RE: Has anyone seen a 2901 that has the same i.o.s as 5000 switch
All. Actually the 2948G is based on the 4000 series switch which is a fix config. 48 10/100 ports plus 2 1000 baseX ports, architectural wise is has 2 non-blocking gig and 6 ASTRODOME thus only 8 of the 12 pipe from the K1 chip are used. -Stuart. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Nick Payton Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 7:10 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Has anyone seen a 2901 that has the same i.o.s as 5000 switch As are the 2948G series too. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tony van Ree Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 9:48 PM To: Jeff Kelly; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Has anyone seen a 2901 that has the same i.o.s as 5000 switch Hi, Don't the cat2900's (NOT XL's all look that way.) The 2926, 2901 are 5000 series based as I understood it. At least the ones I am viewing are. Teunis, Hobart, Tasmania Australia On Wednesday, January 31, 2001 at 01:18:43 PM, Jeff Kelly wrote: > > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- www.tasmail.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Disabling Spanning Tree!!!!!!!
Hi, As long as you don't have any L2 loops then your fine, it will be a more stable topology but only as long as you know there aren't any loops going on. On your 3500xl you can further improve this by enabling portfast on the switch ports connected to PC workstations, ( this eliminates the production of TCN's) check out. LAN tips http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/473/ Port fast http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/473/12.html spanning tree troubleshooting http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/473/16.html regards /Stuart. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Shaun Wakelen Sent: Monday, February 05, 2001 2:46 PM To: Cisco GS Subject: Disabling Spanning Tree!!! OK, I know it's not a good idea, but we have a requirement to disable spanning tree on our switches. We have a 4908 to which we have 3548's connected. Could somebody confirm that I have disabled spanning tree in the configuration for the 4908 attached, as I think it is, but somebody on the relevant site is saying that it is not. <<4908_1.txt>> Many thanks Shaun This e-mail and any attachments may contain privileged, confidential and/or copyright information and is for the sole use of the intended addressee. If you are not the named recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to another person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium.This message is subject to and does not create or vary any contractual relationship between Telindus K-NET Ltd and you. ! version 12.0 no service pad service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime service password-encryption ! hostname 4908-01 ! ip subnet-zero ipx routing 0002.0002.0002 bridge irb ! interface GigabitEthernet1 ip address 10.192.1.1 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast shutdown ! interface GigabitEthernet2 ip address 10.192.2.1 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast shutdown ! interface GigabitEthernet3 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast ! interface GigabitEthernet3.1 encapsulation isl 1 no ip redirects no ip directed-broadcast bridge-group 1 spanning-disabled ! interface GigabitEthernet3.2 encapsulation isl 2 no ip redirects no ip directed-broadcast bridge-group 2 spanning-disabled ! interface GigabitEthernet3.3 encapsulation isl 3 no ip redirects no ip directed-broadcast bridge-group 3 spanning-disabled ! interface GigabitEthernet4 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast ! interface GigabitEthernet4.1 encapsulation isl 1 no ip redirects no ip directed-broadcast bridge-group 1 spanning-disabled ! interface GigabitEthernet4.2 encapsulation isl 2 no ip redirects no ip directed-broadcast bridge-group 2 spanning-disabled ! interface GigabitEthernet4.3 encapsulation isl 3 no ip redirects no ip directed-broadcast bridge-group 3 spanning-disabled ! interface GigabitEthernet5 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast ! interface GigabitEthernet5.1 encapsulation isl 1 no ip redirects no ip directed-broadcast bridge-group 1 spanning-disabled ! interface GigabitEthernet5.2 encapsulation isl 2 no ip redirects no ip directed-broadcast bridge-group 2 spanning-disabled ! interface GigabitEthernet5.3 encapsulation isl 3 no ip redirects no ip directed-broadcast bridge-group 3 spanning-disabled ! interface GigabitEthernet6 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast ! interface GigabitEthernet6.1 encapsulation isl 1 no ip redirects no ip directed-broadcast bridge-group 1 spanning-disabled ! interface GigabitEthernet6.2 encapsulation isl 2 no ip redirects no ip directed-broadcast bridge-group 2 spanning-disabled ! interface GigabitEthernet6.3 encapsulation isl 3 no ip redirects no ip directed-broadcast