Re: Internet usage?
the best one i know . . though not very easy to setup. http://ee-staff.ethz.ch/~oetiker/webtools/mrtg/ Rizzo Damian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 49C181ACF35ED311A7DC00508B5AF61102E524C9@NAEXCHANGE">news:49C181ACF35ED311A7DC00508B5AF61102E524C9@NAEXCHANGE... > > > > > > Do any of you know of any software utilities that can track and monitor > > what percentage of internet bandwidth is being used by various tasks > > such as streaming video, http, mp3, java, etc...? > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Damian Rizzo > > Senior IT Engineer > > Marakon Associates > > 203-978-6341 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Debug not working via telnet [7:9019]
I have yet to experience any debug whose output i cant see on my telnet. are u sure you are using 'term mon' after turning on debug ? "Allen May" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I seem to recall (& experienced) a situation where certain debugs do not > work via telnet & are only visible on the console or by dumping to a syslog > & viewing there. > > - Original Message - > From: "Reinhold Fischer" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 11:48 AM > Subject: Re: Debug not working via telnet [7:9019] > > > > Hi, > > > > the problem could be that only process-switched packets get 'seen' by the > > debug process. issue 'no ip route-cache' at the interface config. please > > report if this solved the problem ... > > > > Greetings > > > > Reinhold > > > > On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, cisco guru wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > I am trying to see the debug output on my routers via telnet sessions > but > > am > > > not having any luck. I first got the debug ip packet command to work but > > > then it stopped working. No other debug commands will work. Eg. debug ip > > > igrp trans > > > I have the service timestamps commands issued along with the term mon > > > command on the router running the telnet session. > > > The ios ver. on this particular router is 11.0 (10c). Does the ios ver. > > make > > > a difference or does something in particular have to be done on both > > > routers? > > > Please advise. > > > Thank you. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9107&t=9019 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Line protocol goes up and down [7:39766]
i agree. looks like facilities issue. check back with your provider. if not bad facilities, then misconfigured or bad optioning on lec's transport equipment. "Tom XU" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > you should ask your isp to check the line again carefully,i think there is > something wrong on this line. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40067&t=39766 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Phew !!! Passed my BCMSN today !!!! [7:12202]
good job imran. although i passed my BSCN 3 weeks ago and 50% done with remote access, i am still revising the stuff in BSCN specifically BGP and multiarea OSPF. somehow, i am stuck with routing which i belive is the core of ccnp. i have got to straighten things out on it. call me crazy but i signed up for bscn again, which i will be taking 2 weeks from now. hopefully, i will then concentrate more on remote access and start on bcmsn. -Shahzad. "George Murphy CCNP, CCDA" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Congratulation Imran!, that exam is good at throwing curve balls. Good luck > on BCRAN, I > thought it was a lot easier, especially if you have some good ISDN > background. > > Imran Moin wrote: > > > Hi Gang, > > > > Guess what...I passed my BCMSN exam > > todaygot a 857 score..Though i am not > > satisfied with it, but i am happy. It was much tougher > > than i anticipated it to be. I got a lot of design > > questions, asking specific details of 4xxx, 5xxx, 6xxx > > and 8xxx switches. I was asked a loto of questions > > about which equipment would be best for a given > > scenario. > > > > Lots of Vlans and STP. A bit of Multicast and MLS but > > surprisingly no HSRP...not even a single > > question !!! > > > > Phew !! Its over for me now and i am looking forward > > to BCRAN now which is due in 2 weeks from now !! > > > > Thanks a lot to all of you there who helped me out !! > > > > Special thanks to all those who replied my panicky > > email 2 days about about LANE .there was > > no LANE in the exam though some questions had a > > mention abt 802.10. > > > > All the best to all of you who plan on taking this > > exam soon. If you need any more information on the > > exam, i would be glad to do that. > > > > Thanks again > > > > Regards, > > Imran. > > > > = > > Imran Moin > > Network Engineer > > CCNA > > > > __ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail > > http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12334&t=12202 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCIE TroubleShooting Part
Title: Packeteer Hi there, Is it true you need to troubleshoot entirely a new scnerio when you are trouble shooting in day 2? AnyOne knows about this? Regards, SchahzaD
Logging Question ???
