Re: cisco works

2001-03-14 Thread nobody

cw2k on nt
i ran it on a p3, 500mb ram, 12gig ide, and it was slugish.
from talking to others and implementing it at different sites
my experience is to not to get anything less than:

dual processor p4 or p3 with
1   gig ram
2   4+gig ultra-wide scsi-2 hdds

cw2k on solaris
this is a better solution, more stable but requires people
who know solaris.

Enterprise Ultra 10s (lower power for cw2k)
Enterprise 220r  (high end for cw2k)

pain:
patches when you are installing solaris


remember a lot of people buy enterprise packages to manage
their network, but never really use it. it takes resources to run
cw2k, it will not do your job for you ;-)  "just a disclaimer"

p.

- Original Message -
From: "Moahzam Durrani" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 10:46 AM
Subject: cisco works



 I want to implement cisco works in my campus. Especiall y need it for
 traffic director. What are decent servers to run this software. ...
 Mo Durrani
 IST
 WYSE\EDS
 phone:408-473 1246
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 _
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: CCNP Certification

2001-03-05 Thread nobody

692 is support 2.0

foundation is 700+ on each of the parts. (the cert from the test does not
say)


- Original Message -
From: "Johnny Sun" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2000 11:18 PM
Subject: re: CCNP Certification


 CCNP Foundation 165 minutres,about 105 question,divided into three
part,each
 pass score 692.

 Johnny Sun, CCNP




 -Original Message-
 ·¢¼þÈË: Igor Glavanic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ÐÂÎÅ×é: groupstudy.cisco
 ÊÕ¼þÈË: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ÈÕÆÚ: 2001Äê3ÔÂ5ÈÕ 13:42
 Ö÷Ìâ: Re: CCNP Certification


 Pass scores are between 690 and 710.
 You will get between 63 and 65 questions.
 Time allowed is 75 minutes as much as I remember.
 
 
 
 
 _
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
 http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 _
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: what is the average age of people in this stuff?

2001-02-27 Thread nobody

there is one thing to say to all those that cry i am too old, i am too
young, i am ..

my experience is:
if you are good, everybody else will tell you.
else if you are doing your own advertising, you are not there yet ;-)


p.
...been young, ...been old and still doing my own advertising ;-)


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Cert Difficulty Comparison.

2001-02-27 Thread nobody

easy is a relative term. if you want to increase the difficulty, you can do
what i did and take foundation 2.0 and support 2.0 on the same day. should
be enough to keep you busy for 3 weeks.

i missed my foundation by 20 points. no excuses.

p.

- Original Message -
From: "Craig Lindstrom" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 2:28 PM
Subject: Cert Difficulty Comparison.


 Hi,
 I'm just starting my Cisco Cert and I was wondering if anyone else is
 surprised how easy the Cisco tests are.  I always hesitated doing the
Cisco
 certs because I heard they were "hard".  Not that I mind a challenge, its
 just I'm a little busy right now.  Anyway,  I just started a week and a
bit
 ago.  I took the CCNA the Monday before last, and switching last Monday.
I
 felt the exams were quite easy.  I passed both with scores well into the
 900s and didn't spend that much time studying.  I work full time and teach
 during the evenings, so all I studied was a little on Sat and Sun.  I'm
not
 the sharpest knife in the drawer, did I just luck out on questions, or
take
 the easy test first, or are all the test about the same difficulty?

 I seem to see folks pooh-pooh the MCSE but I feel like the MS tests are
much
 harder than the Cisco ones.  MS tests cover a large range of topics where
 the Cisco test are a really small subset of topics.  Does anyone else feel
 that way or am I just way up in the night?  I've decided to do a test a
week
 until I finish the CCNP, does this sound nuts?  Anyway I am just trying to
 see what other folks think.

 A little mystified,
 Craig Lindstrom
 MCT MCSE+I CCNA(as of last week!) SOB:)



 _
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Private Vlans

2001-02-27 Thread nobody

i thought this is an appropriate link for all, who first want to learn how
to search the web and then do it right.

http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/hqlibrary/pathfinders/nethelp.htm

and here is the info you should have found at www.cisco.com on VLANs:

http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Support/PSP/psp_view.pl?p=Internetworking:VLANs
_and_Trunking:802.1Q


- Original Message -
From: "Roberts, Timothy" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 1:36 PM
Subject: Private Vlans



 Can someone please provide me with a link to some good information on
 Private Vlans.  I checked out Cisco's site but the only thing that I could
 find took me to marketing information on the 6500.
 Thanks

 _
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Private Vlans

2001-02-27 Thread nobody

sorry, my oversight.

i already responded to timothy, but if you go to www.google.com
and type in private vlans you should be at the begining of you search.
i only skimmed through the first few links and it seems worth a while ;-)

p.

- Original Message -
From: "Leigh Anne Chisholm" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "nobody" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "Roberts, Timothy"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 4:11 PM
Subject: RE: Private Vlans


 Thank you, "nobody" for helping teach common sense - but Timothy DID
indicate
 he did try to find the information on Cisco's site before he posted his
query
 to the group.

 PRIVATE VLANs are the latest switching hype to come out of Cisco.  Our
local
 Cisco rep recently did a presentation which covered this - and there's so
 little information that explains this topic well, even HE was confused.

 I quickly scanned the link you provided on www.cisco.com for more
information
 information on private VLANs.  Perhaps you could provide Timothy and
myself
 with a more direct link?