bridge-group 3 spanning-disabled ! interface GigabitEthernet7 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast ! interface GigabitEthernet7.1 encapsulation isl 1 no ip redirects no ip directed-broadcast bridge-group 1 spanning-disabled ! interface GigabitEthernet7.2 encapsulation isl 2 no ip redirects no ip directed-broadcast bridge-group 2 spanning-disabled ! interface GigabitEthernet7.3 encapsulation isl 3 no ip redirects no ip directed-broadcast bridge-group 3 spanning-disabled ! interface GigabitEthernet8 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast ! interface GigabitEthernet8.1 encapsulation isl 1 no ip redirects no ip directed-broadcast bridge-group 1 spanning-disabled ! interface GigabitEthernet8.2 encapsulation isl 2 no ip redirects no ip directed-broadcast bridge-group 2 spanning-disabled ! interface GigabitEthernet8.3 encapsulation isl 3 no ip redirects no ip directed-broadcast bridge-group 3 spanning-disabled ! interface BVI1 ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.0.0 no ip redirects no ip directed-broadcast no ip route-cache cef ! interface BVI2 ip address 10.2.1.1 255.255.255.0 no ip redirects no ip directed-broadcast no ip route-cache cef ! interface BVI3 ip address 10.3.1.1 255.255.0.0 no ip
RE: ATM BOOK
Cisco ATM Solutions. by cisco press -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Boomie Okeowo Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 1:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ATM BOOK Can anyone recommend a very good ATM book, please. -B __ FREE voicemail, email, and fax...all in one place. Sign Up Now! http://www.onebox.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HDLC
Thats right, cisco hdlc is not compatible with other vendors implemenation of hdlc. An HDLC frame format is shown below: 111 2 variable 2 1 +++++---++-- --+ |flag|addr|ctrl|protocol|data | FCS |flag| |0x7E||0x00|| | |0x7E| +++++---++-- --+ flag = start/end of frame = 0x7E (Other special characters: Idle = 0xFF, Abort = 0x7F) address = this is really a frame type field 0x0F = Unicast Frame 0x80 = Broadcast Frame 0x40 = Padded Frame 0x20 = Compressed Frame Protocol = the Ethernet type of the encapsulated data: 0x0800 = IP 0x6003 = DECnet ... 0x6558 = Bridged Frame 0x8035 = Keepalive Frame 0x80C4 = CDP The bits in the frame (not counting the flag bytes) are 0 bit stuffed to insure that there is never more then 5 1 bits in a row on the wire. Therefore 0xFF, 0xFE, 0xFC, 0x7E, 0x7F, 0x3F bytes could never be in the data portion of the frame - so they are free to be used for start/end framing and other special functions on the wire. /Stuart. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jeremy Dumoit Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 1:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: HDLC Getting some good info here.. So cisco has their own implementation of HDLC.. is it compatible with other non-cisco devices (nothing particular in mind here)? What does the control field of a cisco HDLC frame look like? Thanks!!! Jeremy _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Log message from Cat4006
Hi The message you see on the cat4000 means that the catalyst saw a frame with a null source MAC address and informs you that it will not learn that MAC address and thus not add it into the CAM table. These messages are not displayed on cat5000 because the necessary code for displaying them is not there. Possible causes for having a NULL mac address: a smartbit sending such frames, a router or station which MAC address has been modified or sometimes other vendor switches use such null MAC address as source MAC address (3Com for instance). If none of the above causes apply to your network, the only ways to remove these messages are: 1) use a sniffer to find out which machine is sending such frames 2) change the logging level so the messages are not displayed anymore. This only clears the logging but does not resolve the exact problem (it only masks it). You can change the logging level by using the following command: set logging level sys 3 Regards, /Stuart - | | Stuart Potts ||| ||| Customer Support Engineer .|. .|. .:|:.:|:.Phone: (44) 1908 203478 c i s c o S y s t e m s Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Empowering the Internet Generation" - -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lim Kok Hua Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 9:47 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Log message from Cat4006 Hi Anyone can advise on the following message from a Cat 4006 switch ? %SYS-4-P2_WARN: 1/Filtering Ethernet MAC address of value zero from agent host table interface _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Another "Router-on-a-stick" Post
