RE: ICMP [7:61004]
Yes,the host places this entry into its routing table. -Original Message- From: maine dude [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 2:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ICMP [7:61004] Hi All, Quick question- When a router sends a redirect to a particular host, how does the host remember to use this in the future, does the ICMP place an entry into the hosts routing table? Thanks in advance. -DJ - With Yahoo! Mail you can get a bigger mailbox -- choose a size that fits your needs **Disclaimer** Information contained in this E-MAIL being proprietary to Wipro Limited is 'privileged' and 'confidential' and intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. You are notified that any use, copying or dissemination of the information contained in the E-MAIL in any manner whatsoever is strictly prohibited. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=61005t=61004 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIP 640-910 MPLS [7:60977]
Hi, I passed it around 6 months back.I think the drawings were proper.You can refer some of the PDF's available on this in the web site. Kind Regards/Thangavel -Original Message- From: Marco Eulenfeld [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 11:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIP 640-910 MPLS [7:60977] hy all, is anyone here, who passed the 640-910 exam? i took it and failed by 5 points *argl*. i think that i misinterpret the ospf exhibitions ( the drawings aren't really good). any suggestions? kind regards, marco [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature] **Disclaimer** Information contained in this E-MAIL being proprietary to Wipro Limited is 'privileged' and 'confidential' and intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. You are notified that any use, copying or dissemination of the information contained in the E-MAIL in any manner whatsoever is strictly prohibited. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=60999t=60977 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Need info on cisco wireless Cert [7:60012]
Hi Group, I am planning to take Cisco Wireless LAN certification. If anyone has taken this exam, please let me know what books you used it for its preparation and what is the passing score and the level of difficulty of the exam. Kind Regards/Thangavel V M **Disclaimer Information contained in this E-MAIL being proprietary to Wipro Limited is 'privileged' and 'confidential' and intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. You are notified that any use, copying or dissemination of the information contained in the E-MAIL in any manner whatsoever is strictly prohibited. *** Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=60012t=60012 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Passed DQoS [7:59951]
Hi Group, Today I passed the DQoS exam with this I complete the Cisco IP Telephony Support Certification. About the exam it is the easiest of the 3 exams in this track.You have 90 min to answer 60 questions and passing score is 720. Kind Regards/Thangavel **Disclaimer** Information contained in this E-MAIL being proprietary to Wipro Limited is 'privileged' and 'confidential' and intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. You are notified that any use, copying or dissemination of the information contained in the E-MAIL in any manner whatsoever is strictly prohibited. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59951t=59951 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: FR Low Latency Queuing (LLQ) [7:59820]
Hi, Please encure that LLQ( when u use Priority command) is supported on following IOS LLQ on Frame-Relay supported on Ver 12.1(2)T(Your config has frame-relay) and on other interfaces u need 12.0(7)T... -Original Message- From: Ivan Yip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 12:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FR Low Latency Queuing (LLQ) [7:59820] Hi, I would like to configure QoS by using FR LLQ. I have the following network test lab. pc1 --| ---router1FR network-router FTP server pc2---| I want to test the LLQ feature, ie, fixed bandwidth allocated to certain taffic. I tested with the following steps 1. upload from pc2 to FTP server to make the FR PVC congested. 2. then upload from pc1 to FTP server If no qos defined, the bandwidth will roughly equally shared. (This was tested and OK) 3. Then I define the LLQ on router1 to guarantee the bandwidth from PC1 by 'bandwidth' or 'priority' and test ftp upload again. Configuration is below: class-map match-all 1 match access-group 20 policy-map 1 class 1 bandwidth 80 or priority 80 (** define 80k to this policy) interface Serial0/0 bandwidth 128 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay IETF load-interval 30 no fair-queue frame-relay traffic-shaping frame-relay lmi-type ansi ! interface Serial0/0.1 point-to-point bandwidth 128 ip address 10.114.0.14 255.255.255.252 frame-relay interface-dlci 200 class llq1 map-class frame-relay llq1 frame-relay traffic-rate 128000 128000 no frame-relay adaptive-shaping frame-relay cir 128000 frame-relay bc 1280 frame-relay be 0 frame-relay mincir 128000 service-policy output 1 access-list 20 permit 192.168.10.2 (ip address of pc1) However, when I use 'bandwidth 80', I found the average throughput from pc1 will have around 80k but the traffic rate is vary from time to time. (somtimes 100k and sometimes 50k). Why? Even worse, if I use 'priority 80', the traffic from pc1 can only have average around 30k during link congestion. Why? Also, the ping delay from pc1 to router2 and pc2 to router2 are almost equal (either bandwidth or priority). I expected that the ping from pc1 will get better response as the bandwidth was guaranteed. Anyone can give me some hints on above questions? Thanks in advance. rgds, ivan **Disclaimer Information contained in this E-MAIL being proprietary to Wipro Limited is 'privileged' and 'confidential' and intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. You are notified that any use, copying or dissemination of the information contained in the E-MAIL in any manner whatsoever is strictly prohibited. *** Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59954t=59820 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: FR Low Latency Queuing (LLQ) [7:59820]