Title: copy configs Hi there, I wan to log alerts, critical, debugging, and emergencies. Is this will work. r1(config)#logging console ? alerts Immediate action needed critical Critical conditions debugging Debugging messages emergencies System is unusable errors Error conditions informational Informational messages notifications Normal but significant conditions warnings Warning conditions r1(config)#logging console emergencies ? How about if I want to log only alert and informational ? Thanks for the Help. ShahzaD
Lab date 09/02/2002 @ RTP for swap
Hi there, I have lab scheduled at RTP on 09/02/2002 and I like to swap it for November or December, 2000 at the RTP. Please email if someone like to swap the date. Regards, ShahzaD **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Lab date 09/02/2002 @ RTP for swap
Sorry, It is typo I am secheduled on 09/02/2001 @ RTP and like to swap for November or December, 2000 @ RTP or San Jose. Regards, ShahzaD - Original Message - From: "Bill O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Louie Belt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'David'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 02, 2000 2:57 PM Subject: RE: Lab date 09/02/2002 @ RTP for swap > Louie, > > I think it is a typo. > > Bill > > --- Louie Belt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Don't be fooled by this, dates are currently running > > 3-4 months out - and > > most people will need all of that time to study. > > > > Louie > > > > My philosophy, in essence, is the concept of a man > > as a heroic being, with > > his own happiness as the moral purpose of his life, > > with productive > > achievement as his noblest activity, and reason as > > his only absolute. - A.R. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > > David > > Sent: Monday, October 02, 2000 8:07 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Lab date 09/02/2002 @ RTP for swap > > > > > > Was 2002 the earliest available date? > > > > > > > > "Shahzad Ali" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in > > message > > > 00fe01c02bc6$87045160$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:00fe01c02bc6$87045160$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Hi there, > > > > > > I have lab scheduled at RTP on 09/02/2002 and I > > like to swap it for > > November > > > or December, 2000 at the RTP. Please email if > > someone like to swap the > > date. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > ShahzaD > > > > > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For > > more information go to > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html > > > _ > > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more > > information go to > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html > > _ > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more > > information go to > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html > > _ > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Photos - 35mm Quality Prints, Now Get 15 Free! > http://photos.yahoo.com/ > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html > _ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DLSW questions, another idea .... ~o \.i./o~ ...... [7:3099]
Hi folks, I am working on HaiBo DLSw+ Scenario t0 r1 - r2 --- r3 t0 |t0 Task 1 configure such that host at [r2] t0 can access host at [r3] t0. The answer is quite obvious. Task 2 (this is the tricky one) configure [r1] such that host at [r2] and [r3] can access host at [r1]. Only ONE peer connection is allowed. Border peer command is not allowed. I am thinking to use remote peer Passthru between r1--r2 and r2--r3 which will provide me the same virtual-ring group to use between r1--r2 and r2--r3. But I am not able to see Beta on r1. http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/ibm_ c/bcprt2/bcddlsw.htm#21315 Any comments, suggestions on these configs. r1 ! source-bridge ring-group 100 dlsw local-peer peer-id 140.1.1.1 dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 140.1.2.2 rif-passthru 100 r1#sh dl rea DLSw Remote NetBIOS Name reachability cache list NetBIOS Namestatus Loc.peer Alpha UNCONFIRM REMOTE 140.1.2.2(2065) r2 ! source-bridge ring-group 100 dlsw local-peer peer-id 140.1.2.2 dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 140.1.1.1 rif-passthru 100 dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 140.1.3.3 rif-passthru 100 dlsw icanreach netbios-exclusive dlsw icanreach netbios-name Alpha ! r2# sh dl rea DLSw Remote NetBIOS Name reachability cache list NetBIOS Namestatus Loc.peer BetaUNCONFIRM REMOTE 140.1.3.3(2065) r3 ! source-bridge ring-group 100 dlsw local-peer peer-id 140.1.3.3 dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 140.1.2.2 rif-passthru 100 dlsw icanreach netbios-exclusive dlsw icanreach netbios-name Beta ! r3#sh dl rea DLSw Remote NetBIOS Name reachability cache list NetBIOS Namestatus Loc.peer Alpha UNCONFIRM REMOTE 140.1.2.2(2065) Regards, ShahzaD -Original Message- From: ShahzaD Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 6:53 PM To: Huang HaiBo Subject: RE: DLSW questions, another idea Did you get any feedback on this ??? Regards, sa -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Huang HaiBo Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 11:37 PM To: simplimarvelous Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: DLSW questions, another idea could you give details? - Original Message - From: simplimarvelous To: Michel GASPARD ; Huang HaiBo Cc: Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 11:37 AM Subject: Re: DLSW questions, another idea > Is it