Hi Scott, Make sure that you have at least ip plus feature set, this is the general configuration ISL do1q is only supported on Fastethernet. int fastethernet 0/1 no ip add int fastethernet 0/1.1 encapsulation isl vlan 1 ip add 10.1.1.1 255.255.0.0 int fastethernet 0/1.2 encapsulation isl vlan 2 ip add 10.2.1.1 255.255.0.0 etc on thr switch int fax/x switchport mode trunk and thats pretty much it. Kind regards /Stuart - | | Stuart Potts ||| ||| Customer Support Engineer .|. .|. .:|:.:|:.Phone: xxx c i s c o S y s t e m s Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Empowering the Internet Generation" - -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott M. Trieste Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 2:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Another "Router-on-a-stick" Post Colleagues, I've been browsing cisco.com for some info on inter-vlan routing with the 2610. Cisco says there is a way to build ethernet sub-interfaces for trunking to a switch. But when I do a "int e0/0.100" and try to add an IP address, it gives me an error message: "Configuring IP routing on a LAN subinterface is only allowed if that subinterface is already configured as part of an IEEE 802.10 or ISL vLAN." There doesn't seem to be an "encapsulation [dot1q | isl] command on this router, and mls obviously isn't supported. I know that I could just give this interface multiple IP address and use a "switchport access multi" command on the switch-- but that would be too easy. By the way, I am trying to do this with a 2924XL. Should this or shouldn't this work? Many thanks in advance, Best Regards, Scott M. Trieste _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SPAM ATTACK
HI, Not really on a router, well you can to a certain degree by filtering ip address using access lists, but this is not really a solution and to be honest quite course grained, when what we are after is finer granularity which a router can not provide I.e. if mail programs use smtp then this is a direct connection, you could filter that address which is associated with the domain, but not on a each user for that domain. /Stuart. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Nuria Cañamares Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 10:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: SPAM ATTACK Hi everybody: I don't think I have any chance but just in case there is any magic filter Is there any way to protect a mailserver ,that is connected to internet with a router, from a SPAM attack configuring the router somehow? If You know any related document please let me know. Thanks a lot, Hopeless Nuria _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco Configuration Help
Hi Guys Windows 2000 employs power management, and this can cause problems, disable. Windows NT you cannot issue the break sequence, solution is to drop the baud rate to 2400 or so, save the configuration, reload router, while booting (within 30seconds) change baud rate back to 9600 holding down space. Other than that as Cyndi mentioned use another term application. /Stuart - | | Stuart Potts ||| ||| Customer Support Engineer .|. .|. .:|:.:|:. c i s c o S y s t e m s Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Empowering the Internet Generation" - -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Garrison, Cyndi D. Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 2:17 PM To: 'Navin Parwal'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Cisco Configuration Help I have found that one of the more currnet versions of hyperterminal will not work with the console of some of the cisco routers. I have not figured out whether it is the IOS or just the hyperterminal. Try upgrading your hyperterminal program or using another program. If that is not possible try a another desktop or laptop with Windows NT or 98. I have windows 2000 and have run into the same problem. Cyndi Garrison -Original Message- From: Navin Parwal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 7:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco Configuration Help Hello Everyone , I am new on Cisco routers and Switches , I am facing a problem on a new Cisco router 2610 which my company has purchased . I am able to telnet on to that router via other router , but I am not able to configure with the console port , as soon as i start it with the console port , it starts , displays the welcome message and then it shows the status of the iinterfaces which has come up , but it does not come to the user mode , ie cisco> prompt . When I telnet it from the other router I am able to log in giving the telnet password and I am able to configure it then but I am not able to get the prompt from my console which is on Windows Millemium , could anyone guide me why this error is coming and how I may correct it . thanks in advance, Navin Parwal _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Confuse about Fast Switching and Layer 3 switching
