Re: CCIE Vs. BS or MS dergree [7:59481]
just something to add to the coversation concerning the quality of education certifications http://www.westga.edu/%7Edistance/ojdla/summer52/pond52.html LAWRENCE A SCULARK From: nrf Reply-To: nrf To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE Vs. BS or MS dergree [7:59481] Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2002 05:43:12 GMT Received: from mc6-f25.law1.hotmail.com ([65.54.252.161]) by mc6-s14.law1.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Mon, 23 Dec 2002 21:58:52 -0800 Received: from groupstudy.com ([66.220.63.9]) by mc6-f25.law1.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Mon, 23 Dec 2002 21:58:51 -0800 Received: from localhost (mail@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id FAA08853;Tue, 24 Dec 2002 05:58:49 GMT Received: by groupstudy.com (bulk_mailer v1.13); Tue, 24 Dec 2002 05:43:13 + Received: (from listserver@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id FAA06738GroupStudy Mailer; Tue, 24 Dec 2002 05:43:12 GMT Received: (from mail@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id FAA06731GroupStudy Mailer; Tue, 24 Dec 2002 05:43:12 GMT Message-Id: X-GroupStudy-Version: 3.1.1a X-GroupStudy: Network Technical Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Precedence: bulk Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Dec 2002 05:58:51.0575 (UTC) FILETIME=[88AEDC70:01C2AB11] Pcasey wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Interesting question, but I think the question of which is tougher and which is more valuable get confused. As someone who has an MBA from a top school, I know that it took several thousand of hours of work and an estimated 12,000 - 15,000 pages of reading. I am in process on my CCIE, but so far it looks like it will only be a fraction of that. I would add that people who are looking at only the work involved in getting a top-flight MBA don't see the whole picture. Not only do you need to figure in the work needed to obtain the MBA, you also have to figure in the work involved in getting admitted to a top program in the first place. For example, let's say you want to get an MBA from Harvard/Stanford/Penn/N'Western/whatever. Well, you can't just show up to class one day and demand that they start teaching you. You first have to be admitted - and let's face it, getting admitted to places of that caliber requires you to have done a whole lot of stuff beforehand. They ain't gonna admit just anybody. Therefore when you add in the work involved in simply getting admitted in the first place, in addition to the work involved in getting the degree, I think it's plain to see that the degree from a top school is many times more difficult than the CCIE could ever be. However, how hard it is really doesn't matter. The question is what you want to do with your life and what you find interesting. Would being an successful investment banker pay more than being a solid CCIE? Of course. Would I hate my life? Of course. But, that is just my personal view. This is absolutely true, but I would also add the following. What makes you happy now may not make you happy in the future. Sure, you might like to be the network guy configuring boxes now, but there's no guarantee that this will still be true 20 years later. Maybe you'll still like it, but on the other hand, maybe you want to be the one in the nice office telling other people to configure boxes. Degrees are valuable because of their flexibility. If you want to make a change in your career path in the future, it is far easier to do so with a degree than with a cert. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59779t=59481 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Protect your PC - Click here for McAfee.com VirusScan Online Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59894t=59481 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PIX firewall v6.2 with Windows 2000 Certificat [7:50350]
you need to configure the win2k server to use the scep protocoldownload the file from microsoft or get it off the cd ..you need the correct dll'sms does not uses the scep protocol to enroll certs..cisco uses the scep protocol..also search microsoft's sites for info on procedure..or cisco for scep... cordially, lawrnce a sculark LAWRENCE A SCULARK From: Daniel Czarnecki Reply-To: Daniel Czarnecki To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PIX firewall v6.2 with Windows 2000 Certificate Server [7:50136] Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 16:18:49 GMT Received: from mc1-f16.law16.hotmail.com ([65.54.236.23]) by mc1-s13.law16.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.4905); Tue, 30 Jul 2002 09:42:33 -0700 Received: from groupstudy.com ([66.220.63.9]) by mc1-f16.law16.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.4905); Tue, 30 Jul 2002 09:36:10 -0700 Received: from localhost (mail@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA02035;Tue, 30 Jul 2002 16:32:49 GMT Received: by groupstudy.com (bulk_mailer v1.13); Tue, 30 Jul 2002 16:18:50 + Received: (from listserver@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA30912GroupStudy Mailer; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 16:18:49 GMT Received: (from mail@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA30908GroupStudy Mailer; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 16:18:49 GMT Message-Id: X-GroupStudy-Version: 3.1.1a X-GroupStudy: Network Technical Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Precedence: bulk Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Jul 2002 16:36:11.0050 (UTC) FILETIME=[367670A0:01C237E7] =20 Hello Folks, I am trying to configure PIX firewall v6.2 with Windows 2000 Certificate = Server. I am getting this error when trying enrolll for certificate = through PDM. I would appreciate any ideas. Thank you in advance Regards Daniel=20 =20 [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type image/bmp which had a name of ole0.bmp] misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. Click Here Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=50350t=50350 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Subnet Rule [7:47670]
192.168.152.0 255.255.255.128 my nt servers are at address 192.168.152.45-60 and 192.168.152.145-60 with subnet mask 128...the network is split into two remote locations and no routing problems...oh i am rounning eigrp as my routing protocol.. so in reference to your question yes nt 4 and 2k support this masking.. lawrence a sculark LAWRENCE A SCULARK From: Kazan, Naim Reply-To: Kazan, Naim To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: New Subnet Rule [7:47670] Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 20:48:42 -0400 Received: from [66.220.63.9] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id MHotMailBEE6499900254004319842DC3F090D400; Fri, 28 Jun 2002 17:26:03 -0700 Received: from localhost (mail@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id VAA19292;Fri, 28 Jun 2002 21:04:09 -0400 Received: by groupstudy.com (bulk_mailer v1.13); Fri, 28 Jun 2002 20:48:43 -0400 Received: (from listserver@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA17309GroupStudy Mailer; Fri, 28 Jun 2002 20:48:43 -0400 Received: (from mail@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA17304GroupStudy Mailer; Fri, 28 Jun 2002 20:48:42 -0400 From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri, 28 Jun 2002 17:27:23 -0700 Message-Id: X-GroupStudy-Version: 3.1.1a X-GroupStudy: Network Technical Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Precedence: bulk Ok, now that we know the answer to that question? Will windows support subnets 0-255. -Original Message- From: Mike Mandulak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 8:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: New Subnet Rule [7:47670] It's became available in 12.0. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/40.html - Original Message - From: Gaz To: Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 7:27 PM Subject: Re: New Subnet Rule [7:47670] Thought that's what you meant but thought I'd clarify before I made a pillock of myself. Now I've clarified I'll steam on and make a pillock of myself :-) I don't know how long it's been now (quite a while), but yes both of these are used these days. ip subnet-zero command is useful for this. I'm sure there are situations where this is still not a good idea, and I'm sure people will jump in and give you the low down any minute now, but I've had no problems with using them. Also - not used it much other than playing around, but 31 bit mask is available as well so you've only got a network and broadcast address to play with. I've never been that short of addresses that I want to complicate it that much. Gaz Jarred Nicholls wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Well Gaz, thanks for replying =) Here is the deal in more detail. My friend who just got a job with Merrill Lynch, spoke with several CCIESecurity and RS engineers, and here is what they told him. With new Cisco gear and the latest IOS version, the subnet rule, that wehave all learned in the past, where the first and the last subnet isnon-usable because of the network and broadcast addresses, no longerapplies. Hence, the first and the last subnets are now usable with newCisco gear and new IOS, because of a different process used than ANDing. So, I wanted to see if anyone else has heard about this new change besidesjust my friend. I definitely believe him but I just don't know. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47727t=47670 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: Click Here Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47758t=47670 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Way OT: Enterasys Switching [7:42216]