possible to do it like this? > > Put R2 and R3 in a cluster leave R1 on its own. It would seem that R1 would > only need to make a connection to the clusters ring, and would not need to > have a connection to both routers in the cluster. I would think that the > cluster internal routers would communicate fine, and any traffic from r3 to > r1 would only have to make one connection via the clusters virtual ring. > > sounds good in theory... > > > Gerald > > - Original Message - > From: "Michel GASPARD" > To: "Huang HaiBo" > Cc: > Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 8:07 AM > Subject: Re: DLSW questions, another idea > > > > Dear all, > > > > I though about another possibility, but I do not manage to make it work. > > > > I assume that to solve point 1), I used "promiscuous" in R2. > > > > My idea was: why not create a second DLSW tunnel, between R1 and R2 > > (just a simple remote-peer statement is enough on R1, nothing on R2 nor > > R3). > > > > In that way, frames from R2 ro R1 are OK (simple DLSW). > > > > For frames from R3, I thought that they might be bridged R3-R2 with the > > first DLSW tunnel, and then bridged again if necessary into the second > > DLSW tunnel. > > > > But it seems it is not working that well (well, not at all..) in > > reality. > > > > Does anybody have experience of "double DLSW" bridging, i.e. frames that > > would arrive in a router DLSW, and would be bridged again though DLSW??? > > > > Eventhough, this exercice was good to think "one step further"!! > > > > Regards, > > > > Michel > > > > Huang HaiBo wrote: > > > > > > Here is an interesting scenario I got from a practice lab. > > > > > >e0s0 s0s1 s0 e0 > > > ---[r1]--[r2]-[r3]- > > > | > > > |e0 > > > Task 1 > > > configure such that host at [r2] e0 can access host at [r3] e0. The > answer > > > is quite obvious. > > > > > > Task 2 (this is the tricky one) > > > configure [r1] such that host at [r2] and [r3] can access host at [r1]. > > > Only ONE peer connection is allowed. Border peer command is not allowed. >
RE: DLSW questions, another idea .... ~o \.i./o~ ...... [7:3112]
Nizar, When I do show dl reach at r1. I am not able to see PC name Beta which is on r3 t0. I need to make sure the configs are good for task 2 requirement. I dont have a way to test this. I have netbios-name Alpha on r2 and netbios-name Beta on r3. I only see Alpha is reacable through r2 when I do show dlsw reac on r1. I am not sure this is the right way to approach task 2. Read the task 2 requirement. Thankx Regards, Shahzad -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hedhili Nizar Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 5:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: DLSW questions, another idea ~o \.i./o~ .. [7:3107] What is the problem if a problem exists ShahzaD Ali a icrit : > Hi folks, > > I am working on HaiBo DLSw+ Scenario > > t0 r1 - r2 --- r3 t0 > |t0 > > Task 1 > configure such that host at [r2] t0 can access host at [r3] t0. The > answer is quite obvious. > > Task 2 (this is the tricky one) > configure [r1] such that host at [r2] and [r3] can access host at [r1]. > Only ONE peer connection is allowed. Border peer command is not allowed. > > I am thinking to use remote peer Passthru between r1--r2 and r2--r3 which > will provide me the same > virtual-ring group to use between r1--r2 and r2--r3. But I am not able to > see Beta on r1. > > http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/ibm_ > c/bcprt2/bcddlsw.htm#21315 > > Any comments, suggestions on these configs. > > r1 > ! > source-bridge ring-group 100 > dlsw local-peer peer-id 140.1.1.1 > dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 140.1.2.2 rif-passthru 100 > > r1#sh dl rea > DLSw Remote NetBIOS Name reachability cache list > NetBIOS Namestatus Loc.peer > Alpha UNCONFIRM REMOTE 140.1.2.2(2065) > > r2 > ! > source-bridge ring-group 100 > dlsw local-peer peer-id 140.1.2.2 > dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 140.1.1.1 rif-passthru 100 > dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 140.1.3.3 rif-passthru 100 > dlsw icanreach netbios-exclusive > dlsw icanreach netbios-name Alpha > ! > > r2# sh dl rea > DLSw Remote NetBIOS Name reachability cache list > NetBIOS Namestatus Loc.peer > BetaUNCONFIRM REMOTE 140.1.3.3(2065) > > r3 > ! > source-bridge ring-group 100 > dlsw local-peer peer-id 140.1.3.3 > dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 140.1.2.2 rif-passthru 100 > dlsw icanreach netbios-exclusive > dlsw icanreach netbios-name Beta > > ! > r3#sh dl rea > DLSw Remote NetBIOS Name reachability cache list > NetBIOS Namestatus Loc.peer > Alpha UNCONFIRM REMOTE 140.1.2.2(2065) > > Regards, > > ShahzaD > > -Original Message- > From: ShahzaD Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 6:53 PM > To: Huang HaiBo > Subject: RE: DLSW questions, another idea > > Did you get any feedback on this ??? > > Regards, > > sa > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Huang HaiBo > Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 11:37 PM > To: simplimarvelous > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: DLSW questions, another idea > > could you give details? > > - Original Message - > From: simplimarvelous > To: Michel GASPARD ; Huang HaiBo > Cc: > Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 11:37 AM > Subject: Re: DLSW questions, another idea > > > Is it possible to do it like this? > > > > Put R2 and R3 in a cluster leave R1 on its own. It would seem that R1 > would > > only need to make a connection to the clusters ring, and would not need to > > have a connection to both routers in the cluster. I