RE: MPPP for DS-3's [7:40213]
Thanks for the info. I was aware of the issues involved with running it I just wanted to know if there was a limitation to the speed of an interface that is allowed to perform it. I haven't seen anything that says no but just curious. I agree CEF is a better solution if the platform supports it. We actually run both for the customer that I support. We haven't had any issues with either so far. Thanks, Woody CCNP -Original Message- From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 1:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: MPPP for DS-3's [7:40213] As I haven ranted in the past, for parallel path load sharing just say no to PPP. CEF works great, is efficient and easy to configure. PPP has more overhead, interleaving, fragmentation (which yes can be disabled and should if you choose PPP) all for what?? You can save IP addresses but this is most often a moot point, use RFC1918 addresses. Dave Woods, Randall, SOLCM wrote: Has anyone ever tried to created a mullilink PPP bundle with DS-3's? A coworker was wondering and I never thought about it myself. I've only configured it for t-1's. I would assume the overhead might be bad for the router instead of using CEF or just letting the routing protocol load balance. Any thoughts? Woody CCNP -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40391t=40213 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MPPP for DS-3's [7:40213]
Has anyone ever tried to created a mullilink PPP bundle with DS-3's? A coworker was wondering and I never thought about it myself. I've only configured it for t-1's. I would assume the overhead might be bad for the router instead of using CEF or just letting the routing protocol load balance. Any thoughts? Woody CCNP Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40213t=40213 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VWIC-1MFT-E1NM-1HDVE1/R2 [7:39734]
According to the Cisco's Hardware/Software Compatibility Matrix, this is the results. 12.0(7)XK, 12.1(1), 12.1(2)T, 12.1(5)YB, 12.1(5)YD, 12.2(1), 12.2(8)T, 12.2(2)XT Woody CCNP -Original Message- From: yangchun [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 3:40 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: VWIC-1MFT-E1NM-1HDVE1/R2 [7:39734] DEAR ALL: COULD YOU TELL ME WHICH THE MINI IOS RELEASE SUPPORT THE VWIC-1MFT-E1NM-1HDVE1/R2 NO THE CISCO2610. THANKS Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=39747t=39734 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Looking for an used book.. [7:39715]
I like to use www.bestbookbuys.com . Searches most of the popular sites. Woody CCNP -Original Message- From: Paul Jin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 8:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Looking for an used book.. [7:39715] why don't you look at half.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=39748t=39715 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rack [7:38796]
Hi all, I'm trying to find a rack for my routers. Does anyone have a good source? Woody CCNP Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=38796t=38796 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Rack [7:38796]
The rack I would really like would cost me a couple of dinners and a night at the movies but I'll have to be content with what I have right now. :P Woody -Original Message- From: Patrick Ramsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 11:08 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Rack [7:38796] I didn't see any with shelves but this is what all my buddies say is good stuff! http://www.geocities.com/Yosemite/Geyser/9050/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/19/02 10:57AM Hello all, I am looking for a rack with shelves as well, any advice would be appreciated. Cheap would be good too! :-) Kevin McCarty Computer Sciences Corporation Defense Sector 618 622 4757 Woods, Randall, To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SOLCM cc: Sent by: nobody 03/19/2002 09:32 AM Please respond to Woods, Randall, SOLCM Hi all, I'm trying to find a rack for my routers. Does anyone have a good source? Woody CCNP Confidentiality Disclaimer This email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential and /or proprietary information in the possession of WellStar Health System, Inc. (WellStar) and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom addressed. This email may contain information that is held to be privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution or copying of any information from this email is strictly prohibited, and may subject you to criminal and/or civil liability. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and then delete this email and its attachments from your computer. Thank you. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=38847t=38796 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PPP Multilink on Channelized DS3 [7:38029]
Below is a standard that we use when bonding T-1's together. No difference on the Channelized DS-3. interface Multilink1 description BONDED 2xT1s bandwidth 3072 ip address x.x.x.x 255.255.255.252 ppp multilink ppp multilink fragment-delay 10 ppp multilink interleave multilink-group 1 interface Serial3/0:1 no ip address encapsulation ppp ppp multilink multilink-group 1 interface Serial1/0:2 no ip address encapsulation ppp ppp multilink multilink-group 1 Should be pretty much straight forward. Easy to implement and works great. Woody CCNP -Original Message- From: Fraasch James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 7:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PPP Multilink on Channelized DS3 [7:38029] I was wondering if anyone has been able to PPP Multilink multiple channels of a DS3 going into a 7206 (or other Cisco router). I have multilinked multiple T1's going to seperate serial interfaces but have not tried to do it on a channelized DS3. Initial search on Cisco's site does not give me much to go on. The DS3 terminates directly into the router itself and we are currently using 12 channels for different connections. I would like to use two more channels to link up a new site. Thanks in advance. James Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=38091t=38029 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Delete VLAN [7:37254]