i think enterasys/cabetron makes a great switch. thier routing needs to be improved..they are changing their firmware over to be more compatibilbe with the cisco's cli. when you work with this equipment my advice is to think cisco because their commands are noun verb. for example system show port-statistics all-ports, port show bridging-status all ports, L2-tables show bridge-management, stp show bridiging-info, system image list system, image add, port disable, negate line#, file dir slot0; stp set port gi.(2.3) (1-2) priority 4, copy active to start-up; .. there ospf configuration is not as great as cisco's they lack a database and other oficial tools. BGP is not as great but they make a great rip with the sco unix kernel. the ssr-8600 or matrix E5 has problems with dual control modules... don't forget to type system hot-swap out before you atttempt to hot-swap a module.from my experience the entire switch will reboot and lock up... the element manager should be included in the spectrum network management system.. aprisma has included some of its functionality in the new release of the spectrum software as well as mibs for cisco's catalyst...but to pay $5k for the product and $70k for the enterprise management system not to have the same functionality in the enterprise edition is a little too costly..also the alarm feature does not work without the alarm-manager from spectrum or aprisma.. new price $25K and 10K for existing customer's...with the help of an associate at work, i wrote my own alarms the RAT is a nice tool for upgrading like hardware acroos the network.. SSR-TESTBED(config)# show Running system configuration: ! ! Last modified from Telnet (192.168.150.60) on 2000-12-12 19:31:28 ! 1: port set gi.1.(1-2) auto-negotiation off 2 : port set et.2.(5-6) duplex half 3 : port set et.2.(1-3) duplex half ! 4 : vlan create VIPLAN2 ip id 15 5 : vlan create VIPX ipx id 5 6 : vlan create VIPLAN1 ip id 16 7 : vlan create VIPSERVERS ip id 17 8 : vlan create VIPROUTER ip id 18 9 : vlan create VSNAETC bridged-protocols id 20 10 : vlan create VIPCPS ip id 25 11 : vlan create DMZ ip id 69 ! 12 : interface add ip en0 address-netmask 10.141.147.1/24 13 : interface create ipx IPXNET address 3075 output-mac-encapsulation ethernet_ 802.2_ipx vlan VIPX 14 : interface create ip IPCPS address-netmask 10.10.4.1/24 vlan VIPCPS ! 15 : vlan add ports et.2.8 to VIPCPS 16 : vlan add ports et.2.5 to VIPLAN2 17 : vlan add ports et.2.6 to VIPLAN1 18 : vlan add ports et.3.(1-4) to VSNAETC 19 : vlan add ports et.3.(1-8) to VIPX ! 20 : interface create ip IPROUTER address-netmask 192.168.154.55/24 vlan VIPROUT ER 21 : interface create ip IPSERVERS address-netmask 192.168.148.55/24 vlan VIPSER VERS 22 : interface create ip IPLAN2 address-netmask 192.168.149.55/24 vlan VIPLAN2 23 : interface create ip IPLAN1 address-netmask 192.168.150.55/24 vlan VIPLAN1 ! 24 : vlan add ports et.2.(1-3) to VIPX 25 : vlan add ports et.2.(5-6) to VIPX 26 : vlan add ports et.2.(1-3) to VIPSERVERS 27 : vlan add ports et.2.4 to VIPROUTER 28 : vlan add ports et.2.7 to VIPROUTER 29 : vlan add ports et.2.7 to VIPX 30 : vlan add ports et.3.(1-2) to VIPSERVERS 31 : vlan add ports et.3.3 to VIPROUTER 32 : vlan add ports et.3.(7-8) to VIPX 33 : vlan add ports et.3.4 to VIPSERVERS 34 : vlan add ports et.3.(6-7) to VIPSERVERS ! 35 : interface create ip DMZ address-netmask 10.10.208.49/24 port et.3.5 ! 36 : acl CPSMAIL permit ip 192.168.148.35 10.10.4.5 any any 37 : acl CPSMAIL permit ip 10.10.4.5 192.168.148.35 any any 38 : acl CPSMAIL permit ip any any 39 : acl CPSMAIL permit ip 192.168.148.0/24 10.10.208.49 any any 40 : acl CPSMAIL permit ip 192.168.150.0/24 10.10.208.49 any any ! 41 : ip add route 216.34.208.0/29 gateway 10.10.208.50 ! 42 : rip add interface 192.168.154.55 43 : rip add interface 192.168.148.55 44 : rip add interface DMZ 45 : rip add interface 10.10.208.49 46 : rip start ! 47 : system set location 48 : system set name SSR-TESTBED 49 : system set contact ! 50 : dhcp VLAN1 define parameters address-netmask 192.168.150.55/24 gateway 192. 168.150.55 lease-time 72 dns-domain pmi.delta.org dns-server 192.168.148.15 netb ios-name-server 192.168.148.70 51 : dhcp VLAN2 define parameters address-netmask 192.168.149.55/24 gateway 192. 168.149.55 lease-time 72 dns-domain pmi.delta.org dns-server 192.168.148.15 netb ios-name-server 192.168.148.70 52 : dhcp VLAN1 define pool 192.168.150.60-192.168.150.250 53 : dhcp VLAN2 define pool 192.168.149.60-192.168.149.250 ! 54 : system set hashed-password login zQzzBc 4b6e0e0f019f1176886803c9bab51e57 55 : system set hashed-password enable zQzzBc aa5b54b3a7998779ad1cdf874dc080b9 LAWRENCE A SCULARK From: Wright, Jeremy Reply-To: Wright, Jeremy To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Way OT: Enterasys Switching [7:42216] Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 08:33:04 -0400 Received: from [63.104.50.75] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id
RE: MBA or CCIE [7:41809]
rember, it is not where you are from but where you are going.. ad spice to whatever you do and enjoylawrence a sculark MBA/Info_Mgmt; CCNA;CCNP;ESS;ESR LAWRENCE A SCULARK From: Ladrach, Daniel E. Reply-To: Ladrach, Daniel E. To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: MBA or CCIE [7:41809] Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 09:31:22 -0400 Received: from [63.104.50.75] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id MHotMailBE881A78006C400437A43F68324B05811; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 06:52:14 -0700 Received: from localhost (mail@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA15424;Thu, 18 Apr 2002 09:50:46 -0400 Received: by groupstudy.com (bulk_mailer v1.13); Thu, 18 Apr 2002 09:31:26 -0400 Received: (from listserver@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA10713GroupStudy Mailer; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 09:31:23 -0400 Received: (from mail@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA10707GroupStudy Mailer; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 09:31:22 -0400 From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 18 Apr 2002 06:52:38 -0700 Message-Id: X-GroupStudy-Version: 3.1.1a X-GroupStudy: Network Technical Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Precedence: bulk I was considering both options I have a MIS degree from The Ohio State University. After getting my CCNP and working for a large ISP and seeing a co-worker pass the lab and get nothing but a pat on the back from our company; I made the decision to enroll in an MBA program this fall. After carefully reviewing my options, I did not want to put myself in such a nich market. I think you need to ask yourself where can you go with a CCIE? ISP, Consult, work for yourself. I know there are other companies that would hire a CCIE but you probably would not be utalized to your full potential. Also, a MBA does not expire and if you ever want to be a CTO or CIO most likely you are going to need the education. I have debated this same topic with my friends and co-workers and there is no easy answer. I think it is personal preference but I will say a few things about the CCIE, salaries are coming down due to the fact that there are more CCIE's(some are not the experts they should be). The only reason I say this is once you get your CCIE you should be an expert hence Internetworking Expert. I know people may disagree with some of these statements, but I have seen some CCIE candidates that have issues with basic skills. Daniel Ladrach CCNA, CCNP WorldCom -Original Message- From: Antonio Montana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 5:07 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT: MBA or CCIE [7:41809] Hi all, Maybe this topic is discussed several times but I still can't decide wether to go for the CCIE or to go back to a good business school for MBA. I am doing networking for 3 yrs now and can see that it's getting harder to find a good. Have all Cisco cert's except of the lab and some others Microsoft, Novell etc. and a Computer Science degree. The problem is, that here, in europe, some CCIE's are doing jobs like System or Network Administration, which is indeed not well paid at all. It's just like creating some user logins, assigning and administering IP addresses and do some entries or changes on DNS or even Exchange Servers. Ok I understand that, it's better than being unemployed. But is this a CCIE job ?? Really don't think so. I don't know when the telco market is going up again, but I really think about going to school and getting a management education. Jobs for MBA's are still there. Who knows if and when the market will give back the CCIE's the recognition they earn ?!? So, should I stop my track towards the CCIE and go to the dark side ?? What do you think guys ?? cheers tony Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41820t=41809 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. Click Here Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42066t=41809 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CID books [7:8062]
topdow network design is a great booki used it as the primary source for my classeslawrence From: Priscilla Oppenheimer Reply-To: Priscilla Oppenheimer To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CID books [7:8062] Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 17:42:31 -0400 Received: from [63.104.50.75] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id MHotMailBCEE89DA002B40042A093F68324B04D513; Mon Jun 11 14:58:03 2001 Received: from localhost (mail@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id RAA10518;Mon, 11 Jun 2001 17:55:12 -0400 Received: by groupstudy.com (bulk_mailer v1.12); Mon, 11 Jun 2001 17:42:32 -0400 Received: (from listserver@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id RAA07690GroupStudy Mailer; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 17:42:32 -0400 Received: (from mail@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id RAA07683GroupStudy Mailer; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 17:42:31 -0400 From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 11 14:59:29 2001 Message-Id: X-GroupStudy-Version: 3.1.1a X-GroupStudy: Network Technical Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Precedence: bulk Oh, and I discovered one more strange thing. The current course description for CID is a paraphrasing of the first few paragraphs of my book, Top-Down Network Design. I guess this is a good thing. I always wanted the CID class to teach more top-down methodology which I came up with after I wrote my version of CID. I'm kind of upset that they didn't tell me about this usurping of my material, but it's par for the course (so to speak). The good news is that I think I can now authentically recommend my book for CID: Top-Down Network Design. Priscilla At 05:28 PM 6/11/01, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: At 04:48 PM 6/11/01, hal9001 wrote: Priscilla, You asked for this one, if the Cisco Press Book for CID is off topic (a bit?) then can you state a better source, I'm not asking for testimonials here but just a targeted source for exam success.The Sybex book is good for CID. In this case the author took the test many times to make sure the book covers what's really on the test. Since Cisco seems to be incapable of explaining accurately what is really on the test, that's the only way to know for sure.The CID version control is out of control and could affect the decision on which book is best. The course outline (which says version 3.0) here includes VPN, voice and video stuff. But I know that 3.0 really doesn't include those topics. http://www.cisco.com/pcgi-bin/front.x/wwtraining/CELC/index.cgi?action=CourseDescCOURSE_ID=321 The list of the exam objectives here are the list of objectives that I wrote for each chapter in 1995 for Version 2.0. Seriously. Notice that the list doesn't cover WAN Switching, for example, which is, in fact, in 3.0. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/testing/current_exams/640-025.html So it's truly a mess. Sorry I can't be more help. Everyone I knew at Cisco got laid off! ;-)Priscilla Thanks Karl - Original Message - From: Priscilla Oppenheimer To: Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 9:09 PM Subject: Re: Passed switching [7:7986] The exam and course are written by Cisco. It's not always the same person. If the course has a mistake, the exam may not have the same mistake. (Hopefully it won't!) Some of the Cisco Press books are the course notes ported to book format. The Cisco Press editor who develops the book may have a hard job because he or she must produce an accurate book even if the course is not accurate. In some cases mistakes carry over, but usually they are caught. In a few cases the editor got a bit too creative and the book is off course. Like the Cisco Press CID book, which is a good book, but is not as well targeted toward the test as it could be. Sybex books are written by people not directly associated with Cisco. These authors take the exam over and over again until they are qualified to write a book to help you study for the exam. Bottom line: learn it the right way. If you miss a question on the test because you knew it the right way and the test writer didn't, it's a shame, but you gotta just live with it. Hopefully that situation is rare. Priscilla At 03:05 PM 6/11/01, Gareth Hinton wrote: The Cisco Press book is almost identical to the course notes, which I believe the exam is written from. In fact, it seems the Cisco Press book has less errors than the official notes. I'm on the course at the moment. The table on page 41 of the Cisco Press book is actually wrong on the course notes (Version 1.1) although corrected in the Cisco book. (RIPv1/IGRP VLSM support among others) Is the exam written by someone for Sybex based on the course notes? i.e. Will we have to use the wrong answer on the exam? Priscilla and co.? Do you know what the process is from previous experience? Thanks, Gaz I'm on the
Re: Intrusion Detection [7:6494]
ha cabletron has some outstanding security products...they also have secure port transmissions on their switchescisco's ids is an outstanding product for the small company named cisco easysecure bundle...also check out sscp or cissp..great topic...oh mel i do not want to talk to you although you are in the seat besides me From: Mel Chandler PMI Reply-To: Mel Chandler PMI To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Intrusion Detection [7:6494] Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 15:08:10 -0400 Received: from [63.104.50.75] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id MHotMailBCDE9168006A400432563F68324B06F213; Wed May 30 12:14:46 2001 Received: from localhost (mail@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA04851;Wed, 30 May 2001 15:21:03 -0400 Received: by groupstudy.com (bulk_mailer v1.12); Wed, 30 May 2001 15:08:11 -0400 Received: (from listserver@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA02824GroupStudy Mailer; Wed, 30 May 2001 15:08:10 -0400 Received: (from mail@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA02817GroupStudy Mailer; Wed, 30 May 2001 15:08:10 -0400 From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 30 12:16:20 2001 Message-Id: X-GroupStudy-Version: 3.1.1a X-GroupStudy: Network Technical Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Precedence: bulk Has any had the opportunity to evaluate an intrusion detection system? I know Cisco makes one, not sure what it runs for an OS and how well it's put together. Have looked at Cabletron, excuse me, Enterasys, and Webtrends. Anyone offer any insight? Mel L. Chandler, A+, Network+, MCNE, MCDBA, MCSE+I, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Analyst Information Services PMI misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7174t=6494 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: telnet on Pix 515 ver 5.3.1 [7:1285]
caroll ...thanks for the info..very important ...i have not been able to find a definition for port 22...it is ommitted in most documents...lawrence From: "Carroll Kong" Reply-To: "Carroll Kong" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: telnet on Pix 515 ver 5.3.1 [7:1285] Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 18:23:49 -0400 Received: from [63.104.50.75] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id MHotMailBCA8B52600B04004311A3F68324B069D14; Thu Apr 19 15:44:40 2001 Received: from localhost (mail@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id SAA20689;Thu, 19 Apr 2001 18:35:11 -0400 Received: by groupstudy.com (bulk_mailer v1.12); Thu, 19 Apr 2001 18:23:51 -0400 Received: (from listserver@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA16481GroupStudy Mailer; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 18:23:50 -0400 Received: (from mail@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA16473GroupStudy Mailer; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 18:23:49 -0400 From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 19 15:45:37 2001 Message-Id: X-GroupStudy-Version: 3.1.1a X-GroupStudy: Network Technical Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Precedence: bulk At 04:25 PM 4/19/01 -0400, Scott Dees wrote: Anyone who can help me. I have a PIX 515 running IOS ver 5.3(1) and am trying to set it up to be able to telnet into it from the outside. It is up and running perfectly aside from this little quirk. First question is this possible? Second question how do you do it?Any help will be greatly appreciatedScott I only tried this with the SSH daemon, I see no reason why it can't work with telnet aside from the security risks. You need to turn on the telnet daemon. so telnet 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 outside have an ACL open up port 23 (well I open up a conduit, which might be overkill, since you already bound the daemon to the outside interface) conduit permit tcp host eq 23 any Now, I hope you do listen to this part, but I strongly suggest NOT doing this. Telnet is a clear text protocol, and the pix is a powerful firewall. This is an Achilles Heel to the box to remotely telnet in clear text! Use a VPN, or dial-in to the back and telnet to the internal port. Or, use SSH if you have the DES/3DES key activated! Then use similar commands to enable ssh. (ssh is port 22 by the way). To enable SSH, you need to generate an RSA key pair. (you also need the DES/3DES key) conf t ca generate rsa 1024 ca save all ssh 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 outside conduit permit tcp host eq 22 any-Carroll Kong and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=1319t=1285 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NTP Question?
this is my associate at work...and i am proud to work with such an accomplished gentlemanmcse..mcda..mcne..ccna..you name it good luck mel.. From: "Mel Chandler" Reply-To: "Mel Chandler" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: NTP Question? Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 14:19:09 -0800 X-Originating-IP: [216.34.208.251] Received: from [63.104.50.75] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id MHotMailBC8E54D50023D82197AB3F68324B09A014; Fri Mar 30 14:34:32 2001 Received: from localhost (mail@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id SAA11667;Fri, 30 Mar 2001 18:36:26 -0500 Received: by groupstudy.com (bulk_mailer v1.12); Fri, 30 Mar 2001 18:28:26 -0500 Received: (from listserver@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA10781GroupStudy Mailer; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 18:28:25 -0500 Received: from hotmail.com (f9.law9.hotmail.com [64.4.9.9])by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA10761GroupStudy Mailer; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 18:28:24 -0500 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 14:19:10 -0800 Received: from 216.34.208.251 by lw9fd.law9.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 22:19:09 GMT From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 30 14:35:31 2001 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Mar 2001 22:19:10.0079 (UTC) FILETIME=[7158D0F0:01C0B967] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Precedence: bulk Just about everything I know about NTP came from http://www.usno.navy.mil in one way or another. Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Passed CIT/Priscilla