   -- Leigh Anne



  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
  nobody
  Sent: February 27, 2001 4:44 PM
  To: Roberts, Timothy; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: Private Vlans
 
 
  i thought this is an appropriate link for all, who first want to learn
how
  to search the web and then do it right.
 
  http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/hqlibrary/pathfinders/nethelp.htm
 
  and here is the info you should have found at www.cisco.com on VLANs:
 
 
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Support/PSP/psp_view.pl?p=Internetworking:VLANs
  _and_Trunking:802.1Q
 
 
  - Original Message -
  From: "Roberts, Timothy" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 1:36 PM
  Subject: Private Vlans
 
 
  
   Can someone please provide me with a link to some good information on
   Private Vlans.  I checked out Cisco's site but the only thing that I
could
   find took me to marketing information on the 6500.
   Thanks
  
   _
   FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
  http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
   Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  _
  FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
 http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 _
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: ??Fw: need clarification: ip unnumbered in routing tables

2001-02-26 Thread nobody

Priscilla,

   just need to verify my thinking:
  
   example: serial line (PPP) connection between routers A and B using ip
   unnumbered.
  
   router A:
   e0=192.168.1.1/24
   s0=192.168.3.1/24


 Why does s0 have an address if it's unnumbered?

Good catch. I did not even notice it ;-(
Seems the authors of the BCRAN book (Thomas M. Thomas II and Adam Quiggle)
either used the wrong picture with the output, or there is no link between
the too and I am using my imagination. Both are good possibilities.
They use the same IP addressing in both examples and the picture and the
output are adjacent to each other (pg 152 and 153). I think my imagination
is the problem.


  
   routing table for A:
   c192.168.1.0/24is directly connected, ethernet0
   r192.168.2.0/24[120/1] via 192.168.3.2, 00:00:05, serial0
   s*  0.0.0.0/0  is directly connected, serial0
  
   router B:
   e0=192.168.2.1/24
   s0=192.168.3.2/24
  
   routing table B:
   r192.168.1.0/24[120/1] via 192.168.3.2, 00:00:06, serial0
   c192.168.2.0/24is directly connected, ethernet0
   s*  0.0.0.0/0  is directly connected, serial0
  
   i thought that the routing table should reflect the ethernet ip
address of
   the remote router on local serial interface?

 It will reflect the next hop, unless it really is unnumbered, but it
 appears to be numbered. What am I missing?

 Priscilla

I hate when I don't see the obvious. I think you figured it out. Thank you.

p.

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



need clarification: ip unnumbered in routing tables

2001-02-23 Thread nobody

just need to verify my thinking:

example: serial line (PPP) connection between routers A and B using ip
unnumbered.

router A:
e0=192.168.1.1/24
s0=192.168.3.1/24

routing table for A:
c192.168.1.0/24is directly connected, ethernet0
r192.168.2.0/24[120/1] via 192.168.3.2, 00:00:05, serial0
s*  0.0.0.0/0  is directly connected, serial0

router B:
e0=192.168.2.1/24
s0=192.168.3.2/24

routing table B:
r192.168.1.0/24[120/1] via 192.168.3.2, 00:00:06, serial0
c192.168.2.0/24is directly connected, ethernet0
s*  0.0.0.0/0  is directly connected, serial0

i thought that the routing table should reflect the ethernet ip address of
the remote router on local serial interface? i don't see it here. is it an
error or is it me?

thanx,

p.

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: CiscoWorks 2000

2001-01-15 Thread nobody

can you be more specific on what's slow? and what are the specs of the
server?
just because the proces monitor says that nothing is going on, doesn't mean
nothing
is going on - it's microsoft ;-)

peter
PIA#0001

- Original Message -
From: "Rik Guyler" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Cisco Groupstudy (E-mail)" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 2:01 PM
Subject: CiscoWorks 2000


 Man, I just loaded CW2k for the first time on an NT server and it's really
 slw!

 It's an Apache web server running on NT Server 4.0 SP5 and the CW2k stuff
is
 all Java.  Has anybody been through this already?  I've tried to find some
 information on performance tuning within the hallowed walls of CCO but
 haven't found anything as of yet.  Just tuning the server doesn't help as
 the resources don't appear to be anywhere near maximum.

 If anybody has any ideas, suggestions, or just can share in my misery with
 this product, please let me know!

 ---
 Rik Guyler


 ,

 This mail was processed by Mail essentials for Exchange/SMTP,
 the email security  management gateway. Mail essentials adds
 content checking, email encryption, anti spam, anti virus,
 attachment compression, personalised auto responders, archiving
 and more to your Microsoft Exchange Server or SMTP mail server.
 For more information visit http://www.mailessentials.com

 _
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Subnet mask question..

2000-10-14 Thread Nobody

Default netmask for class B is 255.255.0.0 with 11 subnet mask you will
have /27
ie 255.255.255.224

it's bit confusing though..

Nobody
Keith Woodworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in article
[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 
 Ive been at this for quite a while and the odd subnet question still gets
 me.
 
 Boson question:
 
 IP address 172.16.3.57 w/ and 11-bit subnet mask. What are valid hosts?
 
 I think ok class B, but I look at 11 bits as 255.224.0.0
 (.1110.0.0) which does not go with the choices of answers I
 had.
 
 I got it wrong as the answer says an 11-bit mask is 255.255.255.224 when
 using a class b address. Is the mask there not 27 bits? What am I missing
 there? How do they get the above mask w/11 bits?
 
 The valid hosts were:
 
 172.16.3.33-172.16.3.62, which I think is valid for a 27 bit mask
 

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Silicon Valley Cisco User Group

2000-06-27 Thread nobody

http://www.bacug.com/


- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2000 11:45 AM
Subject: Silicon Valley Cisco User Group




 Does anyone have any info on this group - meeting times, dates, locations
or
 website

 Thanks in advance



 --

 Warning : The information contained in this message may be privileged and
confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
replying to this message and then delete it from your computer. All e-mail
sent to this address will be received by the Providian Financial corporate
e-mail system and is subject to archiving and review by someone other than
the recipient.



==

 ___
 UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]