Vlan 5 will also be cleared on all switches that are configured as clients as well. Also, any port that is configured on those switches will also lose their vlan assignment to vlan 5. Woody CCNP -Original Message- From: mlh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 7:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Delete VLAN [7:37254] In a VTP domain environment, when you use the command clear vlan 5 on a Catalyst configured as a VTP server, do you actually remove vlan 5 only from that Catalyst or from all Catalysts in that VTP domain? Thank you. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37270t=37254 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MPLS and AS5300 [7:37252]
searching the software advisor by features, doesn't look like the as5300 support MPLS. Maybe someone can find something different. Woody CCNP -Original Message- From: Michalis Palis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 7:02 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: MPLS and AS5300 [7:37252] Dear all Can AS5300 supports MPLS? If yes what is the IOS that supports it? I checked Cisco side but i couldn't find any info thanks __ Do You Yahoo!? Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email! http://mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37274t=37252 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: cisco cpe 828 [7:37261]
Komy, I did a search for that feature in the software advisor and according to it, it doesn't support BGP. Woody CCNP -Original Message- From: Mohamed el-Komy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 8:46 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: cisco cpe 828 [7:37261] Does Cisco Router 828 support BGP ?? and if yes which IOS image support the BGP config?? BR, Komy Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37273t=37261 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Not the whole domain - Re: Delete VLAN [7:37254]
let me try to explain a little better. Server - Has the ability to add and remove VLan's for a Domain. This will remove the vlan from all switches that are clients on the domain. Client - Can't add or delete a Vlan from the Domain. All information about Vlan's is received from the Server. Transparent - Can add and delete Vlan's but only on that switch. No other switches in the Domain will be affected. Woody CCNP -Original Message- From: mlh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 12:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Not the whole domain - Re: Delete VLAN [7:37254] Hi,Dave, First, thank you for your answer. But I really got confused. Pls read the following excerpt about Deleting VLAN from the book of Cisco LAN Switching written by Clark Hamilton : You can remove VLANs from the management domain using the clear vlan vlan_number command. For example, if you want to remove VLAN 5 from your VTP management domain, you can type the command clear vlan 5 on a Catalyst configured as a VTP server. You cannot delete VLANs from a VTP client Catalyst. If the Catalyst is configured in transparent mode, you can delete the VLAN. However, the VLAN is removed only from the one Catalyst and is not deleted throughout the management domain. All VLAN creations and deletions are only locally significant on a transparent Catalyst. So, according the above words, it just remove the portion of vlan 5 on that Catalyst which clear command was executed. Is it right? From Woody's answer to my last question : Vlan 5 will also be cleared on all switches that are configured as clients as well. Also, any port that is configured on those switches will also lose their vlan assignment to vlan 5. I raised another question: if Woody is right, the portion of vlan 5 on the Catalysts configured as clients will also be removed, then my question is: Will all clients or just clients configured from that server-Catalyst which clear command is executed be removed? Sorry for taking you long time to read my questions. Any suggestion would be welcome. mlh - Original Message - From: MADMAN To: Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 10:14 AM Subject: Re: Delete VLAN [7:37254] the whole domain. Dave mlh wrote: In a VTP domain environment, when you use the command clear vlan 5 on a Catalyst configured as a VTP server, do you actually remove vlan 5 only from that Catalyst or from all Catalysts in that VTP domain? Thank you. -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37296t=37254 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco 1924 Switch Problem [7:37058]
Have you tried restoring the switch to it's default settings? go to this link http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/474/pswdrec_2800.shtml When you go thru the Password recovery procedures, the switch will default to 9600,8N1 I believe also, their may be a little reset button on the back of the switch next to the console port that has a reset button to reset the port to 9600,8N1. You could try that as well to make sure. Hope that helps. Woody CCNP -Original Message- From: martijn michiel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, March 02, 2002 11:29 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Cisco 1924 Switch Problem [7:37058] Best to go with an adapter: See pinout: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/dsl_prod/6700/iad1101/ca ble.htm#xtocid296711 Martijn Jansen _ Meld je aan bij de grootste e-mailservice wereldwijd met MSN Hotmail: http://www.hotmail.com/nl Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37144t=37058 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Written - ATM Questions [7:37176]
I think I had about 2 maybe 3 questions last Thursday. Woody CCNP -Original Message- From: Audy Bautista [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 2:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE Written - ATM Questions [7:37176] Hi all. I'm taking my CCIE written this afternoon and I'm wondering if there's a lot of ATM questions on the exam? I'm doing some heavy cramming so I just want to know if I should concentrate on ATM. Any other tips would be appreciated. Thanks. Audy Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37183t=37176 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