htmlDIV PPriscilla, how do i purchae the flashcards for the CIT exam...lawrence 562.467.6614/P PTAIWO, WHERE DID YOU PURCHASE THE FLASHCARDS...LAWRENCEBR/P/DIV DIV/DIV DIV/DIVgt;From: Taiwo Adeshugba [EMAIL PROTECTED] DIV/DIVgt;Reply-To: Taiwo Adeshugba [EMAIL PROTECTED] DIV/DIVgt;To: "Cisco (E-mail)" [EMAIL PROTECTED] DIV/DIVgt;Subject: Passed CIT DIV/DIVgt;Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 12:19:44 +0100 DIV/DIVgt;Received: from [63.104.50.75] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id MHotMailBC7B53DE00664004321D3F68324B11DD14; Fri Mar 16 04:37:33 2001 DIV/DIVgt;Received: from localhost (mail@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id IAA32270;Fri, 16 Mar 2001 08:35:40 -0500 DIV/DIVgt;Received: by groupstudy.com (bulk_mailer v1.12); Fri, 16 Mar 2001 08:29:19 -0500 DIV/DIVgt;Received: (from listserver@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id IAA31646GroupStudy Mailer; Fri, 16 Mar 2001 08:29:19 -0500 DIV/DIVgt;Received: from berukexch16.ins.com ([208.164.95.39])by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA31627GroupStudy Mailer; Fri, 16 Mar 2001 08:29:17 -0500 DIV/DIVgt;Received: by BERUKEXCH16 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)id D499ZJ7B; Fri, 16 Mar 2001 12:20:45 - DIV/DIVgt;Received: from adeshut (aventail.ins.com [208.164.93.91]) by berukexch06.ins.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21)id DVHYFHZP; Fri, 16 Mar 2001 12:20:10 - DIV/DIVgt;From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 16 04:37:41 2001 DIV/DIVgt;Message-ID: lt;003401c0ae0b$01a15f00$[EMAIL PROTECTED]gt; DIV/DIVgt;X-Priority: 3 (Normal) DIV/DIVgt;X-MSMail-Priority: Normal DIV/DIVgt;X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) DIV/DIVgt;Importance: Normal DIV/DIVgt;X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 DIV/DIVgt;Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DIV/DIVgt;Precedence: bulk DIV/DIVgt; DIV/DIVgt;Hi Everyone, DIV/DIVgt; DIV/DIVgt;I passed the last exam of the CCNP journey this morning and it was a rough DIV/DIVgt;road. The exam as some people have put it was a tough one as I had to read DIV/DIVgt;the questions twice to understand what they were asking. For those who have DIV/DIVgt;not taken the exam read the CIT book by Laura Chappell, I also supplemented DIV/DIVgt;it with the new Cisco support book and try your hands on Colt as I met some DIV/DIVgt;questions that were similar. OH Priscilla your Flashcards were great on the DIV/DIVgt;CIT question and I am happy I used them. DIV/DIVgt;Anyway CCNP at last its time to celebrate and hit the books after a deserved DIV/DIVgt;rest. DIV/DIVgt; DIV/DIVgt;Thanks Everyone DIV/DIVgt; DIV/DIVgt;Tai DIV/DIVgt; DIV/DIVgt;_ DIV/DIVgt;FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html DIV/DIVgt;Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] DIV/DIVbr clear=allhrGet your FREE download of MSN Explorer at a href="http://explorer.msn.com"http://explorer.msn.com/abr/p/html _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Passed CIT
htmlDIV PTHANKS TO BOTH OF YOU AND PRISCILLA...MOST OF LALL THIS GROUP FOR IT'S GREAT PROFESSIONALnbsp; SUPPORT...LAWRENCEBRBR/P/DIV DIV/DIV DIV/DIVgt;From: Jaeheon Yoo [EMAIL PROTECTED] DIV/DIVgt;Reply-To: Jaeheon Yoo [EMAIL PROTECTED] DIV/DIVgt;To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DIV/DIVgt;Subject: Re: Passed CIT DIV/DIVgt;Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 23:27:43 +0900 DIV/DIVgt;Received: from [63.104.50.75] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id MHotMailBC7B7205009E400431CF3F68324B0B3B14; Fri Mar 16 06:46:10 2001 DIV/DIVgt;Received: from localhost (mail@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA16532;Fri, 16 Mar 2001 10:42:39 -0500 DIV/DIVgt;Received: by groupstudy.com (bulk_mailer v1.12); Fri, 16 Mar 2001 10:36:15 -0500 DIV/DIVgt;Received: (from listserver@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA14888GroupStudy Mailer; Fri, 16 Mar 2001 10:36:14 -0500 DIV/DIVgt;Received: (from news@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA14860GroupStudy Mailer; Fri, 16 Mar 2001 10:36:13 -0500 DIV/DIVgt;From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 16 06:46:20 2001 DIV/DIVgt;Path: not-for-mail DIV/DIVgt;Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco DIV/DIVgt;Organization: GroupStudy.com Discussion Groups DIV/DIVgt;Lines: 34 DIV/DIVgt;Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DIV/DIVgt;References: lt;003401c0ae0b$01a15f00$[EMAIL PROTECTED]gt; DIV/DIVgt;NNTP-Posting-Host: 61.73.240.121 DIV/DIVgt;NNTP-Posting-Date: 16 Mar 2001 15:36:13 GMT DIV/DIVgt;X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.7/32.534 DIV/DIVgt;Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DIV/DIVgt;Precedence: bulk DIV/DIVgt; DIV/DIVgt;Hi, Taiwo DIV/DIVgt;Congratulations!!! ^^ DIV/DIVgt;I myself passed the last exam of "CCNP journey" a few days ago. It was DIV/DIVgt;tough as some people said. Chappell's CIT book and Priscilla's flash DIV/DIVgt;card were two most important sources for the study as Taiwo suggested. DIV/DIVgt;(http://www.priscilla.com/cit/toc.html) Thanks, Priscilla. DIV/DIVgt;And thanks everyone. DIV/DIVgt;Now on to CCIE written. DIV/DIVgt; DIV/DIVgt;Jaeheon. DIV/DIVgt; DIV/DIVgt;On 16 Mar 2001 08:29:19 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Taiwo DIV/DIVgt;Adeshugba) wrote: DIV/DIVgt; DIV/DIVgt; gt;Hi Everyone, DIV/DIVgt; gt; DIV/DIVgt; gt;I passed the last exam of the CCNP journey this morning and it was a rough DIV/DIVgt; gt;road. The exam as some people have put it was a tough one as I had to read DIV/DIVgt; gt;the questions twice to understand what they were asking. For those who have DIV/DIVgt; gt;not taken the exam read the CIT book by Laura Chappell, I also supplemented DIV/DIVgt; gt;it with the new Cisco support book and try your hands on Colt as I met some DIV/DIVgt; gt;questions that were similar. OH Priscilla your Flashcards were great on the DIV/DIVgt; gt;CIT question and I am happy I used them. DIV/DIVgt; gt;Anyway CCNP at last its time to celebrate and hit the books after a deserved DIV/DIVgt; gt;rest. DIV/DIVgt; gt; DIV/DIVgt; gt;Thanks Everyone DIV/DIVgt; gt; DIV/DIVgt; gt;Tai DIV/DIVgt; gt; DIV/DIVgt; gt;_ DIV/DIVgt; gt;FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html DIV/DIVgt; gt;Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] DIV/DIVgt; DIV/DIVgt;_ DIV/DIVgt;FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html DIV/DIVgt;Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] DIV/DIVbr clear=allhrGet your FREE download of MSN Explorer at a href="http://explorer.msn.com"http://explorer.msn.com/abr/p/html _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Passed CCIE Written!!!!
htmlDIV Pnew user keep us posted...it's all about networkingBRBR/P/DIV DIV/DIV DIV/DIVgt;From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DIV/DIVgt;Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DIV/DIVgt;To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DIV/DIVgt;Subject: Passed CCIE Written DIV/DIVgt;Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 16:44:50 -0500 DIV/DIVgt;Received: from [63.104.50.75] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id MHotMailBC7BF2E0001FD82197D43F68324B047114; Fri Mar 16 15:55:39 2001 DIV/DIVgt;Received: from localhost (mail@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id TAA09961;Fri, 16 Mar 2001 19:59:25 -0500 DIV/DIVgt;Received: by groupstudy.com (bulk_mailer v1.12); Fri, 16 Mar 2001 19:53:00 -0500 DIV/DIVgt;Received: (from listserver@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id TAA08296GroupStudy Mailer; Fri, 16 Mar 2001 19:52:59 -0500 DIV/DIVgt;Received: (from news@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id TAA08259GroupStudy Mailer; Fri, 16 Mar 2001 19:52:57 -0500 DIV/DIVgt;From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 16 15:55:54 2001 DIV/DIVgt;Path: not-for-mail DIV/DIVgt;Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco DIV/DIVgt;Organization: GroupStudy.com Discussion Groups DIV/DIVgt;Lines: 47 DIV/DIVgt;Message-ID: lt;98uch9$81d$[EMAIL PROTECTED]gt; DIV/DIVgt;NNTP-Posting-Host: ool-18b82967.dyn.optonline.net DIV/DIVgt;NNTP-Posting-Date: 17 Mar 2001 00:52:57 GMT DIV/DIVgt;X-Priority: 3 DIV/DIVgt;X-MSMail-Priority: Normal DIV/DIVgt;X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 DIV/DIVgt;X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 DIV/DIVgt;Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DIV/DIVgt;Precedence: bulk DIV/DIVgt; DIV/DIVgt;I passed the written today! It was a tough exam, with some funky worded DIV/DIVgt;questions, but I received an 88%. The test did blowup halfway through but I DIV/DIVgt;was only delayed for 5 minutes. DIV/DIVgt; DIV/DIVgt;I have been in this business for 16 years and hold over 25 certs. I have DIV/DIVgt;been supporting Cisco gear for over 8 years. I obtained my CCNP/DP in five DIV/DIVgt;months last year and then I took a break from Cisco for a while (9 months), DIV/DIVgt;so I had to study for a month on old junk I had forgotten or haven't used DIV/DIVgt;since 1994. Thank god for my CNX. I have been in networking before 10base-T DIV/DIVgt;and Token-Ring.(Can someone say Lattisnet???) Man... I lived Token-Ring from DIV/DIVgt;1989-1996. This was one funky exam. This exam is somewhat harder then the DIV/DIVgt;ACRC, but ACRC is more focused, this one tests your knowledge across a broad DIV/DIVgt;scope of topics, so study hard. DIV/DIVgt; DIV/DIVgt;Some study suggestion, if you feel they can help.. DIV/DIVgt; DIV/DIVgt;If you have no TR knowledge try to obtain the Laura Chappell, "Novell's DIV/DIVgt;Guide to Netware Lan Analysis" (ISBN 0-7821-1362-1) It may be out of print DIV/DIVgt;or in it's 3rd or 4th edition. Excellent on TR, IPX, SRB, Spanning Tree for DIV/DIVgt;SRB. Also, if you can get your hands on an "IBM TR Architecture Reference", DIV/DIVgt;then this will explain everything you ever needed to know about the RIF. DIV/DIVgt; DIV/DIVgt;The new Sybex book is only good for a basic cursory review. It also has lots DIV/DIVgt;of errors so be careful. Read or review the books listed on the recommended DIV/DIVgt;reading list, review all of the links on CCO under the blueprint. And most DIV/DIVgt;of all, KNOW YOUR PROTOCOLS IN AND OUT. This may be overkill but it will be DIV/DIVgt;worth it. DIV/DIVgt; DIV/DIVgt;Having your CCNP/DP and/or CNX will make things a little easier, especially DIV/DIVgt;if you go for the written right after obtaining your NP/DP. DIV/DIVgt; DIV/DIVgt;Own, borrow, or use a freeware protocol analyzer. Learn the protocols. Here DIV/DIVgt;is a cool site that was listed for a protocol analyzer DIV/DIVgt; DIV/DIVgt;http://www.ethereal.com/ DIV/DIVgt; DIV/DIVgt;Someone wrote in this board to "be the packet" To add to that "be the DIV/DIVgt;protocol analyzer" DIV/DIVgt; DIV/DIVgt;I want to thank everyone on this list for their questions, answers and DIV/DIVgt;helping each other out. Your information provided me a small clue on what to DIV/DIVgt;expect and how to prepare for the written. You guys are a great and DIV/DIVgt;dedicated bunch, good luck to all. See you in the LAB, ggguuu.. DIV/DIVgt; DIV/DIVgt; DIV/DIVgt; DIV/DIVgt; DIV/DIVgt;_ DIV/DIVgt;FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html DIV/DIVgt;Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] DIV/DIVbr clear=allhrGet your FREE download of MSN Explorer at a href="http://explorer.msn.com"http://explorer.msn.com/abr/p/html _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Question on HSRP