Hi, Brief: Fast switching is as follows, 1st packet is processed switched, 2 packet to destination is fast switched. i.e. it never goes through the cpu. L3 switching , MLS, Multi layer switching, This is based on traffic flows, ie we could swich on a certain tcp flow, or certain source/detination and destination port. as defined by access lists. The three flow masks are as follows: destination-ipThe least-specific flow mask. The MLS-SE maintains one MLS entry for each destination IP address. All flows to a given destination IP address use this MLS entry. This mode is used if there are no access lists configured on any of the MLS-RP interfaces. source-destination-ipThe MLS-SE maintains one MLS entry for each source and destination IP address pair. All flows between a given source and destination use this MLS entry regardless of the IP protocol ports. This mode is used if there is a standard access list on any of the MLS-RP interfaces. ip-flowThe most-specific flow mask. The MLS-SE creates and maintains a separate MLS cache entry for every IP flow. An ip-flow entry includes the source IP address, destination IP address, protocol, and protocol ports. This mode is used if there is an extended access list on any of the MLS-RP interfaces. http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat5000/rel_5_2/layer3/m ls.htm#xtocid171391 http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/473/55.html /Stuart. - | | Stuart Potts ||| ||| Customer Support Engineer .|. .|. .:|:.:|:. c i s c o S y s t e m s Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Empowering the Internet Generation" - -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dove Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 7:02 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Confuse about Fast Switching and Layer 3 switching Hi, I have some confuse about the "Fast Switching" and "Layer 3 switching". Both of them are mentioned that route first packet and switch others. Could anyone please help me? Regards. dovelet _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: dialer idle-timeout [7:12256]
Best practice for speed at which b channels come up is the following dialer load-threshold 2 (dont use 1, there are a few issues, 2 = .78%) load-interval 30 (defualt is 5 minutes, this is the a moveing weighted average at which load is calculated) also to bring up b channels v.fast configure ppp timeout multilink link add 1 you can then configure dialer pools, and for each pool specify the maximum number of b channels allowed per group. ie dialer pool-member 1 max-link 10 then int dialer 2 dialer pool 1 regards -Stuart. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Farhan Ahmed Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2001 10:46 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: dialer idle-timeout [7:12256] wrong dialer load threshold is for bringing up the second link u can put maximum numb on idle time out or use fast idle command -Original Message- From: Vette Boy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2001 8:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: dialer idle-timeout [7:12256] Configue the dialer load threshold to 0 for the link to be always up. VB --- "Michael L. Williams" wrote: > I would have to say that the idle-timer is for pure > idle time. not just > interesting traffic AFAIK interesting traffic is > only used to initiaite > the dial, but after that any traffic is enough to > keep the link open.. > BUT (now that I've looked it up) I'M WRONG! > Damn I hate when that > happens. > > from Cisco's site: > > "Interesting packets are packets that pass the > restrictions of the access > lists. These packets either initiate a call (if one > is not already in > progress) or reset the idle timer if a call is in > progress. Uninteresting > packets are transmitted if the link is active, but > dropped if the link is > not active. Uninteresting packets do not initiate > calls or reset the idle > timer." > > Good call Charles.. > > Mike W. > > "Charles Manafa" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Interesting traffic will bring up the link, and > maintain it. Whilst the > link > > is up, any traffic can cross the link, but only > interesting traffic can > > reset the idle timer. > > > > CM > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Burnham, Chris > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: 13 July 2001 11:39 > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: dialer idle-timeout [7:12256] > > > > > > > > > I am currently working throught the "Caslow , > Pavlichenko Cisco > > > Certification Book" I have a query on page 163 > that you guy's > > > and girl's > > > maybe able to help me with. > > > > > > It states that the DDR connection is maintained > as long as > > > "interesting > > > traffic" is transferred over the connection > before the > > > dialer-idle-timeout > > > occurs.? > > > > > > Is this correct?? I was alway's under the > impression that the > > > interesting > > > traffic only determined what brought up the link > & once the > > > link was up it > > > would stay up regardless of traffic type > crossing the ISDN link > > > > > > I would like to hear your opinions > > > > > > Chris Burnham, > > > Systems Engineer, > > > Delphis