would think that the > > cluster internal routers would communicate fine, and any traffic from r3 > to > > r1 would only have to make one connection via the clusters virtual ring. > > > > sounds good in theory... > > > > > > Gerald > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Michel GASPARD" > > To: "Huang HaiBo" > > Cc: > > Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 8:07 AM > > Subject: Re: DLSW questions, another idea > > > > > > > Dear all, > > > > > > I though about another possibility, but I do not manage to make it work. > > > > > > I assume that to solve point 1), I used "promiscuous" in R2. > > > > > > My idea was: why not create a second DLSW tunnel, between R1 and R2 > > > (just a simple remote-peer statement is enough on R1, nothing on R2 nor > > > R3). > > > > > > In that way, frames from R2 ro R1 are OK (simple DLSW). > > > > > &g
With TDMA Network [7:8044]
Hi all I want some help regarding connecting cisco routers across a frame relay based TDMA ( Time Division Multiple Access ) Network. In TDMA network, main site (hub) is connected to different remote site having remote unit (each site has differet DLCI). At main site there are two different path, one for transmission (Tx) and other for Receive (Rx). So at main site a Frame Relay switch is used to switch data from TX and RX path to DTE device ( e.g Cisco router). Currently a main cisco router is connected to switch port and differnt remote router connected to remote terminal (star topology). The configuration used is at main site subinterfaces are created for each remote site and set specific interface dlci for each subinterface). Configuration at main router interface s0 encapsulation frame-relay no keep-alive ( as TDMA has lmi disabled) no ip address interface s 0.1 ip addr 192.168.21.1 255.255.255.0 frame-relay interface-dlci 17 interface s 0.2 ip addr 192.168.22.1 255.255.255.0 frame-relay interface-dlci 18 and so on as depend on number of remote site Cofiguration at remote sites interface s 0 encapsulation frame-relay no keep-alive no ip address interface s0.1 ip addr 192.168.21.2 255.255.255.0 frame-relay interface-dlci 17 and same at all remote site routers. How can I replace frame relay switch by using two serial port of Cisco router and route data from both TX and Rx path to LAN ethernet port? I want to eliminate switch and want same work with cisco router. My understanding is that cisco router works as frame relay switch by receiving data of a specific dlci from a serial port and swich to different serial port with a differnt or same dlci. Can Cisco router transmit and receive data of same dlci at different serial ports and route these data to LAN ethernet interface? Waiting for help. Thanks Khurrum -- ___ Get your free email from http://mymail.iname.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8044&t=8044 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
frame-relay route question [7:8217]
When connecting cisco router ( as frame-relay switch) with frame relay device, I configured frame relay route as Serial 0Dlci in 16to Serial 1 Dlci out 26 Serial 1Dlci in 27to Serial 0 Dlci out 17 ( require only these 2 routes) But "show frame-relay pvc" shows both route status inactive and both route does not work. When I give additional two route ( not required ) Serial 1Dlci in 26to Serial 1 Dlci out 16 Serial 0Dlci in 17to Serial 0 Dlci out 27 then both route status become active and configuration works. Is it necessary that dlci path must be completed?Because sometime it is not required to complete path of dlci. Can anybody give me guidence on this topic ? -- ___ Get your free email from http://mymail.iname.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8217&t=8217 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: frame-relay route question [7:8217]
I already configured frame relay ietf encapsulation and lmi disable ( no keep alives). In my configuration frame relay cloud get data from s1 with dlci 26 and gives data on s1 with dlci 27. But in order to this configuration words i have to configure 2 additional route ( 26 on s1 and 17 on s0 which is not required for my configuraion). In absence of these route configuratio do not work. It means that cisco route configuration can't work if dlci's do not match and not inverse of each other. All other frame-relay switches ( like memotec, motrolla ) can works with one way route ad in absence of inverse dlci route. >> > >Hi John, When you set up your frame relay network you have to be sure to give your interface a dlci and tell it where to go...like you have below...s0 use dlci 16 to the frame cloud which uses dlci 26 to get to s1. But then you have to tell s1 that it needs to use dlci 26 to get back to the frame cloud which uses dlci 16 to get back to s0. What you have is serial 1 send down dlci 27 to the frame cloud and forward down s0 on dlci 17. If you do an show frame pvc on the routers attached on s1 and s0 you will see that one has dlci 16 assigned and the other has dlci 27 assigned. But the frame is trying to send data to them on dlci 26 and dlci 17 which they dont know about. so you just need to make sure that your dlci's match and that are an inverse of each other. Here is the output from my current lab: c4500#sh frame route Input Intf Input Dlci Output Intf Output Dlci Status Serial1 102 Serial3 201 active Serial2 103 Serial3 301 active Serial3 201 Serial1 102 active Serial3 301 Serial2 103 active good luck, Don -Original Message- From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 1:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: frame-relay route question [7:8217] If you