htmlDIV Player 8 politics/P Player 9 financeBRBR/P/DIV DIV/DIV DIV/DIVgt;From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] DIV/DIVgt;Reply-To: Priscilla Oppenheimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] DIV/DIVgt;To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DIV/DIVgt;Subject: Re: Question on HSRP DIV/DIVgt;Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2001 10:15:46 -0800 DIV/DIVgt;Received: from [63.104.50.75] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id MHotMailBC6FC87E004FD820F3963F68324B0B6214; Wed Mar 07 10:28:20 2001 DIV/DIVgt;Received: from localhost (mail@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA12655;Wed, 7 Mar 2001 14:29:40 -0500 DIV/DIVgt;Received: by groupstudy.com (bulk_mailer v1.12); Wed, 7 Mar 2001 14:22:16 -0500 DIV/DIVgt;Received: (from listserver@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA11313GroupStudy Mailer; Wed, 7 Mar 2001 14:22:14 -0500 DIV/DIVgt;Received: from gate.ashland.k12.or.us ([208.1.81.242])by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA11283GroupStudy Mailer; Wed, 7 Mar 2001 14:22:12 -0500 DIV/DIVgt;Received: from [10.32.101.240] by gate.ashland.k12.or.usfor [EMAIL PROTECTED] KAA13153; Wed Mar 7 10:13:17 2001 DIV/DIVgt;From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 07 10:28:43 2001 DIV/DIVgt;Message-Id: lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]gt; DIV/DIVgt;X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DIV/DIVgt;X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 DIV/DIVgt;In-Reply-To: lt;985n0a$j8s$[EMAIL PROTECTED]gt; DIV/DIVgt;References: lt;98423i$l2e$[EMAIL PROTECTED]gt; DIV/DIVgt;Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DIV/DIVgt;Precedence: bulk DIV/DIVgt; DIV/DIVgt;Now, this is the kind of situation the various design certs should test on! DIV/DIVgt;amp;;-) DIV/DIVgt; DIV/DIVgt;Regarding your actual question, have you considered a Layer-8 solution? DIV/DIVgt;Depending on who you talk to, Layer 8 deals with money, politics, planning, DIV/DIVgt;etc. My thinking is that you should select a provider that gives you peace DIV/DIVgt;of mind regarding resiliency within the provider's network. Howard talked DIV/DIVgt;about scope. Worrying about routes failing within your provider's network DIV/DIVgt;should be outside your scope. Sure, you might have to pay extra for this DIV/DIVgt;"peace of mind." But can you get a service-level agreement that gives you this? DIV/DIVgt; DIV/DIVgt;Now, if your link to the provider dies, then you should be able to failover DIV/DIVgt;to the other provider. That much is within your scope. But worrying about DIV/DIVgt;routes within your providers' networks should theoretically be outside your DIV/DIVgt;scope. DIV/DIVgt; DIV/DIVgt;Priscilla DIV/DIVgt; DIV/DIVgt;At 09:10 AM 3/7/01, NetEng wrote: DIV/DIVgt; gt;Thanks to everyone for the help. My questions have been answered (for now). DIV/DIVgt; gt;What I'm trying to do is; I have multiple remote offices where I want to DIV/DIVgt; gt;create a VPN tunnel across one provider to the corporate office. In case DIV/DIVgt; gt;that the provider goes down, I need to have the second provider take over DIV/DIVgt; gt;(with a new tunnel of course). The fail-over with BGP is the easy part. The DIV/DIVgt; gt;other guy working on this thinks everything should be running in HSRP, and I DIV/DIVgt; gt;don't/didn't think HSRP would allow the stand-by router to become active DIV/DIVgt; gt;with the failure being somewhere in the providers network. I thought that I DIV/DIVgt; gt;could run them in parallel and let a dynamic routing protocol do the DIV/DIVgt; gt;deciding. However, I heard IPSEC breaks routing protocols. I also heard that DIV/DIVgt; gt;you can run them throught a GRE tunnel and not encrypt them. This is all DIV/DIVgt; gt;still theory until we get some equipment in to do the pilot. Has anyone DIV/DIVgt; gt;tried doing this? I'll try this out (track command) and thanks again for the DIV/DIVgt; gt;info. DIV/DIVgt; gt; DIV/DIVgt; gt;Collin DIV/DIVgt; gt; DIV/DIVgt; gt;P.S. Priscilla your book rocks. DIV/DIVgt; gt; DIV/DIVgt; gt;""NetEng"" [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote in message DIV/DIVgt; gt;98423i$l2e$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:98423i$l2e$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... DIV/DIVgt; gt; gt; Does HSRP work at the interface level or is the entire router on DIV/DIVgt; gt; gt; acvtive/stand-by? In other words, if I have two routers working in HSRP DIV/DIVgt; gt;and DIV/DIVgt; gt; gt; a link goes down somewhere down the line, will the first router know to DIV/DIVgt; gt; gt; fail-over to the second router (with a good link)? I have one router DIV/DIVgt; gt; gt; connected to one ISP and a second router connected to a second ISP. Can DIV/DIVgt; gt; gt; these routers be run in HSRP or must they be running in parallel and let a DIV/DIVgt; gt; gt; dynamic routing protocol (BGP on the outside and let's say EIGRP on the DIV/DIVgt; gt; gt; inside) decide? TIA. DIV/DIVgt; gt; gt; DIV/DIVgt; gt; gt; DIV/DIVgt; gt; gt; _ DIV/DIVgt; gt; gt; FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: DIV/DIVgt; gt;http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: Can IPX traffic be forwarded thru PIX?
if the pix does not past ipx then you need to go to netware ip...not ipx tunneling nut netware ip it will pass all of the updates for you through ip onlylook at novells's site on netware ip configurationbest regards...lawrence From: "sougata maitra" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: "sougata maitra" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Can IPX traffic be forwarded thru PIX? Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2001 17:39:47 - X-Originating-IP: [151.200.108.30] Received: from [63.104.50.75] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id MHotMailBC249B590048400431923F68324B081816; Tue Jan 09 09:55:05 2001 Received: from localhost (mail@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA15584;Tue, 9 Jan 2001 13:54:13 -0500 Received: by groupstudy.com (bulk_mailer v1.12); Tue, 9 Jan 2001 13:47:57 -0500 Received: (from listserver@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA14179GroupStudy Mailer; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 13:47:56 -0500 Received: from hotmail.com (f135.law7.hotmail.com [216.33.237.135])by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA14160GroupStudy Mailer; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 13:47:55 -0500 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 09:39:47 -0800 Received: from 151.200.108.30 by lw7fd.law7.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Tue, 09 Jan 2001 17:39:47 GMT From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 09 09:55:58 2001 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Jan 2001 17:39:47.0603 (UTC) FILETIME=[2915F630:01C07A63] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Precedence: bulk we are in the process of testing a PIX firewall 515R and all seems to work fine in the IP realm. we have netware servers (version 4x)running IPX still both on the inside and the outside which need to commmunicate. the documentation for PIX doesn't even use the word IPX !! any ideas? one thought is to make the netware servers run IP ..but how to make them exchange (SAPs) or whatever it is under IP? warm regards _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Knowledge Net
html DIV Pjeff, i think they are great...i took intro and advanced through them [may99] they were awesomegreat suport structure also especially if you have some equiment to work with...lawrenceBRBR/P/DIV DIV/DIV DIV/DIVgt;From: quot;Jeff Duchinquot;[EMAIL PROTECTED] DIV/DIVgt;Reply-To: quot;Jeff Duchinquot;[EMAIL PROTECTED] DIV/DIVgt;To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DIV/DIVgt;Subject: Knowledge Net DIV/DIVgt;Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2000 08:01:02 -0500 DIV/DIVgt;Received: from [63.104.50.75] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id MHotMailBC17333C00B4D820F3AE3F68324B0C3D17; Sat Dec 30 05:51:36 2000 DIV/DIVgt;Received: from localhost (mail@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA30364;Sat, 30 Dec 2000 09:31:37 -0500 DIV/DIVgt;Received: by groupstudy.com (bulk_mailer v1.12); Sat, 30 Dec 2000 09:24:08 -0500 DIV/DIVgt;Received: (from listserver@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA29857GroupStudy Mailer; Sat, 30 Dec 2000 09:24:07 -0500 DIV/DIVgt;Received: (from news@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA29837GroupStudy Mailer; Sat, 30 Dec 2000 09:24:06 -0500 DIV/DIVgt;From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 30 05:52:56 2000 DIV/DIVgt;Path: not-for-mail DIV/DIVgt;Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco DIV/DIVgt;Organization: GroupStudy.com Discussion Groups DIV/DIVgt;Lines: 6 DIV/DIVgt;Message-ID: lt;92kr66$t4c$[EMAIL PROTECTED]gt; DIV/DIVgt;NNTP-Posting-Host: pppa55-resalefrederickb1-2r7138.dialinx.net DIV/DIVgt;NNTP-Posting-Date: 30 Dec 2000 14:24:06 GMT DIV/DIVgt;X-Priority: 3 DIV/DIVgt;X-MSMail-Priority: Normal DIV/DIVgt;X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 DIV/DIVgt;X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 DIV/DIVgt;Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DIV/DIVgt;Precedence: bulk DIV/DIVgt; DIV/DIVgt;Has anyone taken any of the classes through Knowledge Net? I just did the DIV/DIVgt;6509 class which was pretty cool. DIV/DIVgt; DIV/DIVgt;Jeff DIV/DIVgt; DIV/DIVgt; DIV/DIVgt;_ DIV/DIVgt;FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html DIV/DIVgt;Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] DIV/DIVbr clear=allhrGet your FREE download of MSN Explorer at a href="http://explorer.msn.com"http://explorer.msn.com/abr/p/html _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks chuck!!!
