192.168.152.0 255.255.255.128 my nt servers are at address 192.168.152.45-60 and 192.168.152.145-60 with subnet mask 128...the network is split into two remote locations and no routing problems...oh i am rounning eigrp as my routing protocol..
so in reference to your question yes nt 4 and 2k support this masking.. lawrence a sculark LAWRENCE A SCULARK >From: "Kazan, Naim" >Reply-To: "Kazan, Naim" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: New Subnet Rule [7:47670] >Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 20:48:42 -0400 >Received: from [66.220.63.9] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id MHotMailBEE6499900254004319842DC3F090D400; Fri, 28 Jun 2002 17:26:03 -0700 >Received: from localhost (mail@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id VAA19292;Fri, 28 Jun 2002 21:04:09 -0400 >Received: by groupstudy.com (bulk_mailer v1.13); Fri, 28 Jun 2002 20:48:43 -0400 >Received: (from listserver@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA17309GroupStudy Mailer; Fri, 28 Jun 2002 20:48:43 -0400 >Received: (from mail@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA17304GroupStudy Mailer; Fri, 28 Jun 2002 20:48:42 -0400 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri, 28 Jun 2002 17:27:23 -0700 >Message-Id: >X-GroupStudy-Version: 3.1.1a >X-GroupStudy: Network Technical >Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Precedence: bulk > >Ok, now that we know the answer to that question? Will windows support >subnets 0-255. > >-----Original Message----- >From: Mike Mandulak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 8:10 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: New Subnet Rule [7:47670] > > >It's became available in 12.0. > >http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/40.html > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Gaz" >To: >Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 7:27 PM >Subject: Re: New Subnet Rule [7:47670] > > > > Thought that's what you meant but thought I'd clarify before I made a > > pillock of myself. > > > > Now I've clarified I'll steam on and make a pillock of myself :-) > > > > I don't know how long it's been now (quite a while), but yes both of these > > are used these days. "ip subnet-zero" command is useful for this. > > I'm sure there are situations where this is still not a good idea, and I'm > > sure people will jump in and give you the low down any minute now, but >I've > > had no problems with using them. > > Also - not used it much other than playing around, but 31 bit mask is > > available as well so you've only got a network and broadcast address to >play > > with. I've never been that short of addresses that I want to complicate it > > that much. > > > > Gaz > > > > ""Jarred Nicholls"" wrote in message > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Well Gaz, thanks for replying =) Here is the deal in more detail. > > > > > > My friend who just got a job with Merrill Lynch, spoke with several CCIE > > > Security and R&S engineers, and here is what they told him. > > > > > > With new Cisco gear and the latest IOS version, the subnet rule, that we > > > have all learned in the past, where the first and the last subnet is > > > non-usable because of the network and broadcast addresses, no longer > > > applies. Hence, the first and the last subnets are now usable with new > > > Cisco gear and new IOS, because of a different process used than ANDing. > > > > > > So, I wanted to see if anyone else has heard about this new change >besides > > > just my friend. I definitely believe him but I just don't know. > > > > >Message Posted at: >http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=47727&t=47670 >-------------------------------------------------- >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: Click Here Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=47758&t=47670 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