are connecting to a non-Cisco device you need to set the frame relay encapsulation type to ietf and the LMI type to ANSI. The defaults are cisco encapsulation type and cisco LMI, neither of which will that device understand. Try that change and let's see if that resolves the issue. If not, please let us know. HTH, John >>> "Khurrum Shahzad" 6/12/01 12:13:49 PM >>> When connecting cisco router ( as frame-relay switch) with frame relay device, I configured frame relay route as Serial 0Dlci in 16to Serial 1 Dlci out 26 Serial 1Dlci in 27to Serial 0 Dlci out 17 ( require only these 2 routes) But "show frame-relay pvc" shows both route status inactive and both route does not work. When I give additional two route ( not required ) Serial 1Dlci in 26to Serial 1 Dlci out 16 Serial 0Dlci in 17to Serial 0 Dlci out 27 then both route status become active and configuration works. Is it necessary that dlci path must be completed?Because sometime it is not required to complete path of dlci. Can anybody give me guidence on this topic ? -- ___ Get your free email from http://mymail.iname.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8319&t=8217 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Frame Relay Network [7:8381]
I want some help regarding connecting cisco routers across a frame relay based TDMA ( Time Division Multiple Access ) Network. In TDMA network, main site (hub) is connected to different remote site having remote unit (each site has differet DLCI). At main site there are two different path, one for transmission (Tx) and other for Receive (Rx). So at main site a Frame Relay switch is used to switch data from TX and RX path to DTE device ( e.g Cisco router). Currently a main cisco router is connected to switch port and differnt remote router connected to remote terminal (star topology). The configuration used is at main site subinterfaces are reated for each remote site and set specific interface dlci for each subinterface). Configuration at main router interface s0 encapsulation frame-relay no keep-alive ( as TDMA has lmi disabled) no ip address interface s 0.1 ip addr 192.168.21.1 255.255.255.0 frame-relay interface-dlci 17 interface s 0.2 ip addr 192.168.22.1 255.255.255.0 frame-relay interface-dlci 18 and so on as depend on number of remote sites. Cofiguration at remote sites interface s 0 encapsulation frame-relay no keep-alive no ip address interface s0.1 ip addr 192.168.21.2 255.255.255.0 frame-relay interface-dlci 17 and same at all remote site routers. How can I replace frame relay switch by using two serial port of Cisco router and route data from both TX and Rx path to LAN ethernet port? I want to eliminate switch and want to take same work with cisco router. My understanding is that cisco router works as frame relay switch by receiving data of a specific dlci from a serial port and swich to different serial port with a differnt or same dlci. Can Cisco router transmit and receive data of same dlci at different serial ports and route these data to LAN ethernet interface? -- ___ Get your free email from http://mymail.iname.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8381&t=8381 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: frame-relay route question [7:8217]
The device with which I am connecting cisco has lmi disabled. > I am a little curiius why you'd want to do no >keepalive and disable lmi >on >a frame ckt, I mean lmi is how the circuit does a >sanity check to check >status. Brian "Sonic" Whalen Success = Preparation + Opportunity On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Khurrum Shahzad wrote: > I already configured frame relay ietf encapsulation and lmi disable ( no > keep alives). > In my configuration frame relay cloud get data from s1 with dlci 26 and > gives data on s1 with dlci 27. But in order to this configuration words i > have to configure 2 additional route ( 26 on s1 and 17 on s0 which is not > required for my configuraion). In absence of these route configuratio do not > work. > > It means that cisco route configuration can't work if dlci's do not match > and not inverse of each other. All other frame-relay switches ( like > memotec, motrolla ) can works with one way route ad in absence of inverse > dlci route. > > > > > > >> > > > >Hi John, > > > When you set up your frame relay network you have to be sure to give > your > interface a dlci and tell it where to go...like you have below...s0 use > dlci > 16 to the frame cloud which uses dlci 26 to get to s1. But then you > have to > tell s1 that it needs to use dlci 26 to get back to the frame cloud > which > uses dlci 16 to get back to s0. What you have is serial 1 send down > dlci 27 > to the frame cloud and forward down s0 on dlci 17. If you do an show > frame > pvc on the routers attached on s1 and s0 you will see that one has dlci > 16 > assigned and the other has dlci 27 assigned. But the frame is trying > to > send data to them on dlci 26 and dlci 17 which they dont know about. > > so you just need to make sure that your dlci's match and that are an > inverse > of each other. > > > Here is the output from my current lab: > > > c4500#sh frame route > Input Intf Input Dlci Output Intf Output Dlci Status > Serial1 102 Serial3 201 active > Serial2 103 Serial3 301 active > Serial3 201 Serial1 102 active > Serial3 301 Serial2 103 active > > > good luck, > > Don > > > > > > > -Original Message- > From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 1:02 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: frame-relay route question [7:8217] > > > If you are connecting to a non-Cisco device you need to set the frame > relay