Hi Ivan, Your configuration is ok,But I want want to stress that when you configure Bandwidth command under class-map you achieve CBWFQ and When u are configuring Priority command under class-map you are achieving LLQ. As you might know that both this method are congestion management Technique i.e your defined traffic will be limited to 80kbps only when the network encounters congestion and is under congestive state (other wise it may go upto 128kbps ur CIR).. If your intention is to always limit the defined traffic to 80kbps use Rate-Limiting. So please ensure that you are simulating congestion in ur setup to verify CBWFQ LLQ.How much traffic are u pumping per sec to simulate congestion ? Kind Regards /Thangavel -Original Message- From: Ivan Yip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 12:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FR Low Latency Queuing (LLQ) [7:59820] Hi, I would like to configure QoS by using FR LLQ. I have the following network test lab. pc1 --| ---router1FR network-router FTP server pc2---| I want to test the LLQ feature, ie, fixed bandwidth allocated to certain taffic. I tested with the following steps 1. upload from pc2 to FTP server to make the FR PVC congested. 2. then upload from pc1 to FTP server If no qos defined, the bandwidth will roughly equally shared. (This was tested and OK) 3. Then I define the LLQ on router1 to guarantee the bandwidth from PC1 by 'bandwidth' or 'priority' and test ftp upload again. Configuration is below: class-map match-all 1 match access-group 20 policy-map 1 class 1 bandwidth 80 or priority 80 (** define 80k to this policy) interface Serial0/0 bandwidth 128 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay IETF load-interval 30 no fair-queue frame-relay traffic-shaping frame-relay lmi-type ansi ! interface Serial0/0.1 point-to-point bandwidth 128 ip address 10.114.0.14 255.255.255.252 frame-relay interface-dlci 200 class llq1 map-class frame-relay llq1 frame-relay traffic-rate 128000 128000 no frame-relay adaptive-shaping frame-relay cir 128000 frame-relay bc 1280 frame-relay be 0 frame-relay mincir 128000 service-policy output 1 access-list 20 permit 192.168.10.2 (ip address of pc1) However, when I use 'bandwidth 80', I found the average throughput from pc1 will have around 80k but the traffic rate is vary from time to time. (somtimes 100k and sometimes 50k). Why? Even worse, if I use 'priority 80', the traffic from pc1 can only have average around 30k during link congestion. Why? Also, the ping delay from pc1 to router2 and pc2 to router2 are almost equal (either bandwidth or priority). I expected that the ping from pc1 will get better response as the bandwidth was guaranteed. Anyone can give me some hints on above questions? Thanks in advance. rgds, ivan **Disclaimer** Information contained in this E-MAIL being proprietary to Wipro Limited is 'privileged' and 'confidential' and intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. You are notified that any use, copying or dissemination of the information contained in the E-MAIL in any manner whatsoever is strictly prohibited. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59826t=59820 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: FR Low Latency Queuing (LLQ) [7:59820]
Hi, Use debug priority (for LLQ)while simulating and see if u get any info.. -Original Message- From: Ivan Yip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 3:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: FR Low Latency Queuing (LLQ) [7:59820] Hi, Thanks your information. My goal is to make sure from certain source ip (eg, voice gateway) to have guaranteed bandwidth under link congestion. Under normal cases, it can up to 128k. Therefore, 'rate-limit' is not my solution. Due to limited resources, pc2 will upload dummy ftp traffic to the server to make the link congested (As the FR is only 128k, so it can be easily get congested). Afterwards, I will upload from PC1 (source ip defined to have LLQ) to test the LLQ. However, the result was not my expected. The traffic from PC1 was not guaranteed. rgds, ivan **Disclaimer Information contained in this E-MAIL being proprietary to Wipro Limited is 'privileged' and 'confidential' and intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. You are notified that any use, copying or dissemination of the information contained in the E-MAIL in any manner whatsoever is strictly prohibited. *** Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59828t=59820 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
quick question on cisco IPM7SMS [7:59162]
Hi, Can IPM and SMS be used for collecting the performance trend report of Links and other protocols ? **Disclaimer Information contained in this E-MAIL being proprietary to Wipro Limited is 'privileged' and 'confidential' and intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. You are notified that any use, copying or dissemination of the information contained in the E-MAIL in any manner whatsoever is strictly prohibited. *** Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59162t=59162 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Passed Cisco IP Telephony [7:58386]
