Re: Emergency: HOw to extend the telnet timeout for a router? [7:45249]
yes , exec-timeout 0 0 rgds Dain Deutschman wrote: Is it line vty 0 4 exec-timeout ?? I could be misunderstanding the question. Please correct me if I am wrong. Dain Ocsic wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi, all the default timeout for a telnet session is 300 sec Any command can extend the telnet timeout time ? Please mail me [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=45249t=45249 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Please help!!! [7:42411]
Hunt, I guess you don't have the 203.147.154.0 route in the middle router. however, you have a defaut route in it. So, you will experience a routing loop. Check you tunnel configuration as well. see the following from u : I have an OSPF connectivity problem. I have 3 routers as follows: OSPF Area 203.147.188.0 OSPF Area 0 Gw1.bne2 Gw2.bne ---Gw1.bne Gw1.bne2 is connecting to Gw2.bne with Serial 0/0:0 (203.147.255.186 /30) Gw2.bne is connecting back to Gw1.bne2 with Serial 0/0:0 (203.147.255.185 /30) Gw2.bne is also connected to Gw1.bne with FastEth 0/0 (202.139.236.2 /24) Gw1.bne is connecting back to Gw2.bne with FastEth 0/1 (202.139.236.254 /24) Now I have 5 static routes at Gw1.bne2 (the left most Router) that I want to redistributed into OSPF. ip route 203.147.154.0 255.255.255.128 203.147.188.65 ip route 203.147.154.128 255.255.255.248 203.147.188.68 ip route 203.147.154.136 255.255.255.248 203.147.188.69 ip route 203.147.154.144 255.255.255.252 203.147.188.66 ip route 203.147.154.148 255.255.255.252 203.147.188.67 controller E1 0/0 channel-group 0 timeslots 1-31 ! ! interface Tunnel0 description BNE2-Avior ip address 10.255.255.2 255.255.255.252 no ip route-cache cef tunnel source 203.147.255.186 tunnel destination 203.147.190.4 ! interface FastEthernet0/0 no ip address ip route-cache flow speed 100 full-duplex ! interface FastEthernet0/0.5 encapsulation dot1Q 5 ! interface FastEthernet0/0.10 encapsulation dot1Q 10 ip address 10.15.15.254 255.255.255.0 secondary ip address 203.147.188.254 255.255.255.0 ip access-group pfilter in ip accounting access-violations ip nbar protocol-discovery ! interface FastEthernet0/0.999 encapsulation dot1Q 999 ip address 10.2.101.1 255.255.0.0 ! interface Serial0/0:0 description N7065870L to 96 Lytton Rd ip address 203.147.255.186 255.255.255.252 ip nbar protocol-discovery ip route-cache flow load-interval 30 service-policy output voippol ! router ospf 7496 log-adjacency-changes redistribute connected redistribute static subnets passive-interface FastEthernet0/0.999 network 203.147.188.0 0.0.0.255 area 203.147.188.0 network 203.147.255.184 0.0.0.3 area 203.147.188.0 At Gw1.bne2, it shows the subnets are learned via statics gw1.bne2#sh ip route 203.147.154.136 Routing entry for 203.147.154.136/29 Known via static, distance 1, metric 0 Redistributing via ospf 7496 Advertised by ospf 7496 subnets Routing Descriptor Blocks: * 203.147.188.69 Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1 When I goto Gw2.bne (middle router), I can see the routes in the OSPF Topology Table (all of them are learned from 203.147.255.186 - Gw1.bne2), but not the its routing table:- N.B: I also tried to do a clear ip route 203.147.144.0/20, but no help. The same route came straight back Type-5 AS External Link States 203.147.154.0 203.147.255.186 572 0x8002 0xAC01 0 203.147.154.128 203.147.255.186 573 0x8002 0xA40D 0 203.147.154.136 203.147.255.186 573 0x8002 0x6246 0 203.147.154.144 203.147.255.186 573 0x8002 0xFF9F 0 203.147.154.148 203.147.255.186 573 0x8002 0xE5B4 0 gw2.bne# sh ip route 203.147.154.136 Routing entry for 203.147.144.0/20, supernet Known via ospf 7496, distance 110, metric 3, type inter area Last update from 202.139.236.254 on FastEthernet0/0, 00:17:48 ago Routing Descriptor Blocks: * 202.139.236.254, from 203.147.255.156, 00:17:48 ago, via FastEthernet0/0 Route metric is 3, traffic share count is 1 However, if I goto Gw1.bne (the rightmost router), it can see all 5 subnets in the OSPF Topoloy Table and Routing Table Type-5 AS External Link States 203.147.154.0 203.147.255.186 867 0x8002 0xAC01 0 203.147.154.128 203.147.255.186 867 0x8002 0xA40D 0 203.147.154.136 203.147.255.186 867 0x8002 0x6246 0 203.147.154.144 203.147.255.186 867 0x8002 0xFF9F 0 203.147.154.148 203.147.255.186 867 0x8002 0xE5B4 0 gw1.bne#sh ip route 203.147.154.136 Routing entry for 203.147.154.136/29 Known via ospf 7496, distance 110, metric 20, type extern 2, forward metric 52 Redistributing via ospf 7496 Last update from 202.139.236.2 on FastEthernet0/1, 00:49:30 ago Routing Descriptor Blocks: * 202.139.236.2, from 203.147.255.186, 00:49:30 ago, via FastEthernet0/1 Route metric is 20, traffic share count is 1 As a result, when I do a trace from Gw1.bne (the rightmost router), it points it to Gw2.bne, but Gw2.bne points it back - Routing Loop :( gw1.bne#trace 203.147.154.136 Type escape sequence to abort. Tracing the route to 203.147.154.136 1 fa0-0.gw2.bne.webcentral.com.au (202.139.236.2) 0 msec 4 msec 0 msec 2 fa0-1.gw1.bne.webcentral.com.au (202.139.236.254) 4 msec 4