encapsulation type to ietf and the LMI type to ANSI. The > defaults > are cisco encapsulation type and cisco LMI, neither of which will that > device understand. Try that change and let's see if that resolves the > issue. If not, please let us know. > > HTH, > John > > >>> "Khurrum Shahzad" 6/12/01 12:13:49 PM >>> > When connecting cisco router ( as frame-relay switch) with frame relay > device, I configured frame relay route as > > Serial 0Dlci in 16to Serial 1 Dlci out 26 > Serial 1Dlci in 27to Serial 0 Dlci out 17 > ( require only these 2 routes) > > But "show frame-relay pvc" shows both route status inactive and both > route > does not work. > > When I give additional two route ( not required ) > > Serial 1Dlci in 26to Serial 1 Dlci out 16 > Serial 0Dlci in 17to Serial 0 Dlci out 27 > > then both route status become active and configuration works. > > Is it necessary that dlci path must be completed?Because sometime it is > not > required to complete path of dlci. > > Can anybody give me guidence on this topic ? > > > > -- ___ Get your free email from http://mymail.iname.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8388&t=8217 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: frame-relay route question [7:8217]
The device with which I am connecting cisco has lmi disabled. > I am a little curiius why you'd want to do no >keepalive and disable lmi >on >a frame ckt, I mean lmi is how the circuit does a >sanity check to check >status. Brian "Sonic" Whalen Success = Preparation + Opportunity On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Khurrum Shahzad wrote: > I already configured frame relay ietf encapsulation and lmi disable ( no > keep alives). > In my configuration frame relay cloud get data from s1 with dlci 26 and > gives data on s1 with dlci 27. But in order to this configuration words i > have to configure 2 additional route ( 26 on s1 and 17 on s0 which is not > required for my configuraion). In absence of these route configuratio do not > work. > > It means that cisco route configuration can't work if dlci's do not match > and not inverse of each other. All other frame-relay switches ( like > memotec, motrolla ) can works with one way route ad in absence of inverse > dlci route. > > > > > > >> > > > >Hi John, > > > When you set up your frame relay network you have to be sure to give > your > interface a dlci and tell it where to go...like you have below...s0 use > dlci > 16 to the frame cloud which uses dlci 26 to get to s1. But then you > have to > tell s1 that it needs to use dlci 26 to get back to the frame cloud > which > uses dlci 16 to get back to s0. What you have is serial 1 send down > dlci 27 > to the frame cloud and forward down s0 on dlci 17. If you do an show > frame > pvc on the routers attached on s1 and s0 you will see that one has dlci > 16 > assigned and the other has dlci 27 assigned. But the frame is trying > to > send data to them on dlci 26 and dlci 17 which they dont know about. > > so you just need to make sure that your dlci's match and that are an > inverse > of each other. > > > Here is the output from my current lab: > > > c4500#sh frame route > Input Intf Input Dlci Output Intf Output Dlci Status > Serial1 102 Serial3 201 active > Serial2 103 Serial3 301 active > Serial3 201 Serial1 102 active > Serial3 301 Serial2 103 active > > > good luck, > > Don > > > > > > > -Original Message- > From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 1:02 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: frame-relay route question [7:8217] > > > If you are connecting to a non-Cisco device you need to set the frame > relay encapsulation type to ietf and the LMI type to ANSI. The > defaults > are cisco encapsulation type and cisco LMI, neither of which will that > device understand. Try that change and let's see if that resolves the > issue. If not, please let us know. > > HTH, > John > > >>> "Khurrum Shahzad" 6/12/01 12:13:49 PM >>> > When connecting cisco router ( as frame-relay switch) with frame relay > device, I configured frame relay route as > > Serial 0Dlci in 16to Serial 1 Dlci out 26 > Serial 1Dlci in 27to Serial 0 Dlci out 17 > ( require only these 2 routes) > > But "show frame-relay pvc" shows both route status inactive and both > route > does not work. > > When I give additional two route ( not required ) > > Serial 1Dlci in 26to Serial 1 Dlci out 16 > Serial 0Dlci in 17to Serial 0 Dlci out 27 > > then both route status become active and configuration works. > > Is it necessary that dlci path must be completed?Because sometime it is > not > required to complete path of dlci. > > Can anybody give me guidence on this topic ? > > > > -- ___ Get your free email from http://mymail.iname.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8392&t=8217 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re:strange problem in voice [7:9093]
Use command " no supervisory " on voice ports at FXS router. >Hi, >i configured voice on two routers, on one router i ?>hav a phone set attached with Fxs and on the other >router Pbx is connected with fxo. I can recieve >and make calls from both ends, but i m having this >problem that the phone keeps on ringing even when i > onhook the phone. > >Regards, >Dar -- ___ Make PC-to-Phone calls with Net2Phone. Sign-up today at: http://www.net2phone.com/cgi-bin/link.cgi?121 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9646&t=9093 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
STRANGE PROBLEM in updating EIGRP routes [7:37055]