Hi Group, Today I passed the Cisco IP Telephony Exam.I used the cisco Press book by David Lovell and I had a bad experience with this book.The cover page of the book is misleading as it says prepare for IP telephony Certification with this book. To my experience this book is not sufficient for passing the exam as it does not cover all the topics probed in the exam. There is PDF on IP telephony design guide on cisco's web site,I feel the book is a copy of that.The design guide has more than what is covered in this book.I feel spending $60 on this book is not worth as same information you can find on http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/voice/ip_tele/network/. About the exam,It has 70 questions, passing score is 699 and have 2 hrs to answer them.I used cisco site extensively for preparing for this exam. Kind Regards/Thangavel V M **Disclaimer Information contained in this E-MAIL being proprietary to Wipro Limited is 'privileged' and 'confidential' and intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. You are notified that any use, copying or dissemination of the information contained in the E-MAIL in any manner whatsoever is strictly prohibited. *** Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=58386t=58386 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Passing Score ? [7:57687]
Hi, For CIT No of Quest -58 Time to answer -105 min Passing score -776 For Switching No of Quest -57 Time to answer -105 min Passing score -776 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 2:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Passing Score ? [7:57687] Hello, May I learn the current passing score of CIT and Swicthing exams ? Thanks, **Disclaimer Information contained in this E-MAIL being proprietary to Wipro Limited is 'privileged' and 'confidential' and intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. You are notified that any use, copying or dissemination of the information contained in the E-MAIL in any manner whatsoever is strictly prohibited. *** Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=57693t=57687 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
question on IP telephony [7:57756]
Hi, I have a doubt while reading the IP telephony Book, In a Centralized Model of IP telephony,where there is a hub site and two spoke site.And all phones in the spoke site register with the Hub Call manager.My question is if the Wan link goes down how the phones in the spoke1 will communicated with each other.I have read that with SRST can be used in this scenario.Can someone tell me how it happens. **Disclaimer** Information contained in this E-MAIL being proprietary to Wipro Limited is 'privileged' and 'confidential' and intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. You are notified that any use, copying or dissemination of the information contained in the E-MAIL in any manner whatsoever is strictly prohibited. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=57756t=57756 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 640-901 BSCI [7:57599]
Hi, No of questions -57 Time you have -105 min Passing score - 700 -Original Message- From: James Gosnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 3:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 640-901 BSCI [7:57599] Hi people, Sorry, I'm sure this question gets asked 100's of times, I just went back 5 pages and couldn't find an answer. Anybody know the passign score required for 640-901? I'm sitting it on Saturday and would like an idea, someone earlier down said the CIT test had a passing score of 776/1000, are all CCNP exams the same? **Disclaimer** Information contained in this E-MAIL being proprietary to Wipro Limited is 'privileged' and 'confidential' and intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. You are notified that any use, copying or dissemination of the information contained in the E-MAIL in any manner whatsoever is strictly prohibited. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=57601t=57599 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Need Info IPtelephony exam [7:57267]
Hi, Has anyone taken the IP telephony exam(9e0-402) recently ?I just want to know how whether the IP telephony book by David Lovell is sufficient.Can also let me know with any other links (CCO) and materials you used to pass the exam. Kind Regards/Thangavel **Disclaimer Information contained in this E-MAIL being proprietary to Wipro Limited is 'privileged' and 'confidential' and intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. You are notified that any use, copying or dissemination of the information contained in the E-MAIL in any manner whatsoever is strictly prohibited. *** Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=57267t=57267 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
test [7:6111]
_ Chat with your friends as soon as they come online. Get Rediff Bol at http://bol.rediff.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=6111t=6111 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Passed CCIE Written [7:6113]
Hi all, I passed CCIE written,Just narrowly escaped.Anyhow cleared it.Now left with the difficult part to go,The LAB. Can someone suggest me how to proceed for preparing the Lab. Also I am from India and to my knowledge there is no company which offers a practise setup on rental.If anyone has come across,pls let me know. Kind Regards /Thangavel _ Chat with your friends as soon as they come online. Get Rediff Bol at http://bol.rediff.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=6113t=6113 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