you have to be involved with cabling to understand the concept of punch down blocksit's the location where the cable wires connect...some times they are small plastic blocks with different colorswhen you scrip a cat5 cable open you see different color wires...they correspond to the blocks for connections.you also have a tool called a punch down tool used to insert the wires into the block...you are punching the wires down...'punch-down'. you, bradley, are more than right about terminology...there are too many in this great universe and 'we' must clarify them..and help others to understand what we meanfor example ASP has many new meanings... and please do not be afraid to ask any question...chuck larrieu has help me to configure ipx on a cisco router...he looked at my configuration and found the answer even when cisco tac had no ideadoes that mean that they are not qualified...no...it means that we have some very qualified people on this list who are more than willling to help! we cannot and must not close our eyes to sharing knowledge for the development of all man-kind and future network engineers thank all of you and keep up the good work. lawrence a sculark mba/ma, ccna,cnx-a,mcp,cna [phd in progress] From: "Bradley J. Wilson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: "Bradley J. Wilson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "cisco" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: what is a CSU/DSU? Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2000 08:14:15 -0500 Received: from [63.104.50.75] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id MHotMailBC0CA2BD009F40042A1B3F68324B0E2017; Fri Dec 22 05:32:14 2000 Received: from localhost (mail@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA24858;Fri, 22 Dec 2000 09:30:55 -0500 Received: by groupstudy.com (bulk_mailer v1.12); Fri, 22 Dec 2000 09:24:58 -0500 Received: (from listserver@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA24208GroupStudy Mailer; Fri, 22 Dec 2000 09:24:57 -0500 Received: from blount.mail.mindspring.net (blount.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.226])by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA24187GroupStudy Mailer; Fri, 22 Dec 2000 09:24:56 -0500 Received: from bwilson (user-2ive2kj.dialup.mindspring.com [165.247.10.147])by blount.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with SMTP id IAA13529for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 22 Dec 2000 08:17:32 -0500 (EST) From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 22 05:33:06 2000 Message-ID: 009701c06c19$16932c60$ca01010a@bwilson References: 91vml1$id9$[EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Precedence: bulk Folks, is it really necessary to pounce on someone for asking an occasional "simple" question? Okay, so CSU/DSUs are basic networking gear. But guess what: *none* of the CCNA material I studied ever went into any great detail on what exactly this thing was or did, and coming from the technical training side of the house never dealt with one until very recently. Other examples: I have no idea what a "punch-down block" or a "patch panel" is. Maybe I've dealt with them before and would know if someone said "*That* is a patch panel," but the fact is that most of the CC** materials only focus on the routers and switches, and not so much on the peripheral yet essential devices. So, in other words, back off when someone asks a question you think is "beneath" you or this group. Just don't answer if you don't want to. But there are lots of valid, basic questions out there that yes, even CCNP/IE candidates would like answers to. It would be a shame if they felt they weren't "allowed" to ask those questions here. Sincerely, Bradley J. Wilson Who, despite being a CCNA, CCDA, MCSE, CNX-A, NNCSS, MCT and CTT, does not know what a punch-down block is. Sue me. - Original Message - From: netlinesys Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 7:55 AM Subject: re: what is a CSU/DSU? Zhiping, If u know the basic of networking , u can answer this question !!?? I found it difficult for CCNP candidate to ask this question. - Original Message - From: "Zhiping Li" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 12:37 PM Subject: what is a CSU/DSU? Hi,ciscoer: when I study cisco ccnp, I always find CSU/DSU, what are them? what are their use? Are they some kind of MODEM? thanks . _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
RE: 2610 csu/dsu configuration
now what about the configuration of ipx on the serial interfacesany suggestions.i am unable to configure ipx on the serials... From: "Chuck Larrieu" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: "Chuck Larrieu" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Taylor, Don" [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: 2610 csu/dsu configuration Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2000 16:02:06 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from [208.32.175.78] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id MHotMailBBF1F63E001AD820F3B0D020AF4E118123; Fri Dec 01 23:59:26 2000 Received: from localhost (mail@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id AAA22819;Sat, 2 Dec 2000 00:10:46 -0500 Received: by groupstudy.com (bulk_mailer v1.12); Sat, 2 Dec 2000 00:10:45 -0500 Received: (from listserver@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id AAA22805GroupStudy Mailer; Sat, 2 Dec 2000 00:10:45 -0500 Received: from goliath.cnchost.com (goliath.cnchost.com [207.155.252.47])by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA22785GroupStudy Mailer; Sat, 2 Dec 2000 00:10:43 -0500 Received: from ChuckHome.concentric.net (w008.z064220150.sjc-ca.dsl.cnc.net [64.220.150.8])by goliath.cnchost.comid TAA28086; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 19:02:06 -0500 (EST)[ConcentricHost SMTP Relay 1.10] From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 02 00:00:45 2000 Message-ID: 003601c05bf3$1b5f8800$[EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2377.0 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Importance: Normal Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Precedence: bulk RE: 2610 csu/dsu configurationDon, I believe that a CSU is a layer one device. I have never seen any option on any CSU I have ever worked with, internal or external, for line encapsulation. It is always AMI / B8ZS and SF / ESF choices. on the router interface is where you configure HDLC or PPP. ( Or SDLC or SMDS or frame relay, for that matter. ) This is done with both internal and external CSU's. notice that within the Cisco config, you even differentiate between the serial interface and the service module when issuing commands. Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Taylor, Don Sent: Friday, December 01, 2000 2:38 PM To: 'Kelly Scroggins'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: 2610 csu/dsu configuration There's not too much to it. HDLC is the default encapsulation, so you won't have to change that. And if the second router you're connecting too has a Cisco internal CSU, they'll have the same default. Basically you just need to put clocking on one of the routers and that should do it. The command is "clock rate ?" (you get to choose the speed - might as well go with the fastest, 400). The commands for configuring your CSU, though, are (in interface config mode) "service-module t1 ?" (get the list). The ones I use most often are: "service-module t1 timeslots 1-24 speed 64"; this sets the CSU up for 24 channels at 64K per channel (T1 speed) "service-module t1 linecode b8zs"; B8ZS line coding, as opposed to AMI (your provider can tell you which one to use) "service-module t1 framing esf"; ESF or SF are your framing choices Hope that helps. Lemme know if you need something else. - Don -Original Message- From: Kelly Scroggins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 01, 2000 12:35 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 2610 csu/dsu configuration Can someone point me to some good documentation on how to configure the csu/dsu module in a 2610 for a plain ordinary hdlc t1 connection? Thanks, kelly _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dhcp questions ???