Dear All I am facing a strange problem in 1751 routers. In a simple scenario in which two 1751 are connected with over a channel with serial port and eigrp is used for routing. Router 1 s 0/0 ip addr 192.168.10.1 fe 0/0 ip addr 192.168.1.1 Router 2 s 0/0 ip addr 192.168.10.2 fe 0/0 ip addr 192.168.2.1 both router get the routes of remote LAN and any machine on 192.168.1.0 (R1) network ping all machines on other 192.168.2.0 (R2) network. Configurtion on both routers have been saved. But the Promlem is that when any one of the router reboot/power cycle then it do not send its routes to other router but gets the routes of remote router and also it shows other router as eigrp neighbor. It means that when R1 reload/power cycle then after comleting reload it shows routes of 192.168.2.0 but R2 remote router does not shows route of 192.168.1.0. Eigrp configuration is present on both routers and both routers shows other router as their eigrp neighbor. Both routers shows Eigrp configuraton in sh run configuration To solve this problem, eigrp configuration has to be removed from R1 and reconfigured then it becomes OK. no router eigrp 100 router eigrp 100 network 192.168.10.0 network 192.168.1.0 Is anybody knows about this problem? Is there any bug in IOS? The router configuration is very simple and working perfectly on other 2500 series routers. SHOW VERSION Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) C1700 Software (C1700-Y-M), Version 12.2(4)T, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) TAC Support: http://www.cisco.com/tac Copyright (c) 1986-2001 by cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Fri 28-Sep-01 02:10 by ccai Image text-base: 0x800080E0, data-base: 0x80738B80 ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.2(1r)XE1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) ZAM_RT uptime is 3 hours, 3 minutes System returned to ROM by power-on System image file is "flash:c1700-y-mz.122-4.T.bin" cisco 1751 (MPC860P) processor (revision 0x501) with 24576K/8192K bytes of memor y. Processor board ID JAD05470F8C (3805074441), with hardware revision 4246 M860 processor: part number 5, mask 2 Bridging software. X.25 software, Version 3.0.0. 1 FastEthernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s) 2 Serial(sync/async) network interface(s) 32K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory. 16384K bytes of processor board System flash (Read/Write) Configuration register is 0x2102 W_R1#sh run Building configuration... Current configuration : 652 bytes ! version 12.2 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname W_R1 ! enable secret 5 $1$WXuj$iGaxxfubhqEi9uX5YzKKK1 ! memory-size iomem 25 ip subnet-zero ! ! ! ! interface FastEthernet0/0 ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 speed auto ! interface Serial0/0 ip address 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.0 ! interface Serial0/1 no ip address shutdown ! router eigrp 100 network 192.168.1.0 network 192.168.10.0 auto-summary no eigrp log-neighbor-changes ! ip classless no ip http server ! ! line con 0 line aux 0 line vty 0 4 exec-timeout 0 0 password cisco login ! no scheduler allocate end W_R1# Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37055&t=37055 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problem with Console Port
Hi , I am facing a problem with my 2501 router. It was working fine, but for the last few days I am not able to connect to the console port of the router. It shows nothing on the screen when I try to connect and press enter. When I checked the Signal level of the console port on my Break Out box, it showed me the continuous LOW status of TxD signal. When I reboot the router, it shows me the startup messages and finally after showing all those messages it hangs and TAKES NO INPUT from the HYPER TERMINAL. I have also tried many terminal Software like Telix, Teraterm. The router has no prior configurations (as I did an ERASE STARTUP CONFIGURATION before), so I am not able to connect via TELNET or AUX port. Is there any way out??? Can I replace NVRAM of this router with any other NVRAM having configuration and then connect with the router with AUX port or via TELNET? Is NVRAM Of 2501 router replaceable? Khurrum ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problem with Console Port
Hi, I am facing a problem with my 2501 router. It was working fine, but forthe last few days I am not able to connect to the console port of therouter. It shows nothing on the screen when I try to connect and pressenter. When I checked the Signal level of the console port on my Break Outbox, it showed me the continuous LOW status of TxD signal. When I reboot therouter, it shows me the startup messages and finally after showing all thosemessages it hangs and TAKES NO INPUT from the HYPER TERMINAL. I have alsotried many terminal Software like Telix, Teraterm.The router has no prior configurations (as I did an ERASE STARTUPCONFIGURATION before), so I am not able to connect via TELNET or AUX port.Is there any way out???Can I replace NVRAM of this router with any other NVRAM having configurationand then connect with the router with AUX port or via TELNET?Is NVRAM Of 2501 router replaceable? Khurrum
Problem with Console Port