Consulting Plc. > > > Tel: +(44) 020 7916 0200 > > > Mob: +(44) 07799403576 > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > This e-mail and any files transmitted with it > are intended > > > solely for the > > > addressee and are confidential. They may also be > legally privileged. > > > Copyright in them is reserved by Delphis > Consulting PLC > > > ["Delphis"] and they > > > must not be disclosed to, or used by, anyone > other than the > > > addressee. If > > > you have received this e-mail and any > accompanying files in > > > error, you may > > > not copy, publish or use them in any way and you > should > > > delete them from > > > your system and notify us immediately.E-mails > are not secure. > > > Delphis does > > > not accept responsibility for changes to e-mails > that occur > > > after they have > > > been sent. Any opinions expressed in this > e-mail may be > > > personal to the > > > author and may not necessarily reflect the > opinions of Delphis. [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12472&t=12256 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Isdn error with PPP - Why always?? [7:63255]
For more information; http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/129/bri_invalid_spid.html regards /Stuart -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of MADMAN Sent: 18 February 2003 15:06 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Isdn error with PPP - Why always?? [7:63255] try debug isdn q931, this may give you some more info. Dave Cisco Nuts wrote: > Hello, Just set up basic Isdn b/w 2 routers using the default hdlc encap > and was working perfectly fine till I changed the encap to ppp, ppp auth > chap, ppp multilink and ppp chap hostname R7. Then it just stopped > working :- out this msg. on the screen:R8-G# > 4d19h: %ISDN-4-INVALID_CALLEDNUMBER: Interface BR0, Ignoring call, LDN > and Called Party Number mismatch I looked to see if the called number had > changed even though I had not touched it. It is still valid and so are > the spids. R8-G#ri b0 > Building configuration...Current configuration : 353 bytes > ! > interface BRI0 > ip address 9.9.9.1 255.255.255.0 > ip ospf demand-circuit > dialer idle-timeout 90 > dialer map ip 9.9.9.1 broadcast 5553000 > dialer load-threshold 1 outbound > dialer-group 1 > isdn switch-type basic-ni > isdn spid1 055511 5551000 > isdn spid2 055521 5552000 > R8-G#sh is st > TEI > Global ISDN Switchtype = basic-niter Age Seq# C > Layer 1 Status: > ACTIVE > Layer 2 Status: > TEI = 123, Ces = 1, SAPI = 0, State = MULTIPLE_FRAME_ESTABLISHED > TEI = 124, Ces = 2, SAPI = 0, State = MULTIPLE_FRAME_ESTABLISHED > TEI 123, ces = 1, state = 5(init) > spid1 configured, spid1 sent, spid1 valid > Endpoint ID Info: epsf = 0, usid = 1, tid = 1 > TEI 124, ces = 2, state = 5(init) > spid2 configured, spid2 sent, spid2 valid > Endpoint ID Info: epsf = 0, usid = 3, tid = 1 > Layer 3 Status: > 0 Active Layer 3 Call(s) > CCB:callid=801C, sapi=0, ces=1, B-chan=1, calltype=DATA > Active dsl 0 CCBs = 1 > The Free Channel Mask: 0x8002 > Total Allocated ISDN CCBs = 1 I am beginning to guess that the problem is > a HARDWARE one with the ISDN switch being the culprit. I guess as usual I > need to give it rest for a couple of hours and start it again for this to > work with just HDLC encap. To think that I was told that the Merge > switch was the Rolls Royce of ISDN switches when I paid a "million" $$ > for it last year :-(But if any one has any suggestions/advice, I would > gratefully appreciate it.Thank you.Sincerely,CN > > > > STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* -- David Madland CCIE# 2016 Sr. Network Engineer Qwest Communications 612-664-3367 "You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer." --Winston Churchill Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=63271&t=63255 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco routers and MRTG [7:56794]
Hello, a standard ethernet link is 10Mb/sec ie 10Mb/s = 1000 bits/sec (/8)= 125bytes/sec = 1250K/sec = 1.25MB/sec dont get confused between Megabits (Mb)and Megabytes (MB) ;) I hope this helps regards /Stuart -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nobody@;groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of Reinhold Fischer Sent: 04 November 2002 14:10 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cisco routers and MRTG [7:56794] Bytes / Bits MRTG is very accurate - as long as the stuff that gets feeded into it is OK. hth Reinhold On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 12:28:34PM +, Firesox wrote: > Folks, > I am using MRTG to pull cisco Router's snmp mibs. > On ehternet interface the graph shows the max speed of 1250.0K which is only > 1.25 meg > and on Fastthernet is shows as 12.5 megs. > I am wondering why they don't show 10 meg and 100 megs respectively and > starting to suspect how accurate MRTG is. > > Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56805&t=56794 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