Re: ccie 351-001 [7:41655]
I have check the Web site again. It is now corrected to Routing and Switching rather then CCIE Communication and Services This is certainly typo mistake. rgds Greg Macaulay wrote: I just checked the Cisco Website and it makes no mention of getting credit for the CCIE Communication and Services Lab Requirement by passing the beta CCIE written. In fact, what it does say, and I quote: If candidates pass the beta version, full credit will be given toward the written exam requirement for the CCIE Routing and Switching lab exam. Let's try and not misstate info which can only mislead the group. Misstating and misleading is usually relegated to politicians on Capitol Hill!! Greg Macaulay Oldest CCNP/CCDP on Earth Lifetime AARP member Retired Attorney/Law Professor -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 10:38 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ccie 351-001 [7:41655] on the cisco site it states that if you pass the beta RS written you get credit for the CCIE Communication and Services Lab Requirement, which makes no sense except they don't want you taking the cheap written for the most popular CCIE. --T Wallace Lee wrote: I have go through the announcement from Cisco Web. I wonder if I can use this writen test 351-001 to apply the LAB Test which is still 350-001. Anyone have info about this ? rgds khalid ameen wrote: is there any news about the beta CCIE new exam 351-001 ? any news, __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41818t=41655 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bandwidth Monitoing tool
I know there is four well known brands in the market, Lucent AP1000(formly known as Xedia), Packeteer, Allot and Sitara. Packteer and Sitara seem to be better. rgds ""Yadav, Arvind K (CAP, GECIS)"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Anybody is having a idea, which one is the best tool for WAN bandwidth monitoring tool on basis of how much bandwidth utilise by an application, perticular protocol, and User or group of users. Thanks in advance Arvind _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CVOICE 2.0 Beta passed
Ibam, do you have any good resource for the CVOICE exam ? I am looking for the CVOICE 2.0 notes. rgds Wallace Ibrahim wrote: Hi .. I passed it, I thought I'll get failed, because so many questions on Voice over frame-relay .. Ibam Cvoice,Cvoice 2.0 **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] begin:vcard n:Lee;Wallace tel;fax:25906443 tel;work:28622682 x-mozilla-html:FALSE org:Netstar (Hong Kong) Limited adr:;; version:2.1 email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title:Network Consultant, CCDA, CCNA fn:Wallace Lee end:vcard
OSPF in NBMA
Hi, I have configurating a Frame Relay non-fully mesh network. I know how do this by setting the ip ospf network broadcast and the frame relay mapping. However, I have enter a problem to setup the Hub router in a OSPF NBMA Frame relay network without using the IP ospf network broadcast or the frame relay map commands. Does anyone how to do this ? Do I need any policy routing or the ospf neighbor command ? rgds
CVOICE EXAM
Any one knows the exam objectives for the CVOICE ? Thanks in advance. rgds begin:vcard n:Lee;Wallace tel;fax:25906443 tel;work:28622682 x-mozilla-html:FALSE org:Netstar (Hong Kong) Limited adr:;; version:2.1 email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title:Network Consultant, CCDA, CCNA fn:Wallace Lee end:vcard
BGP dampening
Does anyone know how can I setup a BGP network to test my BGP dampening setting in the routers ? Rgds begin:vcard n:Lee;Wallace tel;fax:25906443 tel;work:28622682 x-mozilla-html:FALSE org:Netstar (Hong Kong) Limited adr:;; version:2.1 email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title:Network Consultant, CCDA, CCNA fn:Wallace Lee end:vcard
Re: Cisco flash memory question.
Yes, you can use standard PCMCIA flash memory for the C1600. I am using it. rgds lanatic wrote: Hi: Can I use ATA flash memory on a Cisco 1600 series routers? TIA, RH ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- begin:vcard n:Lee;Wallace tel;fax:25906443 tel;work:28622682 x-mozilla-html:FALSE org:Netstar (Hong Kong) Limited adr:;; version:2.1 email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title:Network Consultant, CCDA, CCNA fn:Wallace Lee end:vcard
