Re: Network database
WhatsUP Gold http://www.ipswitch.com Tony Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@groupstudy.com on 30/10/2000 02:05:58 PM Please respond to Tony Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Subject: Network database What type of tools would group members recommend for tracking the networks/hosts in use on an Intranet. Tony Russell Network Engineer IBEAM Broadcasting _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Tools
I just found this page and wanted to share it with you, it seems to have useful stuff. http://www.davecentral.com/netmon.html Regards, Jose Luis _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Back to Back
Maybe a bad serial on one of them, I had the same issue a while ago, changed the serial with another with same config and it worked!! Jose [EMAIL PROTECTED]@groupstudy.com on 27/09/2000 06:02:08 PM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Back to Back Some possibilities... Wrong cable? Dud cable? Interface shut down on one or both routers? Non-matching encapsulation? Incorrect IP (or other routed protocol) configuration? Forgot to power up a router :-)? There's a lot of things that could be wrong, so a little more information would be useful. 'no success' means what? Can't ping across the link, or the interface doesn't show as up/line protocol up? If you post your configs and 'show int' of the relevant interfaces, we might have a little more chance of providing likely solutions, rather than shots in the dark. JMcL -- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 28/09/2000 08:53 am --- "Henk Botha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 28/09/2000 02:07:24 am Please respond to "Henk Botha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:(bcc: JENNY MCLEOD/NSO/CSDA) Subject: Back to Back Hi I am trying to connect two routers (1601's) back to back for testing. I setup the clock speed on the one, but still have no success What is the correct way of doing it ? Please anybody that can help Henk **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Weird response
nop!! [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 11/07/2000 03:58:00 AM To: Jose Luis Canillas/PY/ABNAMRO/NL@ABNAMRO, [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:RE: Weird response have u got any access lists in place ? Regards Atif -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jose Luis Canillas Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2000 12:29 AM To: cisco Subject: Weird response Hi all, Can someone tell me why is it that I can traceroute to a NT server on e0, and when I ping it I get time outs? Thanks in advance.. Jose Luis ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Weird response
The funny thing of it is that on the PC side, the ping goes through and the trace stops right on the last router. Could there be such an opposite difference on the ping and trace technique of both O.S.? (CISCO & NT) Tnx.. Jose Luis -- Forwarded by Jose Luis Canillas/PY/ABNAMRO/NL on 11/07/2000 08:59 AM --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 10/07/2000 10:36:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: (bcc: Jose Luis Canillas/PY/ABNAMRO/NL) Subject:RE: Weird response Well... Ping uses ICMP packets while Traceroute uses UDP (with ICMP response), maybe you're firewalling off ICMP? Francisco. Jose Luis Canillas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribi¾ en el mensaje de noticias 05E4D396A23E801E*/c=US/admd=400net/prmd=abnamro/o=notes/s=Canillas/g=Jose-L u [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hi all, > > Can someone tell me why is it that I can traceroute to a NT server on e0, > and when I ping it I get time outs? > > Thanks in advance.. > > Jose Luis > > ___ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --- ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Weird response
Hi all, Can someone tell me why is it that I can traceroute to a NT server on e0, and when I ping it I get time outs? Thanks in advance.. Jose Luis ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SNA Between two different ethernet interfaces on the same router
you should configure your interfaces like this: interface Ethernet0 ip address 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 ipx network 10 bridge-group 1 ! interface Ethernet1 ip address 20.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 ipx network 20 bridge-group 1 then you go "sh bridge 1" and you should have something like: 4200..0001 forward Ethernet0 22309 0 4200..0002 forward Ethernet0 0 50755 46549 0004.acdc.585e forward Ethernet1 02504 0 Jose Luis "Harish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@groupstudy.com on 07/06/2000 12:34:49 PM Please respond to "Harish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:SNA Between two different ethernet interfaces on the same router Hi! I have a small question. The sceniro is as follows __ | Router| | _| IP | | IP _IPX__ | |_IPX__ || | || | ---- -- | || | | | ---- -- AS/400 AS/400 AS/400 SNA SNASNA We have a router with two ethernet interfaces. IP and IPX is routed between these two ethernet interfaces. We also have three AS/400 connected on the LAN on two different ethernet interfaces as shown in figure above. These AS/400 need to communicate with each other with SNA. Now since we are already routing IP and IPX between these two ethernet interfaces of the same router, I am looking for a way to Bridge SNA traffic between these ethernet interfaces. Can any of you Cisco/IBM gurus guide me regarding this. Thanking you in advance. Regards, Harish ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Working it too hard?
Thats why "I love Microsoft" Roger Navarro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@groupstudy.com on 25/05/2000 07:16:14 PM Please respond to Roger Navarro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Bartlett, DS1" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject:RE: Working it too hard? Without users we wouldn't have jobs; I guess that _would_ make our jobs easier. ;-) (Just a joke of course) - Roger On Thu, 25 May 2000, Bartlett, DS1 wrote: > Your DHCP requests are only going to be processed during startup. All the > router is going to do is handle a helper address, which means when a station > boots up it will send a broadcast asking for an IP. The router sees the > request and forwards the packet on as a unicast message. There is no real > impact on router performance for such a small task. Beware the idiot users > though who insist on shutting down their machine each time something > happens. > > 75 idiots can bring down any network. And remember all our jobs would be > real easy if only we could get rid of the users. > > Ciao, > daryn > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2000 9:40 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject:Working it too hard? > > I'm trying to setup a temporary LAN and would like my router to > handle DHCP > requests. > > My question is what if I'm asking the router to do too much? > > I'm using a Cisco 1700 series router with about 75 computers running > win98. > The 1700 only has 1 static route to another router (no heavy > processing like > extensive access lists here) and nothing else. Am I asking this 1700 > series > to handle too much? > > How many PC's asking for IP's before it craps out? What if I use a > 2600 > series instead? How many PC's could it handle? > > If it does crap out what can I expect as a reaction? It just > freezing or > something more sinister? > > ___ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ___ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IPX static routes
Anybody heard about floating static routes at all? Jose Luis Canillas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@groupstudy.com on 23/05/2000 01:31:50 PM Please respond to Jose Luis Canillas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: cisco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Subject:IPX static routes Does anyone have any ideas about implementing static ipx routes between two different routers? Or better yet, static routes based on availability of destination interface/address (ip or ipx) Thanks, ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IPX static routes
Does anyone have any ideas about implementing static ipx routes between two different routers? Or better yet, static routes based on availability of destination interface/address (ip or ipx) Thanks, ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