how can yu monitor a dhcp server to ensure that it is operating correctly...?? any suggestions... can you monitor it from snmp, do you need sms for nt to monitor ists services...can you only monitor or test from the server itselflawrence From: Benjamin Walling [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Benjamin Walling [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: 2610 csu/dsu configuration Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 14:12:29 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from [208.32.175.78] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id MHotMailBBF55EA300464004318DD020AF4E04A017; Mon Dec 04 14:00:43 2000 Received: from localhost (mail@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA07811;Mon, 4 Dec 2000 15:25:55 -0500 Received: by groupstudy.com (bulk_mailer v1.12); Mon, 4 Dec 2000 15:25:55 -0500 Received: (from listserver@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA07794GroupStudy Mailer; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 15:25:53 -0500 Received: from primary.edentaldirect.com ([64.182.115.70])by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA07774GroupStudy Mailer; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 15:25:51 -0500 Received: by PRIMARY with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)id X9BKWKYP; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 14:12:30 -0500 From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 04 14:01:23 2000 Message-ID: E73BCE779A68D411BA1C00D0B774117303160F@PRIMARY X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Precedence: bulk You know, Cisco's ConfigMaker handles the 26xx series as well as the WIC cards. It will guide you through a wizard and then make the config for you. You can use this to see how to do things that you don't know. -Original Message----- From: lawrence sculark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 04, 2000 12:43 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: 2610 csu/dsu configuration now what about the configuration of ipx on the serial interfacesany suggestions.i am unable to configure ipx on the serials... _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 804 problems after 'erase startup' and reload
jason are you using nt or 95.if nt upgrade your hyperterm app...it's not sending the correct signal...las From: "Jason Roysdon" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: "Jason Roysdon" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 804 problems after 'erase startup' and reload Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2000 17:03:39 -0800 Received: from [208.32.175.78] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id MHotMailBBE075DD00A7D821EECED020AF4E065B24; Sat Nov 18 17:23:52 2000 Received: from localhost (mail@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id UAA28178;Sat, 18 Nov 2000 20:13:50 -0500 Received: by groupstudy.com (bulk_mailer v1.12); Sat, 18 Nov 2000 20:07:38 -0500 Received: (from listserver@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA27872GroupStudy Mailer; Sat, 18 Nov 2000 20:07:37 -0500 Received: (from news@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA27854GroupStudy Mailer; Sat, 18 Nov 2000 20:07:37 -0500 From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 18 17:24:05 2000 Path: not-for-mail Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco Organization: http://jason.artoo.net/ Lines: 29 Message-ID: 8v794p$r6a$[EMAIL PROTECTED] NNTP-Posting-Host: han.artoo.net NNTP-Posting-Date: 19 Nov 2000 01:07:37 GMT X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Precedence: bulk Was going to let a friend reconfigure an 804 from scratch. We were telnetted to a router and going out the AUX port with reverse telnet to the 804. I copied my current config off to my tftp server, then did an 'erase startup', 'show startup' (came back unconfigured), 'reload,' and said no to save current config and confirmed reload. Next thing we knew we got jibberish (like we had the wrong baud rates). AUX was set for 9600 (default) and was working fine before the reboot... When I got physical access to the 804, I tried with direct console access from my laptop. Same thing, 9600,8,n,1 just gave me jibberish. I tried all other baud rates Tera Term Pro (my favorite free telnet/serial terminal program) supports (100-115200) , as well as 7,e,1 at a random number of baud rates, etc. Even went to try from Hyperterminal, no luck there either at 9600 or 115200 (same results). Actually, the only thing that didn't give me jibberish was 115200 which just flashed the cursor but never moved it. I tried issuing ESC, CTRL+C BREAK after power off/on with 9600 115200, no luck and same results. Any ideas out there? -- Jason Roysdon, CCNA, MCSE, CNA, Network+, A+ List email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://jason.artoo.net/ Cisco resources: http://r2cisco.artoo.net/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Flapping and Dampening
david, that's a great explanation.lawrence From: "David Wolsefer" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: "David Wolsefer" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Flapping refers to a link going up and down. Dampening is a BGP feature used to minimize the instablility caused by a flapping link. A route that is flapping receives a penalty of 1000 for each flap. When the accumulated penalty reaches a configurable limit, BGP suppresses advertisement of the route even if the route is up. The accumulated penalty is decremented by the half-life time. When the accumulated penalty is less than the reuse limit, the route is advertised again (if it is still up). Regards, David Wolsefer, CCIE #5858 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Duane Morgan Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 1:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Flapping and Dampening Would someone be so kind as to explain these too terms, in english? While I'd honor references to where I can get definitions, instead of just uses in context. I'd greatly appreciate a translation into laymen's terms of these two definitions. Thank you. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: question about the dns port
fom my understanig dns has both udp and tcp ports for gather information.. From: "jackie xu" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: "jackie xu" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: question about the dns port Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 16:56:33 +0800 Received: from [208.32.175.78] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id MHotMailBBDA4BA700AB40042A10D020AF4E0B1924; Tue Nov 14 01:09:35 2000 Received: from localhost (mail@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id EAA25261;Tue, 14 Nov 2000 04:05:36 -0500 Received: by groupstudy.com (bulk_mailer v1.12); Tue, 14 Nov 2000 03:59:54 -0500 Received: (from listserver@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id DAA24448GroupStudy Mailer; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 03:59:53 -0500 Received: (from news@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id DAA24427GroupStudy Mailer; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 03:59:47 -0500 From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 14 01:11:11 2000 Path: not-for-mail Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco Organization: GroupStudy.com Discussion Groups Lines: 9 Message-ID: 8uquu3$nqn$[EMAIL PROTECTED] NNTP-Posting-Host: 202.101.166.77 NNTP-Posting-Date: 14 Nov 2000 08:59:47 GMT X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Precedence: bulk i am building a access list on a router to filter the dns lookup, i am wondering whether the source and destination udp port are both domain(53) or the source port is choosed randomly when a client query the dns server, and how about the situation is when domain file transfer happens. thanks advanced. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: acess list question
thanks jason and chuck, for reminding us to think of the order of processing in acess-list...lawrence From: Jason Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Jason Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "'Sisqo'" [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: acess list question Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 16:20:05 +1100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from [208.32.175.78] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id MHotMailBBDA184300C5D821EEDCD020AF4E12B724; Mon Nov 13 21:33:32 2000 Received: from localhost (mail@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id AAA01121;Tue, 14 Nov 2000 00:27:51 -0500 Received: by groupstudy.com (bulk_mailer v1.12); Tue, 14 Nov 2000 00:23:27 -0500 Received: (from listserver@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id AAA00360GroupStudy Mailer; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 00:23:27 -0500 Received: from mel-mail01.davnet.com.au (mel-mail01.davnet.com.au [202.53.45.12])by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA00333GroupStudy Mailer; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 00:23:20 -0500 Received: by mel-mail01.davnet.com.au with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)id 40TVSAKD; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 16:20:10 +1100 From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 13 21:34:22 2000 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Precedence: bulk try reversing the accesslist :).. in access lists if it matches the rule then it is processed and no more processing.. line 2 becomes line 1, and line 1 becomes line 2.. try it out :) your first line says permit all ip... which includes FTP :). Regards, Jason Baker Network Engineer MCSE, CCNA, -Original Message- From: Sisqo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 2:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: acess list question Access-list 101 permit ip any any Access-list 101 deny tcp any any eq ftp Why did the above list FAIL to prevent FTP? _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Routing BSCN cramsession/quick study guide
AT LEAST YO CAN TELL THEM THANKS ...FIRSTWE HELP EACH OTHER OUT NOT CRITICIZE'TITANS'... From: "SI cable news" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: "SI cable news" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Routing BSCN cramsession/quick study guide Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2000 12:02:04 -0500 Received: from [208.32.175.78] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id MHotMailBBD4DDA8006ED820F3A9D020AF4E0D9424; Thu Nov 09 22:18:21 2000 Received: from localhost (mail@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id BAA21870;Fri, 10 Nov 2000 01:14:01 -0500 Received: by groupstudy.com (bulk_mailer v1.12); Fri, 10 Nov 2000 01:08:01 -0500 Received: (from listserver@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id BAA21430GroupStudy Mailer; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 01:07:59 -0500 Received: (from news@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id BAA21410GroupStudy Mailer; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 01:07:58 -0500 From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 09 22:19:24 2000 Path: not-for-mail Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco Organization: GroupStudy.com Discussion Groups Lines: 46 Message-ID: 8ug3bu$kt1$[EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8qohjf$fr5$[EMAIL PROTECTED] NNTP-Posting-Host: 24-168-111-5.si.rr.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 10 Nov 2000 06:07:58 GMT X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Precedence: bulk who ever put the pdf does not know how to number the pages ""Billha"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 8qohjf$fr5$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8qohjf$fr5$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Thanks ! Lauren Child [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hiya, Found this while browsing and as I hadnt seen it I fugure other people may not have. http://www.getccnp.com/ In the Cramsession area it has a very good (IMHO) study guide for the Routing exam. TTFN Lauren -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lauren Child, BSc. CCNP-ATM CCDP Certified http://www.laurenchild.net/ http://www.routerfaq.net/ **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Backup Interface and Routing!
