online. Get Rediff Bol at http://bol.rediff.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=8390t=8306 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Passed CCIE written on first try this morning [7:3066]
Passed the written on the first try this morning with flying colors. Very, very tricky exam. I used Routing TCP/IP by Doyle, TR white paper by Rossi, Boson 1 and 2, and various info. from CCO. THEIR IS NO SHORTCUT TO THIS EXAM! Don't rely on the Boson exams--they are good to get you in the right frame of mind, but won't do much else for you. Study the recommended reading list and info. on CCO. On to the lab exam. . . Scott Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=3066t=3066 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: port number list on DOS [7:2809]
I think you are looking for netstat. Try nestat ? at the command line for the options. Scott Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... OK, I have a DOS question that really is relevant to Cisco networking (sort of. ;-) This came up a couple months ago, but I can't find the answer in the archives. What is the DOS command to see port numbers (services) in use on a PC? Someone posted a command that would let you see the list of TCP and UDP port numbers. One of my students asked how to do this and I remembered that there was a command, but I couldn't remember what it was. Thanks, Priscilla Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=2811t=2809 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ccbootcamp written prep material?
Anybody have any experience with the CCIE written prep. material from ccbootcamp.com? Is it a fair measure of being prepared for the written exam? Thanks, Scott CCNP _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