Hi all , I am facing a problem with my 2501 router. It was working fine, but forthe last two weeks I am not able to connect to the console port of therouter. It shows nothing on the screen when I try to connect and pressenter. When I checked the Signal level of the console port on my Break Outbox, it showed me the continuous LOW status of TxD signal. When I reboot therouter, it shows me the startup messages and finally after showing all thosemessages it hangs and TAKES NO INPUT from the HYPER TERMINAL. I have also tried many terminal Software like Telix, Teraterm but response of the router remains the same. There is no problem in Console Cable as cable is working fine on other Routers. The router has no prior configurations (as I did an ERASE STARTUPCONFIGURATION before), so I am not able to connect via TELNET or AUX port. Before doing ERASE STARTUP CONFIGURATION, I was connecting to reouter with AUX Port and did my configuration but after erase NVRAM, AUX was shut and router becomes useless. Is there any way out???Can I replace NVRAM of this router with any other NVRAM having configuration and then connect with the router with AUX port or via TELNET? Is NVRAM Of 2501 router replaceable? Please help me if anybody has the solution. Khurrum
help required in configuring frame relay traffic shaping [7:44394]
Hello Can anybody tell me any mistake or missing configuration for frame relay traffc shaping? I connected two cisco 2600 router serial interfaces throug 32 k link. I configured point to point frame relay subinterface on both interfaces. I want to use this link on CIR 16k and peak rate 32k. My configuration is On interface frame-ralay traffic shaping and on subinterface frame-relay class cisco and for map-class map-class frame-relay cisco frame-ralay traffic-rate 16000 32000 frame-relay adaptive-shaping becn and I also tried map-class frame-relay cisco frame-ralay cir 16000 frame-relay bc 2000 frame-relay be 2000 frame-relay adaptive-shaping becn Problem is that when I run data on line e.g. file transfer, bandwidth uses always 16k or less although no other data run on ckt and total available bandwidth is 32 k. The data rate does not reach to peak rate and if I remove traffic shaping then total 32 k used. Is any missing parameter or command in above configuration? regards Khurrum -- ___ Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=44394&t=44394 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
voice and 802.11b [7:45342]
Can we use voice through Wireless Ethernet Bridge (like cisco Aironet )? Is is possible to use voice if two cisco router having voice module and FXO/FXS are placed on two location connected through wireless bridge? I read that 802.11b has a drawback of lack of interoperability with voice devies. regards -- ___ Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45342&t=45342 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DIAL Backup of Wireless VLAN [7:20058]
Hi all I want help regarding my scenario which is as follows. I have one central and tow remote sites. Both two remote sites are connected with central through Wireless Ethernet Bridge (high speed). At Central site Ethernet cable from both Wireless Bridge are connected to switch and Cisco 2620 is used for routing between 3 different VLAN ( two for remote and one for central). So at central site I have 3 sub interface on Fast Ethernet each having IP address of separate net. I also require Sync Dial Backup for each remote site. So I placed one 1601 and Sync dialup modem on each remote site and dialup modems at central connected with sync port of 2620. But I can't understand how to configure online (automatic) backup because if any of wireless link will break or down, Ethernet ports will not down and dialer will not initiate. Also for manual backup, if I manually dial to central site from any remote site then after connected to central, I have same IP net on both site of link, it means Ethernet port of 1601 and fast Ethernet port of 2620 have Ethernet IP from same net. Can anybody guide me how I run my main links on Wireless Ethernet Bridge and backup link on dialup with routers? Network diagram of my setup is at http://www.geocities.com/khurrums/ Regards Khurrum Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=20058&t=20058 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DIAL Backup of Wireless VLAN [7:20058]
To which net I configure as my interesting packet because both net of my remote site LAN is also on sub interfaces of my Central site Fast Ethernet Interface. I can't define route to a net which is also on my directly connected interface. >> >>Don't look for an interface going down, instead configure a floating default route as your interesting packet. Dave Khurrum Shahzad wrote: Hi all I want help regarding my scenario which is as follows. I have one central and tow remote sites. Both two remote sites are connected with central through Wireless Ethernet Bridge (high speed). At Central site Ethernet cable from both Wireless Bridge are connected to switch and Cisco 2620 is used for routing between 3 different VLAN ( two for remote and one for central). So at central site I have 3 sub interface on Fast Ethernet each having IP address of separate net. I also require Sync Dial Backup for each remote site. So I placed one 1601 and Sync dialup modem on each remote site and dialup modems at central connected with sync port of 2620. But I can't understand how to configure online (automatic) backup because if any of wireless link will break or down, Ethernet ports will not down and dialer will not initiate. Also for manual backup, if I manually dial to central site from any remote site then after connected to central, I have same IP net on both site of link, it means Ethernet port of 1601 and fast Ethernet port of 2620 have Ethernet IP from same net. Can anybody guide me how I run my main links on Wireless Ethernet Bridge and backup link on dialup with routers? Network diagram of my setup is at http://www.geocities.com/khurrums/ Regards Khurrum Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=20100&t=20058 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