are you using any snmp applications that monitor this backup link??? if so, you will need to use an access-list or place the isdn interface in standy-mode by [backup interface bri1/0] [backup delay]to prevent the snmp activity from polling your backup interface$lawrence From: "Hans Schimek" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: "Hans Schimek" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Backup Interface and Routing! Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2000 22:32:16 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from [208.32.175.78] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id MHotMailBBD313A400B2D820F3B6D020AF4E0B3024; Wed Nov 08 13:44:50 2000 Received: from localhost (mail@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA16000;Wed, 8 Nov 2000 16:41:55 -0500 Received: by groupstudy.com (bulk_mailer v1.12); Wed, 8 Nov 2000 16:35:33 -0500 Received: (from listserver@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA14075GroupStudy Mailer; Wed, 8 Nov 2000 16:35:32 -0500 Received: from email01.aon.at (WARSL401PIP1.highway.telekom.at [195.3.96.69])by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA14048GroupStudy Mailer; Wed, 8 Nov 2000 16:35:29 -0500 Received: (qmail 374726 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2000 21:31:15 - Received: from n229p018.adsl.highway.telekom.at (HELO homer) ([213.33.28.146]) (envelope-sender [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by qmail1.highway.telekom.at (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 8 Nov 2000 21:31:15 - From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 08 13:46:11 2000 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 Importance: Normal Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Precedence: bulk X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by groupstudy.com id QAA16000 Hi! i configured a serial link and an ISDN link between two routers. the serial line is the primary line. if it fails the backup line ISDN-Interface) takes over. i configured RIP - To prevent Routing Updates from establishing the call i set the ISDN-Interface as PASSIVE. Updates didn`t initate the call anymore. BUT ! what about the routing information. if the primary fails, no routing updates won`t flow. so i configured static routes with a higher administrative distance - IS THERE ANOTHER SOLUTION FOR THAT PROBLEM ! thanx in advance = Hans Schimek Student Fachhochschule St. Pölten f. Telekommunikation und Medien mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] gsm : +43 699 10605315 fax : +43 3613 2311 4 icq : 22308773 www : www.schimek.net = _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Routing protocol
look up "redistribution"..it will set you on the right path...lawrence From: "Donald B Johnson Jr" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: "Donald B Johnson Jr" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Routing protocol Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2000 17:28:38 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from [208.32.175.78] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id MHotMailBBD3226D000AD820F3D2D020AF4E054A24; Wed Nov 08 14:47:10 2000 Received: from localhost (mail@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id RAA03962;Wed, 8 Nov 2000 17:43:24 -0500 Received: by groupstudy.com (bulk_mailer v1.12); Wed, 8 Nov 2000 17:36:22 -0500 Received: (from listserver@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id RAA01319GroupStudy Mailer; Wed, 8 Nov 2000 17:36:21 -0500 Received: from smtprelay3.abs.adelphia.net (smtprelay.abs.adelphia.net [64.8.20.11])by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA01291GroupStudy Mailer; Wed, 8 Nov 2000 17:36:20 -0500 Received: from duck1 ([24.48.157.224]) by smtprelay3.abs.adelphia.net (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with SMTP id G3Q99500.J4L; Wed, 8 Nov 2000 17:31:53 -0500 From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 08 14:48:01 2000 Message-ID: 02c801c04ab5$8f85f1f0$[EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Precedence: bulk I don't think this make sense. Routing protocols are used to maintain routing tables. Routed protocols are used for addressing and accessing stations on a network. The process of routing is the ability of a router being able to receive a packet, check the destination in the packet, look for a destination network in the route table and switch the packet to the appropriate interface that can reach the destination network. So routing is the process of: 1. declaring a destination 2. finding the destinaton 3. switching the packet to an interface on the path to the destination. Many protocols are involved in this process from ARP to BGP or anything in between. Duck AVI [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Can anyone tell me, Which is the only routing protocol to route other protocols Is it EIGRP or BGP Thanks _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IPX over VPN
why do you want to use ipx to start with??? you are better off using nwip... lawrence From: "Chris Sees" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: "Chris Sees" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: IPX over VPN Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 13:59:39 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from [208.32.175.78] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id MHotMailBBD19F670095D820F3ABD020AF4E091B24; Tue Nov 07 11:16:42 2000 Received: from localhost (mail@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA10864;Tue, 7 Nov 2000 14:12:49 -0500 Received: by groupstudy.com (bulk_mailer v1.12); Tue, 7 Nov 2000 14:08:38 -0500 Received: (from listserver@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA10213GroupStudy Mailer; Tue, 7 Nov 2000 14:08:37 -0500 Received: from 10.0.1.2 (smtp.mtgroupe.com [38.240.219.2])by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA10195GroupStudy Mailer; Tue, 7 Nov 2000 14:08:36 -0500 Received: from thesniffer ([208.177.113.130]) by 10.0.1.2 (AppleShare IP Mail Server 6.3.1) id 151776 via TCP with SMTP; Tue, 07 Nov 2000 14:04:59 -0500 From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 07 11:17:09 2000 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Precedence: bulk Hi, Does anyone know if IPX will work over VPN using Cisco's VPN Client to a router running IOS w/ IPSec 56 Plus? Thanks. Chris Any suugestions on making this work? _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ISDN call disconnects automatically !
does your configuration have an idle-timeout command. if so then when there is no insteresting traffic it will timeout in the seconds instructed what protocols are you routing...ipx, ip ??? From: "Hans Schimek" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: "Hans Schimek" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ISDN call disconnects automatically ! Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2000 16:48:17 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from [208.32.175.78] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id MHotMailBBCECEFA00B8D82197DED020AF4E11D224; Sun Nov 05 08:01:38 2000 Received: from localhost (mail@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA04026;Sun, 5 Nov 2000 10:57:20 -0500 Received: by groupstudy.com (bulk_mailer v1.12); Sun, 5 Nov 2000 10:51:03 -0500 Received: (from listserver@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA03746GroupStudy Mailer; Sun, 5 Nov 2000 10:51:03 -0500 Received: from server.local (N237P031.adsl.highway.telekom.at [213.33.29.159])by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA03729GroupStudy Mailer; Sun, 5 Nov 2000 10:51:01 -0500 Received: from homer ([192.168.0.3])by server.local (8.10.2/8.10.2/SuSE Linux 8.10.0-0.3) with SMTP id eA5Gs4J00736for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 5 Nov 2000 17:54:04 +0100 From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 05 08:02:03 2000 X-Authentication-Warning: server.local: Host [192.168.0.3] claimed to be homer Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 Importance: Normal Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Precedence: bulk X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by groupstudy.com id KAA04026 ISDN calls get disconncted after some time - though traffic is flowing - and the interface is NOT idle - so it should not be disconncted - or is there a timer which disconnects all calls after a while ? thanx in advance 00:42:199726942860: ISDN BR1/0: received HOST_DISCONNECT call_id 0x8012 00:42:197568495616: ISDN BR1/0: Event: Call to unknown was hung up. 00:42:199726942732: ISDN BR1/0: process_disc_ack(): call id 0x8012, ces 1, call type DATA 00:42:197568495663: %ISDN-6-DISCONNECT: Interface BRI1/0:1 disconnected from 20 2504, call lasted 120 seconds 00:42:199726942540: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI1/0:1, changed state to down 00:42:199724968501: ISDN BR1/0: received HOST_DISCONNECT_ACK call_id 0x8012 00:42:197568495616: ISDN BR1/0: HOST_DISCONNECT_ACK: call type is DATA 00:42:47: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface BRI1/0:1, changed stat e to down 00:42:47: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Virtual-Access1, chang ed state to down = Hans Schimek Student Fachhochschule St. Pölten f. Telekommunikation und Medien mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] gsm : +43 699 10605315 fax : +43 3613 2311 4 icq : 22308773 www : www.schimek.net = _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Where do you put your proxy servers?
chuck, will you please attach a simple design showing us how and where you recommend placing the proxy...lawrence From: "Chuck Larrieu" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: "Chuck Larrieu" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Rik Guyler" [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Where do you put your proxy servers? Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 12:53:13 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from [208.32.175.78] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id MHotMailBBD0672E00B8D821979AD020AF4E103724; Mon Nov 06 13:04:48 2000 Received: from localhost (mail@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA01430;Mon, 6 Nov 2000 16:02:32 -0500 Received: by groupstudy.com (bulk_mailer v1.12); Mon, 6 Nov 2000 15:57:38 -0500 Received: (from listserver@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA00560GroupStudy Mailer; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 15:57:38 -0500 Received: from valiant.cnchost.com (valiant.concentric.net [207.155.252.9])by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA00534GroupStudy Mailer; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 15:57:36 -0500 Received: from ChuckHome.concentric.net (w008.z064220150.sjc-ca.dsl.cnc.net [64.220.150.8])by valiant.cnchost.comid PAA19522; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 15:53:14 -0500 (EST)[ConcentricHost SMTP Relay 1.10] From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 06 13:06:51 2000 Message-ID: 000601c04833$948bdd60$[EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2377.0 In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Precedence: bulk Any box can be compromised, be it router, firewall, or proxy server, and despite the religious war that generally erupts when you say it, any OS can be compromised, be it Unix, Solaris, Linux, or NT. Security is a matter of policy, and placement, and structure, and realistic risk assessment. Question - no matter what the box or function involved, should there be a single point of vulnerability, one which if compromised, provides an intruder direct access to your inside network? It does not matter if this single point is a dial up modem line, or a firewall, or anything else. Is this a risk worth taking? My instinct is that security should be implemented in degrees, and in areas. One should not design situations where the compromise of a single box puts someone on the inside. So in that respect I take your side. My opinion is that your associate would create a point of vulnerability where it is not necessary to do so. Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rik Guyler Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 12:20 PM To:'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Where do you put your proxy servers? I am in the midst of a debate with a coworker on where to put a proxy server in regards to firewall/security physical topology. I say to disable proxy services (if possible) and only use the content caching services, then put the box in the DMZ with other services, like DNS, email, etc. I like this topology better as the firewall can provide some security for these servers and I don't really need the proxy services as I typically will use NAT/PAT on the firewall. My coworker prefers to run the proxy server (proxy and content caching services both enabled) in parallel to the firewall rather than in the internal or DMZ networks, allowing all web surfing to bypass the firewall and not tie up bandwdith on the firewall. I don't like this as well as I feel the security is weakened by doing this. If it's possible to compromise the proxy server (which my coworker doesn't feel is possible), then it might be possible to compromise beyond that. I realize his way may improve firewall performance, but the PIX has never been short in this area and I want security to be top priority over performance. I have a fair amount of experience with this but I'm always open to alternative thinking. Please let me know what you think! Rik Guyler _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
