d/c 4000 to a/c [7:51047]

2002-08-09 Thread Thorne Gene

(originally posted on wanted to buy)
What is the easiest and/or best way to convert a DC-powered 4000 to A/C? Is
it as simple as switching power supplies? Or do they differ in a more
substantial way?


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=51047&t=51047
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Multilayer Switching, CCO contradicts itself? [7:51272]

2002-08-13 Thread Thorne Gene

In my understanding of MLS, the first paragraph is correct. Each
unidirectional sequence of packets with same source and destination and
transport layer is always a separate flow. The second paragraph seems to be
referring to the destination-ip flow mask, in which different flows with the
same destination are switched on the basis of a single MLS cache entry. This
does NOT imply that they are all the same flow, only that the destination-ip
mask directs all flows to the same cache entry. This is sort of analagous to
the way a subnet mask directs all IP packets to the same interface, hence
the use of the term "mask".


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=51321&t=51272
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Multilayer Switching, CCO contradicts itself? [7:51272]

2002-08-13 Thread Thorne Gene

I disagree. There are not 3 types of flows, just 3 ways to switch them.

"destination-ip—The least-specific flow mask. The MLS-SE maintains one
MLS entry for each destination IP address. All flows to a given destination
IP address use this MLS entry. This mode is used if there are no access
lists configured on any of the MLS-RP interfaces"

Note the use of the phrase "all flows" in the quote.

Turpin, Mark wrote:
> 
> There types of flows:
> Destination - per {dest} flow
> Source Destination - per {source/dest address} pair
> IP (aka Full) Flow - per {source, dest, protocol and port} set
> 
> Look under the section labeled Flow Mask Modes
> 



Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=51322&t=51272
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Multilayer Switching, CCO contradicts itself? [7:51272]

2002-08-14 Thread Thorne Gene

I think your argument makes a lot of sense. 

Turpin, Mark wrote:
> 
> I can understand your disagreement.  But I hope you will
> understand that
> its semantics at this point.  A flow by any other name is still
> a flow.


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=51350&t=51272
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: OSPF on secondary IP addresses [7:51525]

2002-08-19 Thread Thorne Gene

I looked at the doc for the "network area" command for 11.3, 12.0, 12.1 and
12.2. They all appear to treat secondary addresses the same way--the
secondary network is not advertised if the primary network/area statement is
deleted.


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=51646&t=51525
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: problem with reverse telnet [7:52270]

2002-08-29 Thread Thorne Gene

In a similar situation I found that entering ctrl+shift+6 twice before the x
worked. The sequence is ctrl+shift+6 ctrl+shift+6 x.
Good luck.
-gt



Antonio Montana wrote:
> 
> hi all,
> 
> have the following scenario.
> 
> ISP -- DSL Router -- FreeBSD -- 2511 -- CCIE Lab
> 
> I do a telnet from the internet to my DSL router.
> from the router a telnet to my unix box.
> from there I do a "cu -l /dev/cuaa1 -s 9600" to connect to the
> 2511 via the COM1. this works fine !!
> 
> from the 2511 I can connect via reverse telnet to my lab routers
> 
> it's not possible to logout from the routers and come back to
> the 2511.
> 
> - CTRL+SHIFT+6 x isn't working at all
> - CTRL+6 x is disconnecting all telnet sessions and throwing me
> back to the prompt of my dsl router.
> - disconnect isn't working
> - exit and logout are giving me the following
> 
> R2 con0 is now available
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Press RETURN to get started.
> 
> 
> after I press return I am back on the router to which I did the
> reverse telnet from the 2511.
> 
> 
> how can I come back to the 2511 without loosing all the telnet
> sessions ??!?!?
> 
> hope somebody can help
> 
> thanks
> monti
> 
> 
> 




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52279&t=52270
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: EIGRP default route distribution. [7:52377]

2002-08-30 Thread Thorne Gene

EIGRP does not recognize 0.0.0.0. Use
ip default-network 192.168.1.0
instead, and then put
network 192.168.1.0 
under your router eigrp config. See Doyle vol. I pp. 756-758 for details.
-gt

Robert Cluett wrote:
> 
> I have the following network in my home lab:
> 
> Internet RouterEisenhowerRooseveltNixonKennedy
>   
> The Internet Router (192.168.1.1) runs RIP.  Eisenhower
> (E0:192.168.1.100 and S0:172.26.1.9) runs RIP and EIGRP. 
> Roosevelt, Nixon, and Kennedy run EIGRP for the
> 172.26.1.0,172.26.128.0,192.168.3.0, and 192.168.4.0 networks. 
> I am peforming redistribution of EIGRP into RIP on the internet
> router which also hosts my LAN of 192.168.1.0).  I am unable to
> propagate the default route out to the rest of the EIGRP
> routers being Roosevelt, Nixon and Kennedy.  Any one have a
> clue on what I am missing?
> 
> EISENHOWER CONFIG BELOW
> 
> router eigrp 1
>  passive-interface Ethernet0
>  network 172.26.1.0 0.0.0.255
>  network 172.26.128.0 0.0.0.255
>  network 192.168.3.0
>  network 192.168.4.0
>  auto-summary
>  eigrp log-neighbor-changes
> !
> router rip
>  version 2
>  redistribute eigrp 1 metric 0
>  passive-interface Serial0
>  passive-interface Serial1
>  network 192.168.1.0
>  no auto-summary
> !
> ip classless
> ip default-network 0.0.0.0
> ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.1




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52379&t=